Attachment 9 - RMWT LEO GEPs DD2794 CSDR Plan.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 105 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) - Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs)
Solicitation number
FA240126R0003
Issued by

About this file

This file is a Compliance and Security Data Requirements (CSDR) Plan in spreadsheet format for the Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs) contract. The CSDR Plan outlines the compliance, security, and data management requirements that contractors must follow throughout the contract performance period. It serves as a planning document that establishes the framework for how the contractor will manage security protocols, data handling procedures, compliance verification activities, and reporting mechanisms to ensure adherence to Department of the Air Force and Space Development Agency standards for this space-based missile warning system infrastructure project.

The document functions as a reference guide and compliance checklist for contractors responding to solicitation FA240126R0003, providing detailed requirements across multiple compliance domains including security clearances, facility certifications, information technology security controls, data protection measures, and contractor responsibility standards. This CSDR Plan is a mandatory attachment to the RFP package and must be understood and incorporated into the contractor's proposal approach and performance plan. The specific compliance requirements detailed in this spreadsheet directly impact how contractors will structure their operations, staffing, facilities, and systems to support the GEP site operations at multiple globally dispersed locations.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DD Form 2794, Pg 1 (METADATA)

FA240126R0003 ATTACHMENT 8
COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLANOMB No. 0704-0671
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 57 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0671). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.

1a. PROGRAM NAME
SDA RMWT LEO GEPs
1b. PHASE/MILESTONE (check all that apply)
Pre-A
A
XB
C-LRIP
C-FRP
O&S
1c. PRIME MISSION PRODUCT
Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs)
1d. ACQUISITION CATEGORY (ACAT)
Pre-ACAT
ACAT I (MDAP)
ACAT IA (MAIS)
ACAT II
ACAT III
XOther
2. COMMODITY TYPE
Space System
3. PLAN ITERATION TYPE
XINITIAL
REVISION
4. CURRENT SUBMISSION DATE (YYYYMMDD)
20260410
5. LAST APPROVED PLAN DATE (YYYYMMDD)
6a. GOVERNMENT PLAN POINT OF CONTACT (POC) NAME (Last, First, M.)
Thomas, Mitchel Maj.
6b. ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code)
6c. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
571-372-4116
6d. E-MAIL ADDRESS
mitchell.r.thomas6.mil@mail.mil
7. PLAN TYPE
GOVERNMENT
XCONTRACT (PRIME)
CONTRACT (SUB)
8. PLAN GOVERNMENT PREPARING ORGANIZATION
Space Development Agency
9a. CONTRACTOR NAME/ADDRESS
i. REPORTING ORGANIZATION NAME
TBD
ii. DIVISION NAME
TBD
iii. LOCATION
TBD
iv. CONTRACTOR BUSINESS DATA REPORT (CBDR 1921-3) REQUIREMENT:
XCBDR REQUIRED FOR THIS ORGANIZATION
9b. CONTRACT NUMBER (List all that apply, separated by commas)
TBD (AF-26-D-C1)
9c. APPROPRIATION (check all that apply)
XRDT&E
PROCUREMENT
O&M
FMS
WCF
OTHER
10a. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER
AF-26-D-C1
10b. APPROVED PLAN REVISION NUMBER
10c. APPROVED PLAN REQUIREMENTS
XAT COMPLETION COSTS FOR STANDARD FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES (FlexFile or Legacy)
XAT COMPLETION COSTS FOR RECURRING/NONRECURRING (FlexFile only)
XTECHNICAL DATA REQUIRED
10d. COST REPORT TYPE
XFLEXFILE
LEGACY DD 1921 SERIES

DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 1), METADATA, MAY 2024 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

mailto:joseph.w.mcnamee2.civ@mail.milmailto:mitchell.r.thomas6.mil@mail.mil DD Form 2794, Pg 2 (REPORTING)

COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLANCOST, SOFTWARE, & TECHNICAL DATA REPORTING/EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT CO-PLAN
11. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS)12. COST13. TECHNICAL DATA
a. WBS
CODEb. WBS
LEVELc. WBS ELEMENT NAMEa. ACTUALS TO
DATE (ATD)b. LEGACY
1921-1c. LEGACY
1921-2d. LEGACY
1921-5e. EAC/FAC
(See item 10d)a. QUANTITYb. SRDR
FORMATSc.

MAINT. &

REPAIR

PARTS

i. QUANTITY
DATAii. GFE

QUANTITY

1.01RMWT LEO GEPsXX
1.12GEP SEIT/PMXX
1.1.13GEP Systems EngineeringXX
1.1.23GEP Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.1.33GEP Program ManagementXX
1.22Dual Ka/S-Band AntennaXX
1.2.13Antenna SEPMXX
1.2.23Antenna Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.2.33Antenna Support EquipmentXXX
1.2.43(Program) Change ManagementXXX
1.2.53Supply Chain ManagementXXX
1.2.63Program ManagersXXX
1.2.43PedestalXXX
1.2.53RadomeXXX
1.2.63ApertureXXX
1.2.73FeedXXX
1.2.83Waveguide/Coax/CablingXXX
1.32Optical Communication Assembly (OGT)XX
1.3.13OGT SEPMXX
1.3.23OGT Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.3.33OGT Support EquipmentXXX
1.3.43Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverXXX
1.3.53Mirrors/OpticsXXX
1.3.63Aft Optics and BenchXXX
1.3.73Alignment Sensors/CalibrationXXX
1.42Radio Frequency (RF) Electronics BandXX
1.4.13RF Electronics SEPMXX
1.4.23RF Electronics Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.4.33RF Electronics Support EquipmentXXX
1.4.43RF ElectronicsXXX
1.4.53Ka-band ModemXXX
1.4.63S-band ModemXXX
1.4.73Optical ModemXXX
1.52TimingXX
1.5.13Timing Subsystem SEPMXX
1.5.23Timing Subsystem Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.5.33Timing Subsystem Support EquipmentXXX
1.5.43ReceiverXXX
1.5.53GPS AntennaXXX
1.5.63Frequency and Timing GeneratorXXX
1.5.73Amplifier and DistributionXXX
1.62Baseband NetworkXX
1.6.13Baseband Network SEPMXX
1.6.23Baseband Network Equipment Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.6.33Baseband Network Support EquipmentXXX
1.6.43Baseband Network EquipmentXXX
1.72Monitor and Control HardwareXX
1.7.13Monitor and Control Hardware SEPMXX
1.7.23Monitor and Control Hardware Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.7.33Monitor and Control Hardware Support EquipmentXXX
1.7.43Monitor and Control EquipmentXXX
1.82GEP SoftwareXX
1.8.13GEP Software SEPMXX
1.8.23GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.8.33GEP Software Support EquipmentXXX
1.8.43Signal and Data Processing SoftwareXX
1.8.53Monitor and Control SoftwareXX
1.8.63Network SoftwareXX
1.8.73Other GEP Software 1…nXX
1.92GEP Site PreparationX
1.9.13GEP Site Preparation SEPMXX
1.9.23GEP Site Preparation Support EquipmentXXX
1.9.33GEP Site Graded Land and TrenchingXX
1.9.43GEP Site RoadsXX
1.9.53GEP Site Antenna and Utility PadsXXX
1.9.63GEP Site Retaining Walls/FencingXXX
1.9.73GEP Site UtilitiesXX
1.9.83GEP Site SurveyXX
1.102GEP Communications ShelterX
1.10.13GEP Communications Shelter SEPMXX
1.10.23GEP Communications Shelter Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.10.33GEP Communications Shelter Support EquipmentXXX
1.10.43GEP Communications Shelter Foundation and Sub StructureXX
1.10.53GEP Communications Shelter Superstructure and FinishingXX
1.112Communications Shelter Fit OutX
1.11.13Comm Shelter Fit Out SEPMXX
1.11.23Comm Shelter Fit Out Assembly, Integration and TestXX
1.11.33Comm Shelter Fit Out Support EquipmentXXX
1.11.43Comm Shelter Heating Venting and Air Conditioning (HVAC)XXX
1.11.53Comm Shelter Power Conditioning/UPSXXX
1.11.63Comm Shelter Network Wiring/Cable TraysXXX
1.11.73Comm Shelter Back-up GeneratorXXX
1.11.83Comm Shelter Computer FlooringXXX
1.11.93Comm Shelter Fire ProtectionXXX
1.11.103Comm Shelter Security SystemXXX
1.11.113DISA and Ground System Contractor Comm Shelter Fit-out SupportXXX
1.122GEP System Test and EvaluatonX
1.12.13GEP Developmental Test and Evaluation (Site Sell Of (SSO), Network Integration (NI), GEP Site Controller (GSC), Site Acceptance Test (SAT), SysOps)XX
1.12.23S-band and Ka-band Compatibility Test (SKCT) SupportXX
1.12.33Optical Ground Terminal (OGT) Interoperability Test (OIT) SupportXX
1.12.43End-to-end (E2E) with FlatSat Test SupportXX
1.132TrainingXX
1.142Peculiar Support EquipmentXX
1.14.13S-Band and Ka-Band Compatibility Test (SKCT)/End-to-end (E2E) Ground Support Equipment (GSE)XXX
1.14.23OIT Appproved Development Unit (ADU)XXX
1.152Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)X
1.15.13GEP Maintenance and SustainmentXX
1.162Industrial FacilitiesXX
1.172Initial Spares and Repair PartsXXX
1.182Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T)XX

Subtotal Cost

Reporting Contractor G&A
Reporting Contractor Undistributed Budget
Reporting Contractor Management Reserve
Reporting Contractor FCCM
Total Cost

Reporting Contractor Profit/Loss or Fee

Total Price
DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 2), REPORTING, MAY 2024

DD Form 2794, Pg 3 (EVENTS)

COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN
14. CSDR SUBMISSION EVENTS
a.
EVENT IDb.
DATA REPORT(S)c.
SUBMISSION EVENT NAMEd.
REPORT CYCLEe. AS OF DATEf. DUE DATE
(YYYYMMDD)(YYYYMMDD)
1Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportInitial Cost Report (30 Days after Contract Award)Initial2026050120260701
2Technical Data ReportInitial Technical Data Report (30 Days after Contract Award)Initial2026050120260701
3Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportAnnual Report #1Interim2027050120270701
4Technical Data ReportAnnual Technical Report #1Interim2027050120270701
5Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportAnnual Report #2Interim2028050120280701
6Technical Data ReportAnnual Technical Report #2Interim2028050120280701
7Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportAnnual Report #3Interim2029050120290701
8Technical Data ReportAnnual Technical Report #3Interim2029050120290701
9Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportAnnual Report #4Interim2030050120300701
10Technical Data ReportAnnual Technical Report #4Interim2030050120300701
11Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data ReportFinal ReportFinal2031050120310701
12Technical Data ReportFinal Technical ReportFinal2031050120310701
DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 3), SUBMISSION EVENTS, MAY 2024PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

DD Form 2794, Pg 4 (REMARKS)

COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN
15. REMARKS

A. In addition to the direction provided in the associated CSDR Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) and the CSDR Manual (DoDM 5000.04), the following instructions, requirements, and considerations found on this page/worksheet shall be utilized when collecting data and preparing CSDR submissions. This CSDR Contract plan is intended to capture costs associated with the contract number(s) listed in block 9.b, irrespective of contract type (e.g., firm-fixed price, cost-plus fixed fee) or CLIN structure, including Over and Above, Advance Procurement, Long Lead Materials, Multiyear Procurement, Inter-Division or Inter-Company Work Orders (IWOs), Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Warranty, etc.

B. CSDR PLAN REMARKS & PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1. Costs reported against this CSDR plan shall be cumulative in nature (i.e., each submission shall report any and all costs incurred on and prior to the submission's "AS OF DATE" (block 14.e)).

i. WBS Element Names (block 11.c) Ending with "1...n (Contractor Shall Specify)": The contractor shall extend and specify (i.e., include additional WBS elements determined by the contractor) in order to provide additional insight into the contractor's technical approach or design. The additional WBS elements shall be developed in accordance with the WBS guidelines included in MIL-STD-881F (or latest version).

ii. The contractor may extend any WBS element in accordance with guidelines included in MIL-STD-881F (or latest version). Any changes to WBS, Order/Lot, End Item, and/or Period of Performance must be reported to the government prior to submission or immediately, with revised CSDR Plan, must be approved by the CSDR Plan approval authority.

C. SUBMISSION EVENTS & DATES

1. Deliverable Preparation Instructions by AS OF and DUE Dates: All CSDR deliverable "AS OF DATE[S]" and "DUE DATE[S]" listed in blocks 14.e and 14.f are identified for planning purposes only. Submission dates are subject to change and are determined in accordance with the event drivers as identified below:

i. All "DUE DATE" requirements are equal to the "AS OF DATE" plus 60 calendar days. If the calculated "DUE DATE" does not fall on a regular business day, the "DUE DATE" will be the next regular business day on the contractor's accounting calendar.

ii. "Final" Submission Events must meet both of the following two conditions:

Condition 1: The final end item(s) has been delivered and accepted by the government (e.g., as evidenced by a completed DD-250) or higher tier contractor in the case of a subcontractor, and Condition 2: 95% or more of all ATD costs associated with the Subtotal, G&A and FCCOM have been incurred relative to all costs the reporting entity expects to incur for each and every Order/Lot (defined in Item 4 of Data Group B) associated with the contract Subtotal, G&A, FCCOM and UB.

iii. If the Contract period of performance is extended by more than six months, or if the scope of work is modified to include work not otherwise covered by the CSDR Plan, the government may modify the CSDR Plan to require additional submission events and add additional WBS elements in order to ensure the accurate and complete collection of cost data associated with the modified contract.

D. COST & HOUR REPORT (FLEXFILE)

1. The Reporting Entity is required to provide unit or sublot (specify) reporting for any given Order/Lot and End Item as outlined in block 18 of the DD Form 2794.

2. The checkmarks for EAC/FAC in column 12e at the WBS level shall be reported as "Forecast at Completion" (FAC). The Forecast At Completion (FAC) required here is not subject to the standards established in ANSI/EIA-748 guideline #27 (Estimate at Complete); therefore, the FAC does not need to be, but may be, derived from Industry Earned Value Management (EVM) processes.

3. WBS Definitions & Remarks (Data Group C) must match the technical content, cost content, and work content of each end item (see Block 17) for all WBS elements for each Cost and Hour (FlexFile) submission. The WBS Definitions & Remarks shall contain a disclosure statement detailing any differences between the CSDR reporting methodology and the reporting entity's Cost Accounting Standards. WBS Definitions & Remarks shall include a section detailing how parts are procured under this contract and any limitations of the parts procurement cost data or allocation of cost data for the WBS element.

4. The reporting entity must maintain and update WBS Definitions & Remarks throughout the life of the contract, IAW DI-FNCL-82162, if changes to the WBS occur, the reporting entity shall annotate and track changes by adding the "As of Date" of the submitted FlexFile report and indicate the changes to the WBS Definitions.

5. Order/Lot: Block 16 Orders/Lots is meant to capture the discrete Delivery Orders/Task Orders exercised on the contract. If a Delivery Order/Task Order is exercised on the contract and the CSDR plan has not been updated, it is the Reporting Entity's responsibility to still submit the dollars and hours in the FlexFile tagged to the appropriate Delivery Orders/Task Orders. The CSDR plan will be revised accordingly to include all exercised Delivery Orders/Task Orders.

6. End Items: Block 17 of this CSDR Plan is meant to capture the discrete hardware end items that are DD-250'ed, ordered, procured, or exercised (as applicable) on the contract. If an End Item is DD-250'ed, ordered, procured, or exercised (as applicable) on the contract but is not listed in block 17, the contractor shall submit the dollars and hours in the Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) and the quantity information in the Quantity Report tagged using the name of the End Item utilized on the contract. The CSDR Plan will be updated to include the appropriate End Item name in block 17, after report submission, if required.

i. The "Common" end item tag shall be used to report costs and hours which are not incurred or directly attributable to an individual end item. For example, overarching program management costs and hours that are required, independent of the type or quantity of end items on contract would be tagged against the "Common" end item. Common hardware (i.e., identical/homogeneous part numbers) procured and integrated into multiple end items shall utilize the end item tag for the prime product they were integrated onto and shall not be tagged with the "Common" end item.

E. TECHNICAL DATA REPORT

1. Include only UNCLASSIFIED/CUI information in Technical Data Report deliverables submitted to CADE. Notify the Government if any values associated with the Technical Parameter Requirements are classified.

F. RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION TABLE (RDT)

1. Submissions of the Resource Distribution Table (RDT) are required under the following conditions:

i. An RDT shall be delivered no later than seven calendar days before the "CSDR Readiness Review". Prepare this submission of the RDT in accordance with the RDT Instructions on the CADE website at FAC/EAC value.This copy of the RDT will be used during the "CSDR Readiness Review" in order to identify which subcontractors will be required to provide CSDR reporting via electronic submission of deliverables directly to CADE and which subcontractors may qualify for a CSDR direct reporting subcontractor waiver.

ii. The contractor must notify the government program office immediately of the contractor identifying that a subcontractor who, at the time of initial subcontractor award, was not anticipated to qualify for direct subcontractor CSDR reporting via electronic submission of deliverables directly to CADE but is subsequently anticipated to meet the CSDR direct reporting subcontractor threshold value due to changes to scopes of work, end-item design, subcontractor/supplier, or subcontract price changes since initial contract award (unless the newly identified subcontractor has already been issued a subcontractor reporting waiver associated with this contract).

G. RELATIONSHIP/USE OF COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CAS)

1. The contractor shall follow the accounting procedures specified in its latest approved CAS Disclosure Statement and with any clauses or requirements included in the contract. As part of the CSDR Readiness Review, the contractor shall identify any aspect(s) of its latest approved CAS Disclosure Statement which preclude or inhibit compliance with this CSDR Plan. The contractor shall identify any deviations from its CAS disclosure statement it intends to utilize to prepare CSDR submissions.

2. The contractor shall provide a description of significant accounting systems or CAS changes and how those changes effect the latest CSDR deliverable or the ability to compare CSDR deliverables provided before/after the accounting system/CAS revision. The contractor shall provide the description within the submission remarks of the FlexFile deliverable.

H. CSDR READINESS REVIEW

1. The contractor shall host a CSDR-RR with the Government's Cost Working Group Integrated Product Team (CWIPT) IAW DFARS 242.503-2(b) and DoD Manual 5000.04 (CSDR Manual). The purpose of the CSDR-RR is to review the contract's CSDR requirements and assess how the Contractor's accounting system satisfies the CSDR requirements found in DODM 5000.04 and this CSDR Plan. Reference the CADE website for instructions and additional information: https://cade.osd.mil/csdrreportingguidance/dd2794.html

2. The contractor and CWIPT will also review the initial submission of the "Resource Distribution Table (RDT)", in order to finalize which subcontractors will be required to provide CSDR reporting and electronic submission of deliverables directly to Cost Assessment Data Enterprise (CADE), and which subcontractors may qualify for a CSDR direct reporting subcontractor waiver.

3. The CSDR-RR shall be held within 60 days of contract award or the start of work meeting on a date mutually agreed to by the CWIPT and the contractor.

I. CONTRACT-SPECIFIC REMARKS

1. Kratos shall flow down CSDR requirements to the following subcontractor(s): Peraton, Inc.

J. SPACE-SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS

1. The definitions are intended for application to all levels of integration, or WBS indenture, within the ground system: parts, materials and labor; hardware components, subassemblies, major assemblies and end items ("boxes"); computer software configuration items (CSCIs) and components (CSCs); and subsystems, system segments, and the system as a whole.

2. General Definitions

i. Acquisition costs for development of the ground system are classified as nonrecurring irrespective of the milestone, phase or gate of the overall program or the WBS element in question. So NRE costs include initial development, upgrades, and improvements to hardware, software and facilities that make up the system. Thus, requirements definition, design, engineering analyses, development hardware and software, development testing, and development support hardware and software are nonrecurring efforts.

ii. Acquisition costs for production of ground operations and processing centers (GOPCs), Ground Entry Points (GEPs), along with associated facilities, and components thereof; for spares; and for replicated spacecraft components used in ground testing and simulators are classified as recurring. Costs for installation of previously developed software in ground stations are recurring. Similarly, costs for acquisition and installation of commercial off-the-shelf software (COTS) for operational use in ground stations are recurring.

iii. Operations and Support (O&S) costs for development of concepts, procedures, training materials and simulators are classified as nonrecurring. Costs for system operation and maintenance, including training, are recurring.

iv. Nonrecurring (NRE) general examples which apply to hardware, software, facilities and O&S include: initial development of spacecraft, GOPCs, GEPs and other system segments, elements, interfaces; support equipment used for development; software development; development of upgrades and improvements (despite magnitude)

v. Recurring (REC) general examples: Ground hardware production and installation; Construction of operational ground facilities; installation of developed and COTS software in GOPCs and GEPs; replicated space hardware in GOPCs and GEPs; spares for spacecraft, GOPCs and GEPs; test equipment, software and procedure maintenance; and system operation and maintenance

vi. The software definitions apply to ground station operational software, development software, and ground test software for development and production. Ground support equipment (GSE) is addressed below. It is usually treated separately from assembly, integration and test for cost collection and estimating purposes.

3. Space Hardware Related Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Requirements definition, engineering design & analysis;

Manufacturing tooling, fixtures and procedures;

Development units (breadboard, engineering, qual), including parts and materials;

Handling and test support equipment, simulators;

Development, qualification and life testing;

Development and production test procedures;

Engineering support for development unit fabrication, assembly & tests;

Redesign, rework and retest to correct design flaws;

Maintenance of tooling and unit test equipment until first launch

ii. Recurring Cost:

Hardware production units (proto-flight, flight, spare);

Production unit parts & materials, assembly and testing;

Setup for fabrication, assembly and test;

Engineering support for production unit fabrication, assembly & tests;

Spare parts, materials and subassemblies for production units;

Rework and retest due to workmanship problems;

Maintenance of designs and production procedures;

Maintenance of tooling and unit test equipment after first launch;

Refurbishment (of both qual and proto-flight units)

4. Software Related Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Development of delivered operational S/W;

Software test procedures;

Software configuration management, quality assurance & documentation;

Support for/conduct of first-time software I&T with hardware and subsequent higher level I&T;

Test, development support and space vehicle production support S/W: develop. and maint. up to 1st launch;

Commercial S/W licenses for development facilities and ground station development support;

Fixing deficiencies and developing enhancements in Ground and flight software from installation up to IOC

ii. Recurring Cost:

Installation and check-out of developed S/W in ground stations;

If first-time S/W I&T is performed at ground station, then it is NRE;

Maintenance of S/C production & test support S/W after first launch;

Acquisition of stand-alone and bundled COTS S/W in operational system;

Maintenance of flight S/W (usually embedded in acquisition contracts)

5. Systems Engineering Related Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Requirements definition, allocation and flow-down;

Specifications and ICDs - initial development & maintenance until all TBDs and TBRs are removed;

Top level design trade-offs and system definition;

Analyses and simulations of system performance and effectiveness, mission assurance, reliability,availability, maintainability, survivability, security, safety, EMI/EMC, radiation, survivability, contamination control, human engineering, autonomy and fault management;

Operations concept development;

Technical direction and configuration control during development;

Risk management though CDR;

Mass, power, link margin & reliability budgets -- initial development & maintenance until design complete;

Processing time & memory budgets;

Development, production, verification, risk management, training and security plans;

Parts, materials and processes - establishing procedures, etc.;

Product assurance development tasks;

Requirements verification through design completion, including demonstrations and IV&V;

Technical change management (RFIs, ECPs, etc.) -- NR tasks supporting changes, handling nonrecurring-only changes;

Design Integration -- mechanical, electrical, thermal, facilities;

Functional and physical configuration audit (FCA/PCA) support;

System documentation

ii. Recurring Cost:

Maintenance of specs, ICDs, plans & budgets -- after all TBDs and TBRs are removed;

Performance, S/W maintenance productivity metrics;

Analysis updates;

System configuration control after design completion;

Mass, power, link margin & reliability budgets - supporting production;

Support for production testing, rehearsals and operational test and evaluation;

Product assurance;

Requirements verification after design completion;

Launch readiness reviews, support for product acceptance;

Technical change management (RFIs, ECPs, etc.) -- supporting recurring portions of changes and recurring- only changes

6. Assembly Integration & Test (AI&T) Related Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Development, qualification and life testing - all levels and system segments;

Development and acceptance test plans and procedures;

Development, qualification and life test analysis and reports;

I&T for correcting software problems prior to IOC

ii. Recurring Cost:

Space vehicle assembly, integration and acceptance testing;

Acceptance test analysis and reports;

Integration and test of previously-developed software -in GOPCs, GEPs

7. Program Management Related Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Management activities applied to/associated with NRE efforts - top level program management, project control and planning, business/financial mgmt, subcontract mgmt, product effectiveness, computer support;

Procedures and infrastructure establishment - Cost accounting, configuration & data management, parts & material acquisition, security, facilities

ii. Recurring Cost:

Management activities applied to/associated with REC efforts

8. Expanded Ground Support Equipment Definitions

i. Nonrecurring Cost:

Concept of operations and maintenance development;

Operations & maintenance procedure development;

Development of training materials, simulators and aids;

Initial ILS analysis and data;

Upgrades/changes to above associated with: Major redesigns, capability increments Recapitalization, operating system changes

ii. Recurring Cost:

System operation costs - operations, training, systems engineering & management staff;

Hardware maintenance & recapitalization;

Software maintenance - including COTS license costs;

Software modifications/fixes after IOC;

Reproduction and updating of technical data and manuals;

Procurement/production of hardware spares;

Rehearsals and initialization of space vehicles

9. Pre-Operations Support Definitions

i. Pre-Operations Maintenance 1..n (Specify):

These elements contain all the resources related to the pre-operations (Pre-Ops) maintenance (software updates) of Software. This function begins with the acceptance of the Software elements and ends with the start of Operations.

ii. Pre-Operations Mission Support:

These elements include all the resources required for the operation of the Space or Ground system prior to turn-over. Includes, for example:

a. On-orbit testing; routine monitoring of Space or Ground system equipment health and status

b. Fault detection

c. Anomaly investigation and resolution. (The Mission Support period typically begins after installation and a specified time prior to launch and ends when the Space Vehicle achieves initial operational capability.)

DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 4), REMARKS, MAY 2024 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

DD Form 2794, Pg 5 (SCOPE DEF)

COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN
INTRA-CONTRACT SCOPE REPORTING DEFINITION
16. ORDERS/LOTS
a. IDb. NAMEc. PHASE/MILESTONE
BYBase YearB
OY1Option Year 1B
OY2Option Year 2B
OY3Option Year 3B
17. END ITEMS
a. IDb. NAME
CCommon
GEP1…nGround Entry Point 1…n
18. UNIT/SUBLOT REPORTING AND UNIT SEQUENCING REQUIREMENTS
a. ORDER/LOT IDb. END ITEM IDc. UNIT/SUBLOT REPORTING
(X if applicable)d. UNIT SEQUENCING

(X if applicable)

DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 5), INTRA-CONTRACT SCOPE, MAY 2024

DD Form 2794, Pg 9a (TECH RQTS)

COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN - TECHNICAL PARAMETER REQUIREMENTS
TECHNICAL PARAMETER REQUIREMENTS
29. WBS
ELEMENT CODE30. WBS ELEMENT NAME31. ITEM TYPE32. TECHNICAL PARAMETER
a. PARAMETER NAMEb. UNIT OF MEASUREc. UNIT OF MEASURE QUALIFIERd. REPEATABLEe. DEFINITIONf. REMARKS
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsMilestone DateContract AwardDate
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsMilestone DateSystem PDRDate
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsMilestone DateSystem CDRDate
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsGroundFactory LocationsList
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsGroundGEP LocationsList
1.0RMWT LEO GEPsGroundTestbed LocationsList
1.3.1OGT SEPMStaffStaffing - LevelFull Time Equivalent (FTE)Staff size.
1.3.1OGT SEPMStaffStaffing - ProfileDescriptorDenotes if the cited staff size is expressed as peak staffing or average of the time period
1.3.1OGT SEPMStaffDurationDaysTotal duration (in calendar days) of activity. Confirms Start Date and End Date inputs.
1.3.1OGT SEPMProgMgmtFrequency of Government Program ReviewsQuantityReviews per YearThe Frequency of Government Program Reviews in the contract.
1.3.1OGT SEPMProgMgmtNumber of Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)sQuantityCLINsThe number of Contract CLINs in the contract.
1.3.1OGT SEPMProgMgmtNumber of SubcontractorsQuantitySubcontractorsThe number of major subcontractors/suppliers in the program.
1.3.1OGT SEPMProgMgmtNumber of Customer StakeholdersQuantityStakeholdersThe number of customers and stakeholders that may require management accommodation. Stakeholders consist of any group or organization with a related or subsequent responsibility that is directly related to the outcome of an action or result. Generally speaking they can influence the outcome or are the recipient of the results. The range of personnel selected to participate as stakeholders is based on the outcome and processes involved. Typical stakeholders are: users or operators, acquisition commands, test communities, depots, manpower, personnel & training communities, maintainers, and suppliers
1.3.1OGT SEPMProgMgmtNumber of CDRLsQuantityCDRLsThe number of Contract Data Requirements List items for which the CRS element staff is responsible.
1.3.1OGT SEPMSysEngNumber of Requirement Document - "Shalls"QuantityShallsYGThe number of requirements cited in the system's requirements documents.
1.3.1OGT SEPMSysEngNumber of Platforms - IntegratedQuantityPlatformsThe number of platforms (e.g. aircraft) on which the system will be qualified.
1.3.2OGT Assembly, Integration and TestIAT&CONumber of Electrical ConnectionsQuantityElectrical ConnectionsThe number of electrical and electronic connections at this level of assembly.
1.3.2OGT Assembly, Integration and TestIAT&CONumber of Mechanical ConnectionsQuantityMechanical ConnectionsThe number of mating surfaces, fasteners, or other non-electrical attach points at the level of assembly.
1.3.2OGT Assembly, Integration and TestIAT&CONumber of Interface Control Documents (ICD)QuantityDocumentsThe number of specification documents describing interfaces between elements within the system, as well as between the system and external entities.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentHeritageNew DesignPercentHeritage: The extent of the item's design that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: - 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9). - 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.) - 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8). - 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range. Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentHeritagePredecessor SystemDescriptorThe year of the predecessor system
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalOtherMaterial Mix 1...nPercent of Total WeightMaterial NameYList of primary materials comprising the item by percent of total weight. (Cite one or more materials as applicable)
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalOtherQuantity Next Higher AssemblyQuantityUnitsNumber of units of this item to be assembled into its parent assembly.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalElecVolumeCubic InchesPhysical volume of the item.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalElecWeightPoundsWeight of the item.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalElecWeight - StructuralPoundsThe item's mechanical/structural weight.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalElecWeight - ElectronicsPoundsThe item's electronics weight.
1.3.3OGT Support EquipmentPhysicalElecPower - Maximum Consumption RateKilowattsMaximum rate of power consumption by the item.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverHeritageNew DesignPercentHeritage: The extent of the item's design that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: - 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9). - 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.) - 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8). - 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range. Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverHeritagePredecessor SystemDescriptorThe year of the predecessor system
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalOtherMaterial Mix 1...nPercent of Total WeightMaterial NameYList of primary materials comprising the item by percent of total weight. (Cite one or more materials as applicable)
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalOtherQuantity Next Higher AssemblyQuantityUnitsNumber of units of this item to be assembled into its parent assembly.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucWeightPoundsWeight of the item.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucLengthInchesThe length of the item.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucDiameterInchesThe diameter of the item.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucHeight/ThicknessInchesThe height/thickness of the item.
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucHeightInchesHeight of aircraft from ground to heighest point
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucVertical Stabilizer HeightInchesThe distance from the top of the fuselage to the tip of the vertical stabilizer
1.3.4Structure/Outerbarrel/CoverPhysicalStrucHorizontal Stabilizer SpanInchesDistance from one tip to tip of the horizontal stabilizer
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsHeritageNew DesignPercentHeritage: The extent of the item's design that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: - 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9). - 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.) - 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8). - 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range. Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsHeritagePredecessor SystemDescriptorThe year of the predecessor system
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalOtherMaterial Mix 1...nPercent of Total WeightMaterial NameYList of primary materials comprising the item by percent of total weight. (Cite one or more materials as applicable)
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalOtherQuantity Next Higher AssemblyQuantityUnitsNumber of units of this item to be assembled into its parent assembly.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucWeightPoundsWeight of the item.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucLengthInchesThe length of the item.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucDiameterInchesThe diameter of the item.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucHeight/ThicknessInchesThe height/thickness of the item.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucHeightInchesHeight of aircraft from ground to heighest point
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucVertical Stabilizer HeightInchesThe distance from the top of the fuselage to the tip of the vertical stabilizer
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsPhysicalStrucHorizontal Stabilizer SpanInchesDistance from one tip to tip of the horizontal stabilizer
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsOpticsAperture - OpticsInchesThe aperture is the opening of a lens's diaphragm which light passes. Specify the aperture of the guidance optics by its diameter.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsOpticsNumber of Curved ElementsQuantityElementsThe Seeker's Number of Curved Optical Elements.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsOpticsNumber of Flat MirrorsQuantityFlat MirrorsThe Seeker's Number of Flat Optical Elements.
1.3.5Mirrors/OpticsOpticsField of ViewDegrees AngularThe Seeker's Field of View.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchHeritageNew DesignPercentHeritage: The extent of the item's design that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: - 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9). - 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.) - 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8). - 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range. Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchHeritagePredecessor SystemDescriptorThe year of the predecessor system
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalOtherMaterial Mix 1...nPercent of Total WeightMaterial NameYList of primary materials comprising the item by percent of total weight. (Cite one or more materials as applicable)
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalOtherQuantity Next Higher AssemblyQuantityUnitsNumber of units of this item to be assembled into its parent assembly.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucWeightPoundsWeight of the item.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucLengthInchesThe length of the item.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucDiameterInchesThe diameter of the item.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucHeight/ThicknessInchesThe height/thickness of the item.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucHeightInchesHeight of aircraft from ground to heighest point
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucVertical Stabilizer HeightInchesThe distance from the top of the fuselage to the tip of the vertical stabilizer
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchPhysicalStrucHorizontal Stabilizer SpanInchesDistance from one tip to tip of the horizontal stabilizer
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchOpticsAperture - OpticsInchesThe aperture is the opening of a lens's diaphragm which light passes. Specify the aperture of the guidance optics by its diameter.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchOpticsNumber of Curved ElementsQuantityElementsThe Seeker's Number of Curved Optical Elements.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchOpticsNumber of Flat MirrorsQuantityFlat MirrorsThe Seeker's Number of Flat Optical Elements.
1.3.6Aft Optics and BenchOpticsField of ViewDegrees AngularThe Seeker's Field of View.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationHeritageNew DesignPercentHeritage: The extent of the item's design that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: - 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9). - 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.) - 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8). - 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range. Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationHeritagePredecessor SystemDescriptorThe year of the predecessor system
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalOtherMaterial Mix 1...nPercent of Total WeightMaterial NameYList of primary materials comprising the item by percent of total weight. (Cite one or more materials as applicable)
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalOtherQuantity Next Higher AssemblyQuantityUnitsNumber of units of this item to be assembled into its parent assembly.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalElecVolumeCubic InchesPhysical volume of the item.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalElecWeightPoundsWeight of the item.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalElecWeight - StructuralPoundsThe item's mechanical/structural weight.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalElecWeight - ElectronicsPoundsThe item's electronics weight.
1.3.7Alignment Sensors/CalibrationPhysicalElecPower - Maximum Consumption RateKilowattsMaximum rate of power consumption by the item.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Human GeneratedSLOCActual to DateThe delivered size of the product developed that is human generated.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Auto-GeneratedSLOCActual to DateThe delivered size of the product developed that is auto-generated.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Human GeneratedSLOCEstimate at CompleteThe delivered size of the product developed that is human generated.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Auto-GeneratedSLOCEstimate at CompleteThe delivered size of the product developed that is auto-generated.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRReused Code - Actual to DateSLOCActual to DateCode from external sources (government-furnished or otherwise) that is included and reused without modification.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRReused Code - Estimate at CompleteSLOCEstimate at CompleteCode from external sources (government-furnished or otherwise) that is included and reused without modification.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRReused Code - AAF%SLOCAdaptation Adjustment Factor (AAF) - top-level percentage of effort of adapting the reused code to the new system relative to a line of new code.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRModified Code - Actual to DateSLOCActual to DateModified code is defined as pre-developed code that can be incorporated in the software component with a significant amount of effort, but less effort than required for a newly developed code.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRModified Code - Estimate at CompleteSLOCEstimate at CompleteModified code is defined as pre-developed code that can be incorporated in the software component with a significant amount of effort, but less effort than required for a newly developed code.
1.8.2GEP Software Assembly, Integration and TestSoftwareNonSRDRModified Code - AAF%SLOCAdaptation Adjustment Factor (AAF) - top-level percentage of effort of adapting the modified code to the new system relative to a line of new code.
1.8.3GEP Software Support EquipmentSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Human GeneratedSLOCActual to DateThe delivered size of the product developed that is human generated.
1.8.3GEP Software Support EquipmentSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Auto-GeneratedSLOCActual to DateThe delivered size of the product developed that is auto-generated.
1.8.3GEP Software Support EquipmentSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Human GeneratedSLOCEstimate at CompleteThe delivered size of the product developed that is human generated.
1.8.3GEP Software Support EquipmentSoftwareNonSRDRNew Code - Auto-GeneratedSLOCEstimate at CompleteThe delivered size of the product developed that is auto-generated.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .