SF30_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please see continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-Sep-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N62470-13-R-3011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Aug-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30-Sep-2013

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N62470-13-R-3011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

Amendment 0004 is being issued to provide the following:

� Response to Pre-Award Inquiries 25-31 � Revised Factor 3: Safety � The following revised Attachments o Attachment J.C-1 J-1604000 Attachments (Revised 24 Sept 13) o Attachment J.C-1 K-1503010-08, Cust Floor Plans (Revised 24 Sept 13)

Pre-Award Inquiries 25-31:

25. QUESTION: For the services that require a local/national license – Waste Transportation, Personnel

Transportation, and Pest Management – is the Prime Contractor required to be licensed in these areas or is it sufficient that the subcontractors that are actually performing the services are licensed?

RESPONSE: Yes, it is sufficient.

26. QUESTION: At Gaeta, it was reported that 250,000 liter tank is part of the “Ship-to-Shore” system and should be maintenance as a part of this contract. But, there is no mention of this Above Ground Storage tank in the PWS. Clarification is requested.

RESPONSE: All apparatus / components requiring preventive maintenance associated with the tank are included in J-1604000-03 [refer to "Location" column in the chart SHIP-TO-SHORE WASTEWATER PLANT (REGION)]. Informational Note has been added providing tank capacity.

27. QUESTION: Main Gate Complex, Telephone exchange, Fire station, Village forum East, Village forum

West, Housing Welcome center, Housing Maintenance building, PW, AFRTV Studio, PW Environmental, POV, MWR Snack Stand, Vet clinic and Central Park restrooms are included in Attachment J-1503010-08 of the PWS. However, these facilities were not mentioned during the site visit as being part of the scope of work and furthermore, they were not included in the site visit. Clarification is requested.

RESPONSE: Site visits usually consist of representative samples and do not typically include all locations / facilities. Floor plan of B-2083, MWR Snack Stand, has been removed from Attachment J-1503010-08.

28. QUESTION: Is it acceptable to have the Project Manager and one of the On-Site Supervisors be the same person.

RESPONSE: No.

29. QUESTION: Is it acceptable to have the Quality Manager and one of the On-Site Supervisors be the same person.

RESPONSE: No.

30. QUESTION: In the SF33 Solicitation, page 57 0f 64, Section M.1, (b) Non-Price Factors (1) Factor 1:

Corporate Experience, it states: “...a contract value of $ 1.5 million or greater per year”:

What do you mean?

1) Must a member of JV have a single contract valued $ 1,5 million or annual Turnover relating to the object of the tender of $ 1,5 million?

For example: related to “Custodial Services”:

For year 2012: a) contract with U.S.Navy of $ 900,000.00 (from 01/01/2012 to 12/31/2012); b) contract with Ministero della Difesa of $ 400,000.00 (from 01/01/2012 to 12/31/2012); c) contract with Ministero della Giustizia of $ 200,000.00 (from 01/01/2012 to 12/31/2012)

2) And must every member of JV have it or only one?

RESPONSE: Please refer to Page 57 of the Solicitation where it states the following: “If the offeror is a Joint Venture, recent and relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. Projects submitted by Joint Ventures, where the Joint Venture firms performed together (either as partners or in a prime-sub relationship) may be viewed more favorably than projects submitted in which the Joint Venture firms did not perform together. If the Joint Venture does not have such experience, relevant experience shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) relevant experience projects.”"

31. QUESTION: As the SF33 Solicitation states:”…..(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the

JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government."…it’s clear that a JV Contractual is accepted, isn’t it?

RESPONSE: Yes.

Factor 3 – Safety has been changed FROM:

(3) Safety (This factor will be evaluated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable).

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: For a partnership or joint venture, each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture shall address its technical approach to safety outlined below. Only one safety narrative addressing the joint venture or partnership’s combined technical approach to safety as outlined below is required.

Technical Approach to Safety: Describe the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to one (1) page.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation (Technical Approach to Safety): The Government is seeking to determine that the

Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection and monitoring of all levels of subcontractors for this solicitation, and if any innovative safety methods are being proposed that the Offeror plans to implement to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. In addition to the above, the Government may review other sources of information for evaluating safety such as, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility

Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

TO THE FOLLOWING:

(3) Safety (This factor will be evaluated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable).

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: For a partnership or joint venture, each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture shall address its technical approach to safety outlined below. Only one safety narrative addressing the joint venture or partnership’s combined technical approach to safety as outlined below is required.

Technical Approach to Safety: Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to: 1) properly manage and implement safety procedures for its employees; 2) evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors, and; 3) monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. The Safety narrative shall be limited to one page.

Offerors who fail to address any of the three aspects of the technical approach to safety will be rated

UNACCEPTABLE.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation (Technical Approach to Safety): The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine if the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself, if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection and monitoring of all levels of subcontractors for this solicitation, and if there is a plan to monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. Offerors who fail to address all three items (i.e. how the Offeror plans to manage and implement safety procedures for itself, whether the safety performance of subcontractors will be evaluated in the selection process for all levels of subcontractors and whether the safety of those subcontractors will be monitored during contract performance) will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

(End of Summary of Changes)