Attachment (c) 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf
FAR Clause PDF 261 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6264925QH034
About this file
This document is an Attachment (2) 52.212-2 Evaluation provision for a Joint Region Marianas (JRM) Chief Information Office (CIO) CompTIA SecurityX (CASP)+ Training solicitation. The evaluation criteria outline two primary factors for assessing contract proposals: Technical Capability and Price. For Technical Capability, proposals will be rated as either "Acceptable" (meets requirements with moderate performance risk) or "Unacceptable" (fails to meet requirements with unacceptable performance risk). The Price factor involves a price analysis to determine reasonableness for technically acceptable quotations. The document explicitly states that technical and past performance considerations are significantly more important than cost or price, and that a written notice of award can result in a binding contract without further action by either party.
View the file
Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-2
Show all 20
Who attaches FAR 52.212-2
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (2) 52.212-2
Title: Joint Region Marianas (JRM) Chief Information Office (CIO) CompTIA SecurityX (CASP)+ Training
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV
2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Factor 1: Technical Capability:
Technical Capability will be determined as follows:
Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.
Factor 2: Price
The price(s) quoted in response to the solicitation and the technical specification quotation is evaluated as Acceptable will be evaluated through price analysis to determine price reasonableness.
Technical and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price.
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .