24R2862 Amendment 0011.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 14

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-FEB-2025

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N40085-24-R-2862

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/17/24

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT /ORDER NO.

10B. DAT ED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT

TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N4008524R2862 P909 SOF SDVT2 OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, JEB LITTLE CREEK-FORT STORY, VIRGINIA

BEACH, VIRGINIA

Contract POC: Demetrice Jenkins, demetrice.jenkins2.civ@us.navy.mil

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 11/16) APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84 Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40085-24-R-2862

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0011

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Extension of the proposal due date

2. Updates to General Requirements

3. 1704761 Continuation Sheet to update drawing information

4. Provide PPI Responses

5. V_Secured Area Second Floor (attached separately)

6. W_Little Creek Oneline (attached separately)

7. Section 01 14 00 R0824 (attached separately)

1. The proposal due date is extended from 14 February 2025 to 18 March 2025 at 02:00PM EST.

2. Updates to General Requirements-

The following sections have been updated:

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs): Offerors who determine that the technical and or contractual requirements of this

RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing. All inquiries shall be submitted via email to Demetrice Jenkins at demetrice.jenkins2.civ@us.navy.mil no later than, fourteen (14) calendar days prior to proposal due date. Additionally, all inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form (Attachment C). Do not submit the same inquiry more than once. Please verify that inquiries submitted by you on behalf of your subcontractors are not duplicates. A response will be published via an amendment by email to MACC holders.

Non-cost/Price Evaluation Factors

Factor 1 – Technical Solution:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a narrative work plan and summary level schedule to describe your approach to managing the project and ensuring adherence to the project schedule. Both the schedule and narrative must address the execution of the base work as identified in the RFP. The narrative shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Up to eight (8) drawings on 11”x17” paper can be provided to supplement the narrative and will not count towards the page limit. There is no page limit on the summary level schedule but must be provided on 11”x17” paper.

The schedule shall be based on a contract award date of 1 May 2025. This date is for proposal purposes only and is not intended to indicate an anticipated/planned award date. NOTE: If a realistic duration shorter than specified in the RFP is proposed, the proposed duration will be incorporated into the resultant contract.

Price

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Following paragraph is deleted in its entirety

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT - This project is considered a “Large-scale Construction Project” as defined in FAR 22.502. Accordingly, the requirements of FAR Subpart 22.5 will apply. The Offeror shall submit a signed Project Labor Agreement (signed by both the Contractor and the Labor Organization) with their Price

Proposal submission, in accordance with FAR Provision 52.222-33 and FAR Clause 52.222-34. Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and 52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award.

3. Continuation Sheet

RFP: RFP - PART 6, ATTACHMENTS

ADD “V – Secured Area Second Floor”.

RFP - PART 6, ATTACHMENTS

ADD “W – Little Creek Oneline”.

4. Provide responses to the following PPI’s: 253, 299, 313, 441, 459, 462, 505, 543, 569, 575, 587, 633, 635, 642, 644-679

PPI#

Reference Question Response

Page Section

Paragrap h

253 428 Att. A, Part 3, Ch. 2

2.3.3 RFP, Att. A, Part 3, section 2.3.3 states

"NAVFAC

High Performance and Sustainable Building C hecklist - GOALS" is attached; no such attachment was included. Please provide this attachment.

See Amendment 0008 and associated

Continuation Sheet.

299 427 Part 3

Project

Descripti on

3.2.3 RFP states "Bldg 3884 is to be demolished

and all electrical utilities rerun through a pad mounted switch station." Please confirm the following:

a) Is the intent to pull utility circuit back to manhole adjacent to Bldg 3884, intercept and extend to new Switch?

b) This referenced switch is one of the two referenced in G401003.

Yes, provide a new switch and manhole.

313 816 D503005 Infrastructure Only Vs Fully Functional

Electronic Security Confirmation

Please confirm if infrastructure only or a fully functional electronic security system is to be provided.

A fully functional ESS shall be provided.

441 3 Part 3

Chapter

6 / ESR

D40

D4020 Per UFC 3-600-01 the DFPE must determine if a Reliable Power Source is available to the

Installation or Facility in the planning stages of the project in order to ensure that the cost and space associated with secondary power is considered and included in the project.

Confirm if the base power is considered reliable and secondary power to the fire pump is not required.

The power is reliable, therefore secondary power source is NOT required.

459 442, CS102

Part 3, Chapter

3.2.4 3.2.4 Site Layout states

"Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west side of the building (100 ft. by 13

0 ft.)". Part 6 CS102 SITE PLAN shows this area located to the east of the building adjacent to Intercove Road. Please confirm the conceptual site layout on CS102 supersedes the description in Chapter 3.

Desired layout is to be on the east side of the building. Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match BFR laydown requirement of

3239 SY for the laydown area. (See amendment 0005) The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydown areas to accommodate the site.

Attachment A is provided for conceptual reference only. Designer of Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the RFP and UFC requirements. ***Update*** - min.

requirement for the laydown area has been updated to 1670 SY, see

Amendment 0008.

462 555 of

Part 3, Chapter

P101 P101 - Individual Storage Cages (Men's), Uniformat line item C102090 Interior

Specialty Doors indicates these are sliding caged doors at fenced partition wall providing access to Corridor #G105. Please clarify/confirm the following:

a) What is the material for these sliding cage doors, i.e. are they chain link or steel mesh?

b) These sliding caged doors are required to be stainless steel, including appurtenant fasteners and accessories, per ESR C101001

c) Confirm it is Type 304 Stainless Steel.

Follow re-issued Room Requirements

Sheets in Amendment 0006. Cages are

8' high, wire mesh with wire mesh lid;

they should have sliding doors that can accommodate a hasp lock.

505 9 Part 3 Ch

3.2.4 3.2.4 Site Layout directs the Contractor to

"Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west side of the building (100 ft. by 130 ft.)." Please clarify that the desired layout area is to be located on the east side of the building in accordance with the Attachment A - Site Plan and Bubble

Diagram.

Desired layout is to be on the east side of the building. Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match BFR laydown requirement of

3239 SY for the laydown area. (See amendment 5) The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydown areas to accommodate the site.

Attachment A is provided for conceptual reference only. Designer of Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the RFP and UFC requirements. ***Update*** - min.

requirement for the laydown area has been updated to 1670 SY, see amendment 008.

543 3 Part 3 -

Ch

3/ESR

G10

G102001 G102001 BUILDING MASS DEMOLITION

says

Building 3814 will not be demolished until 10

0% of DDS operations can be successfully mo ved to P907. Please provide expected date to plan when Building 3814 can be demolished.

Building is scheduled to be completed in the Spring of 2025.

569 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

Please confirm that no lighting poles, fencing, or existing utilities are required to be relocated as a part of the Intercove Road extension.

Existing Utilities, services, including lights and fencing may need to be relocated as a part of the Intercove road extension.

575 Addendu m 6 PPI

Several previous RFIs in Addendum #6 have an answer of “This extends to all areas of the project” and seem to not the answer that would apply to the questions. This appears on

RFIs 248, 249, 255, 259, 260, 261, 263, 266, 267, 268, 269, 273, 274, 275, 276, 278, 279, 280, 285, 317, 338, 361, and 362. Please clarify the meaning of “This extends to all areas of the project”.

248:No additional camera required other than exterior and two interior cameras. Coordinate with SSM.

249: Provide IDS to cover all secure spaces and telecom room/closet, medical office rooms, and all entry points.

255: See amendment 0011, continuation sheet. Yes, eight drawings are allowable.

285: The estimated heat load per server to be 7000BTU/hr. Provide

HVAC cooling and humidity control per UFC 3-580-01

263: The building is outside of the blast arc.

266: Raised access flooring is not used on this project.

267: See the revised Space Tabulation and Room Requirements provided in

Amendment 0006. Note: Subsequent

Amendments after 0006 may contain pertinent information. Contractor is advised to review these as well.

268: See the revised Space Tabulation and Room Requirements provided in

Amendment 0006. Note: Subsequent

Amendments after 0006 may contain pertinent information. Contractor is advised to review these as well. Yes, post-award discussion shall occur to comply with the maximum allowed square footage of 60,000.

269: Bubble diagrams are for spatial adjacencies. The selected DOR shall provide a solution to meet all applicable codes. Provide bids per the pertinent bid schedule.

273/274: Follow STC ratings as indicated on the Amendment 0006

Room Requirements and subsequent

Amendment updates.

275: Design Team is to apply all applicable UFC's to design these spaces.

276: The WBDG website is currently available

278: Offerors shall provide solutions that comply with all pertinent codes and regulations.

279: Floor outlets are not permitted.

280: The door provides access thru the vestibule (X201) to secure corridor

G210

285: This is a design requirement which the Contactors DOR will be responsible to determine.

317: Correct, the Socrates network drops will be routed to the SIPR racks

338: Comply with the RFP requirement. Additional discussion can be had post-award.

361: See amendment Room

Requirement sheet per Amendment

0006.

362: Provide a total of 37 showers.

One shower needs to be ABA

Accessible.

587 1 Part 3, Chapter

F10 F10 System Description, second paragraph references Secure Room Checklist, Traditional Security Checklist, Open Storage

Checklist and Security Technical Information

Guide included in RFP Part 6 attachments.

These documents cannot be located within the

RFP criteria provided. For bidding purposes, please provide these documents to assist with secure construction requirements.

Amendment 0008 Drawings have provided the information needed for the facility secure perimeter.

633 Amend

Revised

Room

Require ments

Sheets

Please confirm the size of a standard open office “desk”.

Furniture sizes will vary based on space availability and desired occupant load.

635 N/A Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

N/A Review and assessment of changes included with the Amendment 0006 4.1 Space

Tabulation and Chapter 5 Room Requirements has revealed that many second-floor spaces will not accommodate the Room Requirement

FF&E while maintaining ABA accessible maneuvering clearances at swing doors and circulation within the space. Please confirm that Offerors are to base conceptual designs on the 4.1 Space Tabulation stated net square footage for all spaces and that adjustments to program square footage and/or FF&E will be addressed during the post award concept design workshop to resolve discrepancies.

Discrepancies should be discussed and worked out at the CDW. The overall building SF cannot increase.

642 418 Att. A, Part 3, Ch. 1

1 PPI #254 was specifically asking about any applicable Facilities Criteria (FC). Is this referring to FC 1-300-09N and FC 4-171-06n?

These are the only FCs listed on WBDG which appear to be an applicable. Please identify any other applicable FCs.

Applicable criteria are defined in the

Whole Building Design Guide and in the RFP.

644 Amd 7 p9

Amd 5 p 1918

Amendm ent 7

3_site_an alysis.pdf

Amendm ent 5

Attach H

– Enviro

Supp

Doc

3.2.4 Part 3 Chapter 3 SITE ANALYSIS 3.2.4 SITE

LAYOUT replaced the 100ft by 130ft heavy duty concrete laydown area east of the building (East per the RFP Attachment A

Bubble Diagram and confirmed via PPI responses 459 and 505) with new laydown criteria of "min. requirement 3239 SY". This represents an increase of approximately 225% over the 13,000SF laydown area previously indicated. In order to accommodate this increase the new building will need to shift west approximately 130', which will place almost half of the structure within both blast arcs indicated in Part Six Attachment H -

Environmental Supporting Documentation and contrary to Part 3 Chapter 2 2.3.1.6 which states "the design of the inhabited building should avoid this area".

Please confirm that the Offeror may adjust relationships shown in the Part Six -

Attachment A, Bubble Diagram and the RFP conceptual site plans as necessary to accommodate the increased laydown area while ensuring the building remains outside of the blast arcs shown in Part Six Attachment H.

See Amendment 0008, Minimum requirement for laydown area has been adjusted to 1670 SY.

645 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 (Pg. 9)

N/A RF Shielding requirements apply to the entire building secured perimeter in addition to the

Administrative Area perimeter. The bubble diagram only shows a red dashed circle depicting a "secured area". Please clarify what other secured spaces and RF shielding requirements are required at the

"Administrative Area perimeter".

Provide shielding where indicated on the bubble diagrams.

646 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 (Pg. 9)

N/A Requirements indicate that RF film is required on standard windows if the built window system provides equivalent RF shielding.

Please specify to what performance level the

RF film will be required to meet.

No windows in the exterior building enclosure for spaces within the commissioned SAA.

647 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 ESR

F10 (Pg.

8)

N/A Windows section says no windows will be implemented in the exterior building enclosure for spaces existing within the commissioned SAA. Please confirm that there will be no RF film required for windows, and there will be no window assemblies required to meet any level of RF shielding performance.

No windows in the exterior building enclosure for spaces within the commissioned SAA.

648 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 (Pg. 9)

N/A RF Shielding section says "Foil-backed gypsum board will not be allowed system for

RF Shielding." Part 3 Chapter 1 specifies that floors, walls, and roof/ceilings be constructed to meet ICD/ICS 705 requirements. In some cases according to the Room Data Sheets, ICD/ICS 705 wall type A is specified. Typical wall construction per ICD 705 specifies RF shielding between two layers of gypsum wall board. Please confirm that this is acceptable, and not the same system as foil-backed gypsum board.

As indicated in the referenced standards.

649 N/A Part 3, 2 (Pg. 7)

N/A 2.3.2.7 Radio Frequency Shielding

Mitigations requires the Secured Annex Area to be approved and Accredited, built to meet

ICD/ICS 705. Please confirm that the SAA will only be testing according to adherance to typical wall type A in ICD 705. There are multiple points of failure in this RF system design and it will not meet a specific performance threshold.

Due to the critical nature of the functional requirements meeting or exceeding the minimum RF/ EM barrier requirements of this project, the DOR must hire a Radio Frequency

Barrier Design Specialist to inform, guide and QA/QC the design and construction of this facility. The

Specialist shall be a part of the A/E design team and be involved in the project from start to finish. Testing requirements and parameters shall be defined by the DOR and the Security

Officer/Customer. The criteria will inform the development and completion of Specification 13 49

20.00 10 RFI /EMI Shielding.

650 N/A Part 3, Chapter

2 (Pg. 7)

N/A Please provide Part 5, Section 13 49 20.00 10 Section 13 49 20.00 10 will be provided by A/E 2 and his RF shielding specialist. Frequencies and

STC shielding requirements will need to be discussed with the Security

Officer.

651 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 ESR

F10 (Pg.

7/12)

N/A Testing section requires systems and construction to be tested by government employees per the regulating documents.

Please clarify what form of testing will be required, and if Contractor will be required to bear the costs of testing in the CAA or SAA.

Testing parameters will be further defined during the Charette and design effort with the customer and security officer. The DOR must hire a Radio

Frequency Barrier Design Specialist to inform, guide and QA/QC the design and construction of this facility. The

Specialist shall be a part of the A/E design team and be involved in the project from start to finish

652 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 ESR

F10 (Pg.

12)

N/A Given that there are multiple places in the documents referring to constructing the SAA according to ICD/ICS 705, please clarify the method the government plans to use for accrediting the secured area. If the accreditation process will involve part 2 or part 3 testing that includes requirements for the SAA to perform to a certain decibel and frequency standard, then constructing the

SAA according to typical wall construction details in the ICD 705, with the means and methods outlined in Part 3 Chapter 6 - RF

Shielding, will not meet any performance standard without significant deviation to the secure boundary design.

The DOR must hire a Radio

Frequency Barrier Design Specialist to inform, guide and QA/QC the design and construction of this facility. The

Specialist shall be a part of the A/E design team and be involved in the project from start to finish.

653 N/A Part 3, Chapter

6 ESR

F10

N/A Will the accreditation process for the SAA involve only part 1 testing that includes visual/photographic documentation of adherence to the ICD/ICS 705 construction means and methods, or will it include testing the facility to meet a specific level of RF protection and decibel/frequency performance?

The DOR must hire a Radio

Frequency Barrier Design Specialist to inform, guide and QA/QC the design and construction of this facility. The

Specialist shall be a part of the A/E design team and be involved in the project from start to finish. Specific testing and requirements shall be defined by the security officer and

DOR and as will be the development of Specification 13 49 20.00 10 RFI

/EMI Shielding.

654 N/A Part 3, F101001

N/A Metal Building Systems (Pre-engineered) section says "not used". Please clarify whether a pre-engineered metal building will be an acceptable structure for this facility.

A pre-engineered metal building is not acceptable.

655 N/A Amend

0007, RFI #436

N/A Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework

Confirmation

The response to RFI #436 states UFGS 25 08

11.00 20 Risk Management Framework

(RMF) for Facility-Related Control Systems

(FRCS) is to be incorporated into this design unless otherwise indicated in writing from the

Government.

This will have a significant impact on the cost.

The industry typically sets at least $250,000 per FRCS to cover RMF, but this number has not been validated by the industry. RFI #432 confirmed four FRCS are applicable to the project.

UFGS 25 08 11 designer notes states to only use this specification on control systems which are obtaining a new Authority to

Operate (ATO). The Little Creek base has existing FRCS (building control systems, fire and life safety systems, etc.) that are currently operating and thus existing ATOs have to be present. The P909 building FRCS would operate under the existing ATOs.

Question: Please confirm RMF is required and bidders should set $250,000 for each of the four FRCS ($1M), or please confirm RMF is not required.

"UFGS 25 08 11.00 20 is to be incorporated into this design unless otherwise indicated in writing from the government."

656 N/A Amend

0007, RFI #324

N/A Demolition of Communications Utility Lines

Follow Up

RFI #324 requested additional information on demolition scope for existing telecom lines.

The response to RFI #324 states to see

Amendment 0006, Attachment U

Telecommunication Connection Point. This attachment only shows the point of connection

Handhole 53 and does not clarify the demolition scope.

Question: Please clarify the telecommunications demolition scope for bidding purposes.

Demo and relocate telecom equipment and infrastructure inside the perimeter of the new building.

For bidding purposes only, and subject to change: Demo 1 telecom man hole, 2 comm handholes. Abandoned in place old unused conduit.

657 N/A Amend

0006 RFI

#277 &

Amend

0007 RFI

#544

N/A To adequately bid the ICD/ICS 705 construction requirements for the 6-sided box, please provide the CTTA design requirements, including Waveguides RF/Acoustic, Power

Scrubbing, Grounding, and Dielectric breaks.

The DOR, working with the customer and security officer shall determine testing parameters, frequencies, systems etc.. during the charette and design effort and the completion of

Specification 13 49 20.00 10 RFI

/EMI Shielding.

658 N/A Amend

0006 RFI

#277 &

Amend

0007 RFI

#544

N/A Please confirm the decibel (DB) rating required for the RF Shielding.

DB ratings, frequencies and STC requirements for the secure space shall be provided by the A/E2 and his specialty consultant and determined during design with the site Security

Officer.

659 2 Amend

0005, Section

01 14 00

Amend

0007 RFI

#455

1.3

Security

Requirem ents

Section 01 14 00 Work Restriction, 1.3

Security Requirements references application of FAC 5252.236-9301, Special Working

Conditions and Entry to Work Area; however, this document criteria cannot be located within FAR or NMCARS change 5-02-2022.

Please provide so requirements can be validated.

See Amendment 0011, Reference

Section 01 14 00, omitting FAC

5252.236.9301 security requirements.

660 876 Amend

0006 RFI

#213 &

Part 3

G40

G401003 The Government response to bidder inquiry

#213 indicates to provide a radial transformer and switch configuration, and to tie into existing switch or provide new as needed.

Please provide as-built drawings or information on existing switch 'PS-313' in order to determine availability of existing switchways for accuracy of bidding purposes.

See Amendment 0011, please reference Attachment W.

661 N/A Amend

0007 RFI

#533

N/A This Government response does not relate to the original question. Please clarify.

Yes, it is acceptable to support the structural slab on grade beams and the required piles.

662 Amend

Space

Tabulatio n

The revised Space Tabulation does not include any square footage allocation / line items that account for required satellite electrical rooms/closets required for distribution at the second floor. Please confirm that discussions for modification of current program to account for additional utility space requirements not accounted for in the Space Tabulation will occur at the post award Concept Design

Workshop.

See "C207 COMM" and "N6-

COMM". No additional electrical closets are required. Electrical space has been allocated to each floor. The program cannot exceed the approved overall Square footage.

663 N/A N/A N/A Will the Government please consider extending the proposal due date to Tuesday, January 14, 2025 due to the number of remaining outstanding RFI responses that carry potentially significant design and cost impacts and to account for the remaining number of limited working days punctuated by holidays? This extension would allow the

Government time to respond to all remaining outstanding RFIs and provide Offerors time to review and incorporate any changes resulting from Government responses.

See Amendment 0011, continuation sheet.

664 2, 6, 7 Amend

Continua tion

Sheet

Item #2

PPI

Response s 459, N/A Amend 0008 Continuation Sheet Item #2 states “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the east side of the building (min.

requirement 1,670 SY)." Amend 0008 attachment CS101 Site Plan supports this by depicting approximately 1,670 square yards of laydown area. However, Amend 0008 PPI

Responses 459 & 505 contradict this direction by stating "Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match BFR laydown requirement of 3,239 SY for the laydown area. (See amendment 0005) The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydown areas to accommodate the site."

Please confirm if the laydown area(s) must provide a total of 1,670 square yards or a total of 3,239 square yards, (separated as required to fit on site).

Laydown area must provide a min.

1670 SY.

665 23 Amend

PPI

Response

N/A PPI 625 response regarding the West site drive lane connection to Gator Blvd. states

"the intersection needs to accommodate the

WB-67 turning radius and width is dependent upon this criteria". Prior PPI response 107 stated that only "mill and overlay of existing paving" is required. However, Amend 0008 concept site plan shows the west drive loop scope stopping approx. 50’ short of the Gator

Blvd intersection.

Please confirm: 1) The existing intersection can currently accommodate the WB-67 turning radius without modification to the existing curbs and sidewalks; 2) If new paving at the West site drive must extend to the Gator

Blvd intersection and not stop short as shown on the concept site plan CS101.

1.) Curbs and sidewalks will not need modification. 2.) The new paving does not need to extend to the Gator

Blvd. intersection.

666 11 of 27 Amendm ent 0008

Responses to PPIs 559 and 561 indicate that

"N6, N2, Command, N3, TU 1-4, G206 and divers room must have RF shielding."

1. N6 exists on both floors outside of secured area. First floor N6 has direct exit to the outside. Second floor N6 doesn’t have common/shared walls with secured area and it is not compromising continuity of secured area RF shielding. In addition, 2nd floor N6 room C201 has requirement for windows which are provided for both natural light and view. Please confirm if RF shielding at N6 is indeed required.

2. G206 is 2nd floor unsecured area general corridor with only limited corridor length adjacent to secured space at one side. Our design doesn't compromise continuity of secured area RF shielding. Please confirm that unsecured side of G206 is not intended to be

RF shielded, and that G206 is only intended to be RF shielded (RF walls, RF doors, waveguides and filters) where adjacent to secured perimeter.

See Attachment V_ Secured Area

Second floor. Layout is preliminary and subject to change.

1)Only N6 on second floor to be secured.

2)No windows in secured areas. If windows are absolutely necessary, they must be non opening, security alarmed for broken glass and treated with RF protection.

3)See attachment V Secured Area

Second Floor for which rooms are inside the secured area.

3. Divers room - It is unclear which room # is referenced in this PPI response. Please clarify.

667 9 and

Amendm ent 0008

PPIs 517 & 574 states that raised access flooring is required for tiered seating. Please clarify how many tiers are anticipated or how high they should be.

The intention for the elevated seating is to provide clear access to the media wall by the users. The number of tiers could vary due to the room configuration, and overall dimensions.

ABA requirements will also need to be met. The first row of desks can be on the portion of the floor that is not elevated.

668 Factor 1

Solicitat ion

Factor 1

Solicitati on

Per the solicitation Factor 1 Evaluation

Factors, the schedule shall be based on a contract award date of 15 January 2025. The proposal due date is after the contract award date. What should be the new contract award date that needs to be referenced in the schedule?

Please see Amendment 0011, revised

General Requirements; the schedule shall be based on an estimated contract award date of 1 May 2025.

669 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

Overhead

Cover

In the Attachment O Basic Facility

Requirement Worksheet, Overhead Cover, Misc states that the SDV TEAM TWO requires overhead cover space to support the wet slip. Please confirm the wet slip is existing and identify which slip should receive the cover.

An overhead cover to support the wet slip is not required.

670 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

Operation

Hazardous

Flammabl e Storage

In the Attachment O Basic Facility

Requirement Worksheet, Operational

Hazardous / Flammable Storage, states that the total requirement is 1,107 GSF. Please confirm that is the correct amount of storage and the storage does not need to be within the

P-909 building.

Storage is adequate size and it does not need to be indoor.

671 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

General

Purpose

Berthing

Pier

In the Attachment O Basic Facility

Requirement Worksheet, General Purpose

Berthing Pier, Small Craft Berthing, states the total requirement in 404 FB, 352 FB. Please confirm the existing piers satisfy this requirement.

Existing Piers are not in the scope of this project.

672 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

Small

Craft Boat

Ramp

In the Attachment O Basic Facility

Requirement Worksheet, Small Craft Boat

Ramp Facility, 2 ramps are required. Please confirm the existing ramps satisfy this requirement.

Existing Ramps are not in the scope of this project.

673 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

Vehicle

Wash

Platform

In the Attachment O Basic Facility

Requirement Worksheet, Vehicle Wash

Platform, please confirm 700 SF is required and clarify if there should be catwalks included.

There is no need of a catwalk for this requirement.

674 Attach ment O

Basic

Facility

Require ment

Workshe et

VNG Please provide VNG primary work number or request reference number for the project.

No primary work number or reference number exist for the project. It is the responsibility of the designer to coordinate with NAVFAC and VNG to acquire VNG services once appropriate loads and calculations are known.

675 RFP Factor 1

Technica l

Solution

Factor 1 requires a schedule. Please confirm a provided Gantt chart would not be included in the page count.

Bid per RFP. There is no page limit on the summary level schedule but must be provided on 11”x17”

676 RFP Factor 1

Technica l

Solution

We respectfully request the technical narrative page count be extended from eight pages to ten. This will provide the government the level of detail they have requested in the RFP.

See Amendment 0011, Continuation page. Please see updates to the

General Requirements; The narrative has been updated to not exceeding ten

(10) pages.

677 Amendm ent 0008, bidder inquiry

#446

The Government response to Amendment

0008 bidder inquiry #446 states "Forced Entry

LOP is defined in the SEPA dated May 2023

(CUI.) Provide level of protection to provide at least 30 minutes of delay as defined in UFC

4-026-01." Multiple prior PPI responses stated that the referenced Security

Engineering Planning Assessment (SEPA) will not be provided until after project award.

UFC 4-026-01 defines specific level of protection ratings, and each LOP rating brings widely variable construction requirements with significant design and construction cost risk to the Government in the form of extensively upgraded building structural systems not typically provided in similar domestically located facilities within a secured perimeter. The PPI response requesting provision of a 30 minute delay suggests certain measures, but lacks additional necessary criteria needed to determine the design requirements of the building envelope

(building perimeter defense layer). Please provide the UFC Chapter 5 minimum minute-delay and threat severity level to be used in determining options for the building envelope

(building perimeter defense layer).

The recommendations for building envelope for specific areas identified in SEPA requiring elevated Forced

Entry protection are as specified:

12-inch, reinforced concrete with

5/16-inch, expanded metal mesh at 2-

1/2-inch on center and ¼-inch backing plate, Windows are not available to meet this requirement. Eliminate or limit openings to 96 square inches, Swing door (6-inches thick) with ½-inch plate inside and out, lightweight concrete fill, and an internal locking system, 10-inch, reinforced concrete with 2 layers of #5 bars at 6-inches on center each way on steel decking and with a built-up roofing system.

The recommendations are to aid bidding purposes but the final design strategy shall employ Design in Depth strategy that shall be worked out during design workshop and presented to the Customer and security for approval.

678 Amendm ent 0008, bidder inquiry

#446

The Government response to Amendment

0008 bidder inquiry #446 states "Forced Entry

LOP is defined in the SEPA dated May 2023

(CUI.) Provide level of protection to provide at least 30 minutes of delay as defined in UFC

4-026-01." Please confirm that the 30 minute delay in an aggregate of all defense layers representing Security In Depth (SID).

The time provided corresponds to the criteria associated with the levels of protection as summarized in Table 3-1 in UFC 4-026-01. The design strategy for level of protection must balance risk at a reasonable cost.

679 Amendm ent 0008, bidder inquiry

#446

The Government response to Amendment

0008 bidder inquiry #446 states "Forced Entry

LOP is defined in the SEPA dated May 2023

(CUI.) Provide level of protection to provide at least 30 minutes of delay as defined in UFC

4-026-01." Multiple prior PPI responses stated that the referenced Security

Engineering Planning Assessment (SEPA) will not be provided until after project award.

UFC 4-026-01 defines specific level of protection ratings, and each LOP rating brings widely variable construction requirements with significant design and construction cost risk to the Government in the form of extensively upgraded building structural

See previous responses and new responses #677 and #678.

systems not typically provided in similar domestically located facilities within a secured perimeter. The PPI response requesting provision of a 30 minute delay suggests certain measures, but lacks additional necessary criteria needed to respond to LOP-specific UFC 4-026-01 requirements. Please provide the required forced entry LOP as defined in UFC 4-026-01.

(End of Summary of Changes)