Draft_PWS_posting_responses_(14_Aug_14).pdf

PDF 157 KB Posted

Attached to
Sheppard Trainer Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA300214R0011
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Sheppard Trainer Maintenance, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA3002-14-R-0011-0002.pdf PDF
Round_3_-_Q A_Final_RFP_(Posted_to_FBO_16_Dec_14).pdf PDF
Amendment_1_(FA3002-14-R-0011-0001) _Posted_to_FBO_9_Dec_14.pdf PDF
Round_2_-_Q A_Final_RFP.pdf PDF
Minutes_-_STM_Pre-Prop_Conf_ _Site_Visit_(3_Dec_14).pdf PDF
Round_1_-_Q A_Final_RFP.pdf PDF
Atch_12_-_Solicitation_Question_and_Comment_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).pdf PDF
RFP_Change_Matix.pdf PDF
Atch_9_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).docx DOCX document
Atch_7_-_Shift_Summary_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_11_-_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter.docx DOCX document
338_SCONS_Subcontracting_Plan_Checklist.pdf PDF
Atch_2_-_Draft_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(QASP).pdf PDF
Atch_10_-_Sample_Subcontractor_Letter_of_Consent.docx DOCX document
Atch_5_-_Wage_Determination_(WD)_-_FLORIDA_and_TEXAS.pdf PDF
PWS_Change_Matrix.pdf PDF
FA3002-14-R-0011.pdf PDF
Atch_6_Part_1_of_2_-_Current_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_(CBA).pdf PDF
Atch_8_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Atch_6_Part_2_of_2_-_CBA_Job_Descriptions.pdf PDF
Atch_4_-_DD_Form_254.pdf PDF
STM_Pre-Proposal_Conf_ _Site_Visit_(2nd_Posting).docx DOCX document
DRFP_Q As_(Posted_7_Nov_14).pdf PDF
STM_Pre-Proposal_Conf_ _Site_Visit.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_Q As_(Posted_8_Oct_14).pdf PDF
Lifting_Devices.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Draft_PWS_posting_responses_(11-Sep-14)_rev1.pdf PDF
Draft_PWS_posting_responses_(11-Sep-14).pdf PDF
Atch_5_-_Wage_Determinations_(WD)_-_TEXAS_and_FLORIDA.pdf PDF
Atch_4_-_DD_Form_254.pdf PDF
Atch_7_-_Shift_Summary_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_11_-_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter.docx DOCX document
Atch_3_-_Incentive_Option-Period_(IOP)_Plan.docx DOCX document
Atch_2_-_Draft_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(QASP).pdf PDF
Atch_10_-_Sample_Subcontractor_Letter_of_Consent.docx DOCX document
Draft_RFP _FA3002-14-R-0011.doc DOC document
Atch_6_-_Current_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_(CBA)_1.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).pdf PDF
Atch_9_-_Past_Performance_Questionaire_(PPQ).docx DOCX document
PWS_Change_Matrix_Sheppard_TRM_Sep_2014.docx DOCX document
Atch_12_-_Solicitation_Question_and_Comment_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_8_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Sheppard_Trainer_Maintenance_PWS.pdf PDF
STM_Draft_PWS_-_Q A_Form.doc DOC document
Show all 45

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SHEPPARD TRAINER MAINTENANCE

Questions and Answers

Draft PWS Posting (16 Jul 14)

Tracking # PWS Reference Question/Comment Answer/Response dPWS-T-01 Pg. 3-1-23

Para. 3.1.12.8

Will the Government provide the current paint scores for each piece of AGE and S.E.? Yes, in the RFP, the Government will provide a copy of the latest paint scores for all AGE, SE and Ground Instructional Training Aircraft and Static Display

Aircraft.

dPWS-T-02 Pg. 3-1-24

3.1.14.6

Will the Government provide an estimated annual cost for all proof load testing or provide a complete list of equipment requiring proof load testing?

A complete listing of equipment requiring proof load testing will be included in the RFP.

dPWS-T-03 Pg. 2-1-31

Para. 2.1.21.5

Is fall protection a new requirement? Can the Government provide information on where fall protection is currently being used, i.e., the Paint Hangar, etc. and what, if any, existing fall protection equipment will be transferred to the contractor?

Fall protection is not a new requirement. Fall protection is required for workers working in elevated locations on open-sided floors and platforms and near floor and wall openings in accordance with AFI 91-203, Chapter 13 and 29 CFRs.

Fall protection equipment is required during GITA painting operations, aircraft maintenance, etc. The Government will furnish 2 ea motorized man-lift devices

(JLG), (Jenie). In addition, to a permanently installed fall arrest system within the paint facility 2 portable restraint systems are available manufactured by DB

Industries (Adjustable free standing Horizontal Rail System and Man Rated Fall

Protection Systems Free Standing Portable Access Ladder Systems) dPWS-T-04 Pg. 2-1-12

Para. 2.1.11.8

Realizing that a draft QASP or PIP have not been provided, what are the specific guidelines and/or formulas used to decrement or reduce the contractor’s price due to non-conformance? FAR 52.246-4(e) states that the Government may reduce price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed “When the defects in services cannot be corrected by reperformance.” In PWS Para. 2.1.11.10, an example of a contract QCS non-conformity is “CORs finding contract problems/defects which the SP has not detected.” A contractor’s QC Plan, for example, that complies with Table

3.1.7.14.1, Service Provider’s Quality Control Baseline Standards, does not inspect everything with 100% frequency. We would ask for more clarity on what we believe should be defined as “systemic” deficiencies (e.g., repeated non-conformities despite previous corrective actions and follow-ups) in the contractor’s QCS that result in persistent degradation of services which can be quantified and that could result in withholding of payment, as well as how reduced value of services is determined and expressed as price.

The Government reserves the right to hold the contractor accountable for any non-conformity of their Quality Control System which could lead to mission degradation or failure. The Government expectations are for the contractor to meet contract requirements through established quality control inspection baselines and performance thresholds. PWS para 2.1.11.10 provides some examples of systemic non-conformities that could potentially degrade services and have a negative impact on the mission. The example provided would align with the ones provided in the PWS, (repeated non-conformities despite previous corrective actions and follow-up). No specific guidelines or formulas have been developed for this requirement as it relates to contractor price reductions for non-conformance.

dPWS-T-05 Pg. 3-1-8

Para. 3.1.5.1

Is TC Max being used now? What is the required timeframe for implementing the TC

Max Tool Asset Management Software? TC Max can be hosted on existing government desktop computers – is that the plan? Are there existing compatible government barcode scanners, barcode label printers and other required ancillary equipment or must the SP provide these?

TC Max is not currently in use. The TC Max Tool Asset Management software should be operational within 90 calendar days from start of the contract. PWS will be revised to reflect 90 calendar day requirement. TC MAX software is authorized to be hosted on Government Computers. Currently no Government compatible barcode, scanners, label printers are available.

Posted to FBO -- 14 Aug 14

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .