HWAD Industry Day 3 Slides.pdf
PDF 489 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-25-S-HWAD
About this file
These are the slides for Hawthorne Army Depot (HWAD) Industry Day #3, outlining a two-phase procurement process for a comprehensive depot operations contract. The acquisition seeks a contractor to manage standard depot operations (SDO), ammunition demilitarization, facility maintenance, and modernization at the Hawthorne Army Depot in Nevada. Phase I requires offerors to submit a Technical Experience Self-Scoring Matrix with work samples and project references, with a threshold score of 63,000/85,000 needed to advance. Phase II involves evaluations across maintenance, demilitarization, innovation/business development, and pricing, using a best-value trade-off methodology.
Key submission requirements include detailed maintenance plans for specific assets, oral presentations on demilitarization approaches for four MIDAS ammunition families, and a marketing/business development plan. The contract will be a 10-year firm fixed-price arrangement, with the government emphasizing innovative practices, cost reduction, and strategic market development. Interested parties must submit questions and feedback electronically by 24 June 2025 to specific Army Contracting Command - Rock Island personnel, with all documents to be uploaded to SAM.gov under solicitation numbers W519TC-25-S-HWAD and W519TC-25-V-HWAD.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 78 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Version 1 As of 16 June 2025
John Fotos, Ashley Korves, and Caitlyn Smith
Army Contracting Command – Rock Island
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Hawthorne Army Depot Industry Day #3
Army Contracting Command Personnel
Bridget Kramer, Branch Chief
John Fotos, Contracting Officer
Ashley Korves, Contract Specialist
Caitlyn Smith, Contract Specialist
Agenda and Questions 17 June 2025
• 0830-0900 Overview
• 0915-1400 One-on-Ones
Additional questions can be submitted to the ACC-RI points of contact below by 24 June 2025
• John Fotos at john.g.fotos.civ@army.mil
• Ashley Korves at ashley.m.korves.civ@army.mil
• Caitlyn Smith at caitlyn.l.smith3.civ@army.mil
• All questions submitted in spreadsheet with reference to specific document or RFP section All questions and answers will be posted to SAM Questions containing proprietary information must be clearly marked
Phase I Submit Technical Experience Self-Scoring Matrix with Work Samples and Project References to support self-rated scores Work Samples should be from the prime contractor or subcontractor the Offeror intends to have complete the work if awarded the HWAD contract
• Letters of commitment required if subcontractor experiences are used
Government will verify self-rated scores using Work Samples and Project References
• Scores may be lowered if not supported
• Scores will not be raised
Threshold for Phase II participation is 63,000/85,000
Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix Maintenance Factor
Points: Weight Factor
Max Possible Pts
Technical Experience 1000 900 750 500 250
1 Number of Facility maintenance Contractor Man-year Equivalents (CMEs) on a single DoD contract/TO. (Include 3) ≥50 CMEs 40-49 CMEs 30-39 CMEs 20-29 CMEs 10-19 CMEs
Work Sample 1 3 3000 Work Sample 2 3 3000 Work Sample 3 3 3000
2 Total Square Feet (SQF) the Offeror covered in a month under a single contract/task order for facility maintenance. ≥4,000,000 SQF 3,000,000-
3,999,999 SQF
2,000,000-
2,999,999 SQF
1,000,000-
1,999,999 SQF
750,000- 999,999
SQF 4 4000
3 Number of facilities/buildings the offeror maintained under a single contract/task order.
≥250 Bldgs/Facilities
150-249 Bldgs/Facilities
100-149 Bldgs/Facilities
50-99 Bldgs/Facilities
25-49 Bldgs/Facilities 3 3000
4 Number of consecutive years the offeror performed facility maintenance work. ≥7 Years 6 Years 5 Years 4 Years 3 Years 2 2000
5 Number of DoD contracts/task orders where the offeror provided facility maintenance services.
≥6 Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
2-3 Contracts/TOs
Contract/TO 2 2000
6 Number of pieces of equipment maintained under a single contract/task order. ≥250 Assets 200-249 Assets 150-199 Assets 100-149 Assets 50-99 Assets 3 3000
Performance Related Experience 1000 850 750 0 0 Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its facility maintenance Work Sample 1. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its facility maintenance Work Sample 2. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its facility maintenance Work Sample 3. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Maximum Total Score 29,000
Demil Factor
Points: Weight Factor
Max Possible Pts
Technical Experience 1000 900 750 500 250
Annual number of short tons of ammunition the Offeror Demiled under a single contract/task order, requiring compliance with DoD Safety, Security, and Federal, State, and Local Environmental regulations. (Include 3)
≥5,000 Short Tons
4,000-4,999 Short Tons
3,000-3,999 Short Tons
2,000-2,999 Short Tons
1,000-1,999 Short Tons
Work Sample 1 3 3000 Work Sample 2 3 3000 Work Sample 3 3 3000
2 Number of consecutive years the offeror performed demil work. ≥7 Years 6 Years 5 Years 4 Years 3 Years 1 1000
Number of DoD contracts/task orders where the offeror provided Demil services, requiring compliance with DoD Safety, Security, and Federal, State, and Local Environmental regulations.
≥6 Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
2-3 Contracts/TOs
Contract/TO 3 3000
4 Number of different types/MIDAS families of ammunition that the offeror has demiled. (See list of families in Demil PWS.) ≥15 Families 11-14 Families 7-10 Families 3-6 Families 1-2 Families 3 3000
Performance Related Experience 1000 850 750 0 0
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its Demil Work Sample 1. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its Demil Work Sample 2. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its Demil Work Sample 3. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Maximum Total Score 22,000
SDO Factor
Points: Weight Factor
Max Possible Pts
Technical Experience 1000 900 750 500 250
Number of annual total short tons of Class V Material the offeror has performed SDO functions for (to include receipts and issuances ONLY) under a single contract/task order. (Include 3)
≥15,000 Short Tons
10,000-14,999 Short Tons
5,000-9,999 Short Tons
1,000-4,999 Short Tons
250-999 Short Tons
Work Sample 1 3 3000 Work Sample 2 3 3000 Work Sample 3 3 3000
2 Number of consecutive years the Offeror performed Class V Material SDO work. ≥7 Years 6 Years 5 Years 4 Years 3 Years 1 1000
3 Number of DoD contracts/task orders where the offeror provided Class V Material SDO work.
≥6 Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
Contracts/TOs
2-3 Contracts/TOs
Contract/TO 2 2000
Total Square Feet (SQF) of SDO facility of which the offeror performed Class V Material SDO work under a single SDO contract/task order.
≥4,000,000 SQF 3,000,000-
3,999,999 SQF
2,000,000-
2,999,999 SQF
1,000,000-
1,999,999 SQF
750,000- 999,999
SQF 2 2000
Number of annual total short tons of Class V Material the Offeror has performed SDO functions for (to include storage ONLY) under a single contract/task order.
≥100,000 Short Tons
50,000-99,999 Short Tons
25,000-49,999 Short Tons
10,000-24,999 Short Tons
5,000-9,999 Short Tons 1 1000
6 Number of Class V Material SDO Contractor Man-year Equivalents (CMEs) on largest DoD contract/task order. ≥30 CMEs 25-29 CMEs 20-24 CMEs 10-19 CMEs 9-8 CMEs 2 2000
Performance Related Experience 1000 850 750 0 0 Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its SDO Work Sample 1. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its SDO Work Sample 2. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory 2 2000
Most recent CPARS rating the offeror has received on its SDO Work Sample 3. Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory/
Maximum Total Score 23,000
Small Business Factor
Points:
Weight Factor
Max Possible Pts
Experience 1000 900 750 500 250 0
Number of Small Business Categories Met/Exceeded (Small Business Concerns, Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns, HUBZone Small Business Concerns, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns) on ISR/ISS
All 5 Categories 4 Categories 3 Categories 2 Categories 1 Category 0 Categories
ISR/SSR Sample 1 2 2000 ISR/SSR Sample 2 2 2000 ISR/SSR Sample 3 2 2000
Number of Small Business Categories in the Offeror's Small Business Subcontracting Plan or Commercial Small Business Subcontracting Plan that Met/Exceeded the Identified Goal
Exceeded Goal by More Than 5%
Met Goal or Exceeded by 5% or
Less
Missed Goal by 5% or Less
Missed Goal by More than 5% and Less than 8%
Missed Goal by 8% to 10%
No Goal Identified or Missed by More Than
10%
Overall Small Business Concerns 30% 1 1000 Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns 5% 1 1000 Women-Owned Small Business Concerns 5% 1 1000 HUBZone Small Business Concerns 3% 1 1000
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns 5% 1 1000
Maximum Total Score 11,000
Phase 1: Self-Scoring Matrix Contractual Documentation
Document Name File Name
Table of Contents [Offeror Name]_TableOfContents
SF 33 Solicitation, Offer, and Award [Offeror Name]_SF33
SF 30 Amendment of Solicitation (if applicable) [Offeror Name]_SF30
Self-Scoring Matrix [Offeror Name]_Self-ScoringMatrix
Document Support for Self-Scoring Matrix [Offeror Name]_MatrixSupport
Section K Representations, Certification, and Other Statements of Offerors [Offeror Name]_RepresentationsCertifications
Offeror's Property Management Plan [Offeror Name]_Property Management Plan
All Section K Clause Fill-Ins [Offeror Name]_SectionKClauses
Clause Fill-Ins for All Other Sections [Offeror Name]_Clauses
Small Business Size Standard Certification (if applicable) [Offeror Name]_SmallBusinessCertification
Joint Venture or Partnership Agreement (if applicable) [Offeror Name]_[Name of Document]
Subcontractor Letters of Commitment (if applicable) [Offeror Name]_LetterOfCommitment_[Subcontractor Name]
Attachment 0018-0019 Price Matrix
• Submit with Phase I
• Evaluated in Phase II
• Best Value Tradeoff with Phase II Factors of Maintenance, Demil, and Innovation/Business Development
Phase II Offerors with validated Phase I score of at least
63,000/85,000
Best value trade-off
Order of Importance
• Maintenance
• Demil and Innovation/Business Development
• Price
Phase II: Maintenance Maintenance Plan IAW Maintenance PWS
• Dock 3
• 117-6 North Tower
• Building 3
Written Submission
• Maintenance Plan Page limit: 25
• Excel spreadsheet – maintenance activities for provided assets
Include Innovative Practices
• Efficiencies in cost, schedule, and/or quality
Phase II: Demil Detailed Demil Plan for 4 MIDAS families in MGQ
• Technical Approach
• Demil Management
Oral Presentations
• 10 slides for each of the 4 MIDAS families
• Total of 40 slides
• 30-minute presentation for each MIDAS family
• Total 2-hour presentation
Phase II: Innovation/Business Development Marketing and Business Development Plan
• Plan for attracting business to HWAD
• Proactive and Innovative business practices
• Strategic market development
• Commitment to cost reduction
Oral Presentation
• 25 slides
• 1-hour oral presentation
Phase II: Price Attachment 0018-0019 Price Matrix
• Evaluated in Phase II
• Used in Best Value Trade-off
• Require FFP for only 10-years
• Prices for CLIN 0001 SDO and CLIN 0002 Demil
• Calculated by multiplying proposed unit prices for each range and ordering period by their respective weight and maximum quantity before summing the totals
• Final weighting of all CLINs will be removed from the price matrix evaluation language
General Information Questions should be submitted electronically to
ACC-RI contracting team
All pertinent documents will be uploaded to SAM under RFP W519TC-25-S-HWAD and VTL W519TC-
25-V-HWAD
Responsibility of the interested parties to check SAM for the latest information regarding this acquisition
Closing Comments All questions and feedback to the Industry Day #3 information are due 24 June 2025
Key Points of Contact
• John Fotos, john.g.fotos.civ@army.mil
• Ashley Korves, ashley.m.korves.civ@army.mil
• Caitlyn Smith, caitlyn.l.smith3.civ@army.mil
Website for Draft RFP:
• https://sam.gov/ under notice W519TC-25-S-HWAD
Website for VTL:
• https://sam.gov/ under notice W519TC-25-V-HWAD
| Slide Number 1 |
| Army Contracting Command Personnel |
| Agenda and Questions |
| Phase I |
| Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase 1: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase I: Self-Scoring Matrix |
| Phase II |
| Phase II: Maintenance |
| Phase II: Demil |
| Phase II: Innovation/Business Development |
| Phase II: Price |
| General Information |
| Closing Comments |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .