24R2862 Amendment 0007.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 34

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12/05/2024

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N40085-24-R-2862

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/17/24

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT /ORDER NO.

10B. DAT ED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT

TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N4008524R2862 P909 SOF SDVT2 OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, JEB LITTLE CREEK-FORT STORY, VIRGINIA

BEACH, VIRGINIA

Contract POC: Demetrice Jenkins, demetrice.jenkins2.civ@us.navy.mil

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 11/16) APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84 Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40085-24-R-2862

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0007

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Extend the proposal due date

2. Continuation Sheet to update specifications

3. Provide PPI Responses

4. Part 2, General Requirements (attached separately)

5. Part 3, Chapter 1 changes (attached separately)

6. NAVFAC High Performance and Sustainable Building Checklist GOALS (attached separately)

7. 3_site_analysis (attached separately)

8. 5_RR_D104_BATTERY STORAGE (attached separately)

9. 5_RR_D105_MAINTENANCE RM-02 SAFE (attached separately)

10. 5_RR_D106_MAINTENANCE RM (attached separately)

11. 5_RR_G108_WOMENS TOILET & SHOWER (attached separately)

12. 5_RR_G109_COMPRESSOR ROOM (attached separately)

13. 5_RR_G111_MENS TOILET (attached separately)

14. 5_RR_G207 MENS TOILET (attached separately)

15. 5_RR_G209 WOMENS TOILET (attached separately)

16. 6_ESR_A20 (attached separately)

17. 6_ESR_D20 (attached separately)

18. 6_ESR_D30 (attached separately)

1. The proposal due date is extended from 06 December 2024 to 07 January 2025 at 02:00PM EST.

2. Continuation Sheet

Specifications:

RFP - PART 2, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

DELETE Section 01 35 13 in its entirety

DELETE Section 01 45 00 05 20 in its entirety

REPLACE Section 01 35 26 with updated section 01 35 26 attached to this amendment

REPLACE Section 01 42 00 with updated section 01 42 00 attached to this amendment

REPLACE Section 01 45 00 with updated section 01 45 00 attached to this amendment

REPLACE Section 01 45 35 with updated section 01 45 35 attached to this amendment

REPLACE Section 01 50 00 with updated section 01 50 00 attached to this amendment

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 5, 5.0 ROOM REQUIREMENTS, D104 – BATTERY ROOM

STORAGE, A202002, BATTERY ROOM PIT/SUMP

ADD references to “Provide spill control per UFC 3-520-05 paragraph 2-2.4 Spill Control”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 5, 5.0 ROOM REQUIREMENTS, G111 – MEN’S TOILET &

SHOWER, D201001

REPLACE references to “Provide wall hung fixtures.” with “Provide floor mounted fixtures.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 5, 5.0 ROOM REQUIREMENTS, G108 – WOMEN’S TOILET &

SHOWER, D201001

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 5, 5.0 ROOM REQUIREMENTS, G207 – MEN’S TOILET, D201001

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 5, 5.0 ROOM REQUIREMENTS, G209 – WOMEN’S TOILET,

D201001

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, A20 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION, D202002 BATTERY ROOM

PIT/SUMP

ADD “Provide spill control per UFC 3-520-05 paragraph 2-2.4 Spill Control”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D20 PLUMBING, D201090 EMERGENCY FIXTURES

REPLACE references to “Provide emergency eyewash in the battery storage space.” with

“Provide emergency eyewash and shower in the battery storage space.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D20 PLUMBING, D203001 WASTE PIPE & FITTINGS

REPLACE references to “Provide hub and spigot pipe and fittings, for below ground installation.” with “Provide PVC pipe and fittings, for below ground installation.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D20 PLUMBING, D203003 FLOOR DRAINS

REPLACE references to “Provide a trap primer to each floor drain….” with “Provide a water supply trap primer to each floor drain…..”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D20 PLUMBING, D209001, SPECIAL PIPING SYSTEMS

REPLACE references to “Not used” with “Provide breathing quality air compressors and tank fill stations.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D20 PLUMBING, D209005 COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM (NONBREATHING)

ADD “Air quality of ISO 8573.1 class 2.4.4 is acceptable.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D30 HVAC, GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, HEATING &

VENTILATING ONLY, SUMMER

REPLACE references to “85” with “80”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D30 HVAC, GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, HEATING &

VENTILATING ONLY, WINTER

REPLACE references to “55” with “68”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 6, D30 HVAC, D304007 EXHAUST SYSTEMS

REMOVED references to “Capture all Room Plan bathroom and other space exhaust air, and route it through a total energy (enthalpy) type energy recovery wheel (heat wheel)device before exiting the Hangar Facility in order to gain heat transfer between the incoming ventilation air and outgoing exhaust air.”

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 3.0 SITE ANALYSIS, 3.2.4 SITE LAYOUT

REPLACE “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west side of the building (100 ft. by 130 ft.)” with “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the east side of the building (min. requirement

3239 SY).

3. Provide responses to the following PPI’s: 3-7, 63-67, 141,190-191, 215, 298, 322, 326, 354-359, 372, 374-376, 378, 419, 429, 431-433, 435-436, 438, 440, 442-445, 448-453, 455-462, 464-491, 493-505, 507-508, 513-516, 521-

524, 526, 528-544, 546-556, 519-591, 613, 623

PPI#

Reference Question Response

Page Section Paragraph

General

Requirement s, Page 7 of

Price

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements last bullet states the requirement for a PROJECT

LABOR

AGREEMENT

In the General Requirements, Non-cost/

Price Evaluation Factors, Under Price

Solicitation Submittal Requirements, the last bullet states the requirement for a

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT as defined in FAR 22.502. This bullet further states that Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and

52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award. This project will require trade contractors for site work, site utilities, demolition, deep foundations, concrete, structural steel, roofing, doors, windows, framing, interiors, mechanical, electrical, and communications, along with many others. The competition for these trades will come from union and non-union (open shop) contractors. With this PLA being mandated, there is high probability that the

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

non-union trade contractors will not participate because PLAs change the way they do business and in turn places an unfair hardship on their business. Please consider removing this PLA mandate as to not detrimentally impact this crucial project for the government.

General

Requirement s, Page 7 of

Price

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements last bullet states the requirement for a PROJECT

LABOR

AGREEMENT

In the General Requirements, Non-cost/

Price Evaluation Factors, Under Price

Solicitation Submittal Requirements, the last bullet states the requirement for a

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT as defined in FAR 22.502. This bullet further states that Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and

52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award. According to the U.S. Bureau of

Labor and Statistics, union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers was

4.3% in the state of Virginia (derived from

Union Membership (Annual) News Release

- 2023 A01 Results (bls.gov)). As most of the local and regional labor force is non-union, mandating the use of a PLA between contractors and the unions will strain current labor availability. Excluding several key non-union trade contractors, who will not be able to comply with union stipulations within a mandated PLA, will place immense undo stress on an already struggling labor force in the mid-Atlantic region. The use of a PLA on this project will also have a negative effect on the global project cost, schedule, quality, and safety. There is significant local interest in participating in this project by both union and non-union trade contractors, however, mandating a PLA will significantly diminish that interest. We are unaware of any national interest in this project;

however, we are aware of significant local interest that will be negated by a PLA requirement. Please consider removing this

PLA mandate as to not detrimentally impact this crucial project for the government.

General

Requirement s, Page 7 of

Price

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements last bullet states the requirement for a PROJECT

LABOR

AGREEMENT

In the General Requirements, Non-cost/

Price Evaluation Factors, Under Price

Solicitation Submittal Requirements, the last bullet states the requirement for a

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT as defined in FAR 22.502. This bullet further states that Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and

52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award. There is a small and declining union presence in the Hampton Roads region and limiting labor resource availability will significantly increase the cost of labor on this project. Additionally, the unions/halls that would be serving this project in the designated region are already strained. Open-shop non-union contractors will be forced to change the way they do business to participate in the PLA, which many will refuse to do. With the currently robust non-federal construction project market in the region, many non-union trade contractors will simply focus their resources on non-PLA projects and will refuse to participate. This will decrease competition and exacerbate the already strained skilled labor force, all resulting in significant cost increases. Please consider removing this

PLA mandate as to not detrimentally impact this crucial project for the government.

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

General

Requirement s, Page 7 of

Price

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements last bullet states the requirement for a PROJECT

LABOR

AGREEMENT

In the General Requirements, Non-cost/

Price Evaluation Factors, Under Price

Solicitation Submittal Requirements, the last bullet states the requirement for a

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT as defined in FAR 22.502. This bullet further states that Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and

52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award. 95.7% of the construction labor force in the state of Virginia is hired by non-union contractors who are unwilling to change their way of doing business due to the negative costly effects of PLAs. This will lead to lack of competition, significant cost increases, skilled labor shortages, schedule issues, quality issues, safety concerns and potential non-bids from prime contractors who cannot find adequate qualified subcontractors to bid the work. Please consider removing this PLA mandate as to not detrimentally impact this crucial project for the government.

General

Requirement s, Page 7 of

Price

Solicitation

Submittal

Requirements last bullet states the requirement for a PROJECT

LABOR

AGREEMENT

In the General Requirements, Non-cost/

Price Evaluation Factors, Under Price

Solicitation Submittal Requirements, the last bullet states the requirement for a

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT as defined in FAR 22.502. This bullet further states that Offerors that do not include a signed Project Labor Agreement complying with the terms of FAR 52.222-33 and

52.222-34 shall be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for award. The original Solicitation for this

IDIQ MACC for Large General

Construction Projects Primarily in the

Hampton Roads Area of Responsibility did not include any provisions for Project Labor

Agreements. The original Seed project nor any of the first several issued Task Orders contained provisions for PLAs as well. The unilateral implementation of a PLA on this project in the middle years of this MACC will negatively impact participation from current MACC Contract Holders limiting competition for the government and likely increasing proposed costs potentially beyond the awardable range. Please consider removing this PLA mandate as to not detrimentally impact this crucial project for the government.

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

94% of the Virginia workforce is non-union. The Project Labor Agreement requirements preclude the vast majority of the workforce from participating in this project which will severely limit subcontractor participation, increase the cost of the project for the Government, and add unreasonable risk to the contractors.

Would the Government consider waving the

PLA reequipments for this MACC?

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

During the seed project for this MACC there were no Project Labor Agreement requirements, PLAs constitute a significant changed condition to the requirements of the MACC. Contractor's on this MACC have all made a significant financial investment into the MACC where now responsive trade partner bids are unavailable. Would the Government consider eliminating the PLA requirements for this project?

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

Due to the overwhelmingly open-shop and small-business market present in Virginia and the Carolinas, Project Labor

Agreements disproportionately effect small, minority, and disadvantaged businesses.

Would the Government consider eliminating PLAs when a Small, Minority, Service Disabled, DBE, or otherwise disadvantaged business can in used in lieu of a union subcontractor?

Given the amount of time and effort necessary to negotiate a PLA with multiple unions, would the Government consider allowing PLAs to be submitted 30 days post award?

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

Many Project Labor Agreements require non-union companies to contribute to the health and welfare accounts of non-participating union companies in order to secure the Labor Agreement for a project.

That means that the employees of non-union companies do not benefit from these financial contributions in any way. Said another way, non- union members of the

PLA are paying for the benefits of workers who are not participating in the project, while workers who are participating in the project are not receiving benefits of the cost paid by the Government. Can Project Labor

Agreement requirements be waived for this project?

The PLA requirement remains unchanged at this time, bid per RFP.

141 428 of 2001

Part 3, Chapter 2 (Pg

9)

2.3.5

Section 2.3.5 (Antiterrorism) does not say what the minimum required standoff distance is. However, on the concept site plans it looks like there is a 33-foot standoff delineated around the building. Is 33-feet the required standoff? Is this just a zone of unobstructed space, or does there need to be barriers in place, such as curbing, bollards, or gates?

No, the 33 feet is the unobstructed space/clear zone. The standoff distance will be as per SEPA level of protection.

Part 3 -

Chapter 6;

UFC 4-010-

ESR F10

F10 Special Construction states that the

Secure Annex Area (SAA) that must compl y with requirements in UFC 4-010-05, Chapter

2 and other requirements as noted througho ut the RFP. " There are minimum requirements for providing compliant secure space in the referenced documents.

However, there are also much more robust secure space requirements also spelled out in these documents and design guidelines.

In order to provide anything above the minimum requirements, the Gov’t needs to have completed the items in UFC 4-010-05, Chapter 2. Please provide these items to allow the bid to properly address the project requirements.

The Government has completed

UFC 4-010-05 Chapter 2 requirements, however the information is CUI and cannot be provided. For bidding purposes utilize requirements included in the

RFP.

Part 3 -

Chapter 6;

UFC 4-010-

ESR F10, 1.

Paragraph 1. states

"Provide a Controlled Access Area (CAA) within the facility designed and constructed in accordance with all governing requireme nts SEE SECTION F104001 (below). It is li kely that the entire second level will be desi gnated as the Controlled Access Area (CAA

) and the DOR must design and construct th e interior and exterior of the second level “6 sided Box” accordingly." Please confirm that Bidders are to include in their proposed price the cost to provide a CAA, "6-sided

A portion of the second floor as delineated in the bubble diagrams shall be designed as a "6 sided box".

Box" for the entire second level per Section

F104001.

215 2

Table of

Contents/Part

NA

Table of Contents lists section 01 33 00 under Part 2, but this section appears to be excluded from the RFP. Can you please provide?

Please see Amendment 0007, Continuation sheet

298 876 Part 3 G40 G401003

Please provide Enclosure 009 as referenced in RFP section G401003 to identify points of connections of primary electrical loop.

See Amendment 0006, continuation sheet for updates. ADD “U –

Telecommunication Connection

Point”.

322 551

5.0 Room

Requirements

M115 Secured Medical Files ESS

Requirements Confirmation

Room Data Sheet for M115 Secured

Medical Files is empty for D503005

Security Systems. Please confirm the ESS requirements for this room.

Electronic Key Pad, Proximity Card

Reader and balanced magnetic door sensor.

323 813 D503001

SIPR Racks in Unsecured Telecom Rooms

Confirmation

Rooms C101, C102, C205, C207 state to provide (4) full sized racks for NIPR, SIPR, GREY Network, and one additional rack for additional capacity. The RFP indicates the second floor will be developed as a secured

6-sided box. There will be SIPR racks located in C101 and C102 on the first floor outside of the second floor secured 6-sided box.

Please confirm it is acceptable to have SIPR racks (with GFGI SIPR encryption equipment) located in an unsecured telecom room outside of the secured 6-sided box.

This is acceptable, as long as the

SIPR Racks and data traveling inside unsecure areas are encrypted.

324 442 3.2.3

Demoltion

Demolition of Communications Utility

Lines

Section 3.2.3 Demolition of the RFP states

"All utility demolition is to be demolished back to their main distribution points". The

Demolition Plan CD101 on RFP pg. 1391 shows hatching to indicate the demolition of utility lines, but it is not clear which specific utilities are being demolished, and the main distribution points they are being demolished to.

Please specify the utilities to be demolished, and the starting and ending points of the demolition, including the manhole/handhole names and main distribution point names.

See Amendment 0006, continuation sheet for updates. ADD “U –

Telecommunication Connection

Point”.

325 D503001

Telecommunications Backbone

Please provide the backbone cabling requirements between telecom rooms C101, C102, C205, C207 and X203, including the cabling quantity, type (fiber or copper), and which telecom rooms the cabling will route between.

Backbone can be either copper or fiber. The location of the telecom spaces is subject to change as the drawings are preliminary.

Separation between Red and Black must be maintained as per ICD/ICS-

705.

C101 is the main service entry point and back bones to C207. From

C101 and C207 route the horizontal cabling as needed.

326 461 Room

Second Floor Telecom Room Confirmation

Per the Room Requirements, two (2)

Communication closets are to be located on the first floor and two (2) communications closets are to be located on the second floor.

The Building Requirements specify two telecom rooms, C205 N6-COMM and C207

COMM, in the N6 CAA area on the second floor, and one telecom room, X203 COMM, in the Secured Annex Area on the second floor.

Question: Please confirm that both telecom rooms C205 and C207 are required for the

CAA area and telecom room X203 is required for the SAA area on the second floor.

Confirmed

354 N/A General N/A

The following rooms appear to be breakrooms based on the room description;

however, there are 0 occupants listed in each room: G106, G203, P201, P218, and

P234.

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

355 N/A General N/A

The following rooms are listed on the provided floorplan but did not have room descriptions in the RFP: D206 thru D208, G204, G205, P209, P210, P214 thru P217, P22, P223, P224, X203, X204, X207 thru

X209, X211, X212.

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

356 N/A General N/A

The following rooms have room descriptions in the RFP but not shown on the provided floorplan: E210, E211, G208 thru G210.

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

461 - 752 of

Part 3, Chapter 4 N/A

The following rooms have room descriptions in the Chapter 5 Room

Requirements but are not shown in the RFP space tabulations on pages 456-459 : E210, E211, E212, G208, G209, G210, P230, P231, P232, P233, P234, T203, T204, X214, X215

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

461 - 752 of

Part 3, Chapter 4 N/A

The following rooms are listed in the RFP space tabulations on pages 456-459 but do not have room descriptions in the Chapter 5

Room Requirements: C202, D206, D207, G204, G205, P209, P210, P214, P215, P216, P217, P218, P222, P223, P224, X203, X204, X207 X208, X209, X211, X212.

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

461 - 752 of

Part 3, Chapter 4 N/A

The following room numbers appear in both the Chapter 5 Room Requirements and the

RFP space tabulations on pages 456-459 but have different names: E201, G206, G207, P201, P202, P203, P204, P205, P206, P211, P212, P213, P219, P220, P221, X202, X205, X206, X210.

Which names should be used?

Amendment 0006 re-issued Room

Requirements sheets and Space

Tabulations.

General -

Floor Plan

There are several references to a floor plan that has pertenant information. Dozens of

Room requirement sheets state "See Floor

Plan" for ideal dimensions. Room

Requirement D109 suggest seeing the floor plan for drop locations for the air compressor, ...etc. Please provide the floor plan or the missing information.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets.

374 466 of 2001

Part 3, Ch 5, Room Req.

C104 N6

EKMS

VAULT

Room C104 - N6 EKMS Vault is not in the space tabulation. However there is a C206

EKMS VAULT that does not have a Room

Requirement sheet. Please confirm this vault is to be located on the second floor as

C206.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets.

Pdf Page

Section Spec

01 57 19

Paragraph

1.5.1.1.1

Section states all excavated soils must be disposed of at a RCRA Subtitle D lined landfill. If the soil is assumed to be PFAS and other contaminates contaminated, then shouldn't it be disposed at RCRA C Facility instead of RCRA D as indicated?.

All surplus excavation spoils must be disposed of at a RCRA permitted lined landfill facility that accepts

PFAS impacted soil media.

RFP page

The RFP calls for floor mounted dual flush toilets. Please confirm it is intended to do floor mounted and not wall mounted. It is also assumed all fixtures are to be manual type and sensor is not desired. Please confirm for all fixtures.

Page reference appears to be incorrect. Floor mounted is the intent with automatic sensor. EPA

WaterSense fixtures are required by

UFC 1-200-02, paragraph 2-4.1, which invokes IgCC 601.3.2, section 6.3.3.

RFP page

Underground sanitary and storm piping is stated to be hub and spigot cast iron. Is it acceptable to use PVC for underground due to salt water contact concerns with cast iron?

Page reference appears to be incorrect. PVC is acceptable for use for sanitary and storm piping within the building and within 5 ft outside of the building per the IPC. RFP

Section G303001 requires storm piping less than 12 in. dia to be

PVC.

457 thru 751 of 2001

Space

Tabulations and Room

Requirements

NA

There are 17 Room Requirement sheets that are not included on the Space Tabulations.

• S103/S203 STAIR 3

• G208 JAN CLOSET

• G209 WOMEN’S TOILET

• G210 SECURED AREA CORRIDOR

• E210 OIC PRIVATE OFFICE

• E211 SEA PRIVATE OFFICE

• E212 OFFICE

• T203 TRAINING OPEN OFFICE

• T204 TRAINING OFFICER PRIVATE

OFFICE

• X214 SPS VTC ROOM

• X215 SPS SERVER/PRINT/STORAGE

• X216 SPS VESTIBULE

• P230 TASK UNIT #5 SUITE – SHARED

SPACE

• P231 TASK UNIT #5 PLATOON HQ –

SHARED OFFICE

• P232 TASK UNIT #5 HQ – SHARED

OFFICE

• P233 TASK UNIT #5 STORAGE ROOM

• P234 TASK UNIT #5 – READY ROOM

Please clarify which of these spaces are to be included in this project, and the space requirements.

If there are spaces to be included in this project it will take time to incorporate this into the proposal. Please consider a 2 week extension beyond the November 15 due date.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

457 thru 751 of 2001

Space

Tabulations and Room

Requirements

NA

There are 22 spaces in the Space

Tabulations that do not have a Room

Requirement sheets.

• G204 CORRIDOR

• G205 MEN

• E202 COMMAND BRIEF/PLAN

• X203 COMM

• X204 GRAPHICS+STOR

• X207 AOIC

• X208 TIO

• X209 HALL

• X211 SPS¬1

• X212 SPS¬2

• C202 LCPO

• P209 TASK UNIT #3

• P210 CONF / VTC

• P214 PLT¬D

• P215 PLT¬LDR

• P216 PLT¬C

• P217 PLT¬LDR

• P222 UUV¬LDR

• P223 TU¬LDRS

• P224 CONF / VTC

• D206 DIV¬LCPOs

• D207 DIV¬LCPOs

Please clarify which of these space is to be included in this project and provide the

Room Requirement sheets. This will take time to fully coordinate the requirements

(Comm, AV, FF&E, occupant load calcs...etc) into the proposal. Please consider a two week extension beyond the

November 15 due date.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

459 and 707 of 2001

Space

Tabulations and Room

P220 is called "DDS-LDR" on the Space tabulation and it has an occupant load of 2.

P220 is called "Storage Room" in the Room

Requirements which has no occupants.

Please provide clarification of the discrepancy.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

458 and 740 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

X210 is called "TOC" on the Space

Tabulation and has no occupants listed.

X210 is called "N2 Joint Operations Center

(JOC) in the Room Requirements and has

15 occupants

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007

457 and 670 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

G206 is called "JAN" on the Space

Tabulation.

G206 is called "Corridor" in the Room

Requirements.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

457 and 673 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

G207 is called "Women" on the Space

Tabulation.

G207 is called "Men's Toilet" in the Room

Requirements.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

459 and 702 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

P213 is called "PLT-LDR" in the Space

Tabulations and has an occupant load of 2.

P213 is called "MS Ready Room in the

Room Requirements and has no occupant load.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

458 and 702 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

E201 is called "COMMAND

PRINT/COPY" in the Space Tabulation and has no occupant load.

E201 is called "COMMAND

CONFERENCE ROOM" in the Room

Requirements and has 36 occupants.

There are several spaces with differing occupant loads between the space tabulations and the room requirements. The occupant load effects, preliminary mechanical calculations, egress with, and space classification (assembly, business..etc). Please provide clarification for the discrepancy. It will take time to fully coordinate the requirements into the proposal. Please consider a two week extension beyond the November 15 due date.

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

458 and 737 of 2001

Space

Tabulations

X206 is called "LCPO" in the Space

Tabulation and has an occupant load of 1.

X206 is called "N2 DEPARTMENT HEAD

/ SEA SHARED OFFICE" in the Room

Requirements and has an occupant load of

2.

Please provide clarification to the

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007

Part 3 -

CHAP 4-4.0

C101, C102, X203, C205, and C207

Building Requirements lists 5 Telecom

Rooms (C101, C102, X203, C205, and

C207). Part 3 – Chapter 5 – 5.0 Room

Requirements only includes 4 Telecom

Rooms (C101, C102, C205, and C207). It appears that Comm Room X203 was not included in the room requirements. The reason we are asking the question, is to better identify any special Telecom Room requirements for which rooms are dedicated to serve which areas. C101 and C102 are assumed to be General Purpose Telecom

Rooms for the first floor. Each of these rooms provides identical services and each feed half of the first floor. On the second floor, between the Chapter 4 requirements and Chapter 5 requirements we have X203, C205, and C207. Within the Room

Requirements, C205 specifically says its located “within the N6 Group’s Office Suite to support the telecommunications systems for the second floor of the facility.” C207’s description appears more general in nature and serves the second floor (assumed to be the other half of the second floor that C205 will not reach). Please provide confirm that even though C205 is located within the N6 suite, it can serve areas outside of the N6 suite. Please confirm the purpose of X203 and provide a room requirements data sheet for this room. Is the X203 room meant to be physically located within the SCI area and can it ONLY provide services to the outlets within the SCI area?

See Amendment 0006 continuation sheets and associated re-issued

Room Requirement sheets. Also reference Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

PDF Page

SECTION 01

33 10.05 20;

subsection

1.2

REFERENC

ES

UFC 4-010-06

(2016; with

Change 1, 2017)

Cybersecurity of Facility-

Related Control

Systems"

Confirm that the most recent release of UFC

4-010-06, October 2023, is to be used for this project and that the most recent UFGS

25 05 11 release of August 2024 is to be used in conjunction with the newest UFC 4-

010-06.

Utilize the most current UFC and

UFGS documents as per the

WBDG.

PDF Page

SECTION 01

31 19.05 20;

subsection

1.3

CONCEPT

DESIGN

WORKSHOP

(CDW), sub-subsection

1.3.1 CDW

General

Requirements

Paragraph (c):

Contractor's

Design Team.

The primary functions of the

Design Team will be to investigate, develop and present alternate design solutions. The entire Design

Team must participate in all phases of the

Concept Design

Workshop and assist the

Facilitator in developing the

Concept Design

Workshop

Report.

It shall be assumed that the FRCS

Cybersecurity Designer of Record must meet DoD 8140.03, formerly known as

DoD 8570.01-M, a Department of Defense

(DoD) instruction that relates to information systems security (ISSE), and must have acceptable qualifications of DOD Work

Role Work Role ID: 462 Control Systems

Security Specialist, certification vendor information for GICSP or its equivalent in other DOD 8140 certification recogintion requirements applicable to IAM/IAT Level

2 or higher for the duration of the contract and shall be required to be onsite and present for the CDW as per the stated requirement that: "The entire Design Team must participate in all phases of the Concept

Design Workshop and assist the Facilitator in developing the Concept Design

Workshop Report."

Confirmed, the FRCS Cybersecurity

Designer of Record must meet DoD

8140.03.

PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6

Cybersecurity

"Design, acquire and execute all control systems

(including systems separate from management utility monitoring and control system) in accordance with UFC 4-

010-06

Cybersecurity of Facility-

Related Control

Systems and as required by individual

Facilities

Engineering

Command, (FEC) or

Installation implementation policy."

Confirm that Telecommunications, ESS, Audio Visual, and any Information

Technology equipment is beyond the scope of the contract as per UFC 4-010-06.

Confirmed, only the building control systems, utility control systems, electronic security systems, and fire and life safety systems are included in the cybersecurity scope.

PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6

Cybersecurity

6th Paragraph:

"Incorporate

Cybersecurity requirements into project facility control systems identified in:

ESR D10,

Per UFC 4-010-06, 10 OCTOBER 2023, Chapter 1, Section 1-2 PURPOSE AND

SCOPE, which states: "This UFC describes requirements for incorporating cybersecurity in the design of all facility-related control systems which include a network. This UFC covers the cybersecurity aspects of control system design, and the requirements of this UFC must be

ESR D50 Security system is apart of the UFC 4-010-06 scope.

Telecommunication and audio visual is not apart of the scope.

CONVEYING

(ELEVATOR),

ESR D20,

WATER

DISTRIBUTIO

N AND

COMPRESSED

AIR SYSTEMS

ESR D30,

HVAC (Utility

Management and Control

System -

UMCS), ESR

D30, DDC and

BUILDING

AUTOMATIO

N SYSTEMS,

ESR D40, FIRE

ALARM AND

DETECTION

SYSTEM, ESR

D50, ELECTRICAL

POWER AND

LIGHTING

SYSTEMS

ESR D50,

TELECOMMU

NICATIONS

AND

SECURITY

SYSTEMS,

ESR D50,

INDUSTRIAL

CONTROL

SYSTEMS,

ESR D50,

AUDIO

VISUAL

SYSTEMS, F10

SCI

FACILITIES,

ESR G30,

MECHANICA

L SITE

UTILITIES

AND

ADVANCED

METERING

SYSTEMS,

ESR G40,

ELECTRICAL

+ COMM SITE

UTILITIES

AND

ADVANCED

METERING

SYSTEMS"

coordinated with the control system design and the criteria relevant to the control system. This UFC only covers aspects specific to control system design."

Therefore, it shall be assumed that the following systems will be considered out of scope for the application of the FRCS

Cybersecurity Design Process as outlined in

UFC 4-010-06: ESR D50,

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND

SECURITY SYSTEMS, ESR D50, AUDIO

VISUAL SYSTEMS, and that any active equipment associated with any of these systems is also beyond the scope of UFC 4-

010-06 and therefore this project.

PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6

Cybersecurity

"UMCS

preliminary classification is

M-L-L and Fire and Life Safety

(FLS)

Preliminary

System

Classification is

M-L-L. The system security classificaion of

M-L-L was given as the default classifications by the base. The final classification will be developed during the ATO process."

Per UFC 4-010-06, 10 OCTOBER 2023, Chapter 1, Section 1-2 PURPOSE AND

SCOPE, which states: "This UFC does not implement the RMF and does not address anything beyond the design of the system.

Use of this UFC does not result in an ATO under the RMF process but will provide a system that is more capable of receiving an

ATO than a system not designed in accordance with this UFC." Therefore it shall be assumed that there is no active

Authority To Operate (ATO) and subsequent eMASS C-I-A loss of system impact ratings for any of the Control

Systems listed on PDF page 431, Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6 Cybersecurity which might be connecting to any existing system with an ATO which are different from the ratings provided in this section. It shall further be presumed that all C-I-A loss of system impact ratings for all Control

Systems identified shall be no higher than

MODERATE.

The CIA rating shall be obtain from the SSM. The C-I-A level will be moderate or lower.

PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6

Cybersecurity

Entire Section

It shall be assumed that UFGS 25 08 11.00

20 is to be incorporated into this design unless otherwise indicated in writing from the government.

Confirmed, UFGS 25 08 11.00 20 is to be incorporated into this design unless otherwise indicated in writing from the government.

PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6

Cybersecurity

"Backup generators, fuel sources, transfer switches and solar energy controls are considered to be

Level 0B Non-

Networked devices in the

Navy Platform

Enclave and

Operational

Architecture model. The equipment is not connected to the network nor monitored by the UMCS."

Unless otherwise indicated by the government in wirting, the following shall be assumed that NAVFAC Command

Information Office (CIO) Bulletin, Issue

No. 2018-02, SUBJECT: Cybersecurity

Procedures for Serial-Only Facility Related

Control Systems will be applicable and that the Designated System Owner for any

Serial Only Connected system will be responsible for execution of the Cyber

Security Hygiene Checklist V2, reference

(b), against the identified serial-only control system upon completion of that control system's integration.

Concur.

440 6 Price Representations

& Certifications

The Price submittal requires “Copy of

Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award

Management (SAM).” Please clarify: are

Offerors to include the full FAR and DFAR report (100+ pages) pulled from SAM in addition to proof of registration in SAM – or – is just proof of SAM registration required?

Please provide both, Sam registration and full FAR/DFAR

Report of Representation and

Certifications.

577 OF

Part 3, Chapter 5

S101/S201, S201/S202, S301/S302

B202001 Exterior Windows and B202004 indicate window/glazing is required at stair towers. Part 3, Chapter 2, section 2.3.2.2 -

Natural and Artificial Light Quality states, "Due to the nature of the project site’s locati on within the ordnance arc, the implementat ion of exterior openings and glazing will ine vitably be minimized and or cost prohibitive." The extent to which the proposed building siting is contained or overlaps the RFP-referenced ordinance arc is not clear and that the specific Inhabited

Building Distance arc location will not be provided until post-award. For bidding purposes, please clarify the following:

a) Should offerors include pricing for all exterior windows and storefront systems included within Part 3 as meeting blast required assemblies?

b) Or, will the Government please clarify on the Part 6 Site plan where the ordnance arc occurs to know the extent of which exterior windows will be impacted and need to meet blast required assemblies.

The project is outside of the blast arc. Provide doors, windows and storefronts as indicated.

443 746, 840

Part 3, Chapters 5 &

X214

SPS VTC Room Uniformat line item

F104002 indicates an exterior window. RFP

Part 3 ESR F104002 states

"No windows will be implemented in the ex terior building enclosure for spaces existing within the commissioned Secured Annex Ar ea (SAA)." Please confirm exterior windows are not permitted in spaces within the Secure Annex (also referred to as "SPS" in the RFP).

Confirmed

444 450, 465

Part 3, Chapters 4 &

C103

Room Requirements section C103006

SHELVING indicates a quantity of seven

(7) with a description of "4 High Density

Rolling Storage units on steel tracks… 48" deep and 10'-12' in length." Additionally, 32' linear feet of 30" deep heavy duty shelving is listed under FF&E. Per Chapter

4 Space Tabulation room C103 is 701sf, which may limit the installation of HD

Rolling Storage and FF&E shelving in the quantities indicated. Please confirm if seven

(7) or four (4) HD Rolling Shelving units are required.

Please see Amendment 0006 and follow re-issued Room Requirement for these areas. Also reference

Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

445 N/A

Part 3, Chapters 3 &

CS102

The RFP requires POV/GOV vehicle circulation separation from the WB67 thru-truck traffic lane; however, Part 6 Site Plan

CS102 shows vehicular paving for the

GOV/POV parking areas linking to and/or crossing the WB67 truck lane(s). Please confirm these interconnections do not contradict the WB67 separation requirement.

These interconnections do not contradict the WB67 separation requirement. CS102 is provided for conceptual reference only.

Designer of Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the

RFP and UFC requirements.

448 427 Part 3, Chapter 2 N/A

2.3.2.8 Design Considerations for Future

MILCONS, second paragraph references to see concept site plan(s)and concept building plans in Part 6 for speculative location of future MILCON structures with locations and forthcoming addition(s)/expansions.

This information could not be located on the

Part 6 site plan(s) and no concept building plans were provided. The only RFP referenced future MILCON structure is the drive-thru truck aisle on the south side of the building. Section 2.3.1.4 - Future

MILCONs states, "The site design for this facility must plan a round all forthcoming additions, expansions and their implications on site access and cir culation." The attachments to Amendment

0005 did not indicate future construction or additions with apparent impacts to the P909 project site. Please clarify/provide future

MILCON project documentation that must be considered in the P909 site plan design.

Coordinate between the future expansion of the sheltered drive thru truck aisle, project P931 that can be found in Amendment 5, and project

P907 that is currently in the construction process.

449 450 Part 3, Chapter 4 4.1

Space Tabulation STC values are contradicted by Room Requirements. Room

Requirements state ALL 2nd floor interior partitions must be STC 55 assemblies.

Please confirm all 2nd floor rooms, including those with no indicated STC requirement such as Break Rooms and shared restrooms, must receive STC55 wall assemblies where not adjacent to rooms with higher prescribed STC requirements.

See Amendment 0006 for re-issued

Room Requirement and Space

Tabulation sheets. Also reference

Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

450 N/A Part 3, Chapter 6 N/A

ESR F10 requires STC50 doors at CAA perimeter and entries into

"Conference Rooms and all primary access doors into individual office suites/ program group spaces." Please confirm that the

Contractor will provide door STC values as indicated in UFC 3-101-01 Architecture for non-program group spaces such as shared restrooms, break room, janitor, etc.

Confirmed

451 various Part 3, Chapter 5 various

RFP indicates an 8'-0" height requirement at various exterior and interior doors. Where

8'-0" doors are required in CMU partitions, please confirm that a frame height of 8'-0" with a 7'-10" door leaf may be provided to align top of openings aligned with block courses.

Confirmed

452 N/A N/A N/A Please confirm the total Building Gross

Square Footage, including all Options.

Not to exceed 60,000 sq. ft.

453 813 of 2001

Chapter 6

ESR D50

D5030

D5030 Communications and Security section states, "The DOR shall work closely with the supp orted command, designated Site Security M anager (SSM), and the Certified TEMPEST

Technical Authority (CTTA) to determine t he requirements for each SCIF. " Please confirm which second floor suites are to be designed as a SCIF, or SCIFs if multiple.

See Amendment 0005, Part 6, Attachments - A-

Diagrams/Drawings "Second Floor" bubble diagrams to identify secure areas.

455 N/A N/A N/A

The RFP does not address the need for an

ICD/ICS-705 accredited consultant. Please confirm one is not required for this project.

ICD/ICS-705 accredited consultant is required.

456 various Part 3, Chapter 5 C102004

Chapter 5 Room Requirements for E203, E205, E210, T204, call out 'Sliding and

Folding Doors' under Uniformat line item

C102004. Part 3, Chapter 6, ESR C102004

Sliding and Folding Doors indicates 'Not

Used'. Please confirm if sliding doors are required, and if so please provide basis of design criteria.

Confirmed

665-669 of

Part 3, Chapter 5

E210, E211, E212

Rooms E210 OIC Private Office, E211 SEA

Private Office, and E212 Office are included in Chapter 5 Room Requirements but not in 4.1 Space Tabulation and as such do not have an assigned square footage.

Please confirm the following:

a) If these rooms are included in 4.1 Space

Tabulation under a different room numbers

/ room names, what are they?

b) If these rooms are not included in 4.1

Space Tabulation, which program spaces can be reduced to accommodate the increase in overall program square footage?

See Amendment 0006 for re-issued

Room Requirement and Space

Tabulation sheets. Also reference

Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

458 various Part 3, Chapter 5 various

There are several private offices, including

O201 N3-DH, D207 DIV-LCPO's, D206

DIV-LCPOs, D203 MDV, D204 MDV, and

D205 MDV, which are programmed at 86 square feet or less within the Chapter 4, 4.1

Space Tabulation. The Chapter 5 Room

Requirements for these spaces include

Uniformat line item C102001 for a standard interior (swing) door and FF&E specifications private office furniture with

'L-shape' desks. These private offices will not meet accessible maneuvering clearances at doors based on the room size and spec furnishings. Sliding doors that will meet accessibility requirements are not available in STC 55, which is required to meet other functional program requirements. Please confirm Offerors should bid the RFP as is and scope modifications to address accessibility requirements, square footage deficiencies and layout adjustments will be addressed post award during the Concept

Design Workshop.

See Amendment 0006 for re-issued

Room Requirement and Space

Tabulation sheets. Also reference

Amendment 0007 continuation sheet for subsequent revisions.

459 442, CS102

Chapter 3 3.2.4

3.2.4 Site Layout states

"Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown are a on the west side of the building (100 ft. by

130 ft.)". Part 6 CS102 SITE PLAN shows this area located to the east of the building adjacent to Intercove Road. Please confirm the conceptual site layout on CS102 supersedes the description in Chapter 3.

Desired layout is to be on the east side of the building. Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match BFR laydown requirement of 3239 SY for the laydown area. (See amendment 0005) The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydown areas to accommodate the site. Attachment A is provided for conceptual reference only.

Designer of Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the

RFP and UFC requirements.

460 554 of 2001 Part 3, Chapter 5 P101

Room Requirements for P101 - Individual

Storage Cages (Men's) lists various cage types under Other/Special Requirements heading. Please clarify/confirm the following related to cage design:

a) What are the finished heights of the

Operator Cages, the Diver Cages, and the

Enabler Cages?

b) What is the material for each type of cage, i.e. are they chain link or steel mesh?

c) All cages are required to be stainless steel, including appurtenant fasteners and accessories, per ESR C101001

d) Confirm it is Type 304 Stainless Steel.

e) The material for the top of the cages is the same as the walls. If not, what is required?

f) Cage interiors are lit by the overhead lighting provided for the entire room and not for each individual cage.

g) Confirm these same responses/specs apply to the cages specified in Men's Drying

G112, Women's Locker G107 and

Women's Drying G109.

Follow re-issued Room

Requirements Sheets in Amendment

0006. Cages are 8' high, wire mesh with wire mesh lid; they should have sliding doors that can accommodate a hasp lock. .Cage requirements should be confirmed with Activity during CDW.

461 554 of 2001 Part 3, Chapter 5 P101

P101 - Individual Storage Cages (Men's), Uniformat line item C10100_ Chain-link

Caged Partition does not include any specific requirements. Please clarify/confirm the following:

a) Where does this partition(s) occur?

b) Partition(s) are full height.

c) What is the material of this…