DRAFT Attachment 0176 - Production Process Attribute Rating Criteria.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles (FoV) Follow-On
Solicitation number
W56HZV-20-R-0072
Issued by

About this file

This document provides details regarding a forthcoming solicitation for the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles Follow-On production contract. The Department of the Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command intends to competitively award a single-award, five-year requirements contract with five additional one-year options. An industry day will be held on February 24-25, 2020 to provide an overview of the JLTV design and acquisition strategy. One-on-one meetings will also be conducted with interested prime contractors on February 25 to obtain feedback on the draft RFP. A static display of JLTVs will also be available. Questions regarding the industry day, draft RFP, and technical data package must be submitted by specified dates in February 2020. Responses will be posted to the beta.SAM.gov website by April 30, 2020.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
220121_JLTV-FoV_Prod_DRAFT-RFP_QAs_(Distribution_A).pdf PDF
JLTV FOC - Industry Day for DRAFT RFP3.pptx PPTX presentation
2021 SANG Vetting Form A2 Static Display.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0107 - Project Expenditure Report(3).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0151 - EDFP Data Righs.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0144 - Data Requirements Form for Acquisition Requirement Package (ARP).pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0142 - Table A-VII (DMWR_NMWR Requirements Matrix)(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0179 - Small Business Participation Cert.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0173 - Production Process Site Visit Plan.docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0122 - JLTV FoV Master Task List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0117 - HMMR Format Example.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0126 - Design Verification Plan and Report (DVPR).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0177 - Small Business Participation Factor WB.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0148 - CDRS Search.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0113 - M and S Input Data Sheets.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0172 -Technology Enhancement TDP Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0118 - Hazard Tracking Log(3).xls XLS spreadsheet
Draft Section E - Inspection and Acceptance(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0159 - Welding Standards(3).doc DOC document
DRAFT Attachment 0119 - Exceptions to Hazardous Materials Requirements(3).doc DOC document
DRAFT Attachment 0127 - GFP_GFI List.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0125 - Windchill User Guide.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0149 - LLRC Proposal Format.DOC DOC document
DRAFT Attachment 0116 - Risk Management Scoring Criteria Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0120 - ECP and VECP.docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0133 - New Equipment Training(3).pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0178 - Small Business Participation Factor WB Instructions.docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0137 - Design Review Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Draft Section C - SOW(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0121 - Request for Variance (RFV).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0134 - Deprocessing Checklist(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0106 - STA Form 7114-2.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0132 - STS Phase 1 WD Process List(3).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0115 - SIL Configuration and Verification Audit (SCAVA).docx DOCX document
Draft Section H - Special Contract Requirements(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0147 - ATPD 2232 Engines - Preparation for Shipment and Storage.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0153 - Pre-TRR Checklist(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0123 - TDP Option Selection Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Draft Section L - Instr., Conditions, and Notices(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0128 - Supplier RFI Form(3).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0146 - Incoming Transaction Format(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0163 - JLTV Special Characteristics(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0168 - DCAA Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0143 - Provisioning Requirements Statement(3).pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0145 - Packaging Data Products(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0152 - Provisioning Requirements LSA-036.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0164 - JLTV PPAP Requirements(3).docx DOCX document
DRAFT Attachment 0135 - FMECA Requirements.pdf PDF
DRAFT Attachment 0174 - Assertion of Restrictions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Attachment 0111 - FPVI Requirements List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 167 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Rating Criteria

UNCLASSIFIED
DRAFT ATTACHMENT 0176: PRODUCTION PROCESS ATTRIBUTE RATING CRITERIA
RATING CRITERIA
#Production Process AttributeFEATURES WHICH MAY PROVIDE STRENGTH TO THE PRODUCTION PROCESS ATTRIBUTEFEATURES WHICH MAY PROVIDE WEAKNESS TO THE PRODUCTION PROCESS ATTRIBUTE
1Work Instructions and Training-Work instructions are observed for all final assembly operations.

-Work instructions are thorough, detailed, complete, and align with observed assembly process.

-Work instructions align with engineering specifications.

-Work instructions are being utilized.

-Work instructions are up to date and readily available to assembly personnel.

-Work instructions are linked to tooling within the station and advance as assembly tasks are successfully completed.

-Quality aids are readily available and posted in the assembly station.

-Training addresses all required skills and operations pertaining to the assembly operation.

-Training is provided to all assembly personnel.

-Training must be successfully completed by personnel prior to being permitted to manufacture product.

-Operations have been observed to not have work instructions.

-Work instructions are observed to not exist or are incomplete, difficult to understand, require the operator to gather information from multiple sources to successfuly perform the required tasks, or do not align with observed assembly process.

-Work instructions are not being utilized.

-Work instructions are out of date or not readily available to assembly personnel.

-Work instructions do not align with engineering specifications.

-Quality aids are not readily available or not posted in the assembly station.

-Training does not address required skills or operations pertaining to the assembly operation.

-Training is not provided to production personnel.

-Training is not required to be successfully completed by personnel prior to being permitted to manufacture product.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

2 Statistical Process Control (SPC) -Extensive implementation of real-time SPC is observed.

-Processes using SPC are observed to be in statistical control (operating within control limits).

-Processes using SPC have the proper process parameters (specification limits) specified.

-Processes are in place to address outputs that fall outside of the control limits before the process begins to produce nonconforming product.

-Implementation of SPC is observed to be incomplete or sporadic.

-SPC is not utilized real-time.

-SPC is not utilized in the production process.

-Processes using SPC are observed to not be in statistical control (operating outside of control limits).

-Processes using SPC are observed to not have the proper process parameters (specification limits) specified.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

3 Error Proofing -Extensive implementation of error proofing is observed.

-Error proofing is robust and cannot be defeated.

-Error proofing does not rely upon inspection.

-Error proofing is regularly challenged to ensure it remains effective.

-Error proofing successfully detects a defect and does not allow it to leave the manufacturing station until corrected.

-Error proofing is not utilized or is sporadically implemented.

-Error proofing is not robust and can be easily defeated.

-Error proofing relies upon human inspection to ensure conforming outputs.

-Error proofing is not regularly challenged to ensure its effectiveness.

-Error proofing does not successfully detect a defect and can permit it to leave the manufacturing station.

-Error proofing relies upon secondary inspections.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

4 Supply Chain Management -Parts utilized in the production process are conforming.

-Parts utilized in the production process have been properly approved for production.

-The process utilized for qualifying/approving parts for production is robust.

-The documentation utilized for qualifying/approving parts for production is robust, thorough, and establishes that the processes being utilized by the supplier are capable of producing conforming product.

-Supplier metrics are extensively utilized, thorough, and capable of evaluating the supplier's performance and risk to manufacturing conforming product. -Parts utilized in the production process are nonconforming from the supplier.

-Parts from suppliers used have not been approved for production.

-There is no process observed for qualifying and validating supplier parts/processes.

-The process observed for qualifying and validating supplier parts/processes is insufficient.

-Documentation for qualification/approval of supplier parts/processes that are being used in production is found to have significant deficiencies and/or does not support that the supplier's manufacturing processes are capable of producing conforming parts.

-There are no metrics utilized to track supplier performance, or metrics utilized are insufficient.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

5 Tooling / Calibration -All tooling required to complete production tasks is present in the applicable work cell.

-Extensive use of tooling that has integrated error proofing enabled.

-Tooling is observed to be properly calibrated.

-Proper tooling in accordance with the specified process work instruction is observed to be in-use in the applicable work cell.

-A robust tooling tracking and management system is observed.

-Tooling required to complete designated production tasks is missing from the applicable work cell.

-Minimal to no tooling with error proofing capability is observed, or the functionality is not enabled.

-Tooling is found to not be properly calibrated.

-Required tooling designated by the work instructions is not being utilized in the applicable work cell.

-Tooling management system is not observed or in place, or is not observed to be effective.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

6 PFMEA / Control Plans -Extensive implementation of PFMEA's and Control Plans is observed.

-PFMEA's demonstrate linkages to Control Plan.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans exist for each assembly station.

-PFMEA's demonstrate robust failure mode documentation, proper severity, occurrence, and detection scoring, RPN assignment, proper special characteristic assignment, and failure mode mitigation actions and their residual severity, occurrence, and detection scoring.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans are observed to be living documents with required maintenance/updates.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans align with engineering specifications.

-Control Plans demonstrate linkages to the PFMEA, proper controls for special characteristics, and align with the controls and processes implemented in the applicable work cell.

-Limited or no implementation of PFMEA's or Control Plans.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans do not align to each other.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans do not address individual assembly processes/work cell content.

-PFMEA's are incomplete or immature, fail to identify critical failure modes, fail to identify special characteristics, or fail to identify mitigations that have been implemented.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans are not maintained.

-PFMEA's and Control Plans do not align with engineering specifications.

-PFMEA severity, occurrence, and detection scores are observed to be inconsistent, incomplete, or not properly assigned.

-Control plans are incomplete or immature, fail to align with the content of the applicable PFMEA, fail to identify and implement controls for special characteristics, or do not align with the controls in the assigned work cells.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

7 Production Traceability and Control of Nonconforming Product and Defects -Extensive implementation of parts traceability is observed.

-Extensive implementation of process traceability is observed.

-Production traceability data are linked to vehicle serial number and retained for future use.

-Production traceability data are error-proofed.

-Production process detects and corrects defects in-station and does not pass them on to downstream assembly processes.

-Production process has robust controls for the identification and correction of nonconforming product.

-Production process does not allow nonconforming product to be utilized.

-Production process has robust controls in place to segregate nonconforming product and ensure it cannot be mixed into conforming stock.

-Production process has controls in place that will not permit the release of product to the customer with defects present.

-Production process utilizes technology and/or error proofing to achieve conforming outputs. -Production process relies upon secondary inspections (outside of the production work cell where the operation is performed) or rework areas to detect and correct defects.

-Production process allows defects to leave the assembly station for correction in later processes.

-Production process does not have robust controls for the identification and correction of nonconforming product.

-Production process is observed to not have a robust process in place to segregate nonconforming product which could allow it to be mixed into conforming stock.

-Production process does not have controls in place to prevent the release of product to the customer with defects present.

-Production process relies upon human inspection to achieve conforming process outputs.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

8 Control of Special Characteristics -All special characteristics are properly controlled.

-SPC is extensively implemented and utilized for the control of special characteristics.

-SPC metrics demonstrate that the required Cpk is being achieved.

-Production process has error proofing techniques implemented to ensure all special characteristics are conforming prior to release of product to the customer.

-Process relies upon 100% inspection to ensure conformance of special characteristics.

-Limited to no use of SPC is implemented in controlling special characteristics.

-SPC metrics demonstrate that the required Cpk for the special characteristics is not being achieved.

-Production process lacks controls necessary to prevent special characteristic defects from being released to the customer.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

9 Production/Quality Metrics and Corrective Action Feedback -Production process captures extensive metrics which are being used to drive process improvements back to the responsible work area.

-Defects Per Unit (DPU) metrics for internal processes auditing and customer inspection show evidence of continuous improvement.

-First Pass Yield Metrics for internal processes auditing and customer inspection show evidence of continuous improvement.

-Corrective Action Feedback process is robust and ensures processes can be corrected at the earliest possible location.

-Corrective Action Feedback Process demonstrates that corrective actions prevent issues from reoccuring.

-Quality Alerts or similar documentation are utilized.

-Production traceability is not utilized or is limited.

-Production traceability data are not error proofed or rely upon manual recording/input of data.

-Production traceability processes do not record critical or significant characteristic data.

-Production process metrics are not tracked or are limited in nature.

-Detected defects are not relayed back to the work cell to be prevented in future product.

-Defects Per Unit (DPU) metrics for internal processes auditing and customer inspection do not show evidence of continuous improvement.

-First Pass Yield Metrics for internal processes auditing and customer inspection do not show evidence of continuous improvement.

-Corrective Action Feedback process is insufficient.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

-Corrective Action Feedback Process does not demonstrate that corrective actions prevent issues from reoccuring or relies upon supplemental human inspection to control defects.

10 In-Process Assembly Testing -Extensive in process assembly testing is observed in final assembly operations.

-In process tests are robust and ensure product is conforming to specifications and is defect free (e.g. leak-free, assembled properly, functioning properly, etc.) prior to being released to the next operation.

-In process testing is conducted frequently enough to ensure conforming product is produced.

-In process assembly testing is error proofed.

-Minimal to no in process assembly testing is observed in final assembly operations.

-In process tests are not robust and do not ensure product is conforming to specifications.

-In process tests are insufficient to establish product is defect free (e.g. leak-free, assembled properly, functioning properly, etc.) prior to being released to the next operation.

-In process testing is available but not utilized.

-In process testing is not conducted frequently enough to ensure conforming product is produced.

-Process observed is not applicable to JLTV manufacturing.

UNCLASSIFIED

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .