TORP_0329.docx
DOCX document 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CN & GT Operations and Logistics Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4890-14-R-0023
About this file
Historical T/O PWS 0329
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
CN & GT Operations and Logistics has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DoD Counter Narcoterrorism Program Office (CNTPO)
TORP 0329
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
USNORTHCOM FY13 Air and maritime operations surveillance system (AMOSS) 17 may 2013
1.0 MISSION OBJECTIVE.
The DoD Counter Narcoterrorism Program Office (CNTPO) was established to create Counter Narcoterrorism (CN) networks, infrastructure, and capabilities worldwide that are focused on the detection, identification, and disruption of narcoterrorist activities and organizations. This task effort will support the War Fighter in the combating of Narcoterrorism worldwide.
2.0 SCOPE.
2.1 Objective:
The objective is the procurement and delivery of specific equipment to the Air and Marine Operations Center (AMOC) in support of SEMAR (Mexican Navy). This equipment will support the air and maritime operations surveillance system (AMOSS).
2.2 Basic Contract References.
This PWS establishes the requirements for the contractor to provide support in the Basic Contract task area(s) of: 4.3.2 Operations, and Logistics support and 4.3.3.4 Material and Equipment Purchase.
3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.
The contractor shall provide, ship, and deliver all parts and equipment. The contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, travel, and required actions to satisfy the PWS requirements. All parts and equipment shall be delivered to the following United States address:
Air and Marine Operations Center (AMOC)
ATTN:
1355 Customs Way, Bldg 605 March ARB, CA 92518 AMOC will install software, ensure the equipment is functioning, and ship equipment to the SEMAR freight forwarder.
SEMAR Freight Forwarder:
TBD
Export licenses and ITAR compliance are required by the freight forwarder in order to export the equipment to Mexico. The freight forwarder works for SEMAR. It is their responsibility to get the equipment to the correct location in Mexico. SEMAR will come to Texas to pick up the equipment and transfer it into Mexico. The contractor shall provide export licenses and all associated technology transfer agreements as required for the equipment to be transferred to Mexico. The contractor is responsible for International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) compliance, custom clearance, value added tax (VAT), and any associated taxes and fees for the equipment to be transferred to Mexico.
3.1 AMOSS Equipment (Brand Name Only).
The contractor shall provide, ship, and deliver the following brand name equipment:
| Equipment / Software |
| Quantity |
| Type |
| Basic specifications |
| Surveillance Processor |
| 2 |
| Dell R820 |
| Dell Xeon E52407 2.20 GHz Quad core Processor , 10M Cache,6.4GT/s QPI, Turbo, 1600MHz, 16GB RAM, Red Hat Enterprise 6, 4 1.2 TB Disk drives Raid 5, Ready Rails Sliding Rails with Cable Management Arm |
| Database Processor |
| 2 |
| Dell R420 |
| Intel® Xeon® E5-2450L 1.80GHz, 20M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, 8C, 1600MHz, 16GB RAM, Red Hat Enterprise 6, 4 1.2 TB Disk drives Raid 5, Ready Rails Sliding Rails with Cable Management Arm |
| Oracle Enterprise Edition Database License |
| 2 |
| Oracle |
| 100 human user licenses |
| Nessus |
| 1 |
| Nessus |
| 1 License (Patch level verification) |
| Equipment / Software |
| Quantity |
| Type |
| Basic specifications |
| McAfee Virus Protection |
| 1 |
| McAfee |
| 15 Server/15 Client |
| Workstation |
| 5 |
| Dell Optiplex 3010 SFF |
| 3rd Gen Intel® Core™ i5-3470 Processor (Quad Core, 6MB, 3.20GHz w/HD2500 Graphics), 8GB (2 DIMM), 250GB SATA disk drive, 2 network interfaces, Red Hat WS 6, Nvidia NVS 300 low Profile video card |
| 20" Flat Panel Monitor |
| 10 |
| Dell |
| Data Interface Servers (2 - Radar Forwarders/ 2 - Flightplan Forwarders / YUM(Patch) Repository) |
| 6 |
| Dell PowerEdge R210 II |
| Intel® Xeon® E3-1220v2 3.10 GHz, 8M Cache, Turbo, Quad Core, 4GB RAM, Red Hat WS 6, 500GB Disk drive, Ready Rails Sliding Rails with Cable Management Arm, Windows 2008R2 |
| NVIDIA NVS 300 Video Card |
| 5 |
| NVIDIA |
| DVI-I NVIDIA CARD |
| Network cards |
| 15 |
| Intel Pro |
| Intel Pro 1000 PT 1GbE Single Port NIC, PCIE-1 (430-0955) |
| NAS File Storage |
| 1 |
| Dell |
| Dell NX3200: 6 - 2 TB drives, RAID 1 OS, RAID 5 data Windows 2008 |
| Tape Backup Solution |
| 1 |
| Dell |
| TL2000, LT04-12HH, 800/1.6TB, 1HHSAS drive |
| LT04-120 Back-up Tapes |
| 5 |
5 count pack (total 25 tapes)
| LT04-120 Back-up Tape labels |
| 1 |
| Dell |
| 1 Package: 1-60 |
| Equipment Rack |
| 1 |
| APC |
| 84" Rack (42 U) |
| Rack Mount KVM Drawer |
| 1 |
| APC |
| Keyboard, Monitor, Mouse, KVM Switch |
| Equipment / Software |
| Quantity |
| Type |
| Basic specifications |
| CISCO 1941 ROUTER w/SECURITY BUNDLE and 1 yr SmartNet |
| 2 |
| Cisco |
| CISCO1941-SEC/K9 |
| CISCO E1 DSU INTERFACE CARD |
| 1 |
| Cisco |
| VWIC-1MFT-G703 |
| CISCO WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 T1 DSU/CUS WAN INERFACE CARD |
| 1 |
| Cisco |
| HWIC-1DSU-T1-V2 |
| Cisco 5520 Firewall w/SmartNet |
| 2 |
| Cisco |
| ASA5520-BUN-K9 |
| CAT-6 Cable |
| 1 |
1000' Box Plenum
| CAT-6 RJ-45 Connectors |
| 1 |
100 count package
| HP PROCurve 24 port Switch 29100AL-24G |
| 5 |
| HP |
| J9145A#ABA |
| HP LaserJet P3015dn printer |
| 3 |
| HP |
| Printer |
3.2 Option A: Workstations (Quantity 5) (Brand Name Only).
Workstation shall include:
· Dell Optiplex 3010 SFF
· 3rd Gen Intel® Core™ i5-3470 Processor (Quad Core 6MB, 3.20GHz w/HD2500 Graphics)
· 8GB (2 DIMM)
· 250GB SATA disk drive
· 2 network interfaces
· Red Hat WS 6
· Nvidia NVS 300 low Profile video card
3.3 Option B: Network Cards (Quantity 15) (Brand Name Only).
Intel Pro 1000 PT 1GbE Single Port NIC, PCIE-1 (430-0955)
4.0 OTHER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.
4.1 Meetings, Briefings, and Publications.
The contractor shall participate in technical interchange meetings, to be scheduled upon request of the responsible Contracting Officer or written designee, to discuss and to informally evaluate the contractor’s efforts and accomplishments. During the meetings, the contractor shall present necessary data to enable a joint review of its various assigned tasks, attendant schedules, and resource expenditures. The contractor shall present and participate in technical discussions and shall inform, in a timely fashion, the Technical Monitor of any problems with contract execution and any proposed solutions. The contractor shall attend and participate in other meetings, as scheduled by the responsible Contracting Officer or written designee.
5.0 TEMPORARY DUTY (TDY) TRAVEL.
The contractor shall perform TDY non-local travel, as required. The contractor shall provide the performance of this task order within the Continental United States (CONUS).
All travel required and approved will be paid IAW the Basic Contract by reimbursement to the contractor. Only required travel previously approved will be reimbursed.
6.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL (GFE/GFM).
None.
7.0 SECURITY.
All work shall be unclassified.
8.0 DELIVERABLES.
| Name |
| CDRL |
| #Copies* |
| PWS Reference |
| Due |
| Master Schedule |
| A002 |
| 3 |
| 9.1 |
| 45 calendar days after award. |
| Progress Report |
| A002 |
| 3 |
| 9.2 |
| Monthly. |
| Management Plan |
| A00G |
| 3 |
| 9.3 |
| 45 calendar days after award. |
| Quality Control Plan |
| A00G |
| 3 |
| 9.4 |
| 30 calendar days after award. |
| Status Meeting |
| A003 |
| 3 |
| 9.5 |
| 10 calendar days after meeting. |
| Program Reviews |
| A004 |
| 3 |
| 9.6 |
| As required. |
*Copies are to be submitted electronically whenever possible. Recipients at a minimum shall include the Contracting Officer (KO), Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and Technical Monitor.
9.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS:
9.1 Master Schedule.
The contractor shall provide a Master Schedule for Government approval within 45 calendar days of award. The contractor shall create, maintain, and report the schedule in conjunction with the progress report after initial delivery. The schedule shall cover all phases of the project from kick off to close out. The Master Schedule shall include; but not be limited to, the following information:
Timeline for procurement of equipment; and Milestones for Deliverables.
Additionally, the contractor shall be required to update the Master Schedule and submit for Government approval within ten (10) calendar days, in the event there are any changes or delays regarding the timeline for procurement of equipment or milestones for deliverables.
9.2 Progress Report.
A comprehensive progress report shall be delivered monthly within ten (10) business days from the end of the previous month. The report shall, at a minimum contain an overall schedule, the current status of funding, accomplishments, any potential issues, and any lessons learned.
9.3 Management Plan.
The contractor shall provide a management plan within 45 calendar days of award defining a management system to plan and control this effort. The management plan shall delineate how the contractor plans to accomplish the effort, to include a breakout of Direct Productive Person Hours (DPPHs), travel, material, ODC, DBA Insurance, a milestone schedule, and a schedule for the planned expenditure of funds.
9.4 Quality Control Plan.
The contractor shall provide a draft Quality Control (QC) Plan with their Proposal. The final plan shall be provided within 30 calendar days after award.
9.5 Status Meeting.
The contractor shall provide a status meeting report within ten (10) calendar days after a meeting.
9.6 Program Reviews.
The contractor shall support Program Reviews (commonly called Program Management Reviews (PMR)). Formats for PMRs will be provided by the COR. In addition, the dates and locations will be announced well in advance of the meetings. In some cases, time will be allotted for the contractor to meet individually with Government representatives to discuss contractual issues.
CNTPO Program and Operations Support USNORTHCOM FY13 Air and Maritime Operations Surveillance System (AMOSS)
PWS 0329
APPENDIX A
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY MATRIX
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVE
| PERFORMANCE STANDARD |
| ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL) |
| METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE |
| PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE |
| Customer Satisfaction (Quality of Service) |
| T/O requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered |
Performance meets all technical and functional requirements, and is highly responsive to changes in technical direction and/or the technical support environment
Personnel qualifications, assessments, evaluations, analyses, recommendations, and related input are thorough, reliable, highly relevant to T/O requirements, and consist of substantial depth and breadth of subject matter expertise.
Deliverable reports contain all required data and meet all applicable CDRL requirements Contractor technical performance meets all T/O requirements.
Adequate Key Personnel with appropriate qualifications including security clearances provided at least 95% of time. Problems that are encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.
| Routine Assessment of Workforce Qualifications and Availability of Resources |
| Assignment of performance rating for Customer Satisfaction criteria: |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets all and exceeds many T/O requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance/rework 99% of time; problems that are encountered are minor and resolved in a highly effective manner.
VERY GOOD
Performance and deliverables meet all and exceed some T/O requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance/rework at least 97% of time; problems that are encountered are minor and resolved in an effective manner.
SATISFACTORY
Performance and deliverables meet all T/O requirements. Performance delivered with no re-performance/rework at least 95% of time; problems that are encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.
MARGINAL
Some T/O requirements not met and/or performance delivered with re-performance/rework required more than 20% of time. Problems encountered were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner.
UNSATISFACTORY
Many T/O requirements not met. Numerous re-performances/rework required. Substantial problems were encountered and inadequate corrective actions employed.
| Adherence to Schedule |
| T/O milestones, periods of performance, and/or data submission dates are met or exceeded; highly qualified Key Personnel are available as required. |
| Contractor meets T/O delivery requirements at least 95% of the time (excluding Government- caused delays) |
| Routine Inspection of Deliverable Products/ |
Services Assignment of performance rating for schedule criteria:
EXCEPTIONAL
T/O milestones/ performance dates met or exceeded 99% of time (excluding Government caused delays)
VERY GOOD
T/O milestones/ performance dates met or exceeded at least 97% of time (excluding Government caused delays)
SATISFACTORY
T/O milestones/ performance dates met or exceeded at least 95% of time (excluding Government caused delays)
MARGINAL
T/O milestones/ performance dates met less than 95% of time (excluding Government caused delays)
UNSATISFACTORY
T/O schedule/performance dates met less than 80% of time (excluding Government caused delays)
| Cost Control |
| Contract mix (labor, travel, and ODCs) is controlled in efficient and effective manner. |
Actual T/O mix (labor, travel, and ODCs) is maintained within 3% of originally awarded.
| Routine Inspection of T/O Funds & Manpower Performance Reports, Payment Invoices. |
| Assignment of performance rating for cost control criteria: |
EXCEPTIONAL
Actual T/O resource mix maintained within originally awarded T/O resource mix
VERY GOOD
Actual T/O resource mix maintained within 1% of originally awarded T/O resource mix
SATISFACTORY
Actual T/O resource mix maintained within 3% of originally awarded T/O resource mix
MARGINAL
Actual T/O resource mix maintained within 10% of originally awarded T/O resource mix UNSATISFACTORY Actual T/O resource mix exceeds 10% of originally awarded T/O resource mix
| Small Business Participation |
| Small business participation goals are met or exceeded. |
| Actual small business participation meets 80% of small business participation goals.[endnoteRef:1] [1: ] |
| Routine inspection of cost reports, including small business participation as a percentage of total task order value. |
| Assignment of performance rating for small business participation criteria: |
EXCEPTIONAL
Actual T/O small business participation meets or exceeds small business participation goals.
VERY GOOD
Actual T/O small business participation meets 90% of small business participation goals.
SATISFACTORY
Actual T/O small business participation meets 80% of small business participation goals.
MARGINAL
Actual T/O small business participation meets 75% of small business participation goals.
UNSATISFACTORY
Actual TO small business participation meets less than 75% of small business participation goals.
Small business participation percentages are based on total task order value. Small business participation percentage for performance rating calculated by adding equally weighted total small business participation, woman-owned small business participation, small disadvantaged business participation service disabled veteran owned participation and historically underutilized business zone small business participation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .