FACTOR 2.docx

FACTOR 2 — PAST PERFORMANCE

Projects must demonstrate offeror’s experience as a prime contractor managing a fire alarm service contract self-performed or with one or multiple subcontractors.

Project(s) shall be in a hospital or clinical environment and be 100% completed/or ongoing (>50% complete).

The offeror’s submission should include at a minimum:

· Contract Number

· Project Location (Physical Address)

· Locations COR or CO & Current Contact Information

· Brief Description of the Scope of Work (highlight recent/relevant factors)

· Identify Subcontractors

· Project Start & Completion Date

· Project Contract Award Amount Performance Relevancy Survey (Exhibit A):

Instructions:

· The offeror shall demonstrate completed/or ongoing (>50% complete) recent and relevant projects at a hospital/ medical center (Federal or other than Federal) project of this same size, scope, and complexity (or greater).

· Note: Clearly identify those examples where an offeror’s proposed subcontractor was the prime (or the subcontractor) on the project examples if utilizing Subcontractor Capability.

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ-Exhibit B):

Instructions:

· Offerors shall prepare and forward to prior client(s) for submission to the Contracting Office EXHIBIT B PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE for all the projects listed by Offeror and submitted using EXHIBIT A PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY SURVEY.

· Exhibit B includes correspondence explaining the requirement to obtain an independent evaluation of prior contract performance and the Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for use in evaluating Past Performance.

· PPQ may have been completed be no later than one (1) year prior to the effective date of this action

· If an offerors Exhibit B is not received by the Contracting Officer, offerors will not be penalized.

An offeror with limited or no past performance may receive a rating based on the evaluation of its subcontractors and/or key personnel, provided an EXHIBIT C SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM has been executed and included in the proposal for proposed subcontractors and/or potential key personnel not employed by the offeror. These ratings shall have the same weight as the ratings of the offeror. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance will be assigned a neutral rating in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv). However, the proposal of an offeror with no relevant Past Performance history, while rated “Neutral” in Past Performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government and thus, may be an unsuccessful proposal when compared to the proposal of other offerors.

Evaluation Methodology: Past performance will be evaluated based on the projects provided by the offeror, and performance information from government databases. Focus will be on recent and relevant contracts that are comparable in size, scope, and complexity. The Intent of this evaluation is to evaluate the demonstrated ability to successfully complete comparable requirements, ensuring they have the experience and capability to deliver quality results on time, within budget, and incompliance with guidelines and regulations.