24R2862 Amendment 0008.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 28

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12/20/2024

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N40085-24-R-2862

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/17/24

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT /ORDER NO.

10B. DAT ED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of th is amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of th is amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT

TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of th is amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitat ion and th is amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N4008524R2862 P909 SOF SDVT2 OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, JEB LITTLE CREEK-FORT STORY, VIRGINIA

BEACH, VIRGINIA

Contract POC: Demetrice Jenkins, demetrice.jenkins2.civ@us.navy.mil

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 11/16) APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84 Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40085-24-R-2862

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0008

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Extend the proposal due date

2. Continuation Sheet to update drawings and RFP information

3. Provide PPI Responses

4. DOD_Anti-ram_Vehicle_Barriers_September_2024 (attached separately)

5. VA_LittleCreek_ApprovedCJ&A_DDC_Exp20291101_Redacted (attached separately)

6. Attachment D – P909 Price Proposal Form_R1 (attached separately)

7. 1704761-CS101 (attached separately)

1. The proposal due date is extended from 07 January 2025 to 17 January 2025 at 02:00PM EST.

2. Continuation Sheet

DRAWINGS:

RFP - PART 6, ATTACHMENT A DRAWINGS

DELETE Civil engineering drawing sheet… P909 SOF SDVT2 OPS SUPPORT FAC-SITE PLAN – SHEET

CS102

RFP - PART 6, ATTACHMENT A DRAWINGS

REPLACE Civil engineering drawing sheet… P909 SOF SDVT2 OPS SUPPORT FAC-SITE PLAN – SHEET

CS101 file name: 1704761-CS101 transmitted with this amendment

RFP:

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 3.0 SITE ANALYSIS, 3.2.4 SITE LAYOUT

DELETE “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west side of the building (100 ft. by 130ft.)” with “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the east side of the building (min. requirement 3239 SY).

RFP - PART 3, CHAPTER 3.0 SITE ANALYSIS, 3.2.4 SITE LAYOUT

REPLACE “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west side of the building (100 ft. by 130ft.)” with “Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the east side of the building (min. requirement1670 SY).

RFP - PART 6, ATTACHMENTS

REPLACE – Attachment L – VA Little Creek Approved CJ&A DDC EXP 20241031 with VA Little Creek

Approved CJ&A DDC EXP 20291101 transmitted with this amendment.

3. Provide responses to the following PPI’s: 416, 430, 434, 437, 439, 446-447, 454, 459, 463, 481, 492, 505-506, 509-512, 517-520, 525, 527, 545, 557-568, 570-574, 576-586, 588-590, 593-612, 614-622, 624-641, 643

PPI

Reference Question Response

Page Section Para

416 Amend

005 page

Part 3

Chapter 6 Section

G20

G204001 and

G204004

Part 3 – Chapter 6, ESR G20, Section G204001 Fencing & Gates is where it states “Not Used.”

Section G204004 Security

Structures is also noted as “Not

Used. "In Part 4 – Section G20, Paragraph G204001 specifies chain-link security fence and gates. Part 4

– Section G20, Paragraph G204004 discusses security structures (active and passive vehicle barriers), but states “Where identified for project elsewhere in this RFP…”.

Part 3 and Part 4 of the RFP are in conflict if security fencing is required or not and where it is required as the site drawing does not indicate any fencing. Please clarify if security fencing and gates are required around this site to limit access to parking lot, building, and laydown yard.

Perimeter fencing is required. Base bid for fencing is 7 foot high fence with 1 foot 3 strand out rigger barb wire, chainlink, polyvinyl coated, 9 gauge steel fabric ties.

Refer to UFC 4-022-03 drawing UFC 701 for more detail and UFGS section 32 31

13.53. For bid option with deadmen and

anti crash barriers refer to this UFC and

UFGS as well along with approved DOD anti-ram vehicle crash barriers see attachment in Amendment 8. Security fencing and gates are required around the perimeter of the building and laydown areas.

430 PDF Page

17-18---

AND---

PDF Page

SECTIO

N 01 30

00;

subsectio n 1.7

PRECO

NSTRU

CTION

MEETIN

G ---

AND---

Part 3, Chapter

2, Section

2.3.6

Cybersec urity

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss and develop a mutual understanding of the administrative requirements of the Contract including but not limited to:

daily reporting, invoicing, value engineering, safety, base-access, outage requests, hot work permits, schedule requirements, quality control, schedule of prices or earned value report, shop drawings, submittals, cybersecurity, Confirm that the ISSE to be provided by the Control

System Integrator Contractor is to be present at the

PRECONSTRUCTION

MEETING and that the ISSE must meet DoD 8140.03, formerly known as DoD

8570.01-M, the Department of Defense (DoD) instruction that relates to information systems security (ISSE).

Confirm that the ISSE must demonstrate acceptable qualifications of DOD Work

Role ID: 462 Control

Systems Security Specialist, certification vendor information for GICSP, or its equivalent in other DOD

8140 certification recognition requirements applicable to

IAM/IAT Level 2 or higher for the duration of the contract.

The ISSE will be the contracting agency hired under contract to perform the duties designated for Steps 1 through 3 of the

RMF process.

prosecution of the work, government acceptance, final inspections and contract close-out.

Contractor must present and discuss their basic approach to scheduling the construction work and any required phasing.----

AND----

"Contractor to provide an

Information System

Security

Engineer

(ISSE)(Contra ctor)"

434 PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter 2, Section

2.3.6

Cybersec urity

Review authorization Strategy for each system.

Per UFC 4-010-06, 10 OCTOBER

2023, Chapter 1, Section 1-2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE, which states: "This UFC does not implement the RMF and does not address anything beyond the design of the system. Use of this UFC does not result in an ATO under the RMF process but will provide a system that is more capable of receiving an

ATO than a system not designed in accordance with this UFC."

Therefore, any Authorization to

Operate as per the Department of

Defense RISK MANAGEMENT

FRAMEWORK are the responsibility of the Navy, NAVFAC Chief of Civil Engineer and the Functional Authorizing Official (FAO) which has jurisdiction for authorizing all Navy ashore control systems and any work beyond the application of the

Cybersecurity Design Process as stated in UFC 4-010-06 for the purposes of obtaining any ATO is beyond this scope. The FAO carries out the responsibilities of

Authorizing Official (AO) as required in UFC 4-010-06, Cybersecurity of Facility-Related

Control Systems. FAO reserves the

Correct, the 4-10-06 guidance does not provide the RMF requirements for the package to achieve or invest in an ATO.

That’s where the UFGS 25-5-11 comes into play, which does provide the necessary background for materials and requirements to achieve and ATO. 25-08-

11 guidance further gives the contracting agency the requirements that are specific to the scope of work necessary to complete the required deliverables for ATO submissions.

right to accept or deny risk of a control system.

437 PDF Page

Part 3, Chapter

2, Section

2.3.6

Cybersec urity

"The FLS shall be designed for integration into the existing base-wide front-end monitoring system."

For the application of UFC 4-010-

06 Cybersecurity of Facility-Related

Control Systems design process, confirm that (U)NAVFAC FAO

Fire and Life Safety (FLS)

Supplement Final v1_CISO

FAODR Signed.pdf for all FLS will be used and that therefore a separate

UFGS 25 05 11.00 will not be required for any new FLS being connected to an already existing basewide system. (Reference Naval

Facilities Engineering Command

(NAVFAC) Fire and Life Safety

(FLS) Supplement, Authorization

Supplement Version 1.0, 13 July 2020.

A separate UFGS 25 05 11 for FLS is typically not needed.

439 PDF Page

SECTIO

N 01 33

10.05 20, subsectio n 1.11.5

Cybersec urity

Basis of

Design

Provide a single submittal indicating criteria and describe requirements for integrating cybersecurity in the design and construction of the facility-related control systems in accordance with UFC 4-

010-06. The basis of design must describe specific guidance for control systems with the assigned

Confidentiality

, Integrity and

Availability

(C-I-A) impact ratings and shall list the security controls with recommendati ons and justifications for future tailoring of the

Prior to the onsite CDW, it shall be assumed that the CIO4 Point of

Contact for MIDLANT will provide the required USN RMF Information

System Categorization Forms v1.2 for each of the following, identified, FRCS for this project: ESR D10, CONVEYING (ELEVATOR), ESR

D20, WATER DISTRIBUTION

AND COMPRESSED AIR

SYSTEMS, ESR D30, HVAC

(Utility Management and Control

System - UMCS), ESR D30, DDC and BUILDING AUTOMATION

SYSTEMS, ESR D50,

ELECTRICAL POWER AND

LIGHTING SYSTEMS, ESR D50,

INDUSTRIAL CONTROL

SYSTEMS, ESR G30,

MECHANICAL SITE UTILITIES

AND ADVANCED METERING

SYSTEMS, ESR G40,

ELECTRICAL + COMM SITE

UTILITIES AND ADVANCED

METERING SYSTEMS

CIO2 to provide the categorization forms, however, they are no longer required for step 1 of the RMF process. We still utilize them for assistance in filling information in eMASS, however they are not required for the RMF process.

The FRCS for all systems under ESR

D10,D20,D30 are owned by NAVFAC.

The FRCS for all systems under ESR G30 and G40 are owned by NAVFAC UEM.

security control set.

446 834 Part 3, Chapter

ESR F10 Please confirm the level of Forced

Entry Protection required for this project.

Forced Entry LOP is defined in the SEPA dated May 2023 (CUI) Provide level of protection to provide at least 30 minutes of delay as define in UFC 4-026-01.

447 N/A Part 6, CD102

N/A A laydown/work area around

Building 3814 will be needed to complete demolition activities.

Please confirm the area/limits of work that will be available to the

Contractor for this scope.

A laydown area will be identified during the charette.

454 N/A Amendm ent 0005, Bidder

Inquiry

Response

#13

N/A The Government's response to

Bidder Inquiry #13 does not address the question. Please review and respond.

The facility is within a controlled perimeter of JEB Little Creek Installation.

459 442, CS102

Part 3, Chapter

3.2.4 3.2.4 Site Layout states

"Provide a heavy duty concrete layd own area on the west side of the buil ding (100 ft. by 130 ft.)". Part 6

CS102 SITE PLAN shows this area located to the east of the building adjacent to Intercove Road. Please confirm the conceptual site layout on CS102 supersedes the description in Chapter 3.

Desired layout is to be on the east side of the building. Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match

BFR laydown requirement of 3239 SY for the laydwon area. (See amendment 0005)

The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydwon areas to accommodate the site. Attachment A is provided for conceptual reference only. Designer of

Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the RFP and UFC requirements.

463 9 Part 3, Chapter

2.3.5 2.3.9 Antiterrorism Criteria includes the statement, "Develop the site based on the requi rements of UFC 4-010--

01 and JEB Little Creek – Fort Stor y command operations orders." The referenced JEB Little Creek – Fort Story command operations orders cannot be located within the RFP criteria provided. Please provide a copy of this document.

Delete JEB Little Creek – Fort Story com mand operations orders. Add "Develop the site based on the requirements of UFC

4-010-01 and in accordance with Design

Criteria as defined by SEPA dated May

2023 (CUI). For bidding purpose assume

MEDIUM level of protection unless otherwise indicated or required.

481 N/A Amend

0005, Bidder

Inquiry

#59

N/A Follow-up to previous RFI (Bidder

Inquiry #59)

Previous: "Please provide Enclosure

009 as referenced in RFP section

G401003 to identify points of connections of primary electrical loop."

Amendment 0005, Government response to Bidder Inquiry #59 states "Enclosure 009 does not exist, utility plans are located in part 6 attachment A and the locations of the SF6 pad mounted switchgear must be coordinated with existing utilities and with government during design." We request the government to provide direction on the location of the switches for bidding purposes as the locations have substantial financial impact. Please provide

Enclosure 009 or a Utilities plan showing the intended locations for the new pad mounted switchgear.

See Amendment 0006, continuation sheet.

Radial loop is no longer needed. Tie into existing switch. The location of switch is at the coordinates 36.918883, -76.166191.

492 Part 3 Ch

6 /

D2020

Domestic

Water Flow

Distribution

The RFP requires a flow test be performed to determine domestic water system requirements. Is a preliminary flow test available to determine whether a booster pump is required for the domestic water supply?

A flow test is required to be performed by the selected bidder.

505 9 Part 3 Ch

3.2.4 3.2.4 Site Layout directs the

Contractor to "Provide a heavy duty concrete laydown area on the west s ide of the building (100 ft. by 130 ft.

)." Please clarify that the desired layout area is to be located on the east side of the building in accordance with the Attachment A -

Site Plan and Bubble Diagram.

Desired layout is to be on the east side of the building. Dimensions for the laydown area has been updated as well to match

BFR laydown requirement of 3239 SY for the laydown area. (See amendment 5) The laydown area can be separated into smaller laydown areas to accommodate the site. Attachment A is provided for conceptual reference only. Designer of

Record (DOR) must design a site plan that meets the RFP and UFC requirements.

506 13 Part 3 Ch

2.6.1 2.6.1 Blast Related Design and

Mitigation - please clarify the necessary levels of blast mitigation that will be required to be implemented and upheld in accordance with the Security

Engineering Planning Assessment

(anticipated to be completed in

January 2023).

Refer to SEPA performed on May 2023

509 13 Part 3 -

Ch 3

Basis for

Bidding

3.2.13.1 -

Unsuitable soils

Under the Basis for Bidding, the 6th item on the list says that

"Excavated onsite soils are unsuitab le for reuse as backfill and fill in str ucture and pavement areas and may only be reused as common fill. Imp orted Backfill and Fill Material mus t be used in all structure and paveme nt areas and for utility and foundatio n excavation backfill." The quantity of onsite soils that are unsuitable is unknown. Please provide a unit price line item on the bid form with a predetermined quantity.

See Amendment 0008, Revised

Attachment D- Price Proposal Form

510 13 Part 3 -

Ch 3

Basis for

Bidding

3.2.13.1 -

Sutcharge

Under the Basis for Bidding, the

10th item on the list says that

"Preloading or surcharge will be required for mitigating excessive long-term consolidation settlement assoc iated with site grade increase." If a surcharge or preloading of material is required, we need to know how thick the surcharge material needs to be and how long the settlement period needs to be for the surcharge before it can be removed.

See Amendment 0008, Revised

Attachement D- Price Proposal Form

511 14 Part 3 -

Ch 3

Basis for

Bidding

3.2.13.1 -

Dewatering

Under the Basis for Bidding, there is an item on the list says that

"All construction dewatering effluen t is to be containerized, treated, and tested prior to onsite discharge in ac cordance with the prescriptive 01 57

19 Specification." There is no way of quantifying the amount of water that will need to be containerized, treated, and tested prior to onsite discharge. Please provide a unit price line item on the bid form with the quantity of water in gallons that is to be treated.

See Amendment 0008, Revised

Attachment D- Price Proposal Form

512 5 Part 3 - Ch 3

3.1.2 In section 3.1.2 under Man Made

Conditions, it says there is Known

Contamination.Based on the finding s of the preliminary Geotechnical Si te Characterization (Ref. Part 6 Atta chments), contaminated soil and gro undwater were encountered at the pr oject site. There is no way of quantifying the amount of contaminated soil and groundwater that will be encountered on the project site. Please provide a unit price line item for both soil and water on the bid form with a quantity for each.

See Amendment 0008, Revised Attachment D- Price Proposal Form

517 Bid Price

Schedule

Price Proposal form calls for Bid

Option 5 calls Access Flooring.

However, no where in there RFP specifically says which rooms are to recieve access flooring. Please confirm which rooms would recieve access flooring for in Bid Option 5 on the Price Proposal form.

Access flooring / Elevated tiered flooring is anticipated in room X210 - N2 Joint

Operations Center (JOC)

518 7 Part 3 Ch

2.3.2.7 2.3.2.7 Radio Frequency Shielding

Mitigations references Part 5, Specification section

13 49 20.00 10. This specification section has not been provided in the

RFP. Please provide section 13 49

20.00 10 or delete the reference from the RFP.

Delete Refrence to Specification 13 49 20

00 10. Design to latest ICD/ICS standard.

519 7 Part 3 Ch

2.3.2.7 Please clarify the RF Shielding

testing requirements and provide the frequency range that the RF Shielding must be tested to.

40-60 db of RF attenuation. For testing requirements coordinate with CTTA.

520 PART 3

CHAP 6

/ ESR D1

0 -

UMCS notes a CJ&A for DDC systems that expired on 10/31/24.

Please provide updated J&A if one exists.

See Amendment 0008, updated CJ&A is attached.

525 Part 3 -

Chapter 2

- Page 9

2.3.5 Antiterrorism

Criteria

Please confirm for the AT/FP design, facility will be considered as without controlled perimeter, even though facility is well within the

JEB controlled entry/ perimeter.

See response to PPI#454

527 Part 3 -

Chapter 2

- Page 9

2.3.5 Antiterrorism

Criteria

Please confirm if the AT/FP design will still need to comply with

Appendix B of UFC 4-010-01 as per the section or Chapter 3 can be utilized

Confirmed. See responses to PPI#15

Amendment 0005 and PPI#463

545 7; 3 Part 3 Ch

2; Part 3

Ch 6; 5.0

Room

Require ments

2.3.2.7;

F104001

Please clarify the continuous architectural RF shielding barrier requirements for the second level

CAA and SAA. Part 3 Ch 6 states that the RF shielding "foil must be run from floor deck to roof deck and overlapped minimum 6” onto the de cks." Per 5.0 Room Requirements for CAA and SAA second level rooms, B1010 Floor - RF Shielding and B301090 Other Roofing - RF

Shielding, contractor is to "Provide

RF Shielding and required RF mitig ations within entire second floor ass embly, and

Provide RF Shielding & required R

F mitigations within all second floor roof assemblies."

Confirm if continuous RF foil is to be applied onto the entire 2nd floor metal deck and 2nd floor roof metal deck, or if a minimum 6" overlap of the RF Shielding foil onto the floor and roof metal deck is compliant.

Only a portion of the second floor is required to be shielded. Shielding standards and certification requirements have been provided/ referenced.

557 PDF page

Section

5.0

Room

Require ments, C101-

Commun ications

Closet

SPECIAL

REQUIREME

NTS: Provide

(4) full-sized racks for

NIPR, SIPR,

GREY

Network & (1) additional

Rack for capacity.

"FF&E

INFORMATI

ON FOR

COORDINAT

ION: FF&E

and AV

Equipment will be funded seperately as a midification to the construction contract.

Infrastructure to support all

FF&E and AV must be included in the construction contract.

Contractor's

Interior

Designer must validate and determine

FF&E

requirements on in-depth interviews with Activity at Concept

Design

Workshop."

Required Information From

Government is needed. Government

POCs will need to determine if this space is designated as a

"Communications Closet" instead of a "Communication Room during the

"in-depth interviews with Activity at Concept Design Workshop:"

1. NIPR, SIPR, GREY etc.

requirements listed but no Tempest requirements provided.

2. Space requirements between differing networks, (NIPR, SIPR, GREY etc.) is not identified.

3. Cooling Requirements for

Infrastructure listed not identified, (e.g., Secondary HVAC?, AHUs?

etc.)

4. Separate power circuit requirements with back up power not identified.

5. Double Door requirements/Access Control

Requirements Not identified.

6. Confirm the four racks are as listed: one rack for NIPR, one rack for SIPR, one rack for GREY and one additional rack for capacity.

1.All network should follow the CTTA.

2.Follow CNSAM TEMPEST/1-13 for separation

3.Contractor to provide HVAC affording to UFC 3-580-01 4.Provide UPS in each server rack enough capacity for 10minutes to allow enough time for back up generator to turn on.

5.Coordinate with security and CTTA. All telecom space to have a minimum of a keypad for entry.

6.Correct

558 PDF page

Section

0.1 .33

00.05 20

Preconstructio n Submittals

Network

Analysis

Schedule

(NAS)

Confirm that the "Network Analysis

Schedule" refers to the provision of a comprehensive view of how the project will be executed, including key milestones, potential critical paths, and estimated completion dates, for review and approval by the project owner and is NOT any

Network Analysis Schedule of point connections or riser diagrams that might refer to any Authority to

Operate (ATO) submittal requirements, as any Authorization to Operate as per the Department of

Defense RISK MANAGEMENT

FRAMEWORK are the

Confirmed responsibility of the Navy, NAVFAC Chief of Civil Engineer and the Functional Authorizing

Official (FAO) which has jurisdiction for authorizing all Navy ashore control systems and any work beyond the application of the

Cybersecurity Design Process as stated in UFC 4-010-06.

559 1. Is RF shielding on the 1st floor limited to Rooms C104 N6 EKMS

Vault, M112 Medical Office, M112

Medical Office? Or not required?

It’s requested in the Room Requirements but references to the second floor.

N6, N2, Command, N3, TU 1-4, G206 and divers room must have RF shielding.

T202, T201, G201, G20, S201, A201,A203,A202 do not require RF shielding.

The building layout is preliminary and is subject to change. RF shielding can be added to rooms that do not require them in order to keep continuous RF shielding as needed.

560 2. Clarify if the 2nd floor Secure

Area requires RF shielding barrier

“6-sided Box” (floors, walls, roof/ ceili ngs) or each room in the Secure

Area should receive RF shielded barrier?

Each room does not need individual RF shielding. A 6 sided box style RF shielding that encompass the entirety of the room is sufficient

561 3. Clarify if the entire 2nd floor

Non-Secure area requires the RF shielding? Is RF shielding also required in the partitions separating the rooms? RFP calls for the RF shielding in the Non-Secure

Corridor G206, Men’s Toilet G207, Janitor Closet G208, Women’s

Restroom G209, etc. but Training

Rooms T201and T02 don’t show any RF shielding requirements.

"N6, N2, Command, N3, TU 1-4, G206 and divers room must have RF shielding.

T202, T201, G201, G20, S201, A201,A203,A202 do not require RF

The building layout is preliminary and is subject to change. RF shielding can be added to rooms that do not require them in order to keep continuous RF shielding as needed. "

562 The Dive Suite has Room

Requirements for small offices

D202 thru D205 but is missing similarly sized Room Requirement for D206 and D207. Please provide those missing Room Requirement sheets.

Please disregard D206 and D207 as they are no longer required for this project as per the Amendment 0006 updated Room

Requirement sheets.

563 The Dive Suite requests windows and sun control devices in four small offices. Please confirm if the intent of the window is to have a view to the outside, or is the intent

Both a view and Natural light would be ideal just to get natural light into the space.

564 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

The revised site plan issued with

AMD 0005 shows the Road Option to the west of the P909 project, which forms a loop around existing building 125. For this road section, please clarify what is required for these roads. For example, the IAP calls for curb and gutter, sidewalks, street furniture, landscape strips, lighting, ground cover and grasses, canopy trees, and wayfinding.

None of these are referenced in Part

3 of the RFP. Are they required for the road option and the base bid option?

For the "Road Option", curb and gutter is not required. For the base bid, curb and gutter, sidewalks, etc, are required.

565 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

The revised site plan issued with

AMD 0005 shows the road section from Intercove to Cove Road.

Please clarify what is required for these roads. For example, the IAP calls for curb and gutter, sidewalks, street furniture, landscape strips, lighting, ground cover and grasses, canopy trees, and wayfinding. None of these are referenced in Part 3 of the RFP. Are they required for the road option and the base bid option?

This section is part of the base bid and the

IAP applies.

566 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

Please confirm whether the Option

Road is considered Primary or

Secondary.

Secondary

567 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

Please confirm whether the extension of Intercove to Cove

Road is Primary or Secondary.

Secondary

568 CS102 Sheet

CS105,

AMD

Please provide as-builts of site utilities in the path of the new

Option Road, and whether their removal/relocation is required as a part of this work.

As-builts is not able to be provided at this time but removal and relocation of utilities is not anticipated at this time.

570 Price

Proposal

Form

All Options on the Price Proposal

Form – What is the time frame for accepting the Bid Options provided on the Price Proposal Form? Will these Bid Options be accepted or declined at the time project award so the design can move forward with or without these options?

See Amendment 0008, reference Revised

Attachment D Price Proposal Form. See

General Bid Notes.

571 Price

Proposal

Form

Option No. 2 on the Price Proposal

Form is for the Platoon Storage

Room. These three rooms are listed in the space tabulation document. Will the required building square footage decrease if

The required building square footage will

NOT be decreased if this option is not accepted.

this option is not accepted? Or is this option intended to be a CLIN for accounting purposes only?

572 Price

Proposal

Form

Option No. 3 on the Price Proposal

Form is for the Staging and Set up

Area. Will the required building square footage decrease if this option is not accepted? Or is this option intended to be a CLIN for accounting purposes only?

The required building square footage will

NOT be decreased if this option is not accepted.

573 Price

Proposal

Form

Option No. 4 on the Price Proposal

Form is the Drive Lane Around the

Complex. Please provide further clarification on where this drive line is required.

General location is shown on the plans.

The charrette will determine final layout and limits.

574 Price

Proposal Form

Option No. 5 on the Price Proposal

Form is the Access Floor. Per Addendum #5 it was stated that the access flooring has been omitted from this project. Is the base bid design not to include access flooring? If access flooring is not be included in the base bid, is it the intent that all project scope that would be typically run under an access floor be run overhead and exposed in the secured areas?

Access flooring is limited to the N2/JCO room where tiered seating is anticipated.

Exposed utilities shall not be considered.

576 Addendu m 6 PPI

In Addendum #6 question 418, the answer mentions Amendment

0007. Is there an Amendment 0007 or was this a typo?

Yes, please reference Amendment 0007, continuation sheet.

577 Addendu m 5

Option No. 6 on the Price Proposal

Form is the Training Rooms and

Stair Tower. Per Addendum #5 no stair tower is part of this bid option. Will the price proposal be updated to indicated that it is just the two rooms and not including the stairs? Will the required building square footage decrease if this option is not accepted? Or is this option intended to be a CLIN for accounting purposes only?

Yes the square footage will decrease if those areas are not constructed. The required number of exists from the second floor will not decrease. The stair referenced in this option is only if another stair is needed to accommodated the increase in occupant load when the training rooms are eventually built.

578 Amend

006 PPI

resposnes

The response to PPI # 35 is in contradiction to the response provided in PPI #36. Please clarify the response for PPI # 35 regarding rooms P230, P231, P232, P233 and

P235.

For clarification, all Room Requirement sheets were re-issued as per Amendment

0006. Any Room Requirement sheets that existed prior are to be disregarded. Lastly, be aware that there are modifications to

Room Requirement Sheets in Amendments after Amendment 0006.

579 Amend

006 PPI

responses

The response to PPI # 36 is in contradiction to the response provided in PPI #35. Please clarify the response for PPI # 36 regarding rooms P210, P214, P215, P216 and

P217.

For clarification, all Room Requirement sheets were re-issued as per Amendment

0006. Any Room Requirement sheets that existed prior are to be disregarded. Lastly, be aware that there are modifications to

Room Requirement Sheets in Amendments after Amendment 0006.

580 Amend

006 PPI

responses

The response to PPI 42 states that room P202 should be adjusted to indicate 200sf on the space tabulation document, however the space tabulation document has been revised to only 130sf. Please confirm which number is correct.

As noted on the revised Amendment 0006

Space Tabulation document, the building total area and associated space areas (P202 for example) are approximations and the final area should be determined by the selected Designer of Record.

581 Amend

006 PPI

responses

The response to PPI #42 does not clarify if the area for spaces P203, P211, P213, P215 have been changed to accommodate the quantity of furniture indicated in the

FF&E cost summary. Please provide an updated FF&E cost summary and direction on the final size for the rooms listed

Please refer to the revised Room

Requirement sheets and revised FFE Cost

Summary that were issued in Amendment 0006.

582 Amend 005 page

FC-2-

000-05N

Part 3 Chapter

2 Section

2.5.2

Section

131-8.2.3

It was previously confirmed that a 70/30 ratio would apply to plumbing fixtures at restrooms (70 male / 30 female). Does this ratio apply to showers as well? Does the

188 Occupants stated on page 430 of the RFP Amend 005 apply to shower counts? In FC-2-000-05N, page 112, section 131-8.2.3, does

'one shower for every 10 PN' apply?

The 70/30 ratio applies to showers.

583 Pavement design will require a

PCASE analysis per UFC requirements; please provide lifecycle design information including service factor; vehicle loading and design life requirement for all discrete road pavement sections. (Each named roadway).

This may be further explored post-award however a response is not available at this time.

584 Please provide any special vehicle provisions required road geometric design (special operational trailer-combination vehicle operations/ramps/ground clearances, vertical and horizontal slope transition requirements, turning radii and maximum/minimum curb transition heights allowed).

Design vehicle is a wb-67 for the truck thru lane and Intercove Rd. and Gator

Blvd. intersections would need to be design accordingly.

585 Design information for loop road around Maritime Operations Center is lacking; please confirm grading requirements for vehicle and logistics management, parking and container storage around the building. Include vehicle types, turning radii, vertical transition requirements and outline drainage requirements including compliance with local, state and federal water

DOR is responsible for providing circulation based upon the user. DOR must comply with all local, state, and federal laws.

quality criteria (please confirm applicability of Chesapeake Bay Act and Virginia Stormwater

Management Program requirements).

586 There is limited information on site utilities in the Road Option / Bldg

125 area; please confirm requirement for integrating existing utilities and replacement of utilities prior to paving new roads.

The area in question is already a gravel area that has transportation vehicles riding on it. Replacement of utilizes is not anticipated.

588 various Part 3, Chapter

5 &

Chapter

C101002 Room Requirements sheets for D201, D202, P201, P202, P204, P205, P207, P213, P230, P232, P233, and P234 all include

Uniformat line item C101002

Demountable Partitions but no

Specific Requirements. These rooms also include Uniformat line item C101001 Fixed Partitions that features Specific Requirements.

Chapter 6 ESR C101002 indicates to provide moveable walls floor-to-ceiling that can be repositioned without creating construction dust or material waste. These spaces all carry a requirement for STC 55 lab-tested/STC-50 field tested partition assemblies which is not achievable with a demountable partition system. Additionally, meeting STC requirements will require acoustical partition assembly construction from the top of demountable partition systems to the underside of structural deck which will not support reconfiguration/repositioning without creating construction dust or material waste. Please clarify the following:

a) The scope/design intent/extent of demountable partitions at each of the rooms identified in Part 3, Chapter 5.

b) Where demountable partition systems are required they do not need to meet the STC-55 lab tested requirement.

c) If demountable partition systems are required they must be bid as part of the construction costs and not incorporated as FF&E.

Demountable partitions are not required in the rooms that are listed. here.

589 828 Part 3, ESR G20

G204001 ESR G204001 FENCING AND

GATES states "Not Used". Please confirm perimeter fencing is not required for this project. Or, if fencing/controlled access is required, provide all related basis of design criteria, including height, material, finish, access control and gates.

Perimeter fencing is required. Base bid for fencing is 7 foot high fence with 1 foot 3 strand out rigger barb wire, chainlink, polyvinyl coated, 9 gauge steel fabric ties.

Refer to UFC 4-022-03 drawing UFC 701 for more detail and UFGS section 32 31

13.53. For bid option with deadmen and

anti crash barriers refer to this UFC and

UFGS as well along with approved DOD anti-ram vehicle crash barriers see attachment in Amendment 8.

590 12 Part 3, Chapter

2.4 Section 2.4 Appropriate Design

references that the platoon storage areas open directly to an exterior fenced in concrete drive-aisle;

however, there is no further basis design criteria related to this scope of work item found within the RFP and ESR G204001 FENCING AND

GATES states "Not Used". Please clarify the basis of design criteria for this fencing including minimum height, fence materials, finish, gates/secure access requirements, and if a roof/lid is required.

Perimeter fencing is required. Base bid for fencing is 7 foot high fence with 1 foot 3 strand out rigger barb wire, chainlink, polyvinyl coated, 9 gauge steel fabric ties.

Refer to UFC 4-022-03 drawing UFC 701 for more detail and UFGS section 32 31

13.53. For bid option with deadmen and

anti crash barriers refer to this UFC and

UFGS as well along with approved DOD anti-ram vehicle crash barriers see attachment in Amendment 8.

593 N/A N/A N/A The RFP does address an anticipated need for concrete over the metal roof deck to meet security/blast requirements.

Amendment 0005 bidder inquiry response to items #13, #14, #15 state that the Security Engineering

Planning Assessment (SEPA) will not be provided until post award.

For bidding purposes please confirm that concrete is not required at the roof deck over CAA or SAA spaces.

Designer must take a six Sided approach when developing the design of these spaces. Wall, Floors Ceilings Doors

Windows if any, penetrations. There is no concrete requirement as long as the 6 sided box fully meets the control requirements.

594 5 Part 3, Chapter

2.3 Section 2.3.2.5.3 lists an Electronic

Key Management Systems (EKMS)

Vault within the N6 Intes/Comms group suite. Please confirm the room number and location for this space as the 4.1 Space Tabulation and Chapter 5 Room Requirements conflict. Please confirm the 6-sided box for this space is to be constructed in accordance with

EKMS-1E Electronics Key management System Policy and

Procedures for NAVY requirements.

The entirety of the N6 Suite is outside the secure perimeter. The Vault is located on the first Floor and is room C104

595 164 of

Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

E203 E203 MAC Private Office, Uniformat B1010 Floor calls for RF

Shielding as required (AR). The

Adjacencies line item states this room is be located within the general corridor adjacent to the break room on the second floor.

Please clarify if this room is

E203 is located outside the secured area.RF Shielding is not required required to be within the RF

Shielded CAA boundary?

596 166 of

Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

E204 E204 CCC Private Office indates to refer to sheet E203 for Uniformat room requirements. E203 MAC

Private Office, Uniformat B1010

Floor calls for RF Shielding as required (AR). The Adjacencies line item for E204 CCC Private

Office states this room is be located within the general corridor adjacent to the N1 Suite on the second floor.

Please clarify if this room is required to be within the RF

Shielded CAA boundary?

E204 is located outside the secured area.RF Shielding is not required

597 6 of 293 Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

C104 C104 - N6 EKMS Vault is included with Amendment 0006 and C206

Vault is not. The Room

Requirements sheet for C104 is populated with several references to the second floor; however, the room is listed as being on the first floor.

Please confirm that C104 - N6

EKMS Vault is located on the first floor.

C104 is located on the First Floor

598 229/232 of 293

Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

P205 & P206 How are Task Unit spaces P205

TU1 and P206 TU2 separated from each other, e.g. full height partition walls with a door between them, demountable partition walls with a door between them, or are they open to each other?

Open space, Systems furniture will delineate the space.

599 239/243 of 293

Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

P212 & P219 How are Task Unit spaces P212

TU3 and P219 TU4 separated from each other, e.g. full height partition walls with a door between them, demountable partition walls with a door between them, or are they open to each other?

Open space, Systems furniture will delineate the space.

600 229/247 of 293

Amendm ent 6

Room

Require ments

P205 & P230 How are Task Unit spaces P205

TU1 and P230 TU5 separated from each other, e.g. full height partition walls with a door between them, demountable partition walls with a door between them, or are they open to each other?

P205 and P230 are in separate suites.

P205 is in TU-1 suite, and P230 is in TU-5

Suite.

601 Part 3, Chapter

G403010 &

G403011

ICS & Cybersecurity OSP POC

Confirmation

Response to RFI #72 and #103 clarified the Industrial Control System (ICS) and Cybersecurity are separate systems from the telecom system described in G403001, to review Attachment U for the

Telecommunications Point of

Connection, and Building 3165 address. Bldg 3165 is approximately

5,000ft away from the new P909 building.

Questions:

1. Please clarify the point of connection for these two systems.

Are we splicing to existing fiber in existing Handhole 53? Or does the fiber need to be routed all the way back to Building 3165?

2. If Building 3165 is the point of connection, please confirm if existing underground telecom infrastructure will be used to

Building 3165. Or will new infrastructure need to be provided back to Building 3165?

1.Provide new duct bank and fiber to

Handhole 53 and connect to existing 144f infrastructure to establish connectivity with building 3165.

2.Yes utilize existing telecom infrastructure from handhole 53 to building

3165.

602 1399 Part 6 TS101 Telecom OSP Duct bank

Amendment 0006 provided

Attachment U Telecommunication

Point of Connection which directs bidders that existing Handhole 53 will be the point of connection for

P909.

RFI #241 clarified the new duct bank routing on Part 6 TS101

Telecom Site Plan is "new to the connection point." The routing shown on TS101 does not appear to be valid with the updated information that the point of connection will be existing

Handhole 53.

Question:

1. Please confirm the routing shown in the original RFP TS101 is no longer required.

2. Please confirm the proposed new duct bank routing from P909 to existing Handhole 53.

1. The original routing is no longer required.

2.Provide new duct bank from Q909 along

Intercove Rd, Cove Rd and Helicopter Rd.

Coordinate with base UEM and verify existing utilities.

603 RFI 242 Telecom Outside Plant

RFI #242 asks for clarity on the telecom point of connection.

Response to RFI #242 states to refer to Attachment U

Telecommunication Point of

Connection and states "it is the contractor's responsibility to terminate within the building."

Attachment U only appears to show existing Handhole 53 as the point of connection, not a building.

Question: please clarify if the telecom point of connection will be spliced to existing fiber in Handhole

53, or if the telecom fibers will need to be routed back to a building for the point of connection.

Provide new duct bank and fiber to

Handhole 53 and connect to existing 144f infrastructure to establish connectivity with building 3165.

604 RFI 243 Exterior PDS to Building 3854

Per the response to PPI #243, the

Protective Distribution System

(PDS) will be buried and tied into

Building 3854. It is understood that a buried PDS falls under the classification of a Category 2 PDS per CNSSI No. 7003, and that a

Category 2 PDS is required for

Controlled Access Areas with Top

Secret and Sensitive

Compartmented Information in medium threat environments. It is also understood that for medium threat environments, the PDS carrier must be an EMT, rigid pipe, PVC, or similar type conduit, buried a minimum of one (1) meter below the surface, and encased within the center of mass of approximately 8” of concrete.

1. Please confirm that our understanding of a Category 2 PDS being required is correct and that the area in which the PDS will be buried between CAAs in the new facility and Building 3854 will be considered a medium threat environment.

2. Please confirm that our understanding of the buried PDS infrastructure is correct and what size conduit for the PDS will be

1. Correct provide category 2 PDS.

2. Provide 4in PVC conduit.

required.

605 RFI 319 X203 Comm Room Data Sheet

Response to RFI #319 appears to indicate a room data sheet for X203

Comm Room was provided in

Amendment 0006 but it does not appear to be provided with the updated room data sheets.

Question: Please confirm if the room is required or provide the missing X203 Comm Room data sheet.

Room X203 is not required.

606 RFI 317 SOCRATES Network Confirmation

RFI #317 asked if the SOCRATES network drops will be routed to the

SIPR rack. Response to RFI #317 stated "This extends to all areas 838 the project" and does not appear to answer the question.

Question: Please confirm the

SOCRATES network drops will be routed to the SIPR rack.

Correct, the Socrates network drops will be routed to the SIPR racks

607 RFI 244,

SIPR Fiber vs Copper Confirmation

Response to RFI #312 states the

SIPR outlet requirements is Cat 6

UTP. Response to RFI #244 states the use of horizontal fiber is permitted for SIPR.

1. If horizontal fiber is used for

SIPR outlets, is Fiber To The

Desktop permitted and if so, what is the SIPR fiber outlet requirement?

2. If this is not permitted, is fiber to be brought near the outlet and a media converter used to convert to

CAT6?

Fiber to be brought near Desktop and converted to CAT6 for ease of use and hardware compatibility.

608 RFI 248 CCTV Camera Locations

RFI #248 asked if there are any additional camera locations besides the exterior of the building (all corners of the building and all entrances and exits) and the two (2) interior locations. The response to

RFI #248 does not appear to answer the question. Please confirm the required locations for CCTV system cameras.

Coordinate with SSM, in addition to the exterior cameras, provide a minimum of one camera for all entry and exits of the building.

609 N/A Part 3 -

Chapter

ESR D30 Response to PPI #293 indicated a

DOAS is required per UFC 3-410-

01. However per UFC 3-410-01 a

DOAS is only required when sum of all ventilation air into facility is greater than 750 cfm and design includes direct-expansion equipment delivering outside air, which is not a condition of the RFP design which requires chilled water coils at air handlers per ESR Section

D304008. Please confirm a DOAS is not required.

A DOAS is not required. Provide total enthalpy energy recovery device in each air handling unit per RFP ESR D309090.

610 N/A N/A N/A Will the Government please consider extending the proposal due date to Friday, December 20, 2024?

There are still outstanding RFI responses carrying potentially significant design impacts and next week is a short week due to the

Thanksgiving holiday. This extension would address the pending holiday, allow the

Government time to respond to outstanding RFIs, and offerors time to incorporate and respond to any changes resulting from Government

RFI responses.

Yes.

611 N/A General

Require ments

N/A Per the RFP, all Communication

Closets will have 4 server racks.

Based on the square footage of the

Comm Closets, 4 server racks will not fit. Confirm quantity of server racks in each Comm Closet.

Layout and size of telecom room and closet is preliminary. The size and equipment layout is subset to change if needed.

612 CS102 N/A N/A On CS102, the heavy duty concrete depicted adjacent to the P909 structure stops short of either laydown area north and south of the truck access road. Please confirm that this area shown for heavy duty concrete is the only location it is required.

It is required in the two laydown areas on sheet CS101 and for the section located in the drive thru truck lane.

614 N/A Room

Require ments

N/A The RFP lists an STC 55 for the entire exterior envelope including roof. The highest rating available for a roof assembly is STC 53, please confirm this is acceptable.

This is not acceptable.

615 N/A Room

Require ments

N/A In many cases the STC ratings shown in the Part 4.1 Space

Tabulations on pages 447 through

456 of the Amendment 0005 RFP document do not match those shown in the Part 5.0 Room Requirements on pages 458-719. For example, the room requirements for the second floor spaces state "Provide STC 55

(min) rated interior partitions for entire second level.", while the space tabulations show the General

Spaces having no STC rating, The

N1 Admin spaces as STC 40 and the remaining second floor spaces as STC 50. Should the STC ratings for the proposed design meet the requirements of the Part 5 Room

Requirements or the Part 4.1 Space

Tabulations?

Minimum STC ratings for second Floor is

55 unless otherwise stated in the room requirement sheets.

616 N/A Amendm ent 006

PPI

Response s

PPI 270

response

"Response PPI #270 states:

""Reference PPI #191 response.""

There is no PPI #191 or responses provided "

The response was provided in Amendment

617 N/A Amendm ent 006

PPI

Response s

PPI 272

response

Response PPI #272 states:

"Coordinate with PPI #270" which states "Reference PPI #191 response." There is no PPI #191 or responses provided. Please provide

PPI #191 and response or a response to PPI #272.

The response was provided in Amendment

618 N/A Amendm ent 006

PPI

Response s

PPI 214

response

PPI 214 references a JEB Little

Creek - Fort Story IAP dated

October 2013 but does not include the document. Please provide all bidders with October 2013 JEB

Little Creek - Fort Story IAP

Document.

This is an error.