19R9253 Amendment 0012.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1.PPI responses : 56, 62, 68-70, 95, 99-102, 103, 128, 140, 2.Provides Attachments

3. Design to

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-May-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9253

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Nov-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-May-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9253

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0012

1. PPI responses : 56, 58, 62, 68-70, 95, 99-102, 103, 128, 140,

2. Provides Attachments:

20200409_Hadnot-1707-PRE-FINAL.pdf ir78 pipe.pdf ir78.pdf

3. Replaces Design to Budget Information in Amendment 0003 to correct transposition error between P1338F and P1512F and replace language:

FROM

The following Design-To-Budgets are provided for informational purposes and are not intended to be interpreted as hard ceilings. While offerors may find that a particular project requires a different budget amount than shown, please be advised that the offeror shall not change or otherwise modify the Design-to-Budget total.

Project Project Title Amount P1512F MCCSSS Log Ops School $59.7M P1338F II MEF Simulation/Training Center Replacement $144.0M P1527F LOGCOM CSP Warehouse Replacement $28.8M Package 3 Total $232.5M

TO

The following Design-To-Budgets are provided for informational purposes and are not intended to be interpreted as hard ceilings.

Project Project Title Amount P1512F MCCSSS Log Ops School $144.0M P1338F II MEF Simulation/Training Center Replacement $59.7M P1527F LOGCOM CSP Warehouse Replacement $28.8M Package 3 Total $232.5M

Reference Question Government Response Page Sect Para

56 184 Part 6 - 6.2 P1512F Log Ops School Phasing of Log Ops School

Phasing plans provided in the RFP attachment list Key Construction milestones as follows - Contract award by 9/2020, Construction Start by 12/2020, and Construction Complete by 9/23/20. Please confirm these milestones are not applicable to the contract. If they are applicable, please clarify if Construction Start is meant to convey design start and that the Log Ops School should be 1st in terms of priority of delivery in lieu of P1338F as required in the solicitation.

Priority order: Bid per RFP.

The dates are meant to be used as guidelines between contract award, construction design, and construction completion and contract dates will depend on actual award date and proposed schedules as submitted.

58 Amendment #3 SF30 Continuation Part 2 & TFF+Package+3_Cost+Estimate_R1

Can the Government elaborate on how the Design to Budgets were developed and explain the correlation with the estimate provided by Jacobs in Amendment #3? For example, the base price in the estimate for P1512F is $181,325,806 and the design to budget (assuming there was a transposition error between P1338F and P1512F in the table) is $144,000,000. Additionally please clarify that while project budgets may fluctuate, the total package cost may not exceed the total design to amount of $232.5M. If the total package amount is a hard ceiling, does it factor only base bid items or base bid and all options?

Design to Budgets were developed from the DD1391s.

Additionally, the amounts were transposed between P1338F and P1512F. The correct design to budgets are:

P1338F $59.7 M P1512F $144M P1527F $28.8M

The total package cost is $232.5M.

62 Part 1, 01 33 10.05.20 1.5 Submittals To meet the government's goals for priorities and schedule, fast track design packages will be required.

With the volume of Lejeune work being designed and reviewed in

Package 3 and other packages, there is concern that the volume of projects being submitted and reviewed may present a challenge.

For both fast track and standard design packages, would a specific design review strategy be able to be developed in partnership with the gov to streamline the submittal, review comment, backcheck and closure process? The intent is not to omit necessary review, rather to develop a mutually efficient process for both the gov and DB team.

The design schedule shall be in accordance with the RFP and referenced criteria. The schedule shall demonstrate adequate time for development and review of the required submittals and be coordinated with the construction schedule.

Critical Path Design Submittals (Fast Track) requirements are specified in Part 1 Section 01 33 10.05 20 Design Submittal Procedures.

Suggestions could include packaged reviews, in person review and comment closure meetings, etc.

68 Part 6.3 Attachment 6 -

Building 1601 IR Plume and

LUC Maps

Maps indicate multiple existing monitoring wells, and Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Systems (VIMS) throughout areas with building demolition. Please provide additional information if available for existing systems including system type, function, piping and equipment layouts, etc

All VIMS/monitoring well data available to date is included either in the RFP, or attached in the PPI responses. Specific coordination of this issue will have to be addressed during design.

69 Page

(1023 of

2366)

Part 3 Site Analysis -

P1512 JRC

At administration portion of JRC, requires Vapor Instrusion

Management System (VIMS) and EPA compliant radon-resistant new construction (RRNC)impermeable membrane system with gas collection piping and exhaust system. Refer to Part 6 "Vapor Instrusion Management System" for additional comments. Please provide relevent VIMS section which is currently not found in Part

6. Provide plan area of required VIMS containments systems.

All VIMS/monitoring well data available to date is included either in the RFP, or attached in the PPI responses. Specific coordination of this issue will have to be addressed during design.

70 Page

(1411 of

2366)

Part 4 3.3.9 Geotech Earthwork and

Site Prep/Sitework Requirements

- P1527F -

LOGCOM

CSP

Warehouse

Repl

Warehouse site requires Vapor Instrusion Management System

(VIMS) and EPA compliant radon-resistant new construction

(RRNC)impermeable membrane system with gas collection piping and exhaust system. Refer to Part 6 "Vapor Instrusion Management

System" for additional comments.

Please provide relevent VIMS section which is currently not found in Part 6.

All VIMS/monitoring well data available to date is included either in the RFP, or attached in the PPI responses. Specific coordination of this issue will have to be addressed during design.

95 17 01 57 19 1.11 Part 2 - 01 57 19 - 1.11 Facility Hazardous Waste Generator Status states that MCAS Cherry Point is designated as a Large Quantity

Generator.

Please confirm that MCB Camp

Lejeune is a Large Quantity Generator and will sign all manifests.

Confirmed.

99 01 14 00 The RFP does not provide the period of time the proposers should allow for the Government to vacate the existing buildings and move into the new facility prior to commencement of existing building demolition. The period of time is required to account for the duration

Time period to vacate existing occupied facilities is 60 days, unless otherwise specified in the RFP.

in the project schedule. A previous PPI was submitted regarding the subject for P1512F, this PPI is requesting the same information for P1338F and P1527F.

100 2 Part 6.2 Attachment 5 Part 6.2 - P1512F – General, Attachment 5, Page 2;

KEY CONSTRUCTION

MILESTONES are provided at the bottom of the page. Are the dates required to be incorporated into the proposed project schedule?

The dates are meant to be used as guidelines between contract award, construction design, and construction completion and contract dates will depend on actual award date and proposed schedules as submitted.

101 2 Part 6.2 Attachment 5 Part 6.2 – P1512F – General, Attachment 5, does not provide for a period of time the project schedule should allow for the Government to vacate the existing buildings prior commencement of existing building demolition. The period of time is required for the proposers to properly account for the duration their project schedule.

Refer to response #99.

3 01 20 00.05 20 1.3.4 SECTION 01 20 00.05 20 describes the HVAC TABS process. Does the Government require the completion date for each building include the HVAC TABS Season I and Season II analysis and reporting process requirements?

Yes, the Government requires the completion dates for each building to include the HVAC TABS Season I and Season II analysis and reporting process requirement

103 2 & 3 01 31 19.05 20 1.3.5 The reservation of rights by the Government leaves a significant amount of schedule time up to interpretation, discretion, and decision out of the Contractor’s control. In order to eliminate this schedule risk, we request the Government provide clear direction of what should be included for days until the first CDW will occur after award.

Bid per RFP.

128 1169 of

Part 3 Chapter 6 G1040 1.1 The RFP states that the project does require contaminated soil or groundwater work. Please define scope of contaminated soil or groundwater at the JRC site.

Per the NEPA Decision Memorandum (see Part 6) for the JRC site, no contaminated soil or groundwater exists;

however there is a groundwater plume under the P1527 (LOGCOM site).

140 1 Part 2 01 33 29.05 20 RFP Part 2 Section 01 33 29.05 20 references ASHRAE 90.1 – 2016, however the UFCs still reference ASHRAE 90.1 -2013 for energy performance. Please clarify which edition of ASHRAE 90.1 shall be referenced for energy performance.

Use ASHRAE 90.1-2013

(End of Summary of Changes)