FA4890-14-R-0023-A0002_CN_ _GT_Ops_ _Logs.pdf

FA4890-14-R-0023

See RFP Para

L-9.3.4

See RFP Para

L-9.3.4

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to incorporate the follow ing administrative changes (all changes made in this Amendment have been highlighted in GREEN):

1) Extend the proposal due date to 30 March 2015, 1430 EDT.

2) Update Secton L & M

3) Update PWS

4) Update Table B-1, Pricing Table

5) Include FAR Clause 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

U 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Mar-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4890-14-R-0023

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Feb-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Mar-2015

CODE

ACC AMIC/PKD

11817 CANON BLVD, STE 306

NEWPORT NEWS VA 23606

FA4890 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Mar-2015 02:30 PM to 30-Mar-2015 02:30 PM.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards MAY 2014

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

L-1 SPECIAL NOTICE TO OFFERORS

L-1.1 The exclusive responsibility for Source Selection will reside with the Government. Each individual involved in this acquisition has executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement with ACC AMIC.

L-1.2 Millennium Engineering and Integration Company, and its subcontractor, Deloitte Consulting LLP were involved in development of this requirement. Additionally, Millennium Engineering and Integration Company (and

NOT Deloitte Consulting LLP) will serve as advisors to the technical evaluation team during this source selection.

Any issues or concerns shall be provided in writing to the Contracting Officer no later than the proposal due date and shall include a detailed statement of the basis for issues or concerns. Millennium Engineering and Integration

Company and its subcontractor, Deloitte Consulting, LLP, are bound contractually by Organizational Conflict of

Interest and Non-Disclosure clauses with respect to proprietary information. In accordance with the Trade Secrets

Act, 18 USC 1905, Offerors are encouraged to protect their interest by signing Non-Disclosure Agreements directly with Millennium Engineering and Integration Company and Deloitte Consulting, LLP. Failure to implement will not eliminate the Government’s use of the aforementioned advisors.

L-1.3 Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clearly marked as such and will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 USC §§ 2101-2107, implemented at FAR 3.104) (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). Any unmarked proprietary information will be considered releasable under the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act.

L-1.4 Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made until funds are available. The

Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the

Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an Offeror for any costs.

L-2 FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

L-2.1 Any formal communication such as requests for clarification, discussions, and information concerning this solicitation shall be submitted in writing (by e-mail) to the Contracting Officer at the address below:

ACC AMIC/PKD

ATTN: James Robinson

Reference: Solicitation No. FA4890-14-R-0023

Phone: 757-225-7706

E-mail: james.robinson.54@us.af.mil mailto:james.robinson.54@us.af.mil

L-2.2 The Government will provide historical work for contractor reference in developing proposals. This historical information will be posted to FedBizOpps.

L-2.3 Pre-Proposal Conference.

L-2.3.1 A Pre-Proposal Conference is currently scheduled for 18 February 2015 to explain the requirements of this solicitation and to respond to questions raised by Offerors. The Pre-Proposal Conference will likely be held at the

Magnuson Hotel and Convention Center at Oyster Point (same location as Industry Day), 1000 Omni Blvd, Newport

News, VA 23606. Specific details will be posted to FedBizOpps. As space is limited, we request that you limit the number of individuals attending to a maximum of two (2) per company. To arrange attendance, send an email to the

Operations and Logistics Support box at accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil no later than 11 February 2015.

Title the e-mail "Pre-Proposal Conference - Company Name" (example "Pre-Proposal Conference - ABC

Company").

L-2.3.2 Offerors are requested to submit questions regarding the solicitation in writing via e-mail to the Operations and Logistics Support box at accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil no later than 11 February 2015 to allow for inclusion in the Pre-Proposal Conference agenda. Questions will be considered at any time prior to or during the conference; however, official answers will be provided to written questions only and posted to FedBizOpps.

L-2.3.3 The Government will not be liable for expenses incurred by Offerors prior to contract award.

L-3 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

L-3.1 The original and copies (specified below) shall be sent or hand delivered to the issuing office listed in Block 7 of the Standard Form 33 on/before the date/time specified on the front page. Mark the front of the envelope/box with the following: “Proposal No. FA4890-14-D-0023, ATTN: Mr. James Robinson, ACC AMIC/PKD, DO NOT

OPEN IN MAIL ROOM.” If proposals are hand delivered, Offerors shall contact the Contracting Officer at 757-

225-7706 to schedule delivery.

L-3.2 Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in an unacceptable proposal that the Government eliminates from consideration for award. The Government will not accept changes to Offerors’ proposals after the closing date of this solicitation (see FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals).

L-3.3 Proposals in response to this solicitation will be valid for 300 calendar days. Block 12 of the SF 33 shall be completed to read 300 calendar days.

L-3.4 Contact Information. Offeror shall provide:

L-3.4.1 Names, titles, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the

Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

L-3.4.2 Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

L-4 DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Extra copies of unsuccessful proposals will be destroyed. No destruction certificate will be provided.

L-5 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

L-5.1 The instructions below prescribe the format of proposals and describe the approach for development and presentation of proposed data. Proposals shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions.

mailto:accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil mailto:accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil

Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the PWS will be considered unacceptable.

L-5.2 A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand and perform a thorough and fair evaluation. The Government may incorporate into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful Offeror’s proposal submitted in response to this solicitation as revised and supplemented through the final proposal revision.

L-5.3 Proposal Format. A complete proposal consists of three (3) separate volumes: Technical, Past Performance, and Price.

L-5.3.1 Page Format. The proposal text shall be printed single-sided versus duplex. Type size for text shall not be smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman 10 point font, single column, normal proportional spacing and one inch (1”) margins (top, bottom, left and right). The text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 8 point font, and used only when absolutely necessary.

Text lines and table lines of text shall be single-spaced. Page color for each page of the proposal submission shall be white or ivory. Information submitted shall not exceed the pages limits established in L-5.3.3 below.

L-5.3.2 Electronic Copies. Electronic copies of all proposal information for each volume shall be submitted on a single CD-ROM or CD-R using Microsoft Office 2003, 2007, or 2010 or Portable Document Format (PDF) using

Acrobat Adobe 9.0 or latest version. Offerors shall NOT submit any documents in PDF that are copied as images.

Volume III Price – Schedule B, Table B-1, shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel 2003, 2007, or 2010. Offerors may elect to submit electronic copies of the Financial Statements required in L-9.3.8 due to the size of the documents. Offerors shall name files in an unambiguous manner, using plain language text, which facilitates the evaluator’s ease of accessing the files for evaluation, using standard naming conventions (e.g., Offeror Name-

Volume Name). Each volume shall be in a single searchable file (all pages (to include charts, tables, diagrams) shall be searchable), with copy/paste capability, and stored in a folder that corresponds to the proposal volume it represents (exception for searchable file: signature page of any documents requiring signature; i.e., SF33). Offerors shall insert the file name in the header of each document. All disks shall be virus checked prior to submission.

Replacement disks (CD ROM/CD-R) shall be required to update the final proposal resulting from any discussions, should they occur. It is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure that electronic copies and hard copies are an exact match. If there is a discrepancy between electronic copies and hard copies referenced in L-5.3.3 below, the hard copy submission will be used to conduct evaluation.

L-5.3.3 Organization/Copies/Page Limit. Information submitted shall not exceed the page limits stated below for each volume. Evaluators will only read up to the maximum number of pages specified. If the page limit is exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed from the applicable volume and will not be considered as part of the evaluation. Copy requirements and page limitations are as follows:

Volume Hard

Copies Electronic Copy Page Limit

Proposal Due

Date

I - Technical Original

+ 3

1 CD-ROM/CD-R

75 pages as follows:

45 pages total for Subfactors 1-3;

15 pages per scenario, Subfactor 4

See L-7.3

30 March 2015

2:30 PM EDT

II – Past Performance Original

+ 1 See L-8.1

30 March 2015

2:30 PM EDT

III – Price (See Note) Original

+ 2

NONE

30 March 2015

2:30 PM EDT

NOTE: One original proposal, which includes a signature on the SF33 in Volume III, shall be submitted. The remaining copies plus original shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions provided in Section L-3 for evaluation.

L-5.3.4 Cross-Referencing. Offerors shall not cross-reference among volumes. Each volume shall be written as a stand-along document so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to another volume.

Information included in another volume but not included in the designated volume for proposal evaluation purposes, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

L-5.3.5 What Counts as a Page. A page shall be an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper. Fold-outs shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be used only where a single 8 ½” x 11” page cannot accommodate a table or other graphic.

Fold-outs shall not exceed (11” x 17”), and shall count as one page. All material shall be contained within the page limit identified for each volume. All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc., are included in the page count, with exception of items stated in L-5.3.6.

L-5.3.6 Pages Not Included in Page Count. The organizational chart, acronym list, ISO registration verification, and overview section (for exceptions) will not be included in the page count. Covers for volumes, tables of contents, indices, title pages, and section dividers/tables will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, e.g., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

L-6 EXCEPTIONS

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions; therefore, Offerors are advised that taking exception to any requirements specified in this solicitation may result in the Government finding the proposal unacceptable. Clarification of Government requirements shall be handled by submitting questions/recommendations prior to submission of proposals. If Offerors still find it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation (Sections A through M, to include the PWS and attachments), clearly identify each exception in the overview section of the appropriate volume along with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and the resulting benefit to the Government. Exception to solicitation requirements may require the

Government to amend the solicitation to reflect a changed requirement. The Government will consider the absence of a stated exception to mean the Offeror takes no exception to the applicable volume and the proposal will be evaluated as submitted. The Government may consider any included Assumptions as an Offeror taking exception to the Government’s requirements which may result in the Government finding the proposal unacceptable.

L-7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME I, TECHNICAL (FACTOR 1)

L-7.1 To facilitate evaluation, the Technical Volume shall be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that Offerors have a thorough understanding of requirements. Statements that Offerors understand, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced AF publications, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable AF publications, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors should note that data submitted prior to the proposal submission will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation;

therefore, such data should not be relied upon or incorporated in the Technical proposal by reference.

L-7.2 Acronym List. Offerors shall provide an acronym list as an attachment within the Technical Volume.

L-7.3 Purpose and Contents. The purpose of this section is to set forth, in the most comprehensive manner, an

Offeror’s understanding of the program requirements and to demonstrate an Offeror’s ability to meet the evaluation requirements of Section M, Factor 1, Technical. This section shall present a clear, concise description of how

Offerors plan to meet award requirements. This section shall not contain any pricing or past performance data.

Offerors shall submit a Technical Volume containing the following:

Technical Volume Contents

1 Subfactors 1-3

Not to exceed 45 pages total

Evidence of ISO registration does not count as a page

See paragraphs L-7.3.1 (and subparagraphs), L-7.3.2, and L-7.3.3

2 Subfactor 4

Not to exceed 15 pages per scenario; maximum of 30 pages total

(Note: If the Offeror utilizes less than 15 pages for one scenario, the remaining scenario is still limited to 15 pages.)

See paragraph L-7.3.4 and Section L, Attachment 1

L-7.3.1 Subfactor 1: Program Management.

L-7.3.1.1 Management / Staffing Plan. Provide Management / Staffing Plan per PWS paragraph 3.5, Table 2 and paragraph 3.5.4.2 that describes proposed organizational structure and staffing necessary to ensure management and personnel resources are provided to successfully accomplish CN&GT Operations and Logistics Support ID/IQ and

T/O requirements. Provide:

Organizational structure detailing management structure, line(s) of authority, chain(s) of command, including subcontractors and teaming partners;

Explanation of procedures that will be implemented to proactively manage subcontractor, teaming partner, and associate contractor relationships to ensure execution of all PWS requirements that meets cost/schedule/performance parameters

Explanation of functional relationships, roles and responsibilities, and any pertinent events or milestones, to ensure effective processes critical to execution of ID/IQ and T/O performance and that mitigate risk associated with cost/schedule/performance.

Communication procedures both within the company and with the Government to demonstrate:

o Responsiveness to Government requests o Effective problem resolution o Successful accomplishment of all ID/IQ and T/O requirements

L-7.3.1.2 Human Resources. Describe:

Integrated process to attract, recruit, hire, train and retain qualified management and technical personnel to ensure corporation/team possesses or can readily obtain appropriate levels of education, experience and expertise to accomplish tasks

Approach to ensure continuation of services during personnel absences due to sickness, leave, voluntary or involuntary termination from employment to minimize impact to the Government

Approach for ensuring qualified personnel at performance start and process for maintaining currency of any required certifications and/or specialized training

Procedures for obtaining appropriate personnel security clearances

Process for ensuring personnel understand and comply with applicable security requirements and safeguard classified materials

L-7.3.1.3 Quality Management System (QMS). Provide:

Evidence of current ISO 9001 registration per PWS paragraph 3.1.1

Quality Manual outline per PWS paragraph 3.5, Table 2 and paragraph 3.5.4.8 that summarizes the

Offeror’s Quality Management approach that is compliant with and meets the requirements of PWS paragraph 3.0 and subparagraphs, and Table 3, Services Summary, and is integrated into the overall management approach.

L-7.3.2 Subfactor 2: Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Plan (per FAR Subparts 9.5 and 9.6). Provide

OCI Plan per PWS paragraph 3.5, Table 2 and paragraph 3.5.4.3 and Section H, paragraph H-2 that explains:

Approach for detecting, disclosing, avoiding, mitigating, and neutralizing OCI issues/risks at the ID/IQ and T/O levels;

Any intentions to serve as subcontractor or teaming partner with another Prime at the ID/IQ level, and

OCI approach for when companies propose as both a Prime and subcontractor or teaming partner on another Prime's T/O proposal;

Prime’s / Joint Venture Partner’s cross-teaming arrangements, as well as any exclusive teaming arrangements;

Subcontractor List per PWS paragraph 3.5, Table 2 and paragraph 3.5.4.5

Processes that will be implemented to resolve OCI identified in the course of contract execution, to include separate physical locations, work forces, management and computer systems;

Representation that there will be no “cross-talk” or information shared between affiliates in connection with all identified OCI;

Process to provide employee conflict of interest training and ensure compliance with non-disclosure policy

L-7.3.3 Subfactor 3: Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) Process. Describe approach to meet any

OCONUS requirements, to include identifying processes for:

Obtaining and retaining required clearances and documentation to allow 100% performance as soon after award as possible

Adhering to applicable guidance (pertinent to each country) for OCONUS performance, to include foreign clearance guidance, foreign travel requirements, import/export, customs fees, taxes

Resource utilization - use of in country, regional, other foreign or US sources for personnel, transportation, materials, Unspecified Minor Military Construction (UMMC), as specified in various countries of performance

Selecting labor categories and applying appropriate adjustments

Provide experience that demonstrates implementation / execution of OCONUS processes on previous contracts. Include contract number, contracting office, and point(s) of contact for Government validation

L-7.3.4 Subfactor 4: Scenarios. The scenarios at Section L, Attachment 1 represent work that may occur under this

ID/IQ contract. These scenarios are examples and will not result in awarded work upon award of the ID/IQ contract, but will be used by the Government to assess the Contractor’s approach to performing representative work. The content in the scenarios is for informational purposes only and provides the framework for Offerors to describe the proposed approach to meeting each of the two (2) sample scenario requirements. Therefore, for each of the two (2) sample scenarios, Offerors shall:

Describe portions of proposed ID/IQ organizational structure, to include subcontractors, that will be utilized and how those resources will communicate and execute work, be responsive to Government requests, and proactively and effectively resolve issues to ensure accomplishment of all scenario requirements

Describe specific process for ensuring execution of all scenario requirements to meet cost, schedule and performance parameters:

o Qualified workforce: appropriately trained, cleared and qualified personnel resources (number of personnel, labor categories and levels, as well as qualifications per proposed position) to begin performance as early as possible and ensure continuity of service o Use of in country, regional or other foreign or US sources, as applicable o Applicable guidance, travel, import/export, customs fees, taxes

Provide an integrated master schedule for each scenario, to include timelines / milestones for:

o Approvals o Clearances o Adherence to applicable guidance o Documentation / deliverables o Hiring, training and mobilizing a qualified workforce o Procurement, shipment and delivery of equipment o Completion of each scenario within one year o As otherwise described in each scenario requirement

L-8 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME II, PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 2).

L-8.1 Contents. Offerors shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

Past Performance Volume Contents

Past Performance

Information (PPI) Sheets

Not to exceed two (2) pages per PPI

See paragraph L-8.1.1 and subparagraphs and Section L, Attachments 2 and 3

2 PPI Summary

Not to exceed five (5) pages total

(Note: Page limit is for description of all requirements, not per PPI reference)

See paragraph L-8.1.2

Subcontractor/Teaming

Partner Consent Letter See paragraph L-8.1.3

Organization Structure

Change History

Not to exceed two (2) pages (bullet format, narrative not required)

See paragraph L-8.1.4

L-8.1.1 Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheets (see Section L Attachment 2). Offerors shall submit PPI Sheets on contracts considered most relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform CN&GT Operations and Logistics

Support requirements. Offerors shall only submit unclassified PPIs. Offerors shall save each PPI sheet in a standard name format with a number associated with the submitted PPI: Offeror Name-Volume Name-PPI X (e.g., XYZ

Company-Past Performance Volume-PPI #) to submit as part of the electronic copy of the Past Performance

Volume.

L-8.1.1.1 Number of PPI References. Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of six (6) contract references. One (1) of the references provided shall be on the Prime. Additional references may be on the

Prime, teaming partner, joint venture partner or subcontractor deemed major or critical to performance of this contract in accordance with the page limitation set forth in the table at L-8.1.

L-8.1.1.2 Types of References. Offerors may provide various contracts as PPI references, to include C-type contracts or a single task/call/delivery/purchase order. Offerors may also submit an ID/IQ or Blanket Purchase

Agreement (BPA) as a PPI reference, if the Contractor served as a Prime on the ID/IQ contract or BPA (see instructions in Section L, Attachment 3). In these cases, the Government will only assess performance at the ID/IQ or BPA level and not performance on each individual, underlying task/delivery order. An Offeror may also submit individual (stand-alone) task/delivery orders under an ID/IQ or BPA as a separate contract reference on a separate

PPI, even if the Offeror submitted the ID/IQ or BPA as a PPI reference. For cases in which the Offeror was a subcontractor performing under a Prime on an ID/IQ or BPA, the Offeror shall not submit the ID/IQ or BPA as a reference.

L-8.1.1.3 Recency Determination. Each relevant contract shall have active work/services that was/were performed during the last five (5) years from the final solicitation release date. This includes contracts that were awarded prior to this period, but still had a minimum of six (6) months of active performance during the previous five (5) years.

NOTE: Underlying task/delivery order periods of performance will determine the recency of an ID/IQ contract or

BPA (in other words, there must have been active performance that meets the recency definition).

L-8.1.2 PPI Summary. Offerors shall submit a single five (5) page narrative that provides frank, concise statements regarding the Contractor(s)’ performance on all of the PPI references provided. The PPI Summary shall meet the page limitation set forth in the table at L-8.1 and describes / addresses the following:

L-8.1.2.1 Roles of Proposed Team. The PPI Summary shall describe the role of Offerors (Primes) and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners considered critical to overall successful performance of this requirement. If submitting a reference for a subcontractor, teaming partner, joint venture, or a corporate division related to the Prime, describe the nature of the work to be performed on CN&GT Operations and Logistics

Support by the company referenced on the PPI, and clearly define the relationship.

L-8.1.2.2 Relevancy. Offerors shall describe how each reference is relevant (individually and/or in aggregate) in demonstrating the ability to perform the full range of CN&GT Operations and Logistics Support capabilities IAW

ID/IQ PWS requirements and the relevancy definitions at M-3.3.2. As applicable, address how the proposed reference provided on each PPI relates to each of the four (4) technical subfactors shown in paragraph L-7.3/M-3.2.

NOTE: The overall scope, dollar value and locations of performance of the underlying task/delivery orders will determine the relevancy of an ID/IQ contract or BPA.

L-8.1.3 Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter (Attachment 4). PPI concerning subcontractor and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a

Prime Contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner PPI to the Prime during exchanges. These letters are only required for subcontractors and teaming/joint venture partners for which the Prime submits Past Performance Information as part of the Past Performance Volume.

Completed consent forms shall be submitted as part of the Past Performance Volume.

L-8.1.4 Organizational Structure Change History. Many companies have acquired, have been acquired by, or have otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate the Government’s past performance evaluation, Offerors shall include in this proposal volume a detailed "roadmap" describing all such organizational changes (if applicable), to include specific names and dates of the prime / joint venture and any companies for which the Offeror provides PPI.

L-8.2 Other Sources. The Government may utilize references other than those identified by Offerors in evaluation of Offerors’ Past Performance. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing accurate and complete, recent and relevant PPI that demonstrates the ability to perform this requirement rests with each Offeror.

L-8.3 Determination of Responsibility. Even though the assessment of Past Performance is separate and distinct from Determination of Responsibility required by FAR Part 9, PPI contained herein may be used to support the

Determination of Responsibility for successful Offerors.

L-8.4 Handling of PPI. Once complete, PPI will be treated as source selection information in accordance with FAR

Part 3.104. In accordance with FAR Part 15.305(a)(2)(iii), the Government will allow consideration of Offeror-defined key personnel, including current employees and new hires proposed to support management of this contract to be evaluated as part of Past Performance.

L-9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME III, PRICE (FACTOR 3)

L-9.1 Table B-1, Pricing Schedule. Offerors shall provide the following per RFP Section B, Pricing Table paragraph and format specified in Section B, Table B-1 (the table is provided as the template/format for submission;

the burden of providing mathematically accurate and complete pricing proposals (total overall evaluated price) using the format provided in Section B, Table B-1 rests with each Offeror (see M-3.4.1)):

L-9.1.1 Labor Rates. Offerors shall propose loaded CONUS (hourly) and OCONUS (daily) (see PWS paragraph

6.1.2.17) Basic Labor and associated cost elements (Fringe, Overhead (OH). G&A), and Profit for each labor category. The Government has included two “Optional” columns for both CONUS and OCONUS Labor Rates in each performance year to accommodate Offerors’ variant accounting practices. When an Offeror utilizes one of these columns, the Offeror shall change “Optional” to an appropriate heading that is indicative of each column’s content and the Offeror’s business practices. Offerors may only change the “Optional” headings. If an Offeror’s business practices do not warrant use of these columns, Offerors shall leave all cells in the column blank and leave the heading(s) as “Optional.” Proposed loaded labor rates will be the maximum allowable rates used throughout the life of this contract for FFP type T/Os; however, they may be discounted by the Contractor at the T/O level. Labor rates for Cost Reimbursable labor will be negotiated at the T/O level, with proposed loaded labor rates serving as the basis for negotiation. There is no guarantee that requirements will exist for all labor categories listed or that the labor categories included are fully representative of all the work that will occur under the CN&GT Operations and

Logistics Support requirement. Additional labor categories/rates may be negotiated at the T/O level (see PWS paragraph 7.1.4).

L-9.1.2 Indirect Rates. Offerors shall propose indirect rates for the items specified in Section B, Table B-1, Pricing

Table. If an Offerors proposes Indirect Rates as Ceiling Rates, the Government will not be obligated to pay any additional amount should the final indirect cost rate exceed the ceiling rate.

L-9.1.3 Minimum Guarantee. The Government has committed to a $50,000 minimum guarantee for each prime to stand up, initiate, and maintain the Offeror’s proposed Program Management structure and capability per PWS paragraph 3.5.4.1. This is a one-time payment that will occur at ID/IQ award as T/O 0001 for each awarded Prime contractor. The minimum guarantee amount is included in Section B, Exhibit 1, Table B-1; Offerors shall not adjust or remove this value in preparation of the Price proposal.

L-9.2 Supporting Price Backup Data. Certified cost or pricing data is not required. The Government reserves the right to request additional pricing information after receipt and evaluation of proposals. However, Offerors shall provide support for all indirect rates proposed based on the Offeror’s accounting system and any applicable Forward

Pricing Rate Agreements. Offerors shall also provide their profit rate for each labor rate.

L-9.3 Proposal Documentation. Offerors shall provide the following as a separate section contained in the Price

Volume and shall be completed as follows:

L-9.3.1 Section A. Complete in its entirety the “Offeror” portion of the Standard Form (SF 33). An official having the authority to contractually bind the company shall sign the SF 33 IAW FAR 4.102. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract. One (1) copy of the SF 33 must bear an original signature.

L-9.3.2 Sections C through I. Complete the necessary fill-ins and provide any information requested. The Offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

L-9.3.3 Section K. State in your proposal whether your representations and certifications are accurate and correct in the System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov. Otherwise, complete in its entirety, Section K of the RFP.

L-9.3.4 Amendments. Offerors shall acknowledge any and all amendments per the directions on the amendment cover page (Standard Form 30). Failure to acknowledge any amendments to the solicitation may result in the

Offeror being deemed nonresponsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive Offeror.

L-9.3.5 Exceptions and Deviations. Describe any exception(s) and deviation(s) to the RFP. See paragraph L-6.

L-9.3.6 Adequate Accounting System (see Section H, paragraph H-6). Offerors shall provide evidence of an adequate accounting system (certified or compliant) to adequately track, segregate, accumulate and report incurred costs for each CLIN as applicable. Offerors shall provide the name and address of the cognizant Defense Contract

Audit Agency (DCAA) and any point(s) of contact in that office if applicable. If an Offeror has never dealt with

DCAA, the Offeror shall review the website at www.dcaa.mil and identify the cognizant DCAA office. If DCAA has already determined the Offeror’s accounting system adequate, the Offeror shall provide the referenced DCAA audit report number and date. Offerors shall provide any information that pertains to a recent Defense Contract

Management Agency (DCMA) or DCAA financial capability assessment or any other independent audit showing that the Offeror’s accounting system is adequate for government cost type contracts.

L-9.3.7 Host Nation Laws. Offerors shall provide a written statement that they will comply with all applicable Host

Nation (HN) laws.

L-9.3.8 Financial Statements. Provide previous three (3) fiscal year-end financial statements for use in the

Government determining the apparent low Offeror's responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1. Also include documentation to show capability to access credit markets if necessary.

http://www.dcaa.mil/

L-9.3.9 Department of Labor Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Clearance. In accordance with FAR Part

22.805, the CO must request pre-award clearance on Prime contractors or Teaming Partners (not subcontractors) from the appropriate Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regional office. If an Offeror is listed in OFCCP’s National Pre-award Registry (http://www.dol-esa.gov/preaward/pa_reg.html), Offerors shall provide the CO a copy of the database registration for Government verification as part of the proposal submission. If an Offeror is not listed in the registry, the CO will request an EEO clearance review.

L-9.3.10 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Large Business Primes Only). Large Business Offerors shall provide a Subcontracting Plan that complies with FAR Part 19, Small Business Programs, and its supplements, PWS paragraph 3.5 Table 2 and paragraph 3.5.4.4, and RFP Section H, paragraph H-4 (minimum of 40%). Identify the percentage of intended business with each of the following small business socioeconomic categories: Small

Disadvantaged, Women-Owned, HUBZone, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned per Section H, paragraph H-4.

Successful Offerors’ Small Business Subcontracting Plans will be incorporated in each applicable Contractor’s

CN&GT Operations and Logistics Support ID/IQ contract.

L-9.3.11 Responsibility Determination. The Government will use the standards established in FAR Subpart 9.104 to determine each Offeror’s responsibility.

L-10 DEBRIEFING OF OFFERORS

Successful or unsuccessful Offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the Procuring

Contracting Officer. Debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.505 for pre-award debriefings and

FAR 15.506 for post-award debriefings.

L-11 CHANGES RESULTING FROM DISCUSSIONS

In the event any adjustment of price becomes necessary to reflect changes made to technical proposals resulting from discussions, if discussions are held, a complete traceable trail shall be provided to show how the changes took place.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-1 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

M-1.1 This competitive best value source selection will be conducted using the Lowest Price Technically

Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process IAW FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, Department of Defense

(DoD) Source Selection Procedures effective 1 July 2011 and Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation (AFFARS)

Mandatory Procedures (MP) 5315.3 for Source Selection as revised 27 Mar 2013.

M-1.2 The Government intends to award the CN&GT Operations and Logistics Support multiple award ID/IQ contract to a target of five (5) Large Businesses and three (3) Small Businesses under NAICS 561210, Facilities

Support Services, $38.5M size standard. The Government reserves the right to evaluate and/or award more than or fewer than the target number of Large Business and/or Small Business contracts based upon Source Selection

Authority (SSA) determination that it is in the Government's best interest. The SSA’s best interest determination will be based upon, but not limited to, a consideration of one or more of the following items: available funding, the need to sustain adequate competition, and the availability of awardable proposals, consistent with LPTA procedures, following completion of an integrated assessment of the proposals received. Within this framework, multiple awards will be awarded starting with the lowest priced Offeror in each pool, and then the next lowest priced Offeror in each pool, in sequence, which is technically acceptable, receives an “Acceptable” Past Performance rating, and is fair and reasonably priced.

M-1.3 The Government may make a final determination as to whether an Offeror’s proposal is acceptable or unacceptable solely on the basis of the initial proposal(s) submitted. Therefore, Offerors are advised to submit proposals that are fully and clearly acceptable without additional information.

M-1.4 The Government intends to award an initial task order within 60 days of ID/IQ award, subject to availability of funds, to each of the awardees to satisfy the minimum guarantee outlined in clause 52.216-19, Order Limitations and in accordance with PWS paragraph 3.5.4.1.

M-1.5 The Government reserves the right to award without discussions and make award based on initial proposals, but may conduct discussions if the Government determines it is necessary. If it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the SSA, with CO concurrence, will make a Competitive Range determination, evaluation notices may be issued to Offerors in the competitive range, responses will be requested from applicable Offerors, and discussions will be opened. The competitive range may include proposals rated as

“Unacceptable” at the sole discretion of the Government. Offerors should be aware that a complete understanding as to price, technical, past performance and all other terms and conditions of the proposed contract must exist between the Offeror and the Government at the conclusion of discussions.

M-1.6 Award will be made to Offerors deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9.1, whose proposals conform to the solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, with the lowest total overall evaluated prices, with an “Acceptable” rating in all Technical subfactors and an “Acceptable” rating for Past Performance. If an Offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that Offeror.

M-2 FINAL PROPOSAL REVISION

M-2.1 If the Government conducts and concludes discussions, the Government will request a Final Proposal

Revision (FPR) from all Offerors remaining in the competitive range once discussions are closed. Formal responses to FPRs will be considered in making the award decision.

M-2.2 Any revision or non-concurrence to contract terms and conditions submitted in the FPR may not be subject to further discussion, and may render the offer unacceptable to the Government. This provision is not intended to restrict the Offeror’s opportunity to revise figures (e.g., prices, discounts, percentages, rates, etc.); rather, it is intended to preclude any misunderstandings by the Government, which could result if new or revised terms and conditions are submitted in the FPR that have not been fully disclosed, discussed and understood during discussions.

Hence, such new or revised terms and conditions are not solicited and, if submitted in the FPR, may render the offer unacceptable to the Government.

M-2.3. If, upon submission of the FPR, an Offeror materially changes its proposal such that the price is no longer fair and reasonable or sufficient to keep them among the lowest priced Offerors, or other factor inputs change their ranking among other Offerors, the Offeror may be removed from consideration for award.

M-3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND METHODOLOGY

Proposals will be evaluated using three (3) evaluation factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Price.

M-3.1 Evaluation Methodology.

M-3.1.1 Initial Proposals. The Government will evaluate the minimum number of proposals for efficiency and to maintain adequate competition, as specified in this section. Upon receipt of the Technical, Past Performance and

Price proposals, the Government will:

M-3.1.1.1 Step 1: Rank by Initially Proposed Total Price. The Government intends to initially rank all proposals by the initially proposed total price, from lowest to highest. The initially proposed total price includes the sum of all option / performance years and the minimum guarantee (the total price listed in Exhibit 1, Table B-1, Tab 1, titled

“Total Price”). Evaluation and determination of the proposed Total Overall Evaluated Price as fair, reasonable and balanced will occur as specified in Step 2 below, paragraph M-3.1.1.2.3, and paragraph M-3.4. For the purposes of the ID/IQ evaluation, the Government will rank all proposals in two pools as specified below. Those outside the initial evaluation pools will not be evaluated unless necessary to obtain adequate competition. The evaluation pools are as follows:

M-3.1.1.1.1 Large Business Evaluation Pool. The Government will select a minimum of the eight (8) lowest priced proposals from among the Large Business Offerors for further evaluation. If the Government receives less than (8) initial proposals in the Large Business Evaluation Pool, the Government will evaluate all Large Business proposals.

M-3.1.1.1.2 Small Business Evaluation Pool. The Government will select a minimum of the six (6) lowest priced proposals from among the Small Business Offerors for further evaluation. If the Government receives less than (6) proposals in the Small Business Evaluation Pool, the Government will evaluate all Small Business proposals.

M-3.1.1.2 Step 2: Factor Evaluations. Upon establishment of the two evaluation pools as described above, the

Government will evaluate each factor simultaneously, as follows:

M-3.1.1.2.1 Technical Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the technical proposals of Offerors in each evaluation pool as specified in paragraph M-3.2. If any of the proposals receives any “Unacceptable” ratings, as described in paragraph M-3.2, and these proposal(s) are not determined to be easily correctable, the Government reserves the right to pull in the next lowest priced proposal(s) to ensure adequate competition, or until all proposals are evaluated.

M-3.1.1.2.2 Past Performance Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the past performance proposals of

Offerors in each evaluation pool as specified in paragraph M-3.3. If any of the proposals receives an

“Unacceptable” rating, as described in paragraph M-3.3, and these proposal(s) are not determined to be easily correctable, the Government reserves the right to pull in the next lowest priced proposal(s) to ensure adequate competition, or until all proposals are evaluated.

M-3.1.1.2.3 Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the price proposals of Offerors in each evaluation pool as specified in paragraph M-3.4.

M-3.1.1.2.4 If additional proposals are pulled in on a one-for-one basis under any of the factors, the Government will evaluate those proposals in all three factors: Technical, Past Performance and Price.

M-3.1.2. Award Decision. If at least five (5) of the lowest priced Large Business proposals and/or at least three (3) of the lowest priced Small Business proposal are technically “Acceptable” and have an “Acceptable” Past

Performance rating, and are fair and reasonably priced, the Government may award with or without discussions, starting with the lowest priced proposal and each subsequently lowest priced proposal until a target of five (5) Large

Businesses and a target of three (3) Small Businesses are selected for award. As stated in paragraph M-1.2, the

Government reserves the right to award with or without discussions to more than or fewer than the target number of

Large Business and/or Small Business Offerors with an “Acceptable” rating for each technical subfactor, an

“Acceptable” Past Performance rating, and fair and reasonable pricing, based upon SSA determination that it is in the Government's best interest.

M-3.2 Factor 1: Technical. The Technical Factor evaluation provides an assessment of each Offeror’s capability to satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. The Technical Factor consists of four (4) subfactors: 1) Program

Management, 2) Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Plan, 3) OCONUS Process and 4) Scenarios. Technical proposals will be assessed a rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" at the subfactor level IAW Table A-1 of the

DoD Source Selection Procedures effective 1 July 2011, as revised below:

In assessing the acceptability of…