WWYK263009_65_NG_energy model results.pdf
PDF 187 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912BV25S0014
About this file
This file contains an energy model analysis document comparing different HVAC system options for the Bomber Agile Common Hangar (BACH) project at Tinker Air Force Base. The analysis evaluates multiple configurations including natural gas and all-electric options, presenting detailed energy usage, cost comparisons, and technical specifications for each scenario. The baseline model follows ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 requirements, with a total energy cost of $319,769 annually and energy use index of 72.4 kBtu/sf*yr.
The document provides comprehensive technical details on building specifications including architectural elements (roofing, walls, windows), mechanical systems (HVAC options, ventilation, exhaust), electrical systems (lighting, receptacle loads), and plumbing systems. Four natural gas alternatives and three all-electric options are analyzed, with Natural Gas Alternative 4 showing the best energy performance at 45.5 kBtu/sf*yr and 37.1% energy savings compared to baseline. The facility consists of a 138,798 GSF hangar and 58,201 GSF office/workspace area, operating two shifts Monday-Friday with 400-515 total occupants. The analysis includes consideration of a 420 kW roof-mounted photovoltaic system option.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 95 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Tinker BACH LCCA Model Inputs (6/07/23)
Total Cost Energy
Cost Index Natural Gas PCI
($/yr) ($/sf) Total Use Facility
Demand Total
Energy
Cost
PCI %
Baseline-90.1-2019 $319,769 $1.58 $319,769 $319,769 $0 $0 0.55
BaseProposed-NGAlt1 $174,750 $0.87 $163,889 $163,889 $0 $10,861 $145,019 0.2% 0.55
BaseProposed-NGAlt2 $167,056 $0.83 $157,251 $157,251 $0 $9,806 $152,713 4.5% 0.52
BaseProposed-NGAlt3 $178,602 $0.88 $157,520 $157,520 $0 $21,082 $141,168 -2.0% 0.56
BaseProposed-NGAlt4 $170,840 $0.85 $163,903 $163,903 $0 $6,938 $148,929 2.4% 0.53
SW-GI-Alt1-901-Baseline $314,375 $1.56 $312,791 $312,791 $0 $1,584 $5,394 -79.6% 0.98
SW-GS-Alt1-901-Baseline $314,147 $1.56 $312,791 $312,791 $0 $1,355 $5,623 -79.5% 0.98
SW-HX-Alt1-NGAlt1 $168,871 $0.84 $156,706 $156,706 $0 $12,166 $150,898 3.5% 0.53
PV Option $275,361 $1.36 $275,361 $275,361 $0 $0 $44,409 13.0% 0.48
Energy Use
Index Natural Gas Savings
(kBtu/sf*yr) Use
(kWh/yr)
Peak
Demand
(kW/mo)
Use
(therms/yr)
Peak Demand
(kW/mo)
Baseline-90.1-2019 72.4 4,280,947 2,842 0
BaseProposed-NGAlt1 50.3 2,194,081 436 26,716 2,406 30.5%
BaseProposed-NGAlt2 47.5 2,105,208 425 24,120 2,417 34.3%
BaseProposed-NGAlt3 61.3 2,108,811 423 51,858 2,419 15.2%
BaseProposed-NGAlt4 45.5 2,194,267 467 17,065 2,375 37.1%
SW-GI-Alt1-901-Baseline 72.7 4,187,522 2,840 3,896 3 -0.5%
SW-GS-Alt1-901-Baseline 72.4 4,187,522 2,840 3,334 3 -0.1%
SW-HX-Alt1-NGAlt1 50.3 2,097,911 398 29,926 2,444 30.5%
PV Option 62.3 3,686,372 2,842 0 0 13.9%
ENERGY COST RESULTS
Electricity Savings
ENERGY USE RESULTS
Energy Use
Electricity
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
A n n u a l
E n e r g y U s e k B tu
End Use
Baseline-90.1-2019 BaseProposed-NGAlt1 BaseProposed-NGAlt2 BaseProposed-NGAlt3 BaseProposed-NGAlt4
18.6%
8.8%
36.2%
4.9%
15.0%
12.2%
0.9% 3.5%
NG Alt 4 End Use Distribution
Heating
Cooling
Interior Lighting
Exterior Lighting
Interior Equipment
Fans
Pumps
Water Systems kBtu/sf
45.5
Tinker BACH LCCA Model Inputs (6/07/23)
General Proposed Baseline
Energy Code ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 Federal Guiding Principles and United Facilities Criteria (UFC)
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 Appendix G
Input Source Design team inputs for
35% SD Set Dated 12/21/2023 Performance Rating Method
Climate Zone and Weather Location 3A, USA_OK_Oklahoma.City-Tinker.AFB.723540_TMYx.2007-2021 Same as Proposed
Elevation (ft) 1,198 Same as Proposed
Location Oklahoma City, OK Same as Proposed
Orientation from North 90 degrees Same as Proposed
Size (sf) Hangar: 138,798 GSF
Office/Workspace: 58,201 GSF Same as Proposed
Occupancy First shift: 280 to 360 people
Total: 400 to 515 people Same as Proposed
Schedule M-F 06:45 AM - 2:45 PM (Shift 1); 03:30 PM to 11:30 PM (Shift 2)
S/Sun: 04:45 AM - 12:45 PM Same as Proposed
Utility Rates Proposed Baseline
Electricity Oklahoma Gas and Electric (OG+E)
Main Base Rate for 2024: $0.07469/kWh Same as Proposed
Natural Gas Tiger Natural Gas
Main Base rate 2024: $4.06534/MMBtu ($0.406534/therm) Same as Proposed
Architectural Proposed (ASHRAE 90.1-2019 Code Min) Baseline
Roofs
Insulation Entirely Above Deck
Admin - 1/2" fiberglass mat gyp roof board on 5" polyiso above deck
Hangar - standing seam
U-0.032 (R-32 c.i.) (light colored roof)
Insulation Entirely Above Deck
U-0.063 (Table G3.4-3)
Reflectivity 0.30
Thermal Emittance 0.90
Walls, Above Grade
Hangar Upper - 4" insulated metal panel
U-0.059 (R-26)
Admin and Hangar Lower - insulated tilt up wall, 1/2" brick veneer, 2.5" concrete, 3" rigid insulation, 8" concrete, U-0.07 (R-15)
Steel-Framed
U-0.124 (Table G3.4-3)
Slab-On-Grade Floors Concrete slab
Unheated F-0.73
Unheated F-0.730 (Table G3.4-3)
Opaque Doors
Swinging: U-0.37 (1-3/4" insulated HM doors R-6)
Nonswinging: U-0.31 (insulated steel) (Kalwall)
Hangar Doors: U-0.04 (R-26)
Swinging: U-0.700 (Table G3.4-3)
Nonswinging: U-1.450 (Table G3.4-3)
Window Assemblies
Admin: Aluminum Storefront - 1" tinted/tempered low-e, double pane
U-0.33 (COG), SHGC-0.25, VT-0.275
Hangar: Thermally broken insulated translucent fiberglass sandwich panels, 2-3/4" min
U-0.29 max (COG), VLT-0.27 min
Window Type (Table G3.4-3)
U-0.57, SHGC-0.39, VT-0.43 if WWR ≤ 10.0%
U-0.57, SHGC-0.25, VT-0.28 if WWR > 10.0%
Window to Wall Ratio (%) From model: 12.1% From model: 12.1% (the calculation is more complex, see G3.1.1-1)
Exterior Shading Southern shading NA
Interior Shading Rolling shades
Infiltration (cfm per sf exterior area)
0.046 (admin), 0.16 (hangar)
For modeling purposes, have to set I to 1.0 cfm/ft2 at 0.3 in. w.g. delta-P, unless I is measured, i.e. Iadjusted = 0.226 cfm/ft2 to match Baseline, per
90.1-2019 Appendix G required infiltration modeling (see G3.1.1.4)
I = 1.0 cfm/ft2 at 0.3 in. w.g. delta-P (see G3.1.1.4 for conversion):
Roof = 183,692 ft2; AGW = 180,402 ft2
==> S = 364,094 ft2
==> IAGW = 0.112 x I75Pa x S / AAGW = 0.226 cfm/ft2 @ 10 mph
Electrical Proposed Baseline
Interior Lighting Power (W/sf)
110 kVA total
Building Area Method
- Office: 0.64 W/sf
- Hangar: 0.75 W/sf
XX kW total
Building Area Method (Table G3.8)
- Warehouse: 0.80 W/sf; Office: 1.00 W/sf
(Space by Space Method from Table G3.7
- Office: 1.10 W/sf; Warehouse: 0.90 W/sf)
Interior Lighting Daylighting Controls 90 kVA with daylight control (UFC min)
Control type (office/admin all spaces, hangar)
N/A
Interior Lighting Occupancy Controls
Every space, dimming, (occ/vacancy controls) except mech/elec Occupancy sensors in employee lunch and break rooms, conference/meeting rooms, and classrooms (not including shop classrooms, laboratory classrooms, and preschool-12th grade classrooms) (see Table G3.1-6). Credit in Proposed for occupancy sensors in other spaces than those listed above
Exterior Lighting Power (W)
30 kVA (TBD) Tradable: per Table G3.6
Nontradable: same as Proposed
No detail yet on Tradable or not, so Baseline modeled same as
Proposed
Exterior Lighting Controls Astronomical clock and sensor Astronomical time switch
Process Lighting 30 kVA Same as Proposed
Receptacle Loads (W/sf)
Total: 480 kVA
IT Room: 5.5
Breakroom: 1.0
Closed Office: 1.575
Conference Room: 1.05
Corridor: 0.21
Electrical/Mechanical Room: 0.21
Open Office: 1.575
Restroom: 0.21
Shop: 1.15
Warehouse/Storage: 0.22
Same as Proposed
Receptacle Controls ASHRAE recommended controls
10% credit in Proposed if receptacle control not required by Section
8.4.2 of 90.1
Conveyance (Elevator, Escalator)
Service Elevator: 25 hp
Motor type (hydraulic or traction):
Weight of elevator car (lb):
Rated elevator load (lb):
Speed of elevator (ft/min):
Counterweight of car (lb):
Pmotor = bhp x 746/hmotor bhp = (Weight of Car + Rated Load - Counterweight) x Speed of
Car/(33,000xhmechanical)
See Table G3.1-16
No detail on elevator yet, so same as Proposed
Process Loads Aircraft power: 1500 kVA
Hangar: assume something reasonable Same as Proposed
Mechanical Proposed Baseline
Setpoints
Occupied: 76 F clg, 68 F htg (admin); 65 F (hangar, considered as shop due to occupancy); 65 F (shop)
Unoccupied: 84 F clg, 55 F htg (admin); 55 F (hangar, considered as shop due to occupancy); 55 F (shop)
Same as Proposed
Other HVAC System
Vestibules: from the main system, no separate heating
IT/telecom, Elec room: ductless system
Mech/elec: unit heaters, exhaust fans
Secure areas: independent system, OA from DOAS
IDF / MDF: System 4 - PSZ-HP, Packaged single zone, constant volume, DX cooling, heat pump heating
Vestibules, mechanical: System 10 - Heating and Ventilation, constant volume, electric resistance
HVAC All Electric Option 1 - Admin: chilled water (ACC, scroll) (44F, 14 F delta-T, 30% prop. glycol), electric reheat, VAV (ERV); Hangar: MAU w/ electric resistance heat and ERV (MAU off in summer; use louvers and exhaust fans during summer)
HVAC All Electric Option 2 - Admin: Packaged RTU heat pump, w/ DOAS heat pump, electric resistance reheat, VAV (ERV); heat pump low ambient temp 17 F; Hangar: MAU w/ ERV, heat pump heating (electric resistance backup)
HVAC All Electric Option 3 - Admin: VRF heat recovery and w/ ERV; VRF low ambient 0 F; Hangar: MAU, ERV, heat pump (Daikin Aurora) (electric resistance backup)
HVAC Natural Gas Alternate 1 - Admin: ACC/chilled water, condensing boiler/hot water (160 F - 120 F), DOAS with chilled/hot water coils, Plate
ERV (70% eff.), AHU VAV with chilled/hot water coils, VAV boxes with hot water reheat; Hangar: (4x) MAUs with direct fired natural gas, 94% efficiency, plate ERV (70% eff.), electric defrost @ 10 F
HVAC Natural Gas Alternate 2 - Admin: Same as Alternate 1; Hangar:
(2x) MAU, 30,000 cfm, with direct fired natural gas (natural gas preheat, electric defrost @ 10 F), 94% efficiency, plate ERV (70% eff.), overhead radiant infra-red natural gas heating at 90 ft (derated to 70% of the heater capacity)
HVAC Natural Gas Alernate 3 - Admin: Same as Alternate 1; Hangar:
(2x) MAU, 30,000 cfm, with direct fired natural gas (natural gas preheat, electric defrost @ 10 F), 94% efficiency, plate ERV (70% eff.), in-floor radiant heating (variable flow, constant temperature, surface temperature reset by space temperature) using same condensing boiler as HVAC hot water loop, with individual control valve for each zone
HVAC Natural Gas Alernate 4: Admin: Same as Alternate 1; Hangar: (2x)
MAU, 30,000 cfm, with direct fired natural gas (natural gas preheat, electric defrost @ 10 F), 94% efficiency, plate ERV (70% eff.), natural gas unit heaters (about 30 ft high) with on-off fan control and 93% efficiency
Zoning: 2 DOAS(N and S); 3 AHU (N, S floor 1, S floor 2), 3 RTU (N, S floor 1, S floor 2), VRF condensing units under 30 tons each
Primary HVAC System
Office: System 6 - Packaged VAV with PFP boxes, DX cooling, electric resistance
Hangar: System 10 - Heating and ventilation, constant volume, electric resistance
Mechanical (contd.) Proposed Baseline
Equipment Efficiencies
Per 90.1-2019
Air-cooled chiller: 150 tons, EER 10.1
Gas-fired MAU: 92-94% efficiency gas
Condensing boiler: 95% efficiency
Cooling -
DX: 3.6 COP
Heating -
Electric resistance: 100%
Equipment Capacities Autosized by energy model Autosized
Design Air Flow Rates (cfm)
Autosized by energy model
No more than 3,000 cfm per VAV box
Max 3 offices per VAV box
System 4 and System 6: 20ºF supply-air-to-zone air temperature difference
System 10: temperature difference between supply air of 105ºF and zone setpoint
Ventilation (cfm)
ASHRAE 62.1-2022 for Admin areas
0.5 cfm/sf for Hangar
Same as Proposed, except for DCV in Proposed where OA system ≤
3,000 cfm serving areas with average design capacity of 100 people per 1,000 ft2 or less
Exhaust (cfm)
Fom Stor EF: 912 cfm
Lo Stor: 1,470 cfm
Mech EF: 1,000 cfm
Restrooms EF: 1,550 cfm
Sheet Metal EF: 770 cfm
Shops EF: 2,100 cfm
Hangar EF: 30,500 cfm
Same as Proposed
Demand Controlled Ventilation NA NA
Economizers 63ºF DB high limit shut off Not required
System Fan Power (W) Autosized Per G3.1.2.9
Exhaust Air Energy Recovery
80% effectiveness, plate and frame (sensible and latent) for HVAC All
Electric options 1 to 3
70% effectiveness, plate and frame (sensible and latent) for HVAC Natural
Gas alternates 1 to 4.
50% effectiveness where applicable (refer to G3.1.2.10): design CFM ≥
5,000 cfm and OA ratio ≥ 70%. Not required for heating systems in
Zone 0 to 3 (e.g. System 10)
Supply Air Reset
SAT for cooling reset higher by 5ºF under the minimum cooling load conditions
System 6: SAT for cooling reset higher by 5ºF under the minimum cooling load conditions
System 4 and System 10: not applicable
Hot Water Plant 95% efficient N/A
Hot Water Loop
Supply 160 F, return 120 F
Reset N/A
Pumps 19 W/gpm, 60 ft head
N/A
Chilled Water Plant 2.96 COP N/A
Chilled Water Loop
Primary-secondary configuration, 30% propylene glycol
Supply 44 F, return 58 F
Pumps 22 W/gpm, 250 gpm, 40 ft head for primary, 55 ft head for secondary
N/A
Plumbing Proposed Baseline
SHW Type Electric Storage Electric resistance storage water heater (per Table G3.1.1-2)
SHW Size (2x) 210 gallon each Same as Proposed
SHW Efficiency 100% efficient 100% efficient
SHW Loop Supply 120F
Pump: 14 W/gpm Same as Proposed
SHW Load (gpm) 4.5 gpm Same as Proposed
Renewable Energy System Proposed Baseline
Photovoltaic
Panel: Fixed, roof mounted
420 kW
5 deg tilt
180 deg azimuth
96% inverter efficiency
N/A
* assumption (NM) not modeled (E) existing
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .