Attachment 7.a.RMWT LEO GEPs Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

DOCX document 189 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) - Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs)
Solicitation number
FA240126R0003
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for the Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs) RFP FA2401-26-R-0003, issued by the Space Development Agency (SDA) under the Department of the Air Force. The document serves as the mechanism for obtaining past performance evaluations directly from government and commercial customer points of contact for contractors responding to the solicitation.

The questionnaire contains two primary sections: Section 1 is completed by the offeror and includes a transmittal letter template identifying the reference contract, program title, period of performance, contract value, and offeror role (prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture partner), along with instructions directing government evaluators to submit completed questionnaires directly to the SDA Contracting Officer by October 26, 2026, with responses due within five business days of receipt. Section 2 is completed by the Contracting Officer, Program Manager, COTR, COR, or AOR and evaluates contractor performance across eight rating categories on a 1-10 scale: schedule/timeliness, technical requirements, subcontractor and supplier management, cost requirements, work quality, government information protection and security, overall satisfaction with responsiveness and problem-solving, and any additional performance details. Completed unclassified questionnaires should be submitted via email to ussf.pentagon.sda.mbx.fa240126R-006@mail.mil, while classified submissions require coordination with SDA for submission instructions.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA2401-26-R-0003 Attachment 7a

TO BE CLASSIFIED BY OFFEROR OR SUBMITTING CONTRACTING OFFICER

SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

1670 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal (RFP) FA240126R0003 Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs)

SECTION 1: This section to be completed by Offeror and submitted to CO/PM

Customer Org/Company
Customer Contract/ Business POC:
Customer Lead Technical POC/COR:
Org City: State:
Name: Phone: Email:
Name: Phone: Email:
Prime Contractor Company Name
Point of Contact
Prime CAGE Code
Name: Phone: Email:
Name: Phone: Email:
Prime Contract Number
Original Contract Value (Incl Options)
Final Contract Value (Incl Options)
Period of Performance
Start Date
Original Completion/Actual Completion/Address Differences
Contract Type (FFP/FPIF/Cost/CPAF)
Award Fee Scores (state N/A if not applicable)

Program Description

Transmittal Letter for Government Sources to Accompany Performance Questionnaire

[TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR]

MEMORANDUM FOR:

[INSERT CUSTOMER CONTRACTING OFFICER / PROGRAM MANAGER NAME & TITLE]

[INSERT CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION / AGENCY, e.g., Space Systems Command / AFLCMC / NASA]

[INSERT ADDRESS / BASE / CITY, STATE, ZIP]

FROM:

[INSERT OFFEROR REPRESENTATIVE NAME & TITLE, e.g., Director of Contracts / Capture Manager]

[INSERT OFFEROR COMPANY NAME]

[INSERT OFFEROR COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS]

[INSERT OFFEROR CAGE CODE & UNIQUE ENTITY ID (UEI)]

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Assessment to Accompany RFP FA2401-26-R-0003 (SDA RMWT LEO GEPs) for Contract: [INSERT REFERENCE CONTRACT NUMBER] — [INSERT REFERENCE CONTRACT/PROGRAM TITLE]

1. Purpose and Solicitation Context

We are currently preparing a competitive proposal in response to Request for Proposal (RFP) FA2401-26-R-0003, issued by the Space Development Agency (SDA) for the Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs) acquisition.

As part of the source selection process, the Space Development Agency requires offerors to obtain past performance evaluations directly from cognizant government and commercial customer points of contact. We have identified our performance under your oversight on the following contract as directly relevant:

Reference Program / Contract Name: [INSERT PROGRAM / PROJECT TITLE] Reference Contract Number / Task Order: [INSERT CONTRACT & TASK ORDER NUMBER] Period of Performance: [INSERT POP START DATE] to [INSERT POP COMPLETION DATE] Contract Value: Original: $[INSERT ORIGINAL VALUE] | Current / Final: $[INSERT FINAL VALUE] Offeror Role: [Prime Contractor / Subcontractor / Joint Venture Partner]

2.) You have been identified as a knowledgeable Point of Contact (POC) for the above-referenced contract. We respectfully request that you complete the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire and submit it directly to the Government at the address provided below. Please DO NOT return the completed questionnaire to us (the Offeror). The information you provide is considered source selection sensitive.

3.) To ensure your input is considered in the evaluation process, please submit your completed questionnaire no later than October 26, 2026

4.) Please return the completed questionnaire within five (5) days of receipt of this request to the PCO, identified below.

Primary Contact:

Emma Williams (PCO) Secondary Contact:

Promise Reichmuth (CS) Email: ussf.pentagon.sda.mbx.fa240126R-006@mail.mil

5.) If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire or the evaluation process, please direct them to the Government points of contact listed above. We (the Offeror) are not permitted to answer questions about the questionnaire or influence your responses in any way. Questionnaires may be submitted via email or DoD Safe. If using DoD Safe, you may need to contact the POCs above for a DoD Safe drop off link if you are not in the DoD Domain. For files larger than 5MB or containing CUI, please use DoD Safe.

[INSERT OFFEROR REPRESENTATIVE NAME]

[INSERT TITLE, e.g., Proposal Manager / Director of Contracts]

[INSERT OFFEROR COMPANY NAME]

Telephone: [INSERT DIRECT PHONE NUMBER] Email: [INSERT WORK EMAIL ADDRESS]

SECTION 2: This section to be completed by Contracting Officer or Program Manager (COTR/COR/AOR) and submitted to SDA Contracting Officer via email below.

Name of Contracting Officer / Program Manager (COTR/COR/AOR) completing this section:

1. How well did the Contractor meet the schedule requirements? How would you rate the schedule or timeliness of the Contractor’s work, e.g., ability to meet completion dates including any significant interim milestones, etc. Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

Rationale for rating:

2. How well did the Contractor meet technical requirements? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

3. How well did the Contractor manage subcontractors and suppliers? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

CLASSIFICATION

CLASSIFICATION

4. How well did the Contractor meet the cost requirements? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

5. How would you rate the quality of the Contractor’s work, e.g., compliance with direction, ability to work without extensive guidance, usefulness of final product, etc.? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

6. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to protect Government information, e.g., information security, cyber security, incident reporting, etc.? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

7. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the Contractor’s work, including how responsive and cooperative the Contractor was, how it addressed unforeseen challenges, etc.? Please select one.

n/a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not Applicable
Below Expectations
Met Expectations
Exceeded Expectations

8. Please provide any additional details regarding the Contractor’s performance if any:

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Unclassified Submissions: Email completed PPQ: ussf.pentagon.sda.mbx.fa240126R-006@mail.mil Subject: PPQ, Ktr Name

Classified Submissions: Contact SDA via email to ussf.pentagon.sda.mbx.fa240126R-006@mail.mil for submission instructions.

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .