N62742-26-R-1306_AMD0001.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

J 1 19

0001 15 Apr 2026 See Continuation Sheet J-875 N62742

NAVFACSYSCOM PACIFIC

258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100, JBPHH HI 96860-3134

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

UNITED STATES

Jennifer Hue, Email: jennifer.m.hue.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 8086026755 SCD: PAS:

N6274226R1306

10 Apr 2026

See Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

See Schedule

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification): RFP N62742-26-R-1306, JFY 2022 PROJECT J-875, BATTLE STAFF TRAINING FACILITY, U.S. NAVSUPPACT MCB CAMP BLAZ, GUAM; AMENDMENT 0001 is for the following:

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers, Correct typo in paragraph 1.2, a. (4) to "Completed DFARS 252.236-7010, OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION - PREFERENCE FOR

UNITED STATES FIRMS"

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instruction, Document 00 22 00 Evaluation Factors for Award Delete and replace the first paragraph of 1.1 INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS with "The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306 (a)). Therefore, the initial proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements and should contain the best offer from a technical and price standpoint."

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instruction, Document 00 22 00 Evaluation Factors for Award, Attachment A Construction Experience Project Data Sheet Delete DOCUMENT 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT A in its entirety and replace with the attached revised DOCUMENT 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT A, pages 1 through 2.

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instruction, Document 00 22 00 Evaluation Factors for Award, Attachment B NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) Delete DOCUMENT 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT B in its entirety and replace with the attached revised DOCUMENT 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT B, pages 1 through 4.

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.1 SITE VISIT

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) A pre-proposal site visit has been scheduled for This siteone-time May 19, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Chamorro Standard Time (ChST).

visit is to provide Offerors with an opportunity to familiarize themselves with the jobsite and conditions to be encountered and is not for the purpose of answering questions. Photography is allowed with prior approval and a valid Camera Pass that must be

The following forms are located at the end of this Section 00 21 16brought on Site Visit day. :

(1) MCBCB VCC Base Access Request Forms

a. Base Access Request

b. Memorandum

c. Company Letterhead Template

Note: Also included are the Cover Sheet Requirements for MCBCB Base Access Requests and Frequently Asked Questions

(2) SECNAV 5512/1 Form

(3) Naval Base Guam Foreign National Base Access Request Form

(4) FN Biometric Data

(5) Camera Pass Request

N6274226R13060001

(6) New Application Requirements

(7) VCC Hours of Operations.

(c) Please submit the applicable information to jennifer.m.hue.civ@us.navy.mil on or before April 17, 2026, 2:00 p.m., Hawaii Standard Time (HST).

(1) Current DBIDS. If an interested attendee has current DBIDS credentials for the specific base where the project is located (for MCBCB, DBIDS issued by MCBCB VCC), submit the following:

a. MCBCB VCC BASE ACCESS REQUEST FORMS: Please ensure to read through the Cover Sheet Requirements for MCBCB Base Access Requests and Frequently Asked Questions. Provide the completed Base Access Request, Memorandum, and Company Letterhead Template (Government to complete the Sponsor information). Company Letterhead Template: One letter required per company. List attendees in alphabetical order (by last name) and indicate each attendees' NCAC number. Must be signed by a person authorized to provide the certification required.

b. CAMERA PASS REQUEST: Applicable only for those with DBIDS credentials who will be taking photos. DBIDS number is required on the form and submit to the POC in paragraph (c) for approval.

The completed MCBCB VCC Base Access Request Forms and Camera Pass Request (if applicable) will be returned once approved.

The MCBCB VCC Base Access Request Forms may be emailed to the MCBCB VCC at mcb_camp_blaz_vcc@usmc.mil. Attendees should carry a printed copy of all approved documents during the site visit.

(2) No DBIDS Credentials (including DBIDS for other locations or issued by other than MCBCB VCC). S ubmit the following:

a. MCBCB VCC BASE ACCESS REQUEST FORMS: Please ensure to read through the Cover Sheet Requirements for MCBCB Base Access Requests and Frequently Asked Questions. Provide the completed Base Access Request, Memorandum, and Company Letterhead Template (Government to complete the Sponsor information). Company Letterhead Template: One letter required per company. List attendees in alphabetical order (by last name) and indicate each attendees' NCAC number. Must be signed by a person authorized to provide the certification required.

b. SECNAV 5512/1 FORM: Each attendee shall read, complete, and sign/date form. Typewritten is preferred. Any handwritten forms MUST be legible. Do not submit the SECNAV 5512/1 form to the Government. The Contractor is responsible for either hand-carrying or emailing this document to the MCBCB VCC along with any other pertinent document listed in this subparagraph.

c. NAVAL BASE GUAM FOREIGN NATIONAL BASE ACCESS REQUEST FORM (Applicable to foreign nationals only). Each attendee please read and complete.

d. FN BIOMETRIC DATA FORM (Applicable to foreign nationals only): Each attendee please read and complete.

Upon review by the Government, the completed MCBCB VCC Base Access Request Forms will be returned to the company point of contact. Each attendee without MCBCB DBIDS credentials will have to present the completed forms in person to the MCBCB VCC to get photographed and fingerprinted. If submitting three or less requests, the documents may be emailed to the MCBCB VCC at mcb_camp_blaz_vcc@usmc.mil. The processing of the forms by VCC may take , therefore, it is the attendees' responsibility 30 days to ensure sufficient time is allowed prior to the date of the site visit. Do NOT expect VCC to expeditiously process the forms.

e. CAMERA PASS REQUEST: Applicable only for those with DBIDS credentials who will be taking photos. Once you have a routing number from the VCC for your DBIDS application, insert that number on the form and submit to the POC in paragraph (c) for approval.

The Camera Pass Request (if applicable) will be returned once approved. Attendees should carry a printed copy of all approved documents during the site visit.

(d) Sufficient processing time is required. Consequently, if submission of forms is received after the specified due date and time, attendees may not be approved to attend the site visit.

(e) The furnishing of the above information, including your Social Security Number, is voluntary. However, your failure to furnish all or part of the information request may result in the Government's denial of access to the jobsite. Any of the above information furnished by you and protected under the Privacy Act shall not be released unless permitted by law and/or you have consented to such release.

(f) Due to limited parking, it is recommended that contractors carpool. Also, as the project site is an active construction site, ALL ATTENDEES MUST WEAR PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (I.E., HARD HAT, REFLECTIVE VEST, PROTECTIVE GLASSES, AND HARD SOLE, STEEL TOED BOOTS).

1.2 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

a. PRICE PROPOSAL (PAPER): An original paper and one (1) paper copy of the price proposal shall be submitted on June 16, in a sealed envelope and marked in the bottom right corner "PRICE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER RFP2026, 2:00 p.m., H.S.T.

N62742-26-R-1306 - DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM." The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) Manually (wet signature) signed and completed SF 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award)(NOTE: SF1442 Block 14 shall include the offeror's name and exactly as shown in the System for Award Management registration. Ifphysical address is different from , both addresses may be shown in Block 14, however both addresses shall mailing address physical address be EXACTLY as shown in SAM)

(2) Signed and completed Bid Guarantee

(3) Completed Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications. Also, see FAR 52.204-7, SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT-REGISTRATION and DFARS 252.204-7998, ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS in Section 00 70 00.

(4) Completed DFARS 252.236-7010, OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION - PREFERENCE FOR UNITED

STATES FIRMS

(5) Information required by paragraph 1.6, Pre-Award Survey/Responsibility Determination

(6) Information required by paragraph 1.7, Partnerships, Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), Limited Partnerships (LP), Etc.

(7) Information required by paragraph 1.9, Complementary Pricing Information

(8) Information required by DFARS 252.204-7025 NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS, paragraph (d) in Section 00 70 00.

b. (FACTORS 1, 2 AND 3) (PAPER): An original paper and three (3) paper copies of the technicalTECHNICAL PROPOSAL proposal for Factors 1, 2, and 3 shall be submitted on in a sealed envelope/package/box and markedJune 16, 2026, 2:00 p.m., H.S.T.

in the bottom right corner "TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER RFP N62742-26-R-1306 - DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM." Identify the original proposal as "Original" on the cover of the proposal. The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall be submitted in a three-ring binder with table of contents and tabbed. The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) All information required by Factor 1, Experience

(2) All information required by Factor 2, Past Performance

(3) All information required by Factor 3, Safety

c. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (PAPER): An original paper and one (1) paper copy of the subcontracting plan shall be submitted by in a sealed envelope/package/box and marked in the bottom right corner "SUBCONTRACTINGJune 17, 2026, 2:00 p.m., H.S.T.

PLAN SUBMITTED UNDER RFP N62742-26-R-1306 - DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM." Identify the original proposal as "Original" on the cover of the proposal.

(1) All information required by 1.8, Small Business Subcontracting Plan

d. PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS (ELECTRONIC): An electronic copy of the price and technical proposals shall be submitted in .pdf format on a CD-ROM with the paper copy of the subcontracting plan. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that all original paper and electronic copies are identical. Should there be a discrepancy between the paper and electronic versions, the paper copy shall govern.

e. Proposals shall be submitted as follows:

(1) If sent via U. S. Postal Mail/Express Courier:

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

Construction Contracts Branch (CON33)

258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134

(2) If hand-carried (Delivery hours between 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM, Monday through Friday except Federal Holidays)

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

Construction Contracts Branch (CON33)

4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 (if facing the building office is on the right. DO NOT drop off at the Navy Federal Credit Union)

Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

1.3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

The RFP can be accessed at https://sam.gov. Printed copies of the RFP will not be issued.

1.4 NINSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING QUESTIONS REGARDING SOLICITATIO

Questions regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in in WORD format via electronic mail to Jennifer Hue, jennifer.m.hue.writing civ@us.navy.mil. Questions shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section including paragraph number. Verbal queries will not be entertained. Responses to the questions will be provided in the form of a Notice and posted to the web site https://sam.gov. The Government may not respond to questions submitted less than 10 business days before the proposal receipt due date.

1.5 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will be posted to https://sam.gov. It is highly recommended that firms register on the SAM website as an interested vendor as this will be the only planholder's list available. It is the offeror's responsibility to check the website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.6 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR 9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical proposal evaluation. The following information shall be submitted:

a. The offeror shall submit a document that appoints, in writing, one or more individuals, by name, each of whom will have full and independent authority to bind the offeror with respect to any act connected with this solicitation, including but not limited to: the submission and revisions of a proposal or proposals by the company, the conduct of discussion or negotiations, the submission of a Final Proposal Revision (FPR), and the execution of a contract and associated documents including bonds. Documents of appointment by a supporting resolution of the board of directors in the case of a corporation and by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. If bonds are not signed manually (wet signature), documents of appointment must include specific authorization and corporate approval for the use of electronic and facsimile signatures by the appointed individual(s).

b. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for past three years.

c. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities for each partner.

d. Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies ("LLC's"), limited partnerships ("LTD's") and newly-created corporate subsidiaries) that is the entity liable for the contract ordinarily have no financial capability to support a responsibility determination. In such cases, the offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the offeror for responsibility purposes where the offer submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources. The offeror shall provide a guaranty agreement (See Form DCMA Form 1620 attached) for the contract price.

e. A list of existing commercial and government business commitments to include contract numbers, names of Contracting Officers, telephone numbers, value of contract, completion date and percent complete. If the list of existing commitments is extensive, provide the required information on at least five projects of similar dollar value and a summary of the existing commitments to include number of contracts, total dollar value of all contracts, and total dollar value of work remaining.

f. Copy of the email confirmation of receipt notification of successful submission of the VETS-4212.

g. As a part of the pre-award survey, the contracting officer will verify that the offeror has a current CMMC status posted in the Supplier Performance Risk Assessment (SPRS) at the specified CMMC level or higher required by the solicitation (see DFARS 252.204-7021 Compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements and DFARS 252.204-7025 Notice of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements), prior to award.

The information submitted for the pre-award survey will not be considered in the technical proposal evaluation unless separately submitted pursuant to the technical proposal evaluation factor submission requirements.

1.7 PARTNERSHIPS, JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

(LP), ETC.

Partnerships, Joint Ventures, Limited Liability Companies, Limited Partnerships and Mentor-Protege arrangements shall submit the following documentation regarding their business entities:

a. A copy of the Partnership Agreement, JV Agreement(s), LLC Operating Agreement(s), LP Agreement(s), and/or Mentor-Protege Agreement(s). Contractor shall provide an updated copy whenever any change is made to the agreement.

b. The proposal and each bond or other document submitted by or on behalf of the joint venture shall be executed by each joint venture partner and shall be accompanied by evidence of the authority of the signer. That authority shall be evidenced by a document satisfactory to the Contracting Officer, which would ordinarily be, in the case of a corporate joint venture partner, a certified copy of a resolution of the board of directors, and in the case of an unincorporated joint venture partner, an instrument of similarly binding character duly executed by that entity. If one individual signs for more than one partner, the individual must sign separately for each partner which he or she represents, and must state under each signature the capacity in which he or she is signing (See FAR 4.207).

c. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the Offeror (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

d. Procedures in the event the entity is dissolved.

e. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

(1) The relationship of the partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, control, and the controlling partner's authority to obligate the entity.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

f. Joint Ventures shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

(1) Together with its proposal, each corporate joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its board of directors has approved its participation in the joint venture. Such evidence shall be in the form of a copy of a resolution of the board of directors, certified by the Secretary of the Corporation.

(2) Together with its proposal, each joint venture partner which is an unincorporated entity shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that all persons or entities which must approve decisions affecting the joint venture partner have approved the participation of the joint venture partner in the joint venture.

1.8 SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

a. As stated in Document 00 22 00, paragraph 2.1, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD, this is a lowest priced technically acceptable source selection. Accordingly, small business subcontracting is not included as a technical evaluation factor.

However, large business concerns must submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that addresses the following:

1. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition, the extent of work you will perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a Joint-Venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member, e.g., LB, SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, etc.

2. In accordance with FAR 52.219-9, submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan utilizing the template at the end of this section for this project. To demonstrate commitment in using small business concerns, the Small Business Subcontracting Plan may list all subcontractors by name. If the proposed Small Business Subcontracting goals do not meet the minimum NAVFAC Small Business Subcontracting Targets, include a detailed explanation describing the actions taken to arrive at that determination, along with an explanation for the goals that actually were proposed.

In accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Alternate II, "If the Offeror fails to submit and negotiate a subcontracting plan, the Offeror shall not be eligible for award of a contract."

b. NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition. Offerors shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

WOSB 9%

SDVOSB 5%

c. See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Template) at the end of Section 00 21 16 for format.

1.9 COMPLEMENTARY PRICING INFORMATION

Offeror's are requested to submit the attached Complementary Pricing Information (Template) at the end of Section 00 21 16 with its proposal. The Complementary Pricing Information is for Government information only and will not be used for the Price Evaluation specified in Document 00 22 00.

1.10 BRAND NAME OR EQUAL

(a) If an item in this solicitation is identified as "brand name or equal," the purchase description reflects the characteristics and level of quality that will satisfy the Government's needs. The salient physical, functional, or performance characteristics that "equal" products must meet are specified in the solicitation.

(b) To be considered for award, offers of "equal" products, including "equal" products of the brand name manufacturer, must--

(1) Meet the salient physical, functional, or performance characteristic specified in this solicitation;

(2) Clearly identify the item by--

(i) Brand name, if any; and

(ii) Make or model number;

(3) Include descriptive literature such as illustrations, drawings, or a clear reference to previously furnished descriptive data or information available to the Contracting Officer; and

(4) Clearly describe any modification the offeror plans to make in a product to make it conform to the solicitation requirements.

Mark any descriptive material to clearly show the modification.

(c) The Contracting Officer will evaluate "equal" products on the basis of information furnished by the offeror or identified in the offer and reasonably available to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or obtaining any information not identified in the offer.

(d) Unless the offeror clearly indicates in its offer that the product being offered is an "equal" product, the offeror shall provide the brand name product referenced in the solicitation.

TERRITORY OF GUAM NOTICE CONCERNING TAXES, LICENSES, WITHHOLDINGS1.11

(NOTE: The information in this Instructions to Proposers is provided by the Government of Guam, Department of Revenue and Taxation. Any questions concerning applicability or interpretation should be directed to that Agency at physical address: 1240 Army Drive, Barrigada, Guam, 96913; mailing address: Department of Revenue & Taxation, Taxpayer Services Division, PO Box 23607, Barrigada, Guam 96921; or by phone at (671) 635-1835. Business registration with the Government of Guam is not considered in determining contractor responsiveness or responsibility. Offerors attention is directed to the Clause in the solicitation entitled

"PERMITS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.")(FAR 52.236-7).

1. All persons engaging in business in Guam must be licensed to do so by the Government of Guam prior to commencement of business in Guam. Engaging in business includes, but is not limited to, services provided by contractors. Applications for business licenses shall be made to the Department of Revenue and Taxation, License and Registration Branch.

2. All corporations, domestic (created under the laws of Guam) or foreign (not created under the laws of Guam) must register with the Department of Revenue and Taxation, License and Registration Branch.

3. Any person engaging in business on Guam must file monthly Business Privilege Tax returns with the Department of Revenue and Taxation.

4. All corporations with the Guam source of funds must file income tax returns to the Department of Revenue and Taxation on the prescribed forms.

5. All employers must deposit wage withholdings from their employees to the Treasurer of Guam. Guam Depository Receipts, as well as Quarterly Withholding Statements are required to be filed with the Department of Revenue and Taxation in the same manner as similar returns and statements required to be filed with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

6. Failure to comply with the above may result in criminal or civil penalties as provided by law.

GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN OBSERVERS1.12

Offerors are advised that officials of the Government of Japan (GOJ) will be observing the source selection process, the evaluation of proposals, and the review of other documentation. Accordingly, submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation will be considered evidence of your consent and permission for the Contracting Officer to reveal your proposal and related submissions to participating GOJ officials (who will, in turn, sign Non-Disclosure Statements that will be retained in the contract files).

ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS1.13

The Government may consider Requests for Information (RFI) concerning the acceptability of alternative materials (e.g., substitution of Japan Industrial Standard (JIS) materials for ASTM standard materials). Government consideration of alternative materials is contingent on the RFI clearly demonstrating (1) benefit to the Government, (2) equivalent or better quality, and (3) compatibility with overall contract intent, operational requirements, and sustainment requirements. Backup information must be provided that identify and address the specific differences between the proposed alternative material, and the referenced standard required by the contract. Refer to paragraph 1.4, Instructions for Submitting Questions Regarding Solicitation.

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

DOCUMENT 00 22 00

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

1.2 COMPETITIVE RANGE

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS / RATING SCHEME

2.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 PRICE EVALUATION

2.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

2.4 RATING SCHEME

ATTACHMENTS

(A) Construction Experience Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR

15.306 (a)). Therefore, the initial proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements and should contain the best offer from a technical and price standpoint.

Only the three (3) lowest-priced proposals will be evaluated for fair and reasonable pricing and technical acceptability. If none of the three (3) lowest-priced proposals are found to be technically acceptable, then the next three (3) lowest-priced proposals will be evaluated for fair and reasonable pricing and technical acceptability. If none of the six (6) lowest priced proposals are found to be technically acceptable, then all remaining proposals will be evaluated for fair and reasonable pricing and technical acceptability.

The Government intends to select the lowest reasonably priced technically acceptable offer and award a contract (within the funds available) without conducting discussions.

1.2 COMPETITIVE RANGE

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer may conduct discussions with Offerors determined to be in the competitive range. The Government may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the most highly rated. If the Contracting Officer determines the number of proposals in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of a contract. The awardee's proposal will be incorporated into the contract and all items proposed will become binding requirements of the contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., subcontractors with teaming agreements, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions must be equal or better and will require prior approval by the Contracting Officer.

PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS / RATING SCHEME

2.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

The contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to that responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the lowest evaluated price of proposals (within the funds available) meeting the acceptability standards for the technical evaluation factors. An overall technical factor rating must be at least "ACCEPTABLE" in order to be considered for award. An "UNACCEPTABLE" rating in any factor will result in the overall technical proposal being rated "UNACCEPTABLE" unless corrected through discussions. An overall technical rating of "UNACCEPTABLE" will make a proposal ineligible for award.

2.2 PRICE EVALUATION

a. One or more of the following techniques may be used to evaluate the total evaluated price to ensure that it is fair and reasonable:

- Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation

- Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Estimate

2.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The following evaluation factors shall be used to evaluate the technical proposals.

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 3: SAFETY

FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall complete the attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) for each project submitted and complete all individual blocks. Attachment A and all information therein is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to evaluate experience. The Government will evaluate only the information provided in Attachment A and all other information provided on other than Attachment A will not be considered. The Offeror may expand individual blocks on the Attachment A; however, Attachment A for each project submitted shall not exceed a total of four (4) single-sided pages [or, two (2) double-sided pages], 8.5" x 11", 1" margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. Information exceeding the four (4) single-sided pages [or two (2) double-sided pages] will not be evaluated. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

Submit a of three (3) construction projects that best demonstrates the Offeror's experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to maximum the types of projects described below. If the Offeror submits more than three (3) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three

(3) projects submitted and disregard any other project information after the first three (3).

RELEVANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant construction project is defined as new construction of a multi-story administrative, office, training, or communications facility consisting of cast-in-place reinforced concrete building structure of approximately $30 million or more in dollar value and completed or substantially completed no earlier than ten

(10) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Building repair, renovation, conversion, and addition work will not be considered as a relevant project.

NOTES:

1. "Substantially completed" is defined as at least 90% physical completion.

2. A relevant construction project is further defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

3. There is a clear distinction between "experience" and "past performance". Experience is related to the types and amounts of projects previously accomplished. Past performance relates to how well a contractor has performed.

4. The "Offeror" is defined as the exact name in Block 14 of the Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF1442). If the Offeror is utilizing experience and past performance information of any entity other than (1) the Offeror; (2) if the Offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and

, the Offeror shall provide in severally liable for the contract; or (3) a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is now part of the Offeror its proposal a fully-executed teaming agreement or other contractual agreement. The teaming agreement or other contractual agreement shall, at a minimum, (1) be signed by the Offeror and the other entity, (2) specifically reference this solicitation/contract, and (3) specify the work to be performed by the other entity such that it is clear that the other entity will be meaningfully involved in this contract. For item (3), clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the other entity in terms of the work it will specifically perform or manage in the performance of the contract at the worksite. Note that generalized statements concerning commitment of resources are not sufficient to demonstrate that an entity will be meaningfully involved in the performance of the contract. Examples of "generalized statements" include a commitment of resources merely based on an entity's "access to resources and other generalized statements such as an entity will "provide support and expertise on the project." The" government will only consider information provided in the teaming agreement for the purpose of determining whether the Offeror has clearly demonstrated that any entity (other than the Offeror and, if the offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract) will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. For experience and past performance information of a firm that has been acquired and is no longer a separate legal entity, provide an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate 1) that the predecessor firm is now part of the entity identified in Block 1 of Attachment A, and 2) that entity currently possesses assets and personnel from the predecessor firm sufficient for the predecessor firm's experience and past performance to be reasonably predictive of the entity's performance on this contract.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation and acceptability include the Offeror's demonstrated experience in performing a minimum of one (1) relevant construction project as defined in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements.

FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1. If a completed CPARS or CCASS evaluation is not available, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) shall be completed and signed by the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration. A PPQ shall not be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. The Offeror shall provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offerors may submit PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

1. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government's inability to contact any of the Offeror's references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government's evaluation of this factor. In addition, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the CPARS using all UEI/CAGE numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

2. Performance awards, letter of appreciation, certificates, or additional information submitted will not be considered.

3. See Notes for Factor 1.

The Offeror's past performance will be evaluated on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 - Experience and past performance on other relevant construction projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government may consider information in the Offeror's proposal as well as information gathered from other sources including former customers, Government agencies, Federal databases and other references. The information provided by the Offeror may provide the major portion of the information used in the Government's evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources (such as those listed in the submittal requirements) to assess past performance information.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, and the context of the data in the Offeror's performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer's responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror's past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror's probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance. The Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown past performance shall be considered "acceptable".

The basis of evaluation will consider the Offeror's performance record that demonstrates the Offeror's ability to successfully perform the required effort or the Offeror's performance record is unknown or neutral. See also paragraph 2.4 below.

Factor 3 - Safety

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates and Total Case Rates (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described below. For a partnership, joint venture, and LLC the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR rates for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture/LLC; however, only one safety narrative is required. Offerors must provide an explanation for any rates higher than 2.99 (DART) and/or 4.49 (TCR) and the actions taken to prevent future occurrences. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

1. If Offeror does not have OSHA DART or TCR rates, they must submit equivalent DART and TCR rates by utilizing the OSHA formulas shown below.

2. DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

MISHAP RATES

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous, complete calendar years' [2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Number of DART Cases x 200,000

DART RATE =

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous, complete calendar years' [2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. TCR incidents include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000

TCR RATE =

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

TECHNICAL APPROACH NARRATIVE

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror's approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor's safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describe a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

4. There is no page limitation to address the Mishap Rates section above. The narrative to address the Technical Approach to Safety above shall not exceed two (2) pages, single-sided, 8.5" x 11", 1" margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. Narrative pages shall contain the page number.

5. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. To meet the minimum requirements, the Offeror must demonstrate the following:

1. DART rates at or below 2.99

2. TCR Rates at or below 4.49

The basis of evaluation and acceptability are DART rates of 2.99 or less for five previous calendar years (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021); TCR rates of 4.49 or less for the five previous calendar years (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021); and an acceptable Technical Approach to Safety as defined in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements for Factor 3 and Paragraph 2.4 below.

NOTE: If the Offeror's rates exceed 2.99 (DART) and/or 4.49 (TCR) for any of the five calendar years, or the Offeror fails to provide acceptable explanations for any rates that exceed these levels and the action(s) taken to correct or prevent any safety issues, this will result in a deficiency.

2.4 RATING SCHEME

The following information is pertinent to the rating of the technical proposals:

(a) Deficiency: A material failure of the proposal to meet a Government requirement.

(b) If the proposal contains an rating for any of the Factors, the overall rating of the technical proposal will be ""UNACCEPTABLE" An overall technical rating of "UNACCEPTABLE makes a proposal ineligible for award.UNACCEPTABLE".

FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE AND FACTOR 3 - SAFETY

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

A C C E P T A B L E

Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown.

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown or neutral past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability neutral shall be considered "acceptable."

U N A C C E P T A B L E

Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

JFY 2022 PROJECT J-875, BATTLE STAFF TRAINING FACILITY, WON 1696746

U.S. NAVSUPPACT MCB CAMP BLAZ, GUAM

RFP N62742-26-R-1306

DOCUMENT 00 22 00 – ATTACHMENT A

Amendment No. 0001

ATTACHMENT A

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3

1. Name of Entity that Performed Project: _________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: __________________________________ SAM UEI: ________________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________________ Contact Phone Number: _____________________

a. If the Entity (named above) that performed the project has been acquired and is no longer a separate legal entity, provide the name of the Acquiring Firm and an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate 1) that the Entity is now part of the Acquiring Firm, and 2) that the Acquiring Firm currently possesses…