ATTACHMENT 2-52.212-2 Evaluation - 36C26227Q0062.pdf

FAR Clause PDF 180 KB Posted

Attached to
On-Site Document Destruction Services-Multi-Site
Solicitation number
36C26227Q0062
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, establishing the evaluation criteria and special standards of responsibility for an Onsite Document Destruction Services procurement.

The Government will award the contract to the responsible offeror whose quote is lowest in price, conforms to the solicitation, does not exceed available funding, and is found to be reasonable. Evaluation factors are Special Standards of Responsibility, Past Performance, and Price, with the first and third being sole evaluation factors. Offerors failing to meet any special standard of responsibility are ineligible for award. Four Special Standards apply: (SP1) AAA NAID certification per i-SIGMA through the National Association for Information Destruction; (SP2) ability to maintain secure chain-of-custody documentation throughout the destruction process via Plans, Certificates, or Accreditation; (SP3) on-site shredding or destruction conducted in compliance with 29 CFR Part 1910 workplace safety and hazard control requirements via Certificate; and (SP4) capability to provide 95-gallon totes, 64-gallon totes, 32-gallon totes, and 24" or 36" consoles. Each standard requires documentation demonstrating current certification status, with Pass/Fail determinations based on submission completeness. The evaluation will also assess past performance through contracting officer knowledge, customer surveys, questionnaire replies, and CPARS records, with a neutral rating if no past performance exists. Total Evaluated Price includes all line-item prices and options. Options under FAR 52.217-8 will be evaluated by adding six months of pricing from the last performance period to the total evaluated price. A preliminary compliance check will reject incomplete offers from further consideration.

View the file

Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-2

File Revision Posted Attached to
Attachment 04 FAR 52.212-2 - Evaluation Draft rev.3.pdf Rev. 3 Vehicle Maintenance Services
Attachment 3 _ 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services_20261103.docx Nov 3, 2026 Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items Agile Professional Services (APS) Department of the Army
HT940827RE003_Evaluation_52.212-2_30 Oct 2026.pdf Oct 30, 2026 Nutrition Care Services; Military Treatment Facilities - Forts Irwin, Leonard Wood, Riley, Stewart, and West Point
Attachment 3 _ 52.212-2 Evaluation_APS_20261023.pdf Oct 23, 2026 Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items Agile Professional Services (APS) Department of the Army
Attachment 3 _ 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services_20261008.docx Oct 8, 2026 Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items Agile Professional Services (APS) Department of the Army
Attachment 3 _ 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services_9.18.2026.docx Sep 18, 2026 Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items Agile Professional Services (APS) Department of the Army
ADD 02 52.212-2 - Evaluation 9.2.26v Final.pdf Sep 2, 2026 Joint Region Marianas Audio Visual (AV) Refresh
ATTACHMENT 2-52.212-2 Evaluation - 36C26227Q0100.pdf Revision not stated Preventative Maintenance, Inspection, & Repair Services For Gov-Owned Fume Hoods/Equipment
FAR 52.212-2 Attachment (A).pdf Revision not stated Microbulk Tank
FAR 52.212-2 Attachment (A).pdf Revision not stated COMPOSITE
52.212-2 REVISED.pdf Revision not stated H265--Imaging Testing and Inspection Services - Medical Physicist
HT940827RE003_Evaluation_52.212-2.pdf Revision not stated Nutrition Care Services; Military Treatment Facilities - Forts Irwin, Leonard Wood, Riley, Stewart, and West Point
52.212-2 Evaluation Factors - DHR Admin Services FY27-30.pdf Revision not stated DHR Installation Administrative Services FY27-30
Attachment 2- 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.docx Revision not stated PMI On Sterilizing Equipment
FAR 52.212-2 Information for Quote .pdf Revision not stated Cyber Platform
52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.pdf Revision not stated Advance Wiring Kit - Brand Name or Equal
52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.pdf Revision not stated MC Machinery Press Brake - Model BB6020 or Equal with Installation and Training
Addendums-FAR 52.212-2.pdf Revision not stated Hangar Fan Replacements
Addendums-FAR 52.212-2.pdf Revision not stated Hangar Fan Replacements
HT940826RE017_Evaluation_52.212-2.docx Revision not stated Nutrition Care Services; Forts Irwin, Leonard Wood, Riley, Stewart, and West Point
Show all 20

Who attaches FAR 52.212-2

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2: 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES

ADDENDUM to 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (DEVIATION AUG 2025)

(a) Basis for Award. The award will be made to the quote most advantageous to the Government and best meets the requirement described in the Statement of Work. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

(1) Special Standards of Responsibility

(2) Past Performance

(3) Price

(b) Evaluation Approach. The Government will evaluate quotations using the comparative evaluation process outlined in RFO 9.104-2, Special Standards of Responsibility procedures. Each response must meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The Government is not requesting or accepting alternate quotations. The evaluation will consider the following: The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quote, conforming to the solicitation, quotes the lowest price, whose quoted price does not exceed the amount of funding available for the procurement, and whose quoted price is found to be reasonable. Price and Special Standards of Responsibility are the sole evaluation factors. Offerors who fail to meet any special standard of responsibility will not be eligible to receive contract award.

(c) Options. The Government will evaluate quotations for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. This includes options under FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, which applies to this solicitation. Evaluation of options under FAR 52.217-8 will be accomplished by adding six months of the quoter's price for the last potential period of performance under this contract to the quoter's total price. For example, if the contract includes option periods that are exercisable under FAR 52.217-9, the quoter's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, all option periods, and an additional six months of the last option period. Quoters must price only the base and option periods specified in the contract line-item numbers (CLINs) and shall not submit a price for the potential six-month extension of services under FAR 52.217-8. The Government reserves the right to exercise the option under FAR 52.217-8 before the end of any of the contractor's performance periods and will be exercised at the price and/or rates in effect at the time the clause is exercised. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(1) Special Standards Responsibility: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Management Plan to determine its understanding of, and ability to effectively implement and manage Onsite Document Destruction Services in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW). The evaluation will focus on the adequacy and feasibility of proposed certified staffing, and operational procedures to ensure uninterrupted service, safety, and compliance with contract requirements.

Special Standards of Responsibility: The following special standards of responsibility apply to this procurement:

(Provide Plans, Certifications or Accreditation)

Special Standards (SP1): Vendor must be AAA NAID CERTIFED per i-SIGMA through the National Association for Information Destruction.

PASS Offeror provides documentation (Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current certification status

FAIL Offeror did not provide documentation (Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current

Special Standards (SP2): Vendor must be able to maintain a secure chain-of-custody throughout the Document Destruction Process. The offeror must provide documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) through the aforementioned demonstrating current certification status.

PASS Offeror provides documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current

FAIL Offeror did not provide documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current certification status

Special Standards (SP3): Vendor must perform On-Site Shredding or destruction activity be conducted in a way that meets general workplace safety, hazard control, and record-keeping rules in 29 CFR Part 1910.

The offeror must provide documentation (Certificate) through the aforementioned demonstrating current certified status.

PASS Offeror provides documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current

FAIL Offeror did not provide documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current certification status

Special Standards (SP4): Vendor must be able to provide the following Document Containers (Size & Quantity): 95 Gallon Totes, 64 Gallon Totes, 32 Gallon Totes, 24” or 36” Consoles.

PASS Offeror provides documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current certification status

FAIL Offeror did not provide documentation (Plans, Certificate or Accreditation) demonstrating current certification status

(2) Past Performance: The past performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with a quoter’s likelihood of success in fulfilling the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by the quoter’s record of past performance. The past performance evaluation may be based on the contracting officer’s knowledge of and previous experience with the supply or service being acquired; Customer surveys, and past performance questionnaire replies; Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at http://www.cpars.gov/; or any other reasonable basis. If there is no past performance, the rating will be neutral.

(3) Price: The Government will evaluate the price by adding the total of all line-item prices, including all options. The Total Evaluated Price will be that sum.

http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/ http://www.cpars.gov/

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE CHECK: A preliminary review of offers will be conducted; if all documentation is not submitted or is incomplete the offer will not be forwarded for evaluation; this will preclude the offer from any further consideration for award.

(End of Provision)

ADDENDUM to 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (DEVIATION AUG 2025)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .