B.08 AMD001 QASP FY23 Carolina Group ORC revised.docx

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan For Carolina Group Optimized Remediation Contract January March 2023

Introduction This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) sets forth the procedures and guidelines that the Government will use in evaluating the technical and quality performance of the Contractor in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the Carolina Group Optimized Remediation Contract. Since the technical approach for achieving the objectives may vary between Contractors, the specific payment milestones will be finalized upon acceptance of the final proposal and contract award and the QASP will be updated accordingly.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the Contractor. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the Contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

Purpose The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the Contractor is meeting the performance standards identified in the PWS and the Contractor’s Quality Control Plan (QCP) and to ensure that the Government only pays for acceptable level of services received.

The QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of the multi-functional Government surveillance team, identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the Contractor’s performance, describes the quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes analysis of the quality assurance monitoring results.

Performance Management Strategy The Contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The Contractor measures quality through the Contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC includes all work performed under this contract regardless of whether the work is performed by Contractor employees or by subcontractors. The Contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. The Contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated Government representative. This QASP enables the Government to take advantage of the Contractor’s QC program.

The Government surveillance team will monitor performance and review performance reports furnished by the Contractor to determine how the Contractor is performing against communicated POs. The Contractor will be responsible for making required changes in processes and practices to ensure performance is managed effectively.

Roles and Responsibilities of Government Surveillance Team Government surveillance will be performed by a multi-disciplinary technical team, which shall create an environment that shapes and effectively executes this contract. The Government surveillance team will perform field and technical oversight of all Contractor activities to ensure that the Contractor is meeting technical, schedule, and other contractual requirements and which will provide early detection of potential performance issues and resolution before any issues become significant problems. The Government surveillance team will be comprised of qualified multi-disciplinary representatives from United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC). The following Government-designated persons will participate in the performance management of this contract: USACE Contracting Officer (KO), USACE Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), and Installation Restoration Program Manager (RPM). The Government surveillance team will also be supported by the USACE Program Manager (PM), AFCEC Restoration Program Management Office (R-PMO) PM, USACE Technical Manager, subject matter experts (SMEs), and other technical personnel.

1. Contracting Officer:

The KO has the overall responsibility for overseeing the Contractor’s performance. The KO, through the assigned COR, monitors the Contractor’s performance in the areas of contract compliance, contract administration, reviewing the COR’s assessment of the Contractor’s performance, and resolving all differences between the COR’s assessment and the Contractor’s assessment of performance. The KO assures that the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The KO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance. The KO for this contract is Mr. Chad Arnett at the USACE Savannah District, (912) 652-5088, Chad.A.Arnett@usace.army.mil. Questions for the KO should be directed to the KO or the assigned USACE Contracting Specialist, David Jimenez, (912)-652-5165, david.a.jimenez@usace.army.mil.

2. Contracting Officer’s Representative:

The COR is responsible for technical monitoring of the Contractor’s field and technical performance as well as assessing, recording, and reporting on the Contractor’s compliance with the contract terms and conditions. The COR, with support of the Government surveillance team, will maintain surveillance documentation and notify the KO of any significant performance deficiencies. The COR will assist the Chief Financial Officer by validating that all invoices are correctly posted against the assigned contractual and financial elements. The COR will prepare an annual performance evaluation into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) as required and at the time of final acceptance of work, contract completion, when the Contractor’s performance is unsatisfactory, or at other times, as appropriate, in accordance with USACE procedures. The COR for this contract is Mrs. Shauna Stotler, (912) 652-5909, Shauna.Stotler@usace.army.mil.

3. Installation RPM:

The Installation RPM has the responsibility to ensure overall progress and strategies of this contract are meeting the requirements and standards of the Air Force Environmental Program. The RPM will assist in budgeting and planning throughout the life of this contract. The RPM will provide and supplement field oversight and technical reviews of Contractor reports. The RPM shall serve as the Air Force regulatory authority at the installation level; as liaison to the federal, state, and local regulatory agencies; and as liaison to the AFCEC/CZR Environmental Restoration Division to relay progress information as appropriate. The RPMs for this contract by installation are below:

The RPM for Seymour Johnson Airforce Base is Mr. Gary "Griffin" Cox, 478-542-1335; gary.cox.1@us.af.mil.

The RPM’s for Joint Base Charleston – Air and North Auxiliary Airfield are Mr. Christopher Wargo, (803) 422-8746, christopher.wargo.2@us.af.mil and Ms. Laura Powers, 843-963-2701, laura.powers.3@us.af.mil.

The RPM for Joint Base Charleston – Weapons Station is Ms. Jennifer O’Rourke, 843-963-2708, jennifer.orourke.2@us.af.mil.

4. AFCEC R-PMO PM:

The AFCEC R-PMO PM validates budgeting and planning requirements and ensures program requirements and updates are compliant with the Air Force Environmental Program Business Processes throughout the life of the contract. The R-PMO PM for each installation will be identified prior to award of the contract.

5. Subject Matter Experts and Technical Personnel:

The KO and COR may call upon the technical expertise of other Government Officials and SMEs as required. These Government personnel may be called upon to review technical documents and products generated by the Contractor and will be identified as work progresses.

3.0 Contractor Performance Assessment

The Contractor will be responsible for accomplishing the POs identified in the PWS and will be monitored and assessed for this contract by the Government surveillance team. The COR will monitor every aspect of the Contractor’s performance and will engage the Contractor and appropriate team members to resolve any discrepancies in performance.

This contract will utilize multiple tools and methods to assess the Contractor’s performance, and every aspect of that performance will be adequately documented to substantiate the Contractor’s compliance with the POs. The Contractor will be engaged in the development of this strategy, as a strong partnership between the Government and the Contractor will help to ensure the POs are achieved.

Discrepancies or deficiencies in performance will be resolved at a level appropriate to the deviation or divergence from the performance objective. Installation RPM and COR interaction will be required for all issues at the milestone level. When required, the KO will be required to engage with the Contractor to ensure all aspects of the contract are adhered to. Anticipated remedies may include: receiving data, information, or reports from the Contractor in response to questions; correction of cost performance data; timely notification of issues effecting health and safety; meetings; correspondence; adjustments to milestones to meet site conditions; or Contractor re-performing tasks or work in order to meet POs.

The following types of documents and activities are currently anticipated and will be evaluated in accordance with this QASP:

Communications Technical plans and report quality Field work completion Laboratory analysis and data review Status reports, meeting minutes, presentations Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS) Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Upon contract award and subsequent submittal of the Contractor’s Program Management Plan, the QASP will be reviewed and updated as necessary to ensure alignment.

3.1.2 Additional Surveillance

Additional Government surveillance activities may include, but are not limited to, the following:

The Contractor’s performance will be evaluated by assessing the listed key milestones, documents, and activities in the areas of evaluation listed below. These areas will be evaluated throughout the course of the project through the use of the following qualifiers: exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. The Contractor’s performance will be evaluated for the attribute of safety during any fieldwork.

AREAS OF EVALUATION

QUALITY

SCHEDULE

BUSINESS RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

SAFETY

The following guidelines are provided for issuing ratings that are subjective in nature; these ratings will be supported by the weight of evidence documented during the Government's surveillance efforts:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet all contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3.3 Surveillance Methodology

Table 1 summarizes the surveillance activities planned for the QASP. The surveillance methods listed below will be used in the administration of this QASP.

1. 100% Inspection: All project milestones, documents, and activities will be evaluated through 100% inspection by on-site inspection or document review through USACE and AFCEC oversight. The COR will document performance for each completed milestone, document, or activity prior to payment.

a. Customer Feedback: Feedback on Contractor performance will be obtained through period inquires by the COR with project stakeholders. The purpose of these inquires would be to supplement the other forms of evaluation and to also provide the Contractor with constructive criticism or recognition for the project milestones, documents, and activities completed. Customer feedback received will be validated to ensure it relates to the requirements of the PWS and will be used in a prudent manner by the COR. Customer feedback will also be solicited from appropriate stakeholders for key documents and activities.

3.4 Acceptable Performance

Performance shall be documented using approval of the plans, field work, and reports. Subsequent approval is further documented by approval and payment of the associated performance milestones. Payments shall be completed by approval of the invoice by the USACE PM and submitted to the COR for payment. The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action. The Government uses CPARS.

3.5 Unacceptable Performance

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the KO. The KO shall notify the Contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case, the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file. The Contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the written documentation from the KO. The written documentation of unacceptable performance should request the Contractor to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the Contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The documentation should also state how long after receipt the Contractor must present this corrective action plan to the KO. The Government shall review the Contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The Government may also submit an interim CPARS rating to document unacceptable performance. Should performance not allow for corrective action, or if the corrective action plan is not implemented, the Government may issue a final CPARS rating documenting the unacceptable performance. Unacceptable performance may also result in the Contracting Officer issuing a contract termination.

The USACE PM or designee will use the Quality Assurance Monitoring Form (QAMF) (Attachment 1) to record evaluation of the Contractor’s performance for each payment milestone or final document/report in accordance with the methodology described in Section 3.0. The USACE PM must substantiate, through narratives on the form, all exceptional or less than satisfactory ratings.

Performance at the satisfactory level is expected from the Contractor. The QAMF will include information on acceptance of the progress reports and payments to percent project completions by the Contractor. The USACE PM will forward copies of all completed QAMFs to the COR and the Contractor within 7 days of performing the inspection.

4.2 Other Documentation

The COR shall review, approve, and maintain at a minimum the following surveillance information within the contract project folder (hardcopy or electronic) or in an appropriate electronic domain:

Project website observations Schedules Technical status reports Meeting documentation Notifications Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Drawings, permits, and technical documents

d. Other applicable documentation, such as:

Progress Reports such as Daily Progress Reports Data and Technical Reports Correspondence (email, teleconference notes, etc.)

Financial documents to support invoicing Back up documentation for all invoices Observations on Contractor activities Milestone records Database records Site visit surveillance documentation

Table 1 - Surveillance Activities Table (Milestones/Documents/Reports)

CLIN 0001 Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Updates to the PMP should be completed within 30 days of the condition forcing the update no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

Comments from regulatory agency shall be addressed within 30 days 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0003 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS) and Update Quarterly

Draft IMS/MPS within 90 calendar days from contract award, Final IMS/MPS within 21 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of IMS/MPS with no more than 2 revisions.

Updates to the IMS/MPS should be completed monthly no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

Updates to the CIP should be completed within 90 days of the condition forcing the update no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

The Contractor shall repair deficiencies that were noted for the monitoring wells. The Cotractor shall continue to survey the condition of monitoring wells during requisite sampling events.

Complete updates to the basewide well inventory within 30 days of changes to the no less than inventory 95% of the time.

Complete repairs to monitoring wells no less than 90 days from the noted deficiencies for minor repairs (missing locks, faded paint, etc.) 95% of the time.

Reports for well abandonments or well replacements shall be completed within the required regulatory timeframe 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

Completing the study and having the data validation conclude that at least 95% of the analytical data is usable.

100% review, monthly.

Completing the investigation and having the data validation conclude that at least 95% of the analytical data is usable.

100% review, monthly.

CLIN 0013 DD540 (AOC P)

Conduct RA-O with Optimization in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Quarterly/Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Reports, Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, etc.)

Completion of RA-O documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0014 FT003 Conduct RA-O in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis, RCRA Permit and Reduce LCC

LTM in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Reports, Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, etc.)

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

Completion of RA-O and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0021 OT016 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0024 RW532 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Completion of RA-O documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0025 SS042 Achieve Alternate Objective:

1) Advanced Site Characterization (Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program Update)

2) Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation (including results of any pilot study)

3) Decision Document Amendment

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Basewide Monitoring Plan.

AF and USACE approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Permit Modifications or Stmt. Of Basis Amendments (i.e., Air Force, and Regulatory signatures on new Final Permits or new Decision Documents.)

Completion of Alternate Objective documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on Alternate objective documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0027 TS837 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Addressing regulator comments on SC documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Updates to the CIP should be completed within 90 days of the condition forcing the update no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

The Contractor shall repair deficiencies that were noted for the monitoring wells. The Contractor shall continue to survey the condition of monitoring wells during requisite sampling events.

Complete updates to the basewide well inventory within 30 days of changes to the no less than inventory 95% of the time.

Complete repairs to monitoring wells no less than 90 days from the noted deficiencies for minor repairs (missing locks, faded paint, etc.) 95% of the time.

Reports for well abandonments or well replacements shall be completed within the required regulatory timeframe 95% of the time.

100% review, monthly.

Completing the study and having the data validation conclude that at least 95% of the analytical data is usable.

100% review, monthly.

Completing the investigation and having the data validation conclude that at least 95% of the analytical data is usable.

100% review, monthly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0042 CS023 Conduct LTM in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit Injections to address concentration rebound (Option)

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Completion of RA-O documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0043 DA017 Achieve Alternate Objective:

1) Advanced Site Characterization (Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program Update)

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Basewide Monitoring Plan.

AF and USACE approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Permit Modifications or Stmt. Of Basis Amendments (i.e., Air Force, and Regulatory signatures on new Final Permits or new Decision Documents.)

Completion of Alternate Objective documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on Alternate objective documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Completion of RA-O documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0046 FL066 Achieve Alternate Objective:

1) Advanced Site Characterization (Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program Update)

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Basewide Monitoring Plan.

AF and USACE approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Permit Modifications or Stmt. Of Basis Amendments (i.e., Air Force, and Regulatory signatures on new Final Permits or new Decision Documents.)

Completion of Alternate Objective documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on Alternate objective documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0047 FL073 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0048 ID068 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0049 LF003 Conduct LTM in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit Injections to address concentration rebound (Option)

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of Groundwater Monitoring documentation (e.g., Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Reports, Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, etc.)

Completion of LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0053 SA036 Achieve Response Complete (RC).

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the Statement of Basis and RCRA Permit AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and Regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports, Annual Corrective Measures Implementation Progress Report).

Completion of RC and LTM documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RC and LTM documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

Completion of RA-O documentation with no more than 2 revisions no less than 95% of the time.

Addressing regulator comments on RA-O documentation within 30 days of receiving the comments no less than 95% of the time.

100% review, weekly.

CLIN 0054 SS012 Achieve Alternate Objective:

1)…