Attachment 08 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Solid State Phased Array Radar System (SSPARS) Reacquisition - FY26
Solicitation number
FA251823R0021_2
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Attachment 8 for a Solid State Phased Array Radar System (SSPARS) solicitation. The PPQ is a tool for the Government to conduct past performance interviews, but Offerors are not to complete and submit the PPQ. The questionnaire covers areas such as quality of product/service, schedule, cost/price control, personnel management, business relations, subcontractor management, and small business utilization. Evaluators are asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and provide detailed narrative comments. The document also states that the Government may use the PPQ as source selection information in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the SSPARS Reacquisition - FY26, with solicitation number FA251823R0021_2. This is a pre-solicitation request for information to assist the United States Space Force's Space Acquisitions and Integration Office in determining the best acquisition strategy. The current contract's performance is forecast to complete by 30 April 2026, and the North American Industry Classification System code is 517810 - All Other Telecommunications. Interested vendors are instructed to submit responses via email to the Government's points of contact.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 02 - SSPARS TO 01 PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 - DD Form 254.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 - Section_L.docx DOCX document
Attachment 07 - Transmittal Letter.docx DOCX document
Attachment 09 - Labor Categorization Tool.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 11 - Subcontractor Teaming Partner Consent Form.docx DOCX document
Updated Post_18 Sep 2024_SAM.gov.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - PIEE Solicitation Module.pdf PDF
Attachment 05 - Section_M.docx DOCX document
Attachment 12 - Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD).docx DOCX document
Attachment 14 - Posting Offer in Solicitation Module.pdf PDF
Updated Post_29 Aug 2024_SAM.gov.pdf PDF
Attachment 03_DD Form 254.pdf PDF
Attachment 06_Past Performance Information Citation.docx DOCX document
Attachment 11_Pricing Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 12_Subcontractor Teaming Partner Consent Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment 13_Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD).docx DOCX document
SF33 Solicitation_FA251824R0040.pdf PDF
Attachment 08_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment 10_PWS Labor Categorization Tool.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 14_PIEE Solicitation Module.pdf PDF
Attachment 15_Posting Offer in Solicitation Module.pdf PDF
Attachment 01_IDIQ PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 04_Section_L.docx DOCX document
Attachment 05_Section_M.docx DOCX document
Attachment 02_TO 01 PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 07_Transmittal Letter.docx DOCX document
FA251823R00212 - SSPARS Reacquisition - Draft PWS Questions_InDyne.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT IDIQ and TO 01 PWS_Q and A_August 2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SSPARS TO PWS_DRAFT.pdf PDF
MW_MD and SDA_IDIQ PWS_DRAFT.pdf PDF
SSPARS Announcement_05July2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Q and A Post CSFS Site Visit.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - CSFS Mission Brief.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Summary Events Attendee List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - Schedule Classified Documents and One-on-One Meeting.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3 -SF 312_Classified Information NDA.pdf PDF
SSPARS Industry Day Briefing_06Mar2024.pdf PDF
Industry Day Event Q and A Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - RFI 4_Worksheet for Vendor Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - RFI 4_Historical Clear Dining Facility Variance.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - RFI 4_SAIO-ProPricer Instructions to Contractor (DRAFT).docx DOCX document
RFI_4_SSPARS Reacquisition - FY26.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - RFI 4_SSPARS PWS (DRAFT).docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - RFI 4_Worksheet for Vendor Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Vendor Questions and Gov Responses_RFI 2_SSPARS Reacq FY26.docx DOCX document
RFI_2_SSPARS Reacquisition - FY26.pdf PDF
RFI_2_SSPARS Reacquisition - FY26_Amend_01.pdf PDF
RFI_2_SSPARS Reacquisition - FY26.pdf PDF
Atch 1_SSPARS PWS_2023-04-17.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI

Solid State Phased Array Radar System (SSPARS) Solicitation FA2518-25-R-XXXX

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Attachment 8 The Government may use the attached PPQ as a tool for conducting Past Performance telephonic or email interviews. The PPQ is provided as a point of information to Offerors and is for Government use only. In the event a PPQ is used, it will be treated as source selection information in accordance with FAR Part 2.101 and 3.104. Offerors shall not complete and submit the PPQ. Any PPQs submitted by Offerors will not be considered as part of the evaluation.Controlled by: USSF Controlled by: SAIO/PMG CUI Categories: SSEL Distribution/Limited Dissemination Control: FED ONLY POC: Mr. Jimmy Richey, 719-554-2810

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:

A. Contractor

B. Contractor UEI

C. Role (check): Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture Partner Other (specify) ______

If subcontractor, partner or other, who is the Prime?

D. Contract Number ________________________________________________ Task Order Number

Note: If the cited contract is an overarching IDIQ, the Government will only assess performance at the IDIQ level and not performance on each individual underlying task order. If the Offeror would like assessment of the single task/call/delivery/purchase order, the Offeror shall submit that as a separate citation.

E. Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, LH, etc.)_____________________________________________

F. Period of Performance ________________________________________________________

G. Place(s) of Performance:

Multiple locations? Yes No If yes, specify locations:

CONUS OCONUS Both

Provide details:

H. Total Contract or Task Order $ Value (including options)

I. Has a CPAR (or more than one CPAR) been completed for this contract?

Yes No

If Yes, provide dates covered by CPARs:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name ____________________________________________________

B. Customer or Agency Description

C. Description of Service(s) provided. (Provide details on type of work (i.e., providing mission system Operations and Maintenance, providing Base Operations Support (BOS) Services, meeting performance operations availability thresholds of a mission system, and conducting cyber requirements and information assurance on a mission system), locations worked, and organizations serviced.)

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name _______________________________ B. Title

C. Phone _______________________________ D. Email

E. Years worked on Subject Contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E
EXCEPTIONAL - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VG
VERY GOOD- The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
S
SATISFACTORY – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or was satisfactory.
M
MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U
UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A
NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score or item is not applicable to the cited contract.

Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Q1. Quality of Product or Service
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide accurate deliverables/reports; meet service specifications of the contract; provide timely proposals; respond to short notice requirements; provide and adhere to quality control/program plan (when required)

Explanation:

Q2. Schedule
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to provide deliverables/reports required by the contract on time with minimum rewrites

Explanation:

Q3. Cost/Price Control
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide accurate contract costs/estimates; track and control costs; meet and perform within negotiated costs; provide current, accurate and complete invoices/billing; submit cost reporting information in a timely manner

Explanation:

Q4. Management of Personnel
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: attract, recruit, hire, train and retain qualified management and technical personnel to accomplish mission requirements; ensure continuation of services during personnel absences or vacancies; replace/fill vacancies within timeframe specified; maintain training/certification currency

Explanation:

Q5. Management of Business Relations
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel; manage, resolve problems and respond to and/or integrate changes in mission-related requirements;

Explanation:

Q6. Management of Subcontractor
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: manage subcontractors to include identification and resolution of subcontractor problems

Explanation:

Q7. Utilization of Small Business
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

Ability of Contractor to: comply with Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Large Businesses only); meet Small Business subcontracting goal as stated in the contract (Large Businesses only); meet the Limitations on Subcontracting in accordance with FAR 52.219-14

Explanation:

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

A. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or is there any pending termination actions? (Place an “X” by all that apply.)

Yes No Default Convenience Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

B. Would you have any reservations about having this Contractor perform again on one of your critical and demanding programs?

Government Evaluator’s Signature Date

CUI

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .