1442 W9123822R0008 A0007.pdf

W9123822R0008

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See SF 30 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 30

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Mar-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9123822R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Nov-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Mar-2022

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

SF 30 CONTINUATION PAGE

Amendment 0007 is issued to:

1) Issue Phase 2 solicitation documents to the Offerors identified in Phase 1 as the most highly qualified;

2) Establish the Phase 2 proposal due date and time;

3) Add solicitation Section 00 22 00, Submission and Evaluation for Phase 2 Proposals;

4) Issue updated Phase 2 solicitation technical documents and attachments;

5) Reopen ProjNet for new bidder inquiries until 10 days prior to proposal due date;

6) Revise solicitation block 13(b) to require a bid guarantee for Phase 2 proposals;

7) Add relevant Phase 2 solicitation provisions and clauses; and,

8) Add site visit information to FAR 52.236-27.

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION

Attachment 01 Statement of Work Attachment 02 Drawings Attachment 03 Supplemental Contract Requirements Attachment 04 Davis Bacon Wage Determination Attachment 05 Project Information Form to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 HAFB W 388th

Specification Number

641 03-JAN-2022

Attachment 2 Construction Wage Rate Req. UT20220083

55 03-JAN-2022

Attachment 3 Site Visit Map 2 03-JAN-2022 Attachment 4 HAFB W 388th Plans 11 Attachment 5 Price Schedule 1 02-MAR-2022 Attachment 6 Pre-Award Survey 4 02-MAR-2022

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 07-Jan-2022 10:00 AM to 04-Apr-

2022 10:00 AM.

CLIN 0001

The CLIN description has changed from Two Phase Design Build 388th/419th Apron to HAFB Repair West 388th Apron.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall design and construct improvements to replace the West 388th/419th Fighter Wing Apron at Hill AFB. The work shall consist of approximately 700,000 SF of replacement of existing Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) slabs along with full rework of structural base materials, as required for seasonal frost conditions, all in accordance with current UFC standards.

Work also includes installing underdrain pipe, stormwater manhole structures, providing grounding points and pavement markings on new apron pavement and replacing existing aircraft sunshade structures. The demolition includes but is not limited to removal of existing apron PCC slabs, and adjacent PCC drainage swale. Any asbestos/LBP removal shall be accomplished by a certified asbestos/LBP removal contractor.

To:

The Contractor shall provide all labor, management, supervision, tools, materials, equipment, and transportation for the West 388th Apron project at Hill Air Force Base, in accordance with this contract and all associated documents, drawings, and specifications.

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 1.00 from 0.00 to 1.00.

The unit of issue Job has been added.

CLIN 1001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

and transportation for removal and replacement of unstable soil at the West 388th Apron project at Hill Air Force Base, in accordance with this contract and all associated documents, drawings, and specifications.

CLIN 1002

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

and transportation for removal of asbestos pipes at the West 388th Apron project at Hill Air Force Base, in accordance with this contract and all associated documents, drawings, and specifications.

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

730 dys. ANP N/A

FOB: Destination

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

W91238

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 1001 has been added:

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 4,206 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 1002 has been added:

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 500 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

The following have been deleted:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for—

Thursday, Mar 17th 2022, at 0900 MDT. Offerors are urged to attend the site where services are to be performed to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance. All questions entertained at the site visit must be submitted via ProjNet in accordance with the instructions in the solicitation.

When: Thursday, 17 Mar 2022 Time: 0900 – 1200 MDT Where: Hill AFB, Utah (Show up at South Gate Visitor Center at least 30 minutes prior to ensure ability to get on base)

The information below is requested for each interested attendee NLT 1200 PDT on Monday, 14 Mar 2022. Please put “W388th DB ph2 Site Walk” in the subject line.

- Complete legal name of employee

- Date of Birth

- Driver License Number and State of Issuance

- Company

- Email Address

Please provide the information via email to:

Mr. Stephen Osgood, stephen.m.osgood@usace.army.mil mailto:stephen.m.osgood@usace.army.mil

(c) Participants will meet at—

Offerors will convene at the Utah Resident Office (URO) prior to the site walk.

URO Directions / Meeting Location:

• 7227 6th Street, Bldg. 366 Hill AFB, UT 84056

- From the Hill AFB South Gate entrance go straight.

- Left turn at 8th street and park in main parking area on the right.

- Utah Resident Office (URO) are the adjoined temporary buildings in the middle of the parking area.

- Proceed to the main entrance and await further instructions.

All visitors shall be escorted 100% of the time during the site visit. The Government will provide a sufficient number of escorts to accommodate attendees. Transportation will not be provided from the conference room location to the site. Photography will not be permitted. Requested photos may be taken by authorized Government personnel and posted to SAM.gov. It is anticipated the briefing and site visit may run approximately 2-3 hours.

(End of provision)

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

CONDITIONS AND NOTICES

INQUIRIES:

Prospective Offerors should submit inquiries related to this solicitation in accordance with the following (collect calls will not be accepted):

a. For information related to amendments, and the dates set for receipt of proposals, please check https:// sam.gov

b. Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet.

1. To submit and review bid inquiry items, Offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to the aforementioned web page and click on the QUICK ADD link. Select agency as USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click continue. Fill in all required information and click Add User.

2. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.

3. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

4. The Solicitation Number is: W9123822R0008 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: VTPGJX-WYHY5Y

c. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries ten (10) calendar days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

https://beta.sam.gov/ https://www.projnet.org/projnet

d. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

e. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

f. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

g. The point of contact for this solicitation is:

Contract Specialist: John Wysocki E-Mail Address: john.wysocki@usace.army.mil

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY AND PREAWARD SURVEY:

To determine a Contractor's responsibility for purposes of contract award in accordance with FAR Part 9, the Contractor is required to provide a statement regarding previous experience and past performance in performing comparable work, information related to the business organization, financial resources, and/or plant to be used in performing the work (see Section 00 22 10 or 00 22 20 OR Attachments, Preaward Survey). All Offerors will complete and return the Preaward Survey as part of the Price/Cost proposal. (Pre-award Survey is not required for Phase I, Preaward Survey will be required for Phase 2. ) Failure to submit the Preaward Survey in conjunction with the price proposal will not of itself render the offer unacceptable.

If the Contractor or Subcontractor does not already have sufficient resources demonstrated in the completed Preaward Survey, acceptable evidence of "the ability to obtain" the required, adequate resources (all of the resources discussed in FAR 9.104-1) normally consists of a commitment or explicit arrangement that will be in existence at the time of contract award to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel.

The Preaward Survey as a tool used by the Government in determining responsibility of the offeror is submitted as part of the Price/Cost proposal and is separate from the technical proposal's response to the technical evaluation criteria found later in this section. Some of the information required from the offeror for completion of the Preaward Survey and the technical proposal may be duplicative but it is necessary that the information be provided in full in both places and that the Price/Cost proposal and the Technical proposal be separate documents. DO NOT state, for example, in the technical proposal, "See Price/Cost proposal for past performance information".

AVAILABILITY OF USACE PUBLICATIONS:

a. The internet URL for Corps of Engineers publications is: http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/

b. Construction Criteria Base (CCB). The Construction Criteria Base (CCB) system available through the National Institute of Building Sciences includes copies of Corps of Engineers methods and specifications.

Information about the CCB can be obtained from: http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ccb.php

FACSIMILE BIDS/OFFERS:

Facsimile bids/offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of bids/offers will not be accepted.

INDIVIDUAL SURETIES IN SUPPORT OF BID BONDS:

mailto:john.wysocki@usace.army.mil http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/ http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ccb.php

Offerors utilizing individual sureties in support of a bid bond shall include a Standard Form (SF) 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety, accompanied by a pledge of acceptable assets from each person acting as an individual surety, and include these with the SF 24, Bid Bond, and the bid itself (see FAR 52.228-11, Pledges of Assets).

Pledges of acceptable assets shall be in the form of (1) evidence of an escrow account and/or (2) a recorded lien on real estate.

Failure to provide pledges of acceptable assets with the bid, in the specified form, accompanied by a properly executed SF 24 and SF 28 will render the bidder nonresponsible and thus ineligible for award.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS:

A written award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM) REGISTRATION:

All Offerors that intend to do business with the Government must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. No contract may be awarded by the Government to any Contractor who is not registered in SAM. If your company is not registered in SAM, you must register in order to be eligible for any Government award. The following link provides access to the SAM website:

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

If you have difficulties with or questions regarding the SAM registration, the following link has been set up by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) to assist Contractors registering for CAGE codes for enrollment and navigation within SAM: https://www.logisticsinformationservice.dla.mil/CAGETier3/

(End of Section)

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been added by full text:

PHASE II INSTRUCTIONS

PHASE II INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SOLICITATION SECTIONS PERTAINING TO OFFEROR'S SUBMISSION AND

EVALUATION GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS FOR PREPARATION OF PHASE-TWO PROPOSALS

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS. PHASE-TWO PROPOSALS

a. Media, Page Size, Margins, Fonts, and Page Limitations: Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. Do not include links to information on websites in lieu of incorporating the information physically into the proposal. Except where another size is specifically authorized for a specific submission, use only 8 1/2" x 11" paper. Use at least 1 inch margins, which may include headers and footers. Do not justify the right margin. Ensure that all text and graphics are clearly legible. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, unusual font styles such as script, or condensed fonts. For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, a foldout sheet will count as one page. Pages furnished for https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ https://www.logisticsinformationservice.dla.mil/CAGETier3/ organizational purposes only, such as a "Table of Contents" or divider tabs, are excluded from page limitations.

b. Format of Proposal Volume: Offers are to be formatted in accordance with the instructions that follow.

c. Table of Contents: Include a table of contents for each proposal volume.

d. Conditioning of Offer: Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal volumes. Inclusion of any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the offer is unacceptable and thus ineligible for award. Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the offer; see "Inquiries", located in Section 00 21 16, for points of contact. Notwithstanding the above, the offerer must clearly describe in the proposal cover sheet submitted with each volume any exceptions to the contractual and/or technical terms and conditions of the solicitation contained within the offer.

e. Restrictions on Offerer-Provided Information: "Confidential" projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the offerer's technical proposal.

Offerers that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark the information in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, "Instructions to Offerer- Competitive Acquisition" paragraph (e), "Restriction on disclosure and use of data." Files shall not contain classified data.

1.1 GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION. PHASE-TWO

The proposal shall be submitted as summarized below and as required by the specifications.

(1) Price Volume

(2) Technical Volume

1.2 Marking of Proposal Volumes

Mark each volume in accordance with the Detailed Submission Requirements instructions that follow for each proposal volume. In addition, mark the outside front cover of each volume with the project title and location, solicitation number, name and address of the Offeror, and volume copy number. (Markings which identify the Offeror are not required on either the back cover or on the spine/binding.)

1.3 Tabbing of Proposal Volumes

Offers are to be formatted and tabbed in accordance with the Detailed Submission Requirements instructions that follow for each proposal volume.

1.4 NUMBER OF VOLUMES FOR PHASE-TWO PROPOSALS

V o l u m e P r i c e V o l u m e T e c h n i c a l

Phase-Two Proposals shall consist of Volume 1 - Price which is to be submitted in one (1) electronic copy (separate PDF). Volume 2 - Technical is to be submitted in one (1) electronic copy (separate PDF).

2. PHASE-TWO VOLUME 1 - PRICE (PRICE PROPOSAL)

2.1 NUMBER OF SETS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Submit the price proposal volume in an electronic format, using a searchable bookmarked "pdf' file format which will become part of the contract. Submit one electronic copy of the Price Proposal, as required at paragraph 1.4. Submit one electronic copy of the original bid guarantee.

2.2 FORMAT, CONTENTS AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Use only 8-1/2" x 11" pages. There are no page limits for the price proposal; however, limit responses to required information. Excess information will not be evaluated. Organize your price proposal as indicated below. If a tab is not applicable to your proposal, omit that tab but do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

PHASE-TWO PRICE PROPOSAL VOLUME

TAB

I

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Proposal Cover Sheet SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement Pricing Schedule (Attachment 5) Work Breakdown Structure Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors Bid Guarantee Pre-Award Survey Information

2.3 DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PHASE-TWO PRICE PROPOSAL

2.3.1 Tab 1 of the Price Proposal: Proposal Cover Sheet

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c)(2). This provision, titled "Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition" is incorporated by reference in Section 00 21 00. The format and content for the proposal cover sheet follows:

PROPOSAL COVERSHEET

a. Solicitation Number.

b. The name, address, DUNS Number, and telephone numbers of the Offeror.

c. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the Solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

d. Names, titles, E-MAIL address, and telephone numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

e. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

2.3.2 Tab 2 of the Price Proposal: SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement. The Standard Form (SF) 1442 must be completed by the Offeror and duly executed with an original signature by the official(s) identified in the proposal cover sheet as authorized to bind the Offeror in accordance with FAR 4.102, which includes specific instructions pertaining to individuals, partnerships, corporations, Joint Venture participants, and agents. Include the Offeror's DUNS number in block 14 of the SF 1442, along with the Offeror's address. All amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV agreement and indicate its status.

2.3.3 Tab 3 of the Price Proposal: Pricing Schedule

Submit the completed price schedule (attachment 0005) with the Offeror's proposed contract prices inserted in the appropriate spaces Prices must be proposed for all contract line items (except for those CLINs deleted from the solicitation), including Option line items. Unit prices must be extended to the actual "dollar and cents" amounts (e.g., to two decimal places).Do not round off the extended prices to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission. Any qualification of pricing may render the proposal unacceptable and therefore not eligible for award.

2.3.4 Tab 4 of the Price Proposal: Work Breakdown Structure.

Submit a Work Breakdown Structure of the Offeror's proposed contract prices, for each line item in the Price Schedule, using the format below.

LIN E ITE

M

ITEM

DESCRIPTI ON

Y

UNIT

LABOR

MAT'L

EQUIP

SUBCONTR AC-

TED WORK

INDIRECT

COSTs

(JOOH)

OVERHE AD

(HOOH)

PROFI T

BOND

TOTA L

2.3.5 Tab 5 of the Price Proposal: Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors The Offeror must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the "System for Award Management" (SAM) website in accordance with FAR 52.204-8. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. In addition, the Offeror must also complete and return the "Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors" included in Section 00 45 00 of the solicitation. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete both the SAM Representations and Certifications and Section 00 45 00.

2.3.6 Tab 6 of the Price Proposal: Bid Guarantee

All Offerors must submit a bid guarantee, (e.g., Standard Form 24, Bid Bond) which complies with the requirements of

FAR 28.101 Bid Guarantees, and any Defense and Army supplements thereto.

2.3.7 Tab 7 of the Price Proposal Pre-Award Survey information

a. The Contracting Officer is required to make an affirmative pre-award determination of the prospective Contractor's responsibility in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements. The contracting officer must have sufficient information available to determine that a prospective Contractor meets these minimum standards. Therefore, the Offeror is requested to provide the pre-award survey information described below with its price proposal:

(1) The completed Construction Contractor Data Form with Supplemental Schedules A-C (see format which follows). If the Offeror is a large multi-segmented business concerns, the data provided on the supplemental schedules may be limited to information that directly pertains to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) proposed to perform work under the prospective contract with its own work force. If the offer is being submitted by a Joint Venture, submit a separate form for each Joint Venture participant. The Offeror may submit pre-award survey information in another format, provided that the information furnished is substantially the same as that which would be furnished on the Construction Contractor Data Form and its supplemental schedules.

(2) Current financial statements. If the financial statement is more than 60 days old, submit a certificate stating that the firm's financial condition is substantially the same, or, if not the same, state the changes that have taken place. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each participant in the Joint Venture.

(3) Banking information. Provide letters from banks or other financial institutions with which the Contractor conducts business. The letters should contain information about your firm's accounts, loans, lines of credit, etc. The Government is interested in financial stability, timely payments, the length and nature of the relationship between the firm and the financial institution, and the firm's financial ability to perform the contract. The letters should also provide the name and telephone number of the bank representative the Government may contact. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each Joint Venture participant.

b. The Government will treat the pre-award survey information submitted by the Offeror as proprietary.

c. See Attachment 6, Pre-Award Survey.

3.0 GOVERNMENT EVALUATION OF PHASE-TWO PRICE PROPOSALS:

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY

The Government will evaluate offers received in response to this Phase-Two solicitation by confirming that the Offeror has submitted a complete proposal meeting the Detailed Submission Requirements presented in paragraph 2.3 above. The Government may elect to waive minor irregularities, omissions, or mistakes, but is under no obligation to do so.

Offerors are cautioned to carefully align their proposals to the Phase-Two submission requirements. Prices received in response to a confirmed suitable Volume 1 Price Proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the best value Basis of Contract Award guidance presented at the Phase-One Solicitation Section 00 22 10, paragraph 2, and the Phase-Two Relative Importance of Technical Evaluation Factors and of Price to the Technical Evaluation Factors paragraph guidance.

4. PHASE-TWO VOLUME 1 - TECHNICAL (TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)

4.1 NUMBER OF SETS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

One copy of the Phase-Two Technical Proposal is to be submitted in searchable bookmark "pdf' format through electronic submission.

4.2 FORMAT, CONTENTS AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Unless specified otherwise, use 8-1/2" x 11" pages for the narrative portions of the proposal. There is not a page limit for the overall technical proposal; however, there may be limits imposed at the tab level. Organize your technical proposal as indicated below. The tabs directly correlate to the technical evaluation factors. Although the Government may use information contained anywhere within the technical proposal in its evaluation of any technical evaluation criteria, the Government is not obligated to search for or to consider information that is not located in the specified location. Number the pages. Do not include information pertaining to your proposed pricing for this project in the technical proposal. Limit your submittals to the information specified; excess information will not be evaluated.

PHASE-TWO TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor 3: Design and Construction Approach Factor 4:

Performance Capability

4.3 DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PHASE-TWO TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

4.3.1 Tab 1 - Factor 3 - Design and Construction Approach.

4.3.1.1 Factor 3 Tab 1A- Technical Narrative. The plan/approach must be in sufficient detail to clearly demonstrate (1) the Offeror's understanding of the principal components of work described in the project specifications and drawings and

(2) the Offeror's understanding of the site and other conditions that could impact schedule. The narrative must contain sufficient information to allow the Government to perform a basic analysis of the proposed design and construction approach.

a. Describe the Offeror's integrated approach to the design of the West 388th/419th Apron Repairs project at Hill AFB, UT. Clearly distinguish the roles and involvement of the Architect-Engineer design firm in the project. Describe the role of the prime construction Contractor, Subcontractors, and vendors in the design process. Also address any design effort that will be performed "in-house" by the key Subcontractor. Describe the roles and planned interaction between the Independent Technical Reviewers and various Contractor and Government personnel.

b. Describe how the Offeror will approach the design and construction of the West 388th/419th Apron Repairs project. The Government is interested in information such as: (1) site preparation; (2) security requirements; (3) establishment and maintenance of Free Zones;(4) Aircraft Shade Structures (5) Foreign Object Debris (FOD) remediation; (6) installation of subgrade utilities;

(7) construction work discipline sequencing; (8) site work including concrete mix design, and

(8) clean- up.

c. Describe any significant problems or major difficulties anticipated in performing or accomplishing the work, challenges associated with this project, and the Offeror's plan for avoiding problems and mitigating difficulties which could adversely impact project schedule. If no problems and difficulties are anticipated, state so and why.

d. Formatting and Other Restrictions: The submission is limited to eight (8) 8-1/2" x 11" pages total.

4.3.1.2 Factor 3 Tab 1B - Network Analysis Schedule {NAS).

a. Provide an electronic copy of the NAS Project Schedule or GANTT chart (not a PERT Chart), broken down to the "Feature of Work" level, that graphically illustrates the proposed integration, scheduling, and phasing of the major features on the critical and near-critical path for this project, including final close-out.

b. The schedule is to include activities on the near critical and critical paths, including the following:

(1) NTP (assume a contract award date of 18 July 2022)

(2) Charrette Meetings

(3) Submittals

(4) Design Reviews

• Government,

• Contractor,

• Designer

(5) Independent Technical Reviews

(6) Design review conferences

(7) Construction activities broken down to the "Feature of Work" level

(8) Adverse weather per section 01 00 00

(9) Pre Commissioning System Testing (if applicable)

(10) Final Commissioning System Testing (if applicable)

(11) Mechanical System Testing (if applicable)

(12) Electrical System Testing (if applicable)

(13) Test and Balancing (if applicable)

(14) As-Builts

(15) Contractor Punch-out Inspection items

(16) Pre-final Inspection

(17) Correction of pre-final inspection items

(18) Final Inspection

(19) Correction of Final Inspection items

(20) Project Complete

(21) Long Lead Item (if applicable)

c. Clearly identify the critical path.

d. Clearly indicate the following time frames:

(1) The durations of the principal components of work with anticipated start and finish dates. For the purpose of this pre-award design and construction sequence plan only, assume a construction start of 08 August 2022.

(2) The total number of calendar days allocated to design.

(3) The total number of calendar days allocated to construction.

(4) The total number of calendar days from NTP to Project Complete.

e. The milestone schedule cannot exceed the contract performance period specified in item specified in box 11 of the SF1442 and must be in compliance with any contractually required interim completion dates specified in the solicitation for separate parts or stages of work (Should the Offeror discover during proposal preparation that the project cannot be completed within the required contract performance period, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer immediately).

f. The NAS project schedule that is required to be included as part of the Technical Approach is a preliminary schedule for pre-award evaluation purposes only, the actual NAS project schedule submitted in the Offeror's Technical Proposal will not be incorporated into the contract. Therefore, the Government may at its discretion consider minor irregularities to be weaknesses in the proposal, rather than deficiencies. Nonetheless, the successful Offeror will be required to submit a schedule after contract award that fully complies with all the requirements, whether or not all pre-award discrepancies were noted or corrected during negotiations. Although the schedule will need to be redone, the proposed period of performance will remain as proposed.

g. Formatting and Other restrictions.

(1) Include an electronic file ".prx" of the NAS Project Schedule (Primavera preferred).

(2) There is not a page limitation for this submission; however, pages must not exceed 11" x 17" in size. Ensure the font size is legible so each activity and its duration can be read.

(3) Number line items on the NAS Project Schedule for easy reference.

4.3.2 Tab 2 - Factor 4 - Performance Capability.

4.3.2.1 Factor 4 Tab 2A- Project Organization Chart.

a. Provide an organizational chart that, at a minimum, graphically depicts the Offeror's proposed project team, to include "key" major work elements and identification of:

(1) The prime Contractor;

(2) All key Subcontractors by firm name; and

(3) All key personnel

(4) The separate Joint Venture (JV) concern's firm names and proposed personnel's roles and responsibilities (if applicable).

b. In addition, indicate the organizational placement of the prime's On-Site Project Superintendent, On-Site CQS System Manager, On-Site Safety Manager, On-Site Quality Control Manager, Site Security Manager, and the Design A-E Design coordination Manager, Independent Technical Reviewer, and Design Quality Control Manager

c. Indicate lines of authority and lines of communication using a separate depiction (either color, solid, etc. lines).

d. Provide a legend.

e. Formatting and Other Restrictions: This submission is limited to one page not to exceed 11" x 17" in size.

4.3.2.2. Factor 4 Tab 28 -Approach to Quality Control.

a. Provide a detailed narrative discussion of the Offeror's plan for ensuring quality control during both the design and construction phases of this project. The discussion should address the Offeror's understanding of, familiarity with, and intended use of Corps-specific procedures and automated information management/tracking systems related to quality control. The Government is interested in the Offeror's plan to build quality into the project during both the design and construction phases. Other areas of interest include:

(1) The planned involvement of both construction personnel during the design phase and design personnel during the construction phase.

(2) The Offeror's understanding of the Government's involvement during the design development.

(3) The Offeror's understanding of the roles and planned interaction between the various Contractor personnel involved with QC activities, such as the prime's D-B PM, the lead AE's Design PM, the lead AE's Design Quality Control Manager, the prime's Design Coordination Manager, the Independent Technical Reviewers, and the prime's CQC System Manager and his/her staff. (Note: Identify non-key personnel only by position title, not by name.)

c. Formatting and Other Restrictions: The submission may include narrative and/or graphics and is limited to four (4) 8 ½" x 11" pages total.

5.0 PHASE-TWO VOLUME 3 - SMALL BUSINESS (SMALL BUSINESS PROPOSAL)

"Reserved" to maintain the numbering".

6.0 GOVERNMENT EVALUATION OF PHASE-TWO

TECHNICAL PROPOSALS: EVALUATION CRITERIA

AND METHODOLOGY

6.1 General Evaluation Guidelines

a. Material submitted by each Offeror under each evaluation factor will be evaluated by the Government.

b. The Government will evaluate each Offeror's Phase-Two technical proposal on the basis of the thoroughness and factual detail of the narrative and documentation submitted.

c. Failure by an Offeror to comply with formatting or submission requirements contained in the solicitation, the presence of significant mistakes or errors in a proposal, or the presence of more than a nominal number of less significant mistakes/errors in a proposal, may be considered indicative of an increased risk of inattention to detail or quality control during contract performance. Lack of conformance may therefore result in a higher risk assessment, in addition to other possible adverse impacts on the evaluation. Material omission(s) may cause a technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable. However, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government may waive informalities or minor irregularities in proposals. For example, a failure by a proposed key Subcontractor to submit a properly executed letter of commitment may be considered reflective of increased risk but not an outright proposal deficiency.

d. Phase-Two technical proposals which do not provide the specified information in the specified location in accordance with these submission instructions may be downgraded. The Government is not obligated to search for information that is not in its specified location.

e. Any prescribed page and formatting limitations will be strictly adhered to by the Government. The Government will not evaluate information contained on pages that exceed the limitations set forth in these instructions. For example, submission of a three page document in response to a requirement with a two page limitation will be treated as follows: information on the first two pages will be evaluated while any information on the third page will be ignored. Similarly, if an Offeror were to submit a fold-out sheet (e.g. 11"x17") in response to an information request with a one-page limitation where fold-out sheets are not authorized, only the information that could reasonably be submitted on one 8-1/2 x 11 inch sheet will be evaluated. If an Offeror were to submit three 8-1/2 x 11 inch pages in response to a request containing a not-to-exceed 11 x 17 inch page limitation, only the information that could reasonably be submitted on one 11 x 17 inch sheet would be evaluated. If an Offeror were to submit alternates that were not requested (e.g. key Subcontractor), the information would not be evaluated.

f. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be downgraded. Responses that are essentially blanket offers of compliance cannot substitute for inclusion of the detailed and thorough technical information necessary to determine an Offeror's qualifications to successfully complete the proposed project. Accordingly a proposal's omission of information the Government requests in this solicitation may result in a finding of deficiency or a downgrade of the proposal if inadequate detail is provided.

g. An "uncertainty" or "ambiguity" is any aspect of the proposal for which the intent of the Offeror is unclear because there may be more than one way to interpret the proposal or because inconsistencies in the proposal indicate that there may be an error, omission, or mistake. Examples include a mistake in calculation or measurement and contradictory statements. A "strength" is an aspect of an Offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance. A "deficiency" is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. "Weakness" means a flaw in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A "significant weakness" is a proposal flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. The Government cannot accept an offer with a deficiency in its technical proposal. The term "acceptable" is therefore used in this context to describe a technical proposal that does not contain a deficiency and thus could be accepted by the Government, notwithstanding any weaknesses or significant weaknesses in the proposal.

h. The Government cannot make award to a Contractor with a deficient offer. Proposals containing deficiencies will be rated "Unacceptable," making them ineligible for award unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that Offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

6.2 Technical Evaluation

6.2.1 Factor 3 - Design and Construction Approach

a. Factor 3 Tab 1A-Technical Narrative.

(1) The Government will evaluate how well the proposal indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance. The soundness and workability of the Offeror's approach and method to design and construct the subject procurement. As part of its evaluation, the Government will consider whether the Offeror's approach appears reasonable, achievable, and reflects logical sequencing and progression of activities.

(2) The greater the narrative demonstrates knowledge and understanding based on the specifications and drawings as it relates to : (1) site preparation; (2) security requirements; (3) establishment and maintenance of Free Zones;(4) Aircraft Shade Structures(5) Foreign Object Debris (FOD) remediation;

(6) installation of subgrade utilities; (7) construction work discipline sequencing; (8) site work including concrete mix design, and (8) clean- up.; the higher the evaluation rating.

(3) The Government will evaluate the identified roles and involvement of the key- Subcontractor(s), and planned interaction between Technical Reviewers and various Contractor and Government personnel for how well the proposal indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

(4) The Government will evaluate the description of any significant problems or major difficulties anticipated in performing or accomplishing the work, challenges associated with this project, and Offeror's plan for avoiding problems and mitigating difficulties which could adversely impact project schedule for how well proposal indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

b. Factor 3 Tab 1B - Network Analysis Schedule (NAS).

(1) The Government will evaluate the NAS to determine the extent to which it demonstrates (i) the Offeror's understanding of the unique requirements and challenges of this project and (ii) the Offeror's ability to schedule and integrate the design and major work elements at the "feature of work" level, phasing of the major work features, construction and close-out activities on the critical and near-critical path meeting the contract performance schedule specified in the solicitation. As part of its evaluation, the Government may consider whether the Offeror's approach to the scheduling/phasing of these major activities appears reasonable, and achievable. The Government may also consider whether the Offeror's approach to scheduling/phasing of major activities reflects logical sequencing and progression of activities; inclusion of all of the important features of the work;

milestones along the critical path, incorporation of time for Government activities; and appropriate consideration of recognizable constraints, including material and equipment lead times and the impacts on construction activities of adverse weather typical for the construction site.

(2) The Government will ensure, at a minimum, all activities in paragraph 4.3.1.2.b, the critical path and identified time frames are included and that the period of performance does not exceed the performance period specified in block 11 of the SF1442.

(3) The schedule will be evaluated for how well it indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance. A proposed schedule and approach that clearly reflect an understanding of the complexity of this project will be evaluated more favorably. Schedule and approach demonstrating professionalism and thoroughness may be evaluated more favorably.

6.2.2 For Factor 3, the Government will assign an adjectival rating as set forth in the following chart:

EVALUATION STANDARDS AND EXPLANATION OF TERMS

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

ADJECTIVE

DESCRIPTIO

N

"STRENGTH"

Any aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criterion enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably enhances the probability of successful contract performance.

"WEAKNESS"

A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A "significant weakness" in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

"UNCERTAINTY

" or

"AMBIGUITY"

Any aspect of the proposal for which the intent of the offerer is unclear because there may be more than one way to interpret the proposal or because inconsistencies in the proposal indicate that there may be an error, omission, or mistake.

Examples include a mistake in calculation or measurement and contradictory statements.

"DEFICIENCY"

A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. Examples of deficiencies include a statement that the Offeror cannot or will not meet a requirement, an approach that clearly does not meet a requirement, or omission of data required to assess compliance with the requirement.

6.2.3 Factor 4 - Performance Capability

a. Factor 4 Tab 2A- Project Organization Chart.

(1) The Government will ensure, at a minimum, the following are identified within the organizational chart:

(i) Prime Contractor

(ii) Key Subcontractors by firm name

(iii) Key personnel

(iv) Joint Venture Roles and Responsibilities by company name

(v) On-Site Project Superintendent

(vi) On-Site CQS System Manager

(vii) Site Security Manager

(viii) Design A/E Design Coordination Manager

(ix) Design Quality Control Manager

(2) The Government will evaluate whether the organizational placement and proposed project team's lines of authority, responsibility, and communications are appropriate, well-defined and how well it indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

a. Factor 4 Tab 2B - Approach to Quality Control.

The Quality Control narrative will be evaluated for how well it indicates an approach and understanding of the requirements that decreases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

Consideration will include:

(i) Plan for ensuring quality control during both the design and construction phases of this project to include, but not limited to the Offeror's understanding of, familiarity with, and intended use of Corps- specific procedures and automated information management/tracking systems related to quality control.

(ii) The Offeror's plan to build quality into the project during both the design and construction phases.

(iii) The planned involvement of both construction personnel during the design phase and design personnel during the construction phase.

(iv) The Offeror's understanding of the roles and planned interaction between the various

Contractor personnel involved with QC activities, such as the prime's D-B PM, the lead AE's…