CNGT_Industry_Day_Briefing_20140902.pdf
PDF 620 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CN & GT Operations and Logistics Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4890-14-R-0023
About this file
Industry Day Briefiing 3 Sep 14
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
CN & GT Operations and Logistics has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
This Briefing is:
UNCLASSIFIED
Headquarters Air Combat Command
Counter Narcotics & Global Threats
Operations & Logistics and
Training Support Services
Industry Day
3 September 2014
Welcome
Mr. Jeffrey Hermann
Chief, Counter Narcotics & Global Threats Division
ACC AMIC/PMT
Mr. Kermit Burnett
Air Force Counter Drug Program Manager
HAF/A3O-A
Industry Day &
Project Overview
Ms. Katharine Weimer
Project Lead
ACC AMIC/DRX
Industry Day & Project Overview
• Agenda
• Administration
• Industry Questions & Potential Offeror
Communications with the Government
• Acquisition Management & Integration Center (AMIC)
• Acquisition Team Interaction & Milestones
Agenda
• 0900-1000 – Briefing
• 1000-1015
• Break
• Attendees submit written questions for discussion panel
• 1015-1100 – Discussion Panel
• 1100-1300 – Lunch Break
• 1300-1645, 3 Sep 14; 0800-1645, 4/5 Sep 14
• One-on-One meetings with interested parties
• Schedule / locations posted to FedBizOpps and on registration form
Administration
• Magnuson Hotel Facilities
• Restrooms
• Emergency Exits
• Smoking Areas
• Industry/Attendee Folders
• Agenda
• Briefing
• Open Forum ( ) & 1-on-1 ( ) question sheets
• Government Questions for Industry Day
• Industry Day Surveys (Open Forum & 1-on-1 Session)
• Reference Documents
• Latest Draft PWS
• Latest Draft RFP Sections
Industry Day / 1-on-1 Questions question sheets for discussion panel questions question sheets for 1-on-1 questions
• Government answers to industry questions:
• Responses as a result of discussion panel or 1-on-1s are preliminary / interim
• The Government will provide “official” responses in writing via posting(s) to FedBizOpps
• Contractors must submit any questions for which they desire an
“official” answer “in writing” to the Contracting Officer
• Questions received in writing during Industry Day / 1-on-1s will be included in “official” response; therefore, write legibly
• Proprietary Information:
• Clearly identify any information deemed proprietary
• The Government will provide answers to questions, including proprietary information, directly to the contractor
Potential Offeror Communications
• All potential offeror communications shall be sent to:
• Operations and Logistics Support:
accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil
• Training Support Services:
ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil
• After the Government releases the final RFP, offerors shall limit all communications to the Contracting
Officer (or as otherwise specified in the RFP) mailto:accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil mailto:ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil
AMIC Background
• Direct Reporting Unit (DRU) under HQ ACC/CV
• Recognized “Center of Excellence” for AF services acquisition management with contract portfolio > $10B
• Cradle-to-grave acquisition & management of command-wide, AF-level special interest, and complex services acquisition
(>$100M) requirements
• Provides strategic facilitation, integrated program and contract management, and specialized contracting support
• Supports DHS; DASD-CN> Host Nations; FMS &
Pseudo-FMS; Combatant Commands (COCOM);
MAJCOMs; and ACC Directorates, Tenants & Wings
• Manages 14 complex service acquisition programs
AMIC Integrated Culture
• Pioneering SPO Type services acquisition organization
• Dedicated Program Managers, Contracting Officers and
Quality Assurance
• Functional support within organization (Logistics, Civil
Engineering, Communications / Electronics, Finance, etc.)
• Cross-functional / cross-directorate enabling capability
• Report to single Director
• Project Lead inserted in complex service acquisitions to facilitate process & employ project management disciplines
• Maintain / apply philosophy of partnering with industry to create business-like environment conducive to mission success
AMIC Director
(SES)
PK (GS-15)
Deputy Director, Contracting
PSU
Surveillance
Division
PM (GS-15)
Deputy Director, Program Management
Deputy
Director (Col (S))
DD
Det 1
Ottawa
PMS
Mission Spt
Division
PMT
CN>
Division
PMA
Aircraft MX
Division
PCE
Civil Engineer
Division
PSC
Comm/Elec
Division
PLG
Logistics
Division
DRQ
Quality Assurance
Division
SEM (SMSgt)
Sr Enlisted Manager
XO
Executive Officer
DRE
Executive Spt
PKC
Contracting
Division
PKS
Contract Spt
Division
PKA
Contracting
Division
PKB
Contracting
Division
PKD
Contracting
Division
JWAC
Contracting
Division
DRJ
Legal
Division
DRA
A&AS
Division
DRF
Financial Mgt
Division
DRX
Plans & Prgms
Division
DRI
Info Mgt
Division
AMIC Organizational Chart
Joint Tasks Review PWS
Develop Acquisition Strategy
Develop Request for Proposal (RFP)
Evaluate Proposals
Acquisition Team Roles & Responsibilities
Contractor
Contracting Officer Post Requirements to FedBizOpps
Primary Interface to Industry
Program Manager Interface to Customer
Develops Program Requirements
Functional Support
PSC, PLG, PCE, DRQ
Contract Manager
Project Lead Milestone/Configuration
Management
Training
Lessons Learned
Acquisition Authorities
• Acquisition falls under Air Force Program Executive
Officer for Combat and Mission Support (AFPEO/CM) portfolio since ceilings are > $500M for each acquisition
• Stakeholders:
• AFPEO/CM: Mr. Randall Culpepper, SES
• Source Selection Authority (SSA)
• Acquisition Approval Authority
• AFICA/KC: Col Tara Morrison
• Clearance Authority
• Ombudsman
• Multi-functional Independent Review Team (MIRT)
• Technical
• Legal
• Contracting
Milestone Date
Post Draft Performance Work Statements / Sources
Sought / Request for Capabilities Statements 11 Aug 14
Industry Day / One-on-Ones 3-5 Sep 14
Post Draft RFP 6 Oct 14
Post Final RFP 27 Jan 15
Pre-Proposal Conference 10 Feb 15
Proposals Due NLT 30 Mar 15
Source Selection (8 months allotted) Mar – Oct 15
Contract Award ~29 Oct 15
Performance Start NLT 23 Dec 15
Anticipated Project Milestones
Program Overview
Ms. Maureen Thibodeau
Program Manager
ACC AMIC/PMTC
Program Overview
• Mission
• Contract Scope Summary
• Performance Work Statement (PWS) Overview
• Risks
Mission
• Augment DASD-CN> missions around the globe
• Target narcotics trafficking, organized crime & narco-terrorist organizations worldwide
• Deploy CN assets and/or assets resourced with CN funding to regions where targeted organizations benefit from illicit drug revenue or use drug smuggling systems
• In cooperation with DoD, law enforcement, other government agencies & foreign governments
Contract Scope Summary
• Customers: Geographical Combatant Commands
(GCC), Military Departments, Defense Agencies that provide unique military platforms, personnel, systems, capabilities to federal law enforcement agencies, foreign governments, and foreign security forces involved in CN missions
• Performance locations: Continental United States
(CONUS) and outside the CONUS (OCONUS), with the bulk of performance occurring OCONUS
Operations & Logistics
• Personnel, services, equipment, construction to support start up of new, restart of former, or conduct / sustainment of existing project, program, process, initiative or directive
• Procure (purchase or lease) services, equipment, material that directly or indirectly support operational mission & objectives
• Resources to design, build and/or operate, maintain & sustain
• Actions to keep items in serviceable condition, return those items to service, or update or upgrade a capability
• Movement of units, personnel, equipment, materials, supplies, to include acquisition of modes of transportation
• Provision of training on equipment acquired under a T/O
• Design, construction of new and/or renovation, remodel, upgrade and/or repair of existing facilities to support operations and/or logistics endeavors
Training
• Activity aimed at transferring knowledge, skills, abilities with objective of improving individual or organizational performance or creating a required level of competency
• Training Assessment – determine feasibility of providing training to an intended organization / audience
• Training Development – recommend and/or provide training aids, instructor material, student material, timeline, personnel requirements/limitations, instructor requirements/qualifications, facilities and locations
• Training Delivery – Provide instruction, transfer training products, retrain, document progress, outcomes & successful completion, assess effectiveness of medium, instructors
Training Types
• Strategic & Operational Training
• Flight Instruction
• Military Skills Training
• End Item Usage, Handling, Maintenance
• Subject Matter Expertise
• Other Specified Training
• Training Products
• Minor Construction & Repair
• Repair & modification of existing facilities to support training efforts
• Limited to SAT
PWS Summary
• Contractor ID/IQ Program Management
• Program Management Capability to manage ID/IQ contract and all T/Os issued under the ID/IQ contract
• Decisions – Government responsibility, not Contractor
• Communication within contractor team, professional, monitor & report situations that could cause delays
• Management Information System (MIS) – develop, administer & maintain MIS with capabilities, deliverables, status
• Documentation specifications
• Performance Reviews – at least annually to cover performance, performance measures, significant events
• Kick-off Meetings – ID/IQ and T/O
• Human Resources Management
• Personnel Qualifications – attract, hire, train, retain qualified personnel
• Personnel Training – Contractor responsibility, initially & recurring
• Rapid Response to T/O requirements
• Personnel Turnover – allow continuation of services during a variety of absences
• Key Personnel – binding, specified replacement/substitution & turnover requirements
• Removal of Contractor Personnel at Government Request – for reasons related to security, safety, environment, health, fraud, unreasonable behavior
• Contractor Identification – Contractor personnel easily identifiable in person, communications, representations (exceptions for locations where identification would jeopardize safety/security)
• Financial Management
• Travel Reimbursement – pre-approved, as needed, IAW FAR
31.205-46
• Material Reimbursement – Allowable costs, less discounts, application of indirect rates
• Billing / Invoicing – monthly unless otherwise specified in T/O or by CO, travel within 30 days on single invoice, no separation of subcontractor costs
• Duty Hours, Holidays, Overtime
• Duty Hours – CONUS typically 40 hours a week; OCONUS any variety of work hours (contributor to daily vs. hourly rates)
• Holidays – CONUS performance follow US federal holidays
• Base Shut Downs – IAW FAR 52.249-14, payment terms negotiated, Government personnel must be in place & alternate work locations specified in T/O or pre-negotiated
• Quality Control (1 of 2)
• Quality Management System – ISO 9001 registered; monitor cost, schedule, performance; quality manual
• Records of Inspection – available to Government
• Performance Evaluation – Access, nonconformances (will be held accountable to performing IAW specified requirements)
• Deliverables – on time, specified format
• Minimum Guarantee (Management & MIS)
• Management/Staffing, OCI, SB Subcontracting Plans
• Quality Manual
• Kick-Off Meetings, Subcontractor List
• Quarterly Lapse Rate Report & Performance Summary
• Individual and/or Summary Subcontracting Report (ISR/SSR)
• Enterprise Contractor Manpower Reporting Application
• Contractor-identified Concerns/Issues
• Quality Control – Services Summary
• Identifies critical factors / surveillance items as basis for
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) & successful performance of requirements
• Purpose: Lists performance objectives for required service
• Components: States performance objective, standard, and threshold for each critical success factor (accept/reject point)
• Objectives:
• Qualified people at T/O start
• Stable workforce
• Effectively replaces/substitutes personnel
• Develop & submit all required deliverables (on time, accurate)
• SB participation
• Environmental, Safety, Health, Security
• ESOH - compliance with federal, state, local guidance
• Security
• Safeguard Government property and controlled items
• Adhere to Freedom of Information Act & Privacy Act
• Appropriate personnel clearances
• Properly handle classified information
• COMSEC, OPSEC, Restricted/Formerly Restricted Data
• General Items
• Training
• Pass & ID; Traffic Laws; Weapons, Firearms, Ammunition
• FOUO; Reporting; Controlled/Restricted Areas
• Automatic Data Processing Equipment (ADPE)
• Key/Access Badge Control; Lock Combinations
• Property Management
• General – Contractor may be asked to provide facilities; use
COTS, GOTS, GFE when possible
• Property Control – property control system; identify & inventory;
use appropriate identification & tracking methodologies
• Government Furnished Items
• Accountability
• Government will provide identification, documentation, access, workspace, LAN, computers, telephone, publications & forms unless otherwise specified
• Transportation provision, tracking, coordination
• Appendices
• Appendix A – Acronyms
• Appendix B – Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)
• Appendix C – Publications & Forms
• Appendix D – Task Order requirements
• Appendix E – Labor Categories
• Appendix F – Customers Supported
Acquisition / Program Risks
• Fully defining ID/IQ requirements (scope of each PWS)
• ID/IQ contracts that are agile enough to cover all CN work related to ID/IQ scope
• Labor category identification & descriptions
• Prime experience across multiple work areas and for performance around the globe
• How to meaningfully discriminate among offerors at the ID/IQ level
• Technical focus on critical performance areas
• Cost/Price
Acquisition / Program Risks
• Establishing & maintaining:
• Viable pool of primes
• Appropriate oversight, accountability, documentation of performance
• How to properly address:
• Government caused delays
• Unstable work environment (OCONUS, especially)
• Appropriate & variant processes for each country
Acquisition Strategy /
Solicitation Overview
Ms. Veronica Johnson
Contract Manager
ACC AMIC/PKBA
Contracting Overview
• Key Contractual Aspects
• Period of Performance
• CLIN Structure
• Source Selection Methodology / Factors
• Draft RFP Posting
• Pre-Proposal Conference
• Points of Contact
• One-On-One Information
Key Contractual Aspects
• Solicitation Numbers:
• FA4890-14-R-0023 – Operations & Logistics
• FA4890-14-R-0024 – Training
• North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) - The Government is contemplating the following NAICS for these requirements:
• 561210 - Facilities Support Services
• 541330 - Engineering Services
• Anticipated Contract Type - Multiple Award Indefinite
Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (MA ID/IQ)
• Anticipate non-commercial acquisition (FAR Part 15)
(continued)
• Small Business Set Aside Determination
• Government assessing capabilities
• Capabilities statements were due 28 Aug 14
• RFP currently set up for two separate & specified pools
• SB Subcontracting Plans required for Large
Businesses (if applicable) IAW FAR Part 19
• If executed as Full & Open competition, mandatory SB
Subcontracting requirement(s) may be considered
• The Government is seeking Industry feedback on areas that can be subcontracted and appropriate percentages
(continued)
• Draft PWSs posted to FedBizOpps on 11 Aug 14
• PWSs written in performance-based terms
• Industry review & feedback encouraged
• Government Furnished Property / Equipment – need to comply with FAR Part 45
Period of Performance
Projected Contract Length (Ordering Period)
7 years (3-year Base with two 2-year options)
Period Duration
Base Period (3 years) 23 Dec 15 - 22 Dec 18
Option Period 1 (2 years) 23 Dec 18 - 22 Dec 20
Option Period 2 (2 years) 23 Dec 20 - 22 Dec 22
Note: Task Orders can be issued on the last day of the ordering period for up to 2 years (T/O performance will not go beyond 22 Dec 24)
CLIN Structure
CLIN # TITLE Type Quantity Unit of Issue
XX01 FFP Months
XX02 FFP, LOE Term Months
XX03 FPI- Firm Months
XX04 FPI- Successive Months
XX05 FFP, LOE Completion Months
XX06 CR Lot
XX07 CPIF Lot
XX08 CPAF Lot
XX09 CPFF Lot
XX10 CPFF-LOE Lot
Source Selection Methodology
• Best Value: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
(LPTA) IAW DoD Source Selection Methodology
• Factors
• Factor 1 – Technical (Acceptable / Unacceptable)
• Factor 2 – Past Performance (Acceptable / Unacceptable)
• Factor 3 – Cost / Price (Fair, Reasonable, Balanced)
• Trade-offs not permitted
• Government reserves right to award w/o Discussions
• Process:
• Rank by total overall evaluated price (TOEP)
• Evaluate Technical / Past Performance / Cost/Price to maintain established minimums (in each competition pool, if applicable)
Source Selection Technical Factor
• Subfactor 1: Program Management
• Management / Staffing Approach
• Human Resources
• Quality Management System
• Subfactor 2: Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan
• Subfactor 3: OCONUS Support
• OCONUS Process
• Scenario
Technical Evaluation Process
• Rated “Acceptable”/ “Unacceptable” at Subfactor level
• Technical proposals must meet all subfactor requirements / aspects to be rated “Acceptable”
• No extra credit for proposals that exceed requirements
• Proposals with any Deficiency (material failure or combination of significant weaknesses increasing risk to unacceptable level) or
Weakness (flaw increasing risk of unsuccessful performance) in a subfactor will be rated “Unacceptable”
• A rating or “Unacceptable” in any subfactor will render the proposal Technically Unacceptable & therefore unawardable
• An overall factor-level rating will not be assigned
Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation
Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation
DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table A-1
Past Performance Factor
• Submit Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheet
• Up to 6 PPI references; minimum of 1 on Prime
• 1 page PPI sheet per reference
• Recent – at least 6 months of performance within last 3 years
• PPI Summary - 5 page narrative describing:
• Roles of proposed team
• How each reference is relevant (individually or in aggregate in demonstrating ability to perform full range of ID/IQ PWS requirements
• Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter
• Organizational Change History
Past Performance Process
• Rated “Acceptable” / “Unacceptable” at Factor level
• References must be:
• RECENT – minimum of 6 months of performance within last 3 years of RFP release date
• RELEVANT – similar size, scope, complexity
• NO adverse past performance - Government will use CPARS as primary means to assess quality of performance
RATING DEFINITION
Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (see note below)
Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)).
Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.
Past Performance Rating Process
Obtain Past Performance Information on Each Offeror and Determine Recency
Assess Relevancy for Each Recent Contract
Review Performance Quality for Each Contract
Review Offeror Relevancy and
Performance Ratings
Assign Offeror’s PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR
Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating
Cost/Price Factor
• Complete Table B-1, Pricing Schedule
• Labor Rates
• Hourly - CONUS
• Daily - OCONUS
• Indirect Rates
• Minimum Guarantee (Program Management Capability)
• Complete all applicable proposal documentation
• Sections A (SF 33), C – I (as applicable), K – Reps & Certs
• Acknowledge all amendments
• Address any exceptions or deviations
• EEO clearance
• SB Subcontracting Plan
• SB Choice of competition (if applicable)
Cost/Price Process
• Cost / Price analysis IAW FAR 15.404-1
• Price reasonableness based on comparison of offerors’ TOEPs
• Labor & indirect rates for all performance years (years 1-7 and performance periods A & B)
• Minimum Guarantee
• Comparison of proposed costs - preferred & intended method
• Cost / Price must be:
• Fair & Reasonable
• Balanced
Read and evaluate
Offerors’ proposals
Document eval findings
Reach Consensus
Finalize ENs
Evaluate
EN responses
Document eval. findings
Prepare follow-up ENs, if required
Establish initial ratings
Competitive Range or
Award w/o Discussions
Adjust ratings/
Competitive Range based on EN responses
** IEB **
Award w/o Discussions or
Release ENs upon SSA approval;
Discussions Started
Receive Contract Clearance
** Pre-FPRB**
Issue Request for FPRs upon SSA approval
Discussions Closed
Receive & evaluate
FPRs from offerors
Document FPR Findings
Formulate award recommendation
Establish final ratings
Finalize PAR/SSDD
Award recommendation
Receive Clearance
** SSDB**
SSA makes Award decision
PAR/SSDD signed
Award
INITIAL
EVALUATION
INTERIM
EVALUATION
FINAL
EVALUATION
Source Selection Evaluation Phases
Initial Evaluation
• Based on Initial Evaluation, CO must decide to either:
• Recommend SSA Award Without Discussions (AWOD), OR
• Establish Competitive Range (CR) & enter into Discussions
• AWOD is the desired approach (submit best proposal with original submission)
• CO will notify offerors if:
• AWOD
• Entering Discussions
• Eliminated from CR (may request pre- / post-award debriefing)
Discussions
• CO will release ratings from initial evaluation & any issues, captured in Evaluation Notices (EN)
• Offerors in CR provide responses to ENs by established due date
• Government evaluates responses
• May require “follow-on” ENs
• CO makes determination when to close Discussions
• CO may recommend further reduction of CR
• CO will notify offerors when:
• Closing Discussions
• Requesting Final Proposal Revisions (FPR)
• Eliminated from CR (may request pre- / post-award debriefing)
Final Proposal Revisions
• CO will release ratings resulting from Discussions (no further Discussions are allowed)
• Offerors in CR provide FPRs by established due date
• Government evaluates FPRs
• CO makes award recommendations
Key Events
• Draft RFP tentatively scheduled for release 6 Oct 14
• Industry review & input encouraged
• Government will post responses to questions to FedBizOpps
• Pre-Proposal Conference
• Currently scheduled for 10 Feb 15
• Location TBD (details will be with final RFP (~27 Jan 15))
• Required information (similar to Industry Day process):
• Attendee(s) names (no more than 2 per offeror)
• Company name
• Job Title
• Photo ID
• Additional information will be posted to FedBizOpps
• Bidders’ Library (historical PWSs) will be posted to
FedBizOpps
Points of Contact
• Contracting, ACC AMIC/PKD
• Contracting Officer, Mr. Jim Robinson, 757-225-7706,
• Contract Manager, Ms. Veronica Johnson, 757-225-7714
• All questions or comments regarding this recompete must be submitted in writing to the appropriate box:
• Operations and Logistics Support:
accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil
• Training Support Services:
ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil mailto:accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil mailto:ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil
Internet Links
• www.FBO.gov or www.FedBizOpps.gov
• FA4890-14-R-0023 (Operations & Logistics)
• FA4890-14-R-0024 (Training)
• http://farsite.hill.af.mil (Federal Acquisition Regulation) http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.fedbizopps.gov/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/
One-on-One Sessions
• Dates: 3-5 Sep 14
• Location: ACC AMIC, 11817 Canon Blvd, Newport
News, VA
• Questions/recommendations from Industry are highly encouraged
• Verbal dialog between Government and Industry, both during today’s open forum & one-on-one appointments, is unofficial
• Official responses to questions requires Industry submittal of questions to the Government on the blue (Open Forum) and yellow (1-on-1s) question sheets
• The Government will post official responses to all Industry questions on FedBizOpps; however, the names of the Industry representatives and their companies will not be published
• Proprietary information will not be published
Break
TURN IN ALL WRITTEN QUESTIONS on BLUE Paper
Discussion Panel
Closing Remarks
TURN IN ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND SURVEYS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .