25-1301 CmdCtrl Notice2.pdf
PDF 295 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274225R1301
About this file
This document is a pre-proposal notice for a Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command solicitation for the construction (design-bid-build) of a Guam Defense Radar System Command Center, power generation facility, and associated infrastructure, with an estimated value between $250,000,000 and $500,000,000. The work includes demolition, civil site work, concrete construction, a galvanized steel antenna tower, seismic isolation, security infrastructure, control system integration, electrical, fiber optic, and other utilities. The solicitation is set for full and open competition, with technical evaluation factors of Experience, Small Business Utilization, Safety, Management Plan, and Past Performance. A relevant project is defined as new construction of an administrative, office, communications, secure, or essential facility located in moderate to high seismic areas, valued at $80 million or more. The pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for 11 December 2024, and proposals are due on 9 January 2025. Amendments will be posted on the SAM website.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 63 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100
PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134
RFP N62742-25-R-1301
Notice No. 2
13 November 2024
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP N62742-25-R-1301
FY25 MCON P-693 PACIFIC DETERRENCE INITIATIVE: GUAM DEFENSE SYSTEM
COMMAND CENTER,
JOINT REGION MARIANAS, GUAM
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
6. Reference Drawing 14CC-A-151
Drawing sheet 14CC-A-151 provides Air Barrier Boundaries. Please provide a sheet similar to this for RF shielding to show the boundaries of RF shielding?
ANSWER: RF Shielding Boundary is shown on 14CC-A-301, 14CC-A-303, 14CC-A-304, and 14CC-A-411, per the dashed outline around that space.
7. Specification section 03 30 00 14 lists various supplementary cementitious material and admixtures such as Fly Ash, Pozzolans, and Slag Cement for the concrete mix. Please confirm that use of those material is at Contractor’s option and it is not a mandatory requirement.
ANSWER: Confirmed.
8. Reference RFP Document 00 21 16 – Instructions to Proposers, paragraph 1.1C requires the subcontracting plan to be submitted on the same day Price and Technical Proposals are due.
With the magnitude of this project, we humbly request for the subcontracting plan to be due a day after Price Proposal is due in order for contractors to focus on pricing on bid day.
ANSWER: The RFP remains unchanged.
9. Reference Sheet CP100. Striping – Fire Department Site Access Road Stop Bars.
Are stop bars required at each of the two stop signs on the Fire Department Site Access Drive along O’Malley Ave? Please advise and revise drawing if needed.
ANSWER: Per Specification 34 75 13.13.14, stop bars are required on both sides of the active vehicle barrier per safety scheme for the barrier. Placement will be per selected AVB manufacturer and placement of the safety loop sensors.
Sheet CP100 will be revised and issued in a future Amendment to indicate approximate location.
Stop bar is not required for the stop sign.
RFP N62742-24-R-1327
10. Reference Sheet CP100 and Detail C3/C-502. Crosswalk Marking Length.
Detail C3/C-502, for crosswalk stripe length, states “Sidewalk Width Plus 12” on “Both Sides” and has a callout for 10 ft. length. The crosswalk stripes drawn on CP100 have a length of 8 ft., which appear to be 2 ft. wider than the sidewalk width. Please confirm if we are to use 8 ft. or 10 ft. for the length of the crosswalk stripe, and revise detail to match
ANSWER: The width of the crosswalk is a min. of 10 feet or 12” on both sides of sidewalk.
Sheet CP100 will be revised and issued in a future Amendment.
11. Reference Detail A1/C-503. Warning Signs.
Please confirm that the “Warning Restricted Area” sign is the only sign to be installed for detail A1/C-503, and that the “No Drone Zone” sign shown in the draft plan detail is not required.
ANSWER: “No Drone Zone” signs are not required. Note that this question refers to the draft plan detail; this sign was removed in the RFP drawings.
12. Reference drawing CP100 and Detail A2/C-503. Sign Details – Sign R5-1.
Detail A2/C-503 note “Spacers to be provided between R1-1 and R5-1” so “Do Not Enter” Can be Installed” would suggest that the R5-1 “Do Not Enter” sign is required to be installed on the same post as the stop sign, yet on drawing CP100 there is no callout for the R5-1 “Do Not Enter” sign.
Please confirm if the R5-1 “Do not Enter” sign is required, and revise CP100 if necessary.
ANSWER: Sign R5-1 is required. Sheet CP100 will be revised and issued in a future Amendment.
13. Reference drawing CP100 and Detail A2/C-503. Sign Details – Sign R1-2.
“Yield” sign R1-2 is listed in detail A2/C-503, yet we were unable to locate any callouts for the R1-2 “Yield” sign on drawing CP100.
Please advise if R1-2 “Yield” sign is required and revise CP100 if necessary.
ANSWER: The yield sign is not required. Sheet C-503 will be revised and issued in a future
14. Reference Detail A3 and B1/C-502. Sign Post Detail – Concrete Foundation.
Please provide the concrete foundation dimension.
ANSWER: Post foundation information will be issued in a future Amendment.
15. Traffic Signage specification.
We were unable to locate the specification section for Traffic Signage in the RFP documents.
Please provide.
ANSWER: Specification will be issued in a future Amendment to include the requirements for traffic signage.
16. Reference Detail A4/C-502. Sign Post with Bollard Detail.
Please revise detail A4/C-502 to provide the following information:
1. Please provide the underground length of the bollard.
2. Is the bollard galvanized?
3. Does the above ground portion of the bollard receive painting or coating? Please advise and provide color required
ANSWER:
1. Detail will be revised and issued in a future Amendment to provide the underground length of the bollard.
2. The bollard is galvanized.
3. The above ground portion is to be painted yellow.
17. Reference Details C3/C-520 and C3/C-522. Civil Utility Bollard Diameter.
Detail C3/C-520 calls for “0.5’ (6”) Pipe Bollard RE: C3/14ST-C-522.” Detail C3/C-522 calls for 4” diameter bollard. Please advise which detail to follow and revise other detail to match.
ANSWER: A 6” bollard is required. Sheet C-522 will be revised and issued in a future
18. Specification Sections 23 09 00.00 14, 25 10 10.00 14, and 34 75 13.13 14. DD Form 1423
The referenced spec sections state requirements for delivery “in accordance with the Contract Clauses and in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form 1423, which is attached to and thereby made part of this contract.”
We were unable to locate DD Form 1423 in the RFP documents. Please provide.
ANSWER: DD1423 forms not required. Specifications will be revised and issued in a future
19. Specification Sections 01 45 00.00 14, Quality Control.
Secure Space & Sound Rated Area Identification.
Item 1.6.5.4.1 calls for periodic inspections of the secure space & sound rated area in collaboration with the government appointed SSM. Please confirm that the attendant contractors’ representative can be drawn from the cadre of special inspectors and doesn’t need to have any special security clearance.
ANSWER: Confirmed.
20. Specification Sections 01 45 35.00 14, Special Inspections. Structural Observations
Observer.
1. Item 1.2 of the general requirements call for structural observation (SOO) to be performed by the structural engineer of record. Since the design is provided by the government, please confirm that these services will likewise be provided by the government.
2. Under the Access Control Point – Statement of Special Inspections the contractors SIOR is not required to be in attendance and the governments SOO appears to take the lead. Is this a correct interpretation of the government intent.
ANSWER:
1. Per Paragraph 1.2, SOO will not be performed on the ACP. The SOO is not provided by the contractor.
2. The SIOR is provided by the contractor per Paragraph 1.3.7, and is required to inspect the
ACP.
Forms in Attachment A of Specification 01 45 35.00 14 will be revised and issued in a future Amendment.
21. Proposal due date extension.
With the current load of NAVFAC projects currently out for bid, combined with the P-693 project scopes that are above and beyond typical NAVFAC building construction, which require more time and research into providing a best-value solution for the stakeholders than is currently allotted, we request a 6-week extension to the current proposal due date of January 9, 2025. Please advise.
ANSWER: The proposal due date remains unchanged.
22. Price Proposal Schedule.
Reference Am-0001 Proposal Schedule sheet 1 of 4. Please provide revised proposal schedule to include missing line items.
ANSWER: SubCLINs 0001AA through 0001AF were deleted from the price proposal schedule.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .