Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ)_REV_02.doc
DOC document 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Italy Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA568219RA001
About this file
This document contains a draft request for proposal and pre-solicitation notice for a multiple award construction contract in Italy. The scope of work includes design-build construction services for repair, alteration, renovation, maintenance, and minor construction projects across multiple trades at Aviano Air Base. Work may involve grading, utilities, painting, roofing, building construction, mechanical and electrical systems. The North American Industry Classification System code is 236220. The base period of performance is one year with four optional one-year extensions. The minimum guaranteed amount is $2,500 Euro and the maximum aggregate contract value is estimated at $96 million USD. The minimum task order value is $2,500 and maximum is $7 million. Interested parties must submit any comments on the draft attachments by April 19, 2019 to the named contracting officers. The final solicitation will be issued on or around May 2019 via the Federal Business Opportunities website.
ATTACHMENT 5 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) REV02
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Italy has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FA568219RA001
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
***Please DO NOT send the completed PPQ back to the contractor. Please e-mail directly to the following individuals no later than 15 days after the RFP posting date: the proposal due date stated in SF 1442 Section A, Block 13 of this RFP:
Ms. Melissa Maurhart
AND
MSgt Jeffrey Fluck melissa.mauhart.it@us.af.mil jeffrey.fluck@us.af.mil
31 CONS/PKC
31 CONS/PKC
Tel: +39-0434-30-4318
Tel: +39-0434-30-4979
DSN: (314) 632-4318
DSN: (314) 632-4979
1. This Acquisition is for the Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) program consisting of a broad range of design-build, maintenance, alteration, repair, renovation, and minor construction projects affecting real property at, but not limited to, Aviano AB, Italy.
2. As part of the source selection process, this questionnaire is provided to assist the 31st Contracting Squadron (31 CONS) in the performance evaluation of offerors pertaining to the competitive acquisition for the MACC that will result in the award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and as complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up queries by the evaluators. Please complete the attached questionnaire using the following guidance:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
SECTION 1: CONTRACT AND PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION
a. Contractor: _____________________________________
b. Contractor’s CAGE Code: ________________________________
c. Contract / Task Order (TO) Number: _______________________________
d. Contract Type (e.g. FFP, Cost, T&M): ___________________________
e. Was this a competitive contract?
Yes_____ No______
f. Period of Performance: _____________________________
g. Performed as:
Prime Contractor _____
Sub-Contractor ______
h. Initial (at the time of award) Contract Value (if it was a Task Order, indicate the TO value: $_______________
i. Current or Final Contract/TO Value (include all modifications): $_____________________
j. Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _______________________________________________________
k. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS) or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract or task order?
Yes ____ No _____
SECTION 2: RATER INFORMATION:
Primary
Alternate Name of Rater:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Title:
Agency:
Agency:
Office Symbol:
Office Symbol:
Telephone Number:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:
Note: Once the PPQ is complete, it is considered to be Source Selection Information.
SECTION 3: PROGRAM RELEVANCY
A. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by marking the applicable box with X or √ or N/A.
A-E Design work
Civil (pavements, site utilities) work
Structural work (including roofing)
Electrical and/or Communications work
Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work
Fire Protection work
Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work
New Construction (including building additions)
Interior renovation (including flooring)
Interior/Exterior painting
B. Was this an Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type contract with multiple task orders?
Yes
No
C. Was it a design-build contract/task order?
Yes
No
D. Geographic description of work under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, or other commands:
SECTION 4: PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please mark the appropriate column with “X” or “√” using the definitions matrix set forth in the instructions, and provide a narrative explanation for ratings of E, VG, M or U.
| A. |
| Project Management: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| A1. |
| Provides a good project management structure, to include a single point of contact with responsibility for all contract requirements. |
| A2. |
| Communicates effectively with Government team and with on-site supervisors to ensure accurate/timely information flow. |
| A3. |
| Requires minimal Government direction regarding contract and technical requirements already available to them (i.e. they read/understand the contract in its entirety). |
| A4. |
| Hires, trains, and applies a qualified workforce to this effort. |
| B. |
| Technical Performance: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| B1. |
| Complies with technical requirements and contract objectives. |
| B2. |
| Adheres to contract performance schedule. |
| B3. |
| Provides complete and timely submission of design submittals and all supporting documents. |
| B4. |
| Provides complete and timely submission of construction submittals and other required documents. |
| B5. |
| Provided post-construction documents (manuals, warranties, as-built drawings, etc.) in a timely manner. |
| B6. |
| Contractor was responsive to warranty calls and quickly fixed legitimate problems. |
| C. |
| Safety/Labor Compliance: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| C1. |
| Provides a Safety Program compliant with OSHA and contract requirements. |
| C2. |
| Demonstrates safety awareness and performance. |
| C3. |
| Complies with labor laws/standards. |
| D. |
| Customer Satisfaction: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| D1. |
| Overall commitment to customer satisfaction. |
| D2. |
| Contractor is reasonable and cooperative in dealing with customer. |
| D3. |
| Responds to customer questions concerning technical/service/administrative issues. |
| D4. |
| Demonstrates professionalism and courtesy in dealing with customers. |
| E. |
| Change and Cost Control Management: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| E1. |
| Contractor did not try to “nickel and dime” the customer with numerous change order requests. |
| E2. |
| Flexibility and efforts made to accommodate the customer within the terms of the contract. |
| E3. |
| Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution. |
| E4. |
| Meets and performs within originally awarded contract costs. |
| E5. |
| Alerts Government of potential unforseen costs/changes before they occur. |
| E6. |
| Submits reasonable supportable costs for change requests. |
| E7. |
| Submits timely, accurate, and complete invoices. |
| F. |
| Quality Control Program: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| F1. |
| Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements. |
| F2. |
| Adequacy of design quality control process. |
| F3. |
| Adequacy of construction quality control process. |
| F4. |
| Performs quality work with minimal rework needed. |
| F5. |
| Monitors and controls performance of subcontractors. |
| F6. |
| Ensures poor performance by subcontractors or in-house personnel is not repeated. |
| G. |
| Overall Contract: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| G1. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance for this contract? |
| G2. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |
If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
| YES |
| NO |
| G3. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES |
| NO |
| G4. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? |
If not, explain in “remarks.”
| YES |
| NO |
Remarks: ____________________________________________________________________________________
RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO
THE CONTRACTING OFFICER (see POCs at paragraph 2)
**DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR**
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
For Official Use Only
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .