C05_04_Attachment_6_-_Risk_Assessment-Value_Add_7_14_2026.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Folsom Warehouse Bridge Crane Replacement
- Solicitation number
- 140R2026R0017
About this file
This is a Risk Assessment/Value Added attachment for Solicitation No. 140R2026R0017 concerning the Folsom Dam Warehouse Bridge Crane Replacement project in Folsom, California. The document serves as a template for contractors to identify project risks and propose value-added solutions, with examples provided to guide contractor submissions.
The template contains two primary sections. The Risk Assessment section instructs contractors to identify up to five potential risks associated with the 30-ton bridge crane replacement project and propose solutions with supporting data demonstrating past successful implementation. The example provided addresses design errors, showing how Company "A" successfully minimized design error costs from 10% to 2% on three similar $50M-scope projects, achieving a 9.0 out of 10 customer satisfaction rating. The Value Added section allows contractors to propose up to five value-added alternatives or enhancements beyond base requirements, with quantified impacts on cost and schedule. The example demonstrates an alternate sound wall construction method for school projects that reduced costs by 4.2% and schedule by 30 calendar days while achieving 9.8 out of 10 customer satisfaction and zero noise-related complaints. Contractors are required to provide specific data including number of projects implemented, average scope, performance metrics (cost and time deviations), and customer ratings to substantiate their proposed risk mitigation strategies and value-added offerings.
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No.: 140R2026R0017 Folsom Dam Warehouse – Bridge Crane Replacement Folsom, California
Risk Assessment/Value Added Risk Assessment Risk No. Example
| Contractor Identified Risk: |
| The drawings have signification design errors that amounts to 10% of the project cost. The contractor can correct the design errors decreasing the Government’s cost from 10% to 2%. |
| Solution: (what data does the Contractor have to show they have been successful with the proposed solution?) |
| Company “A” has successfully corrected and minimized design errors on similar projects: |
· # of project implemented: 3
· Average Scope: $50M
· Average design error cost minimized: 7%
· Deviation rate cost and time due to design errors: 1%
· Customer rating of vendors ability to react and minimize design errors: 9.0 (out of 10)
| Impact: |
| Decreased Government’s cost from 10% to 2% for design errors. Reduced Modifications. |
Risk No. 1 Contractor Identified Risk:
Solution:
Impact:
Risk No. 2 Contractor Identified Risk:
Solution:
Impact:
Risk No. 3 Contractor Identified Risk:
Solution:
Impact:
Risk No. 4 Contractor Identified Risk:
Solution:
Impact:
Risk No. 5 Contractor Identified Risk:
Solution:
Impact:
Risk Assessment/Value Added Value Added
Value Add No. Example
| Contractor Value Add: |
| Contractor has an alternate method to the sound wall specific at the school construction site during the school year that minimizes cost by -4.2%. |
Option used on 2 similar school projects with construction during school year:
· The average cost and time deviation: -0.2% and 1.4%
· The # of complaints due to construction noise: 0
· The customer satisfaction: 9.8 out of 10
| Cost Impact: |
| Reduced project cost by 4.2%. |
| Schedule Impact: |
| Reduced schedule by 30 calendar days. |
Value Add No. 1 Contractor Value Add:
Cost Impact:
Schedule Impact:
Value Add No. 2 Contractor Value Add:
Cost Impact:
Schedule Impact:
Value Add No. 3 Contractor Value Add:
Cost Impact:
Schedule Impact:
Value Add No. 4 Contractor Value Add:
Cost Impact:
Schedule Impact:
Value Add No. 5 Contractor Value Add:
Cost Impact:
Schedule Impact:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .