80KSC020R0024 LC39B ECS Amendment 05 Slip Pages.pdf

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

CODE

6. PROJECT NUMBER

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance within

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

80KSC020R0024

TBD

John F. Kennedy Space Center, NASA Procurement Office Code: OP-CS Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

The contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, and related activities necessary to upgrade the Environmental Control System at Launch Complex 39-B at Kennedy Space Center, Florida.

This is a Full and Open, Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement.

Offeror MUST enter their cage code and DUNS number in block 14, page 2 of the SF 1442.

Offeror MUST be registered SAM and VETS-4212.

Offeror MUST submit electronic offer as specified in section L.15.

KSC-IDIQbids@mail.nasa.gov Attn: C. M. Julius Williams John F. Kennedy Space Center, NASA Procurement Office Code: OP-CS Bldg M7-0301, Room: 5416A Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

4200729166

OP-CS

C. M. Julius Williams, Contracting Officer (321) 861-2661

99263

1 7506/01/2020

07/14/2020

2:00 PM

*Section F.1

NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC020R0024

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATION/WORK STATEMENT

C.1 SCOPE OF WORK (JAN 2018)

The Contractor shall furnish all management, supervision, labor, transportation, facilities, materials, tools, equipment, disposal, and documentation (except any property, including utilities, specified in the Schedule to be Government-Furnished) to perform all work for the Task(s) named below, and defined in the contract drawings, maps, specifications, and/or statements of work.

Line Item Description

0001 Upgrade ECS, LC-39B, Pre and Post Artemis I work with a 180 calendar day Post-Artemis I performance schedule

0002 Alternate Proposal, Upgrade ECS, LC-39B Pre and Post Artemis I work with a 150 calendar day Post-Artemis I performance schedule

(End of Clause)

C.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS, MAPS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND/OR STATEMENTS OF WORK

(JAN 2018)

(a) Five sets of full scale contract drawings, maps, specifications, and/or statements of work (excluding publications incorporated into the technical provisions by reference), plus one CD or DVD containing electronic, portable document format (PDF) versions, and an electronic copy of the 3D model, will be furnished at award to the Contractor without charge. The work shall conform to the following contract drawings, maps, specifications, and/or statements of work, attached to this contract.

Drawing Number 79K40792, titled “Upgrade ECS at LC-39B,” dated 04/13/2020, sheets 1 through 240.

Specification Number 79K40793, titled “Upgrade ECS at LC-39B,” dated 04/13/2020, pages 1 through 797.

(b) Addenda to Drawings, Maps, Specifications, and/or Statements of Work: N/A

(1) Specification section 40 05 13.96, paragraph 3.2, is changed from:

Visual inspection of all welds installed by the Contractor shall be performed by the Contractor to detect surface and internal discontinuities in completed welds. All tack welds, weld passes, and completed welds shall be visually inspected. When inspection and testing indicates defects in a weld joint, the weld shall be repaired by a qualified welder in accordance with paragraph CORRECTIONS AND REPAIRS.

To:

Visual inspection of 100 percent of pressure piping and ECS pressure duct welds shall be performed by the Contractor to detect surface and internal discontinuities in completed welds.

All tack welds, weld passes, and completed welds shall be visually inspected. In addition for all ECS pipe and pressure ductwork, magnetic particle or liquid penetrant for aluminum examinations shall be performed on 100 percent of multi-pass thickness, root and cap passes, and any 1/2 inch filler pass in-between. When inspection and testing indicates defects in a

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATION/WORK STATEMENT

weld joint, the weld shall be repaired by a qualified welder in accordance with paragraph 3.4

CORRECTIONS AND REPAIRS.

(2) Specification section 40 05 13.96, paragraph 1.5.1, is changed from:

Record in detail and qualify the Welding Procedure Specifications for every proposed welding procedure. Qualification for each welding procedure shall conform to the requirements of ASME B31.3, and to this specification. The welding procedures shall specify end preparation for butt welds including cleaning, alignment, and root openings. Preheat, interpass temperature control, and postheat treatment of welds shall be as required by approved welding procedures, unless otherwise indicated or specified. The type of backing rings or consumable inserts, if used, shall be described and if they are to be removed, the removal process shall be described. Copies of the welding procedure specifications and procedure qualification test results for each type of welding required shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph SUBMITTALS. Approval of any procedure does not relieve the Contractor of the sole responsibility for producing acceptable welds. Welding procedures shall be identified individually and shall be referenced on the detail drawings or keyed to the contract drawings.

To:

Record in detail and qualify the Welding Procedure Specifications for every proposed welding procedure. Qualification for each welding procedure shall conform to the requirements of ASME BPVC SEC IX, ASME B31.3, AWS D17.1, and to this specification. The welding procedures shall specify end preparation for butt welds including cleaning, alignment, and root openings. Preheat, interpass temperature control, and postheat treatment of welds shall be as required by approved welding procedures, unless otherwise indicated or specified. The type of backing rings or consumable inserts, if used, shall be described and if they are to be removed, the removal process shall be described. Copies of the welding procedure specifications and procedure qualification test results for each type of welding required shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph SUBMITTALS. Approval of any procedure does not relieve the Contractor of the sole responsibility for producing acceptable welds. Welding procedures shall be identified individually and shall be referenced on the detail drawings or keyed to the contract drawings.

(3) Specification section 23 00 00, paragraph 2.7.1.7, add the following sentence:

Proof pressurize the individual sections and completed chamber assembly to 1.1 times the system design pressure (8.8 psig) per ASME B31.3 requirements for pneumatic leak testing.

(c) "Or Equal" Items”

Throughout the technical specifications and drawings of this contract, where certain manufacturers’ trade names and model numbers are specified and followed by the term "or equal," the manufacturer's name and data as specified shall represent the minimum standard type, quality, and capacity acceptable for incorporation into the work covered by this contract. The products of other manufacturers will be considered as being acceptable, provided that such products fully meet or exceed all minimum structural or use and operational features of the particular manufacturers’ items as specified, and provided that the other manufacturers’ items are easily interchangeable and can be adequately incorporated within the allocated space in the

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Contracting Officer’s assessment of the appropriate subcontracting goals for this procurement.

(iii) Large Business Offerors must meet all of the following standards to receive an

“Acceptable” rating on this sub-factor:

(A) The Small Business Subcontracting Plan addresses all of the 15 requirements of FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternate II), Small Business Subcontracting Plan, paragraphs (d)(1) thru (15).

(B) The rationale provided for any proposed subcontracting goal that is less than the

Contracting Officer’s recommended goal includes an independent assessment of the small business opportunities and demonstrates a reasonable attempt was made to meet the Contracting Officer’s recommended small business subcontracting goals.

(C) The Small Business Subcontracting Plan demonstrates a reasonable commitment to the use of small business subcontractors.

(d) EVALUATION PROCESS

The following describes the general methodology that will be used for proposal evaluation:

(1) Offerors will be checked in the System for Award Management for current entity registration, representations and certifications, and the exclusions and Non-procurement Programs and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System. Offerors will be checked against the List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement and Non-procurement Programs. Offerors who appear on the List will be eliminated without further consideration.

Proposals will also be checked for responsiveness. The Contracting Officer will follow guidance at FAR 15.306 for resolving minor informalities or irregularities.

(2) A joint venture will be evaluated as a single offeror.

(3) The Contracting Officer will conduct a price analysis on each offeror’s submitted price.

(4) The technical (non-price) volume of the offeror with the lowest evaluated reasonable price of the 150 day proposals will be given to the technical evaluators for review. If the technical (non-price) proposal is determined to be technically “Acceptable”, award shall be made to that offeror, subject to a positive responsibility determination in accordance with FAR Part 9.

In order for a technical proposal to be determined technically “Acceptable”, all of the non-price factors in the technical proposal must be individually evaluated as “Acceptable”.

(5) If the technical proposal is determined to be technically “Unacceptable” the technical (non-price) volume of the offeror with the next lowest evaluated reasonable price of the 150 day proposals will be given to the technical evaluators for review. If the technical (non-price) proposal of the offeror with the next lowest evaluated reasonable price is determined to be technically “Acceptable” award shall be made to that offeror subject to a positive responsibility determination in accordance with FAR Part 9.

(6) If the technical proposal is determined to be technically “Unacceptable” the process described

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

will be conducted again, as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically “Acceptable” 150 day proposal.

(7) If none of the 150 day non-price/technical proposals are determined technically “acceptable,” the non-price/technical proposal of the lowest proposed 180 day price will be provided to the technical evaluators for review. If the non-price/technical proposal is determined to be technically “acceptable,” award shall be made to that offeror subject to a positive

(8) If the technical proposal is determined to be technically “Unacceptable” the technical (non-price) volume of the offeror with the next lowest evaluated reasonable price of the 180 day proposals will be given to the technical evaluators for review. If the technical (non-price) proposal of the offeror with the next lowest evaluated reasonable price is determined to be technically “Acceptable” award shall be made to that offeror subject to a positive

(9) If the technical proposal is determined to be technically “Unacceptable” the process described will be conducted again, as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically “Acceptable” 180 day proposal.

(710) Should no proposal be determined technically acceptable, the Contracting Officer may cancel the solicitation or establish a competitive range consisting of a maximum of the three lowest priced offers. After receipt of the offerors’ responses raised during the discussions with all offerors included in the competitive range, responses will be rated again in the same manner as in the initial evaluation.

(End of Provision)