Attachment (c) 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf
FAR Clause PDF 289 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6824624Q0018
About this file
This document is Attachment (c) 52.212-2 RFQ: N6824624Q0018 titled "USS FRANK CABLE (AS 40) Gas Turbine Generator (GTG) Maintenance and Operation", which describes the evaluation criteria for a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for Gas Turbine Generator Maintenance and Operation support services, with a firm-fixed price contract, for a base period plus up to two option periods. The evaluation factors are Price, Technical Capability, and Past Performance, with all non-price factors approximately equal to price. The Technical Capability and Past Performance will be rated using adjectival scales. The solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside with NAICS code 333611 and a 1,500 employee size standard. The Government intends to award a contract to the responsible quoter whose quote conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
View the file
Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-2
Show all 20
Who attaches FAR 52.212-2
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (c) 52.212-2
RFQ: N6824624Q0018
Title: USS FRANK CABLE (AS 40) Gas Turbine Generator (GTG) Maintenance and Operation
52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) Quotations will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 Evaluation of quotations or offers; the tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1 will be utilized.
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quoter whose quote conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate quotes:
Factor 1 – Price Factor 2 – Technical Capability Factor 3 – Past Performance
All evaluation factors other than price are approximately equal. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
Technical Capability adjectival rating will be provided using the following table:
Adjectival Rating Description
Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is un-awardable.
Attachment (c) 52.212-2
Past Performance adjectival rating will be provided using the following table:
Adjectival Rating Description
Substantial Confidence Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
In the case of a quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .