35-Table 2 A B Contractors Approach.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- CIZ-DWU-26 003
- Issued by
- Dallas County, Texas
About this file
This is a contractor's approach documentation for the Southwest 96-inch Water Transmission Pipeline Project, a City of Dallas water infrastructure initiative managed by Project Manager Tracey Long, PE. The project involves installation of approximately 14,300 linear feet of 96-inch steel water pipe, 570 linear feet of 78-inch steel water pipe, and 30 linear feet of 54-inch prestressed concrete cylinder water pipe using combined open cut and tunneling methods, along with cathodic protection, electrical systems, instrumentation and controls for electrically actuated valves, and site and paving restoration. Plans, specifications, and bid proposal spreadsheets were made available on the Bonfire platform at https://dallascityhall.bonfirehub.com/ on Friday, March 13, 2026, prior to 4:00 p.m.
The document presents two tables detailing the contractor's proposed approach to nine tunnel segments identified by stationing locations. Table 2A outlines the contractor's approach per contract documents, specifying terminal shaft locations and sizes, intermediate shaft requirements, initial support methods, and tunneling methods for each tunnel segment. Table 2B presents alternate proposals for the same tunnel segments. Notably, several tunnel segments are marked as "NOT ALLOWABLE," while segments 5 and 8 identify steel casing combined with open or closed face pipe jacking as the proposed tunneling method. The tables establish the framework for evaluating contractor methodology and compliance with project requirements for subsurface construction activities.
View the file
Other files
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TABLE 2A: CONTRACTOR’S APPROACH TO PROPOSED TUNNELS (PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS)
| ID |
| TUNNEL STATIONING |
| TERMINAL SHAFT 1 APPROX. LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH X LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| TERMINAL SHAFT 2 APPROX. LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH X LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| INTERMEDIATE SHAFT LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH x LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| PROPOSED TUNNEL INITIAL SUPPORT METHOD (PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS) |
| PROPOSED TUNNELING METHOD (PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS) |
| 1 |
| 2+40 TO 21+90 |
| 2 |
| 34+91 TO 37+07 |
NOT ALLOWABLE
| 3 |
| 41+38 TO 46+60 |
NOT ALLOWABLE
| 4 |
| 50+98 TO 51+47 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| 5 |
| 84+40 TO 87+43 |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| STEEL CASING |
| OPEN OR CLOSED FACE PIPE JACKING |
| 6 |
| 97+05 TO 100+15 |
NOT ALLOWABLE
| 7 |
| 113+69 TO 115+26 |
NOT ALLOWABLE
| 8 |
| 117+39 TO 117+89 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| STEEL CASING |
| OPEN OR CLOSED FACE PIPE JACKING |
| 9 |
| 122+82 TO 141+59 |
NOT ALLOWABLE
TABLE 2B: CONTRACTOR’S APPROACH TO PROPOSED TUNNELS (ALTERNATE PROPOSALS)
| ID |
| TUNNEL STATIONING |
| TERMINAL SHAFT 1 APPROX. LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH X LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| TERMINAL SHAFT 2 APPROX. LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH X LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| INTERMEDIATE SHAFT LOCATION AND SIZE (WIDTH x LENGTH OR RADIUS) |
| PROPOSED TUNNEL INITIAL SUPPORT METHOD |
| PROPOSED TUNNELING METHOD |
NOT ALLOWABLE
NOT ALLOWABLE
| N/A |
| N/A |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| STEEL CASING |
| OPEN OR CLOSED FACE PIPE JACKING |
NOT ALLOWABLE
NOT ALLOWABLE
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
| STEEL CASING |
| OPEN OR CLOSED FACE PIPE JACKING |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| NOT ALLOWABLE |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .