26-1306 Note 2.pdf
PDF 211 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JFY 2022 PROJECT J-875, BATTLE STAFF TRAINING FACILITY, U. S. NAVSUPPACT MCB CAMP BLAZ, GUAM
- Solicitation number
- N62742-26-R-1306
About this file
This document is a Pre-Proposal Questions & Answers notice for RFP N62742-26-R-1306 issued by the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific on April 29, 2026.
The notice addresses clarifications regarding technical specifications and evaluation criteria for the JFY 2022 Project J-875, Battle Staff Training Facility at U.S. NAVSUPPACT MCB Camp Blaz, Guam. Key answers include: (1) Specification Section 01 57 19.03 20 regarding MEC/UXO requirements will be replaced with Section 01 57 19.03 21 in a forthcoming amendment; (2) Section 03 42 13.00 10 will be revised to delete the requirement for epoxy-coated reinforcing in precast concrete products, as the project site is above the water table and local manufacturers do not provide such materials; (3) contractors requesting relevant project experience will be evaluated based on projects demonstrating similar size, scope, and complexity rather than a strict $30 million threshold, with the Government evaluating projects the offeror believes best demonstrates their qualifications; and (4) proposal submission instructions remain unchanged, requiring physical hard copies with wet signatures rather than permitting initial electronic submission via PIEE followed by hard copies within five business days.
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP N62742-26-R-1306
Notice No. 2
April 29, 2026
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
JFY 2022 PROJECT J-875, BATTLE STAFF TRAINING FACILITY,
U.S. NAVSUPPACT MCB CAMP BLAZ, GUAM
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
REVISED RESPONSE FROM NOTICE 1:
1. Reference: Spec Section 01 57 19.03 20
MEC / UXO Requirements. Spec section 01 57 19.03 20 is included in the RFP, which to our understanding is outdated. Please advise if Spec Section 01 57 19.03 21 “Supplemental Temporary Environmental Controls – Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Explosive Safety Risk Acceptance Within Joint Region Marianas” would apply to this project, and if so, provide revised spec section for the J-875 project. (See attached from P-678 as reference).
RFI No. 01_01 57
19.03 21 P-678 Supp
ANSWER: Section 01 57 19.03 20 will be replaced with Section 01 57 19.03 21 in a forthcoming amendment.
2. Reference: Spec Section 03 42 13.00 10
Plant Precast Concrete Products - Reinforcment. Spec section 03 42 13.00 10 includes reference ASTM listings for epoxy coated reinforcing bars and steel wire and welded wire reinforcement.
As the project site is well above the water table, and local precast manufacturers do not provide epoxy coated reinforcement in their products, we interpret that the epoxy coated reinforcement in not intended for this project.
Please confirm that if epoxy coated reinforcement is not specifically called out for in the product detail in the drawings, it is not required.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDER
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DRIVE SUITE 100
PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134
ANSWER: Section 03 42 13.00 10 will be revised to delete the requirement for epoxy-coated reinforcing, in a forthcoming amendment.
5. Reference: Factor 1: Experience
RELEVANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant construction project is defined as new construction of a multi-story administrative, office, training, or communications facility consisting of cast-in-place reinforced concrete building structure of approximately $30 million or more in dollar value and completed or substantially completed no earlier than ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Building repair, renovation, conversion, and addition work will not be considered as a relevant project.
Question: The contractor requests clarification on whether the Government will consider construction projects in the $20 million range as meeting the definition of a relevant construction project in lieu of the stated $30 million threshold.
ANSWER: The Government will evaluate relevant experience in accordance with the established criteria defined in the solicitation. Offerors are required to submit projects that they believe best demonstrate their experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the type of project defined in the solicitation.
NOTICE NO. 2:
7. Reference: Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers (incl. AMD001), paragraph 1.2
Will the Government please consider revising the instructions to allow for the use of PIEE for the initial proposal volumes followed by physical hard copies with wet signatures within 5 business days via courier or hand delivery?
ANSWER: The solicitation remains unchanged.
End of Notice
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .