52.212-2 EVALUATION.pdf

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 Enclosure (2) Page 1

52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (ADDENDUM)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the responsible vendor whose proposal, in full compliance with the RFQ, is deemed most advantageous to the Government, considering price and other factors. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Technical Capability Past Performance Price

In accordance with FAR 15.101-2, an award will be made to the responsible offeror who receives an acceptable rating in technical and past performance, and provides the lowest evaluated price.

Offerors who fail to possess the required technical capability or past performance will not be considered for award and the other elements of their offer will not be evaluated.

The Government also reserves the right to not award a contract if a contract award is not in the best interest of the Government.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical capability as either acceptable, or unacceptable, based on their proposal, submission of their Technical Capability Certification, and their submitted Training Outline.

Technical Capability will be evaluated to determine an overall rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”.

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will assess the degree of confidence it has in each offeror’s ability to perform the services described in the Performance Work Statement based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of past performance.

That degree of confidence will be assessed based on the relevance of the offeror’s past performance and the recency of that past performance.

Relevance is determined by those aspects of an Offerors history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the Offeror will successfully satisfy the current requirement.

Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. Per Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Offerors shall provide Past Performance references from the past five (5) years.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 Enclosure (2) Page 2 assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR

15.305 [a][2][iv]). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note above).

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort

PRICE: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed price to determine price reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3. All prices must be considered Fair and Reasonable as determined by the Government.

The Government will multiply the estimated quantities provided in the schedule by the unit pricing proposed to determinate the estimated amount for each line item. The estimated amount for each line item will then be added together to determine the total estimated price which will become the evaluated price.

Quotes shall be held firm and valid for sixty (60) days.