1 Gold_CM Req_Attachment_4.13.26.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70T05026R5900N005
About this file
This is a Statement of Work (SOW) attachment outlining configuration management requirements for Transportation Security Equipment (TSE) systems.
The Contractor must require the equipment manufacturer to establish and maintain a comprehensive Configuration Management (CM) Program applicable to all TSE systems and associated deliverables throughout the contract life. The program shall include configuration identification and control methods, configuration audits, and Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) procedures for system hardware, software, firmware, and deliverables. If the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) already possesses a TSA-approved CM plan, that plan must be maintained for the contract duration. The Contractor must require submission of four key deliverables: (1) Configuration Management Plan (CDRL L001) establishing the CM program structure; (2) Master Configuration Item List per TSE (CDRL L002), with initial submission within ten business days of contract award and quarterly updates thereafter; (3) monthly Configuration Status Accounting Reports (CDRL L003) identifying all deviations from the master list for each unit serial number, with failure to submit resulting in corrective action; and (4) Configuration Audit Plan (CDRL L004) describing procedures for Functional Configuration Audits and Physical Configuration Audits. Configuration control requirements mandate that the manufacturer maintain change management at the Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) level for hardware and version level for software. Changes must be documented as Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Requests for Deviation (RFD), or Requests for Waiver (RFW) using specified DD Forms (1692 and 1694) submitted to CTOCM@tsa.dhs.gov. The manufacturer is encouraged to submit Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP) and shall share in net maintenance cost savings from accepted VECPs per FAR clause 52.248-1, with clear incorporation schedules to maintain operational availability.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Transportation Security Equipment Configuration Management Requirements
Attachment: Configuration Management Requirements
1.1 Configuration Management Program
All Transportation Security Equipment (TSE) systems shall be maintained under strict configuration management. All system Configuration Items (CIs) and hardware and software CIs shall be uniquely identified and map back to the Original Equipment Manufacturer’s (OEM) configuration baseline. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer not to alter these systems in any way without the express approval of the Government.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to establish, implement, and maintain a Configuration Management (CM) Program based on the requirements of this statement of work. Should the OEM already have a TSA-approved CM plan, the Contractor shall maintain the TSA-approved CM plan for the life of this contract. The CM program shall provide an organizational structure with configuration identification and control methods, configuration audits, and Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) procedures for system hardware, software, firmware and deliverables. The CM requirements are applicable to all deliverables under this contract and associated task orders.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and deliver the Configuration Management Plan in accordance with the referenced CDRL.
CDRL L001 – Configuration Management Plan
1.1.1 Configuration Baselines
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to establish and maintain the configuration baseline for each TSE configuration and establish and maintain the required documentation to support this configuration, referred to as the Product Baseline (PBL).
1.1.2 Configuration Identification
The PBL shall retain all documentation for identification, control and status accounting of any Configuration Item (CI) throughout the program life cycle. The CI identification shall be available in a Master Configuration Item List (MCIL). All system CIs and top level hardware and software CIs shall be uniquely identified.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and deliver a MCIL per TSE in accordance with the referenced CDRL. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and submit the initial MCIL to the Government ten (10) business days after contract award;
updated MCILs will be required quarterly.
CDRL L002 - Master Configuration Item List
1.1.3 Configuration Control
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to apply configuration change management measures to each baseline CI and its configuration documentation. The configuration change management system shall provide effective means, as applicable, for proposing changes to CIs and ensuring implementation of the approved change. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to maintain configuration change management of hardware, software, firmware, and developmental/commercial and training documentation. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to maintain configuration change management of hardware to the Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) level and software to the version level.
Changes represent opportunities for improvement or correction of deficiencies. Desired changes are documented in Requests for Change (RFC) in the form of Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Requests for Deviation (RFD), and Requests for Waiver (RFW), which are uniquely identified. All change requests are entered, tracked, controlled, and documented and the Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to establish and maintain a system for tracking, controlling, and submitting all changes.
The equipment manufacturer is encouraged to voluntarily develop, prepare, and submit Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP). The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to share in any net maintenance cost savings realized from accepted VECPs, in accordance with the incentive sharing rates in paragraph (f) of FAR clause 52.248-1. The VECP shall include a clear description and related schedule on how the Contractor plans on incorporating the VECP into fielded Transportation Security Equipment (TSE) units without adversely affecting operational availability of the
EDS.
ECPs are requests to incorporate a permanent change to product configuration, which produces a new baseline. RFDs are requests to temporarily incorporate a known departure from product requirements. Authorized deviations are a temporary departure from requirements and do not constitute a permanent change. RFDs must state actions to be taken at the end of the temporary deviation (e.g. restoration to original configuration). RFWs are requests to incorporate a known departure from product requirements. Authorized waivers are for specific quantities of product and do not constitute a change to the baseline configuration or its documentation.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to deliver configuration control data submittals directly to government via email at CTOCM@tsa.dhs.gov using the following formats:
• ECP DD FORM1692, AUG 96 (EG), Pages 1-7 as applicable
• RFD / RFW: DD FORM 1694, AUG 96 (EG)
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to deliver all supporting documentation directly to the government via email at CTOCM@tsa.dhs.gov and link it to the appropriate
ECP/RFD/RFW.
1.1.4 Configuration Status Accounting
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to maintain a Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) Information System to assure accurate identification of each CI. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to ensure that the CSA information is provided to the Government upon request. The CSA information shall be provided as a monthly Configuration Status Accounting Report (CSAR). Failure to submit the CSAR on a recurring monthly basis will result in a corrective action report against the Contractor that will document the negative performance and may led to Government consideration. The CSA System shall be described in the CMP. The CSAR shall identify all deviations from the MCIL for each unit, i.e. for all serial numbers.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and deliver the CSAR in accordance with the referenced CDRL.
CDRL L003 - Configuration Status Accounting Report
1.1.5 Configuration Audits
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to support PBL Audits and shall perform internal configuration audits. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and submit a Configuration Audit Plan (CAP) that describes procedures for conducting the audit, including Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). When proposed and approved in the CAP, the Contractor may invite SubContractors, vendors, and suppliers to participate in the configuration audits, as proposed and approved via the CAP.
The FCA shall verify system functional performance requirements; the PCA shall verify system physical performance requirements. The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and submit a Configuration Audit Summary Report (CASR) documenting the results of each audit and the resolution for each finding.
The Contractor shall require the equipment manufacturer to prepare and deliver the CAP in accordance with the referenced CDRL.
CDRL L004 - Configuration Audit Plan
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .