Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 54: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 25% of FY2025 NAICS 54 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $221,494,526,636 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 54 or a code under it
- Contractors
- 20,119 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- General Dynamics Corporation $12.1 billion, 5.1% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $12,054,448,858 | |||
| 2 | $8,387,495,490 | |||
| 3 | $7,549,528,865 | |||
| 4 | $6,152,143,099 | |||
| 5 | $4,701,250,024 | |||
| 6 | $4,360,902,844 | |||
| 7 | $4,217,427,261 | |||
| 8 | $3,757,367,083 | |||
| 9 | $3,724,362,688 | |||
| 10 |
Accenture Federal Services LLC
|
$3,488,629,464 | ||
| 11 |
RTX Corporation
|
$2,937,541,932 | ||
| 12 | $2,528,762,049 | |||
| 13 | $2,330,418,367 | |||
| 14 | $2,295,954,700 | |||
| 15 | $2,290,588,347 | |||
| 16 |
Johns Hopkins University
|
$2,267,995,874 | ||
| 17 | $1,945,494,122 | |||
| 18 | $1,892,214,767 | |||
| 19 |
BAE Systems
|
$1,810,419,123 | ||
| 20 | $1,733,790,751 | |||
| 21 | $1,667,732,056 | |||
| 22 | $1,472,875,714 | |||
| 23 | $1,454,669,927 | |||
| 24 | $1,443,735,054 | |||
| 25 | $1,405,536,210 | |||
| 26 |
Tcom, L.P.
Top agencies
|
$1,387,180,148 | ||
| 27 |
KBR Wyle Services LLC
|
$1,253,533,584 | ||
| 28 | $1,244,417,470 | |||
| 29 | $1,235,909,424 | |||
| 30 |
CGI Federal Inc.
|
$1,134,629,374 | ||
| 31 | $1,113,628,535 | |||
| 32 | $1,092,482,411 | |||
| 33 |
Oracle Health Government Services Inc.
|
$1,011,830,639 | ||
| 34 | $1,010,787,290 | |||
| 35 | $894,961,406 | |||
| 36 |
Thundercat Technology LLC
|
$856,520,902 | ||
| 37 |
ManTech International Corporation
|
$853,917,325 | ||
| 38 | $833,759,907 | |||
| 39 | $816,595,605 | |||
| 40 | $783,784,799 | |||
| 41 | $778,380,365 | |||
| 42 | $759,053,658 | |||
| 43 | $747,079,821 | |||
| 44 | $727,295,536 | |||
| 45 |
Guidehouse Inc.
|
$712,525,525 | ||
| 46 | $679,911,935 | |||
| 47 | $672,737,792 | |||
| 48 | $609,333,257 | |||
| 49 | $596,666,282 | |||
| 50 |
Asgn Incorporated
|
$573,424,255 | ||
| 51 | $563,995,855 | |||
| 52 |
V2X, Inc.
|
$561,472,857 | ||
| 53 | $558,465,055 | |||
| 54 |
Ernst & Young LLP
|
$556,827,077 | ||
| 55 | $505,176,987 | |||
| 56 | $496,146,005 | |||
| 57 | $470,149,451 | |||
| 58 | $464,553,899 | |||
| 59 | $445,681,182 | |||
| 60 | $434,579,681 | |||
| 61 | $426,224,382 | |||
| 62 | $421,665,172 | |||
| 63 | $405,533,451 | |||
| 64 | $398,321,440 | |||
| 65 | $393,407,849 | |||
| 66 |
DDB Chicago Inc.
Top agencies
|
$390,942,182 | ||
| 67 |
Semanticbits LLC
|
$385,933,146 | ||
| 68 | $372,295,645 | |||
| 69 | $370,262,899 | |||
| 70 | $369,078,423 | |||
| 71 | $366,893,848 | |||
| 72 | $365,586,454 | |||
| 73 | $365,380,627 | |||
| 74 | $362,071,256 | |||
| 75 |
World Wide Technology LLC
|
$359,395,085 | ||
| 76 | $348,114,181 | |||
| 77 |
Mythics Inc.
|
$346,988,301 | ||
| 78 |
Jacobs Government Services Company
|
$343,386,593 | ||
| 79 | $337,593,792 | |||
| 80 | $315,364,204 | |||
| 81 | $309,958,549 | |||
| 82 | $302,820,703 | |||
| 83 | $302,244,892 | |||
| 84 | $276,955,584 | |||
| 85 | $274,817,752 | |||
| 86 | $272,297,330 | |||
| 87 | $270,778,966 | |||
| 88 | $266,721,966 | |||
| 89 | $262,969,170 | |||
| 90 | $262,863,850 | |||
| 91 | $261,192,647 | |||
| 92 | $255,628,510 | |||
| 93 | $254,946,382 | |||
| 94 | $253,659,606 | |||
| 95 | $252,170,800 | |||
| 96 | $250,574,153 | |||
| 97 | $249,497,691 | |||
| 98 | $249,171,462 | |||
| 99 | $249,075,971 | |||
| 100 | $245,261,091 |
Show 75 more
100 of 20,119 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Rankings for the codes under NAICS 54
| Code | Net obligations | Largest contractor |
|---|---|---|
| 541 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services | $221,494,526,636 | General Dynamics Corporation |
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $236 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 54 contractors in FY2025?
1. General Dynamics Corporation ($12.1B), 2. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($8.39B), 3. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation ($7.55B), 4. Leidos Holdings, Inc. ($6.15B), 5. CACI International Inc. ($4.7B), 6. Northrop Grumman Corporation ($4.36B), 7. Science Applications International Corporation ($4.22B), 8. Fluor Corporation ($3.76B), 9. Deloitte ($3.72B), 10. Accenture Federal Services LLC ($3.49B).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work