HII-NNS_RFP_bidders_questions_legal_response_sent_to_Marina.docx

DOCX document 122 KB Posted

Attached to
USS COLUMBUS (SSN 762) Engineering Overhaul (EOH)
Solicitation number
N0002415R4300
Issued by

About this file

RFI responses

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
amendment_20.doc DOC document
amendment_0019_USS_COLUMBUS_revised.pdf PDF
CJA_41069.20_SSN_765_and_762_Redacted.pdf PDF
SEA07B_Approved_Clarifying_6_4_15_Attachment_2.pdf PDF
amendment_18.pdf PDF
Amendment_18_Attachment_3.pdf PDF
Amendment_17.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_to_amendment_0016.doc DOC document
Amendment_16.doc DOC document
amendment_0015.doc DOC document
amendment_0014.pdf PDF
Final_amendment_13.pdf PDF
Final_amendment_12.doc DOC document
HII-NNS_762_BQ_12_answer.pdf PDF
EBC_BQ_125_revised_clarification_5FEB2015.pdf PDF
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_Question__5_020515.docx DOCX document
EBC_INDUSTRY_DAY_BIDDERS_QUESTIONS.pdf PDF
EBC_pending_answers_4_11_78_79_116_134_135.pdf PDF
Final_amendment.doc DOC document
HII_BQ_149_01_02_03_14_18_24_28_44_55_answers.pdf PDF
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_final_RFP_questions.docx DOCX document
N00024-15-R-4300-0010.doc DOC document
Final_HII-NNS_Final_Questions.pdf PDF
EB_questions_27 _51 _52 _54 _57 _59 _67 _83 _82 _121 _126 _130 _131 _132 _133 _136 _137 _138 _139 _140 _and_141.pdf PDF
HII_questions_47 _48 _49 _51 _56 _6 _8 _13 _14 _25 _39 _50.pdf PDF
amendment_09.doc DOC document
N00024-15-R-4300-0008.doc DOC document
amendment_0007_approved.doc DOC document
20150123_HII-NNS_answers.pdf PDF
EBBQ_96-110_114_115_answers.pdf PDF
EBBQ_15-16-22-23-28-31-32-40-81.pdf PDF
amendment_0006_posting.pdf PDF
NNSBQ_answers_146-6-8-20-33-34-35-40-43-50-22JAN2015.pdf PDF
2015Jan14-EBC_BQ_answers_1_14_26_41_47_49_53_56_58_64_post_01222015.pdf PDF
amendment_05_post_01222015.pdf PDF
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_Question__18_011515_Response_011615.pdf PDF
EBC_BQ_113__Final_011615.pdf PDF
Final_amendment_0004_FBO.pdf PDF
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_Question__16_011515_Response_011615.pdf PDF
20150115-USS_MONTPELIER_IDD_Q7 8_revision.pdf PDF
EB__74_-__Corp_cost_est__765_IDD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_Question__41_011515_response_011615.pdf PDF
EBC_BQ_125_shift_to_CLIN_5-11_response_011615.docx DOCX document
2015Jan12-EBC_BQ_answers.pdf PDF
EB__74_Corp_Cost_est_762_EOH.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EBC_BQ_74.docx DOCX document
2015JAN14_HII-NNS_Answers.pdf PDF
HII-NNS_RFP_Bidders'_Question__34_011515_response_011615.pdf PDF
Bidders_question_112_FinalRev_011615.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Conf_final_slides_01132015.pptx PPTX presentation
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 70 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

(NO QUESTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER)

16 January 2015

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 13-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 7 (RFP)

SHIPS: USS M ONT PELI ER SSN 765/USS COLUMBUS S S N 762

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: SECTION M

TITLE: PAGE NO.: 146

QUESTION:

Clarify how the Fores eeable Cos t Adjus tment will be applied to the offeror’s propos al. Is it a s ingle, one-time adjus tment to the offeror’s propos al in the amounts s pecified, or s ome other application of the adjus tment amount?

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE--- (SPACE BELOW FOR GOV'T USE ONLY) ANSWER:

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

(NO QUESTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER)

16 January 2015

The foreseeable costs will be a single, one-time adjustment to the offeror’s cost/price proposal. The foreseeable costs in the amounts stated in M-1-0004 of the RFP will be added to the offeror’s total lowest evaluated cost/price

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 16-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 11 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: TITLE: PAGE NO.:

QUESTION:

The RFP includes the paragraph “Extension of Commercial Warranty (NAVSEA) (1996)” on page 42 and page

55. Does the Government intend to include the clause only once in the resultant contract?

The duplicate clause on page 55 will be deleted

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 15-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 16 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: SECTION F

TITLE: PAGE NO.: 76

T h e Co n tractor requests that the Government remove the c la use FA R 52.236-10, Operations a n d Storage Are as (A PR 1984). T h e c la us e is not applicable to master agreements for s hip re pair and it’s in demnification requirement Conflict with the nuclear in demnification c la uses and t h e Liability and Insurance clause in the RFP.

The clause 52.236-10 will be removed.

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 15-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 17 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: TITLE: PAGE NO.:

T h e Contractor requests that the Government re move the c la use FA R 52.211-16, Variation in Quantity as this clause is typically only included in contracts where CLIN’s call for large quantities o f a n item.

Clause 52.211-16 will be removed.

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 15-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 19 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: SECTION I

TITLE: PAGE NO.:

DFARS 252.217-7007, Payments, which is incorporated by reference in Section G refers to the “Title clause.” Given this reference, does the Government intend adding DFARS 252.217-7006, Title?

Since “DFARS 252.217-7007, Payments, has been deleted, therefore Title clause will not be used.

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: X-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 20 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: SECTION I

TITLE: PAGE NO.:

T h e RFP includes both FAR 52.246-23 a n d FAR 52.246-24, which indicates that the contract is for high value items a n d o the r end it ems . Accordingly, the contract should identify what items are considered high value items. Contractor recommends that the Government add a clause specifying that the vessel is considered a high clause item for t h e purpose of FA R 52.246-24, Limit a t ion of Liability – High Value It ems .

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE--- (SPACE BELOW FOR GOV'T USE ONLY)

ANSWER:

Clause FAR 52.246-24, Limitation of Liability – High Value Items Alt I will be added.

NAME OF OFFEROR: NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDING DATE: 15-Jan-15

NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300 QUESTION# 35 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.:

TITLE:

QUESTION: PAGE NO.:

Will the government consider adding the following clause in any subsequent contract issued as a result of this RFP.

AGREEM ENT REGARDING PAYM ENT OF PERIODIC INVOICES

The parties agree that the Government will promptly make payment up on submission of invoices by the Contractor in accordance with the provisions of this contract. Such payment shall be made within the same time intervals from submission of invoices to receipt of payments by the Contractor as has been the practice for previous contracts between NAVSEA and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.

No, the Government will not add this proposed clause

NAME OF OFFEROR:NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDINGDATE:15-Jan-15
NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300QUESTION# 36 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: TITLE: PAGE NO.:

QUESTION:

Reques t the Government add the following to any s ubs equent contract is s ued as a res ult of this RFP:

ADDITIONAL INSURANCE PROVISIONS

Notwithstanding any other provision of this contract, for the purpose of the contract clause entitled "Insurance Liability to Third Persons (FAR 52.228-7)", the vessel, its outfit, supplies, equipment, and the property or equipment of Government personnel or Government contractors other than the Prime Contractor, shall not be considered to be in the care, custody or control of the Contractor nor used by the Contractor.

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE--- (SPACE BELOW FOR GOV'T USE ONLY)

ANSWER:

NAVSEA will not include the proposed clarification in any contract resulting from this solicitation. This is a competitive procurement and offerors must price their proposals based on the clause as set forth in the solicitation

NAME OF OFFEROR:NEW PORT NEW S SHIPBUILDINGDATE:15-Jan-15
NA VSEA SOLICITATION NUMBER: N00024-15-R-4300QUESTION# 40 (RFP)

SPECIFICATION NO: RFP PARAGRAPH NO.: TITLE: PAGE NO.:

As the prescription isn’t applicable to this contract, will the Government remove the clause FAR 52.230-3, DISCLOSURE AND CONSISTENCY OF COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICES (MAY 2014)?

Yes, the Government will remove the clause 52.230-3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .