W900KK20R0004_Amend 0002_PD2_Mod_06122020.pdf
PDF 647 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-20-R-0004
About this file
This document is a request for proposal for Staff Technical Assistance and Functional Support services. The Army is seeking administrative, project management, and technical staff support for training centers of excellence and combat training centers. Key dates include questions due by March 5, 2020 and Phase I proposals due by March 12, 2020. Phase II of the solicitation will utilize best value tradeoff for evaluation. The contract will have a one-month phase-in period and a one-year base period, with four one-year option periods. The indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract ceiling is $29.8 million. The contract type will be firm fixed price and cost no fee task orders.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 52 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
See Clause 52.252-3 for the purpose of Amendment 0002.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
S 1 36
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 12-Jun-2020
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W900KK20R0004
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
27-Feb-2020
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
12-Jun-2020
CODE
ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ORLANDO
ATTN: ECHO DIVISION
12211 SCIENCE DRIVE
ORLANDO FL 32826-3224
W900KK 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W900KK20R0004
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The required response date/time has changed from 12-Mar-2020 12:00 PM to 29-Jun-2020 12:00 PM.
The following have been modified:
A.1 The Staff Technical Assistance and Functional (STAF) Support Services requirement will result in a Single
Award (SA) Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract with an ordering period of (1) one year, with
(4) four (1) year Options. Initially, the Government will award the basic IDIQ contract as well as Task Order
(TO) 0001 and 0002.
A.2 The IDIQ Not-to-Exceed Ceiling Amount is $29,800,000 (Amend 0002). The cumulative total of all TOs awarded as a result of this Contract shall not exceed $29,800,000 (Amend 0002) over the life of the contract without prior written approval from the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO).
A.3 The Government intends to provide incidental Government property and facilities for this effort. However, the
Government property clause are included in the IDIQ in the event that future TOs or modifications to TOs require providing GFP. In the event the Government wishes to provide GFP to the contractor, the appropriate memos, documents and approvals shall be obtained on the TO to provide GFP to the contractor (Amend 0002).
SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES
B.1 CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE
The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.
MINIMUM
QUANTITY
MINIMUM
AMOUNT
MAXIMUM
QUANTITY
MAXIMUM
AMOUNT
1.00 $1,000.00 $29,800,000
B.2 The predominate contract types to be used on this IDIQ are Firm Fixed Price (FFP) and Cost no fee (Amend
0002 deleted language). Each future TO will be reviewed by the PCO to determine the applicable contract type to meet the requirements. In the event another contract type is best suited for that requirement, the PCO shall, if required, generate a D&F justifying the contract type, obtain the proper approval, incorporate language to use that contract type and contract clauses into the SA IDIQ prior to issuing a TO that includes that contract type
(Amend 0002).The CLINs marked as FFP in Section B of this IDIQ are established for the sole purpose of facilitating administration of the contract in the Government’s Procurement Desktop Defense (PD2) system.
(Amend 0002 language deleted).
B.3. The Fixed Fully Burdened Labor rates (Amend 0002 language deleted), as proposed (or negotiated, if applicable) in the Cost/Price Workbook (Attachment 6), for both the prime and the subcontractor(s), will be binding Fixed Fully Burdened labor rates, and will be incorporated Section J of the contract used to price all efforts under this SA IDIQ (Amend 0002 language deleted).
In the event a new subcontractor (or subcontractors) is (are) required (other than those included in clause 52.244-
2(j)) OR if an existing subcontractor needs to utilize an additional (but existing) labor category that was not originally propose at contract award; the direct labor rates, indirect rates, and fully burdened labor rates associated with that subcontractor shall be proposed, negotiated (if applicable), and incorporated within Section J of this contract prior to any TO award which includes the new subcontractor(s) and/or additional labor category rate(s)
(Amend 0002).
LANGUAGE FOR SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT:
The Fixed Fully Burdened Labor Rates incorporated into the contract will be used (Amend 0002) to extend services if the Option to Extend Services (FAR 52.217-8) is exercised IAW FAR 37.111 Extension of Services:
“the contracting officer may include an option clause (see FAR 17.208(f) [FAR 52.217-8]) in solicitations and contracts which will enable the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract.”
SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The contractor shall furnish the necessary resources required to perform the work described in
The IDIQ PWS (Amend 0002), TO PWSs, and all associated attachments/exhibits referenced in Section J.
SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been added by reference:
252.222-7006 Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements DEC 2010
252.239-7000 Protection Against Compromising Emanations OCT 2019
52.216-19 ORDER LIMITATIONS (OCT 1995)
(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than $1,000, the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.
(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor -
(1) Any order for a single item in excess of $29,800,000;
(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of $29,800,000; or
(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within 30 days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in paragraph (b) (1) or (2) of this section.
(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e., includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the
Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within 5 days after issuance, with written notice stating the Contractor's intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.
(End of clause)
52.222-2 PAYMENT FOR OVERTIME PREMIUMS (JUL 1990)
(a) The use of overtime is authorized under this contract if the overtime premium cost does not exceed TBD at TO level or the overtime premium is paid for work --
(1) Necessary to cope with emergencies such as those resulting from accidents, natural disasters, breakdowns of production equipment, or occasional production bottlenecks of a sporadic nature;
(2) By indirect-labor employees such as those performing duties in connection with administration, protection, transportation, maintenance, standby plant protection, operation of utilities, or accounting;
(3) To perform tests, industrial processes, laboratory procedures, loading or unloading of transportation conveyances, and operations in flight or afloat that are continuous in nature and cannot reasonably be interrupted or completed otherwise; or
(4) That will result in lower overall costs to the Government.
(b) Any request for estimated overtime premiums that exceeds the amount specified above shall include all estimated overtime for contract completion and shall--
(1) Identify the work unit; e.g., department or section in which the requested overtime will be used, together with present workload, staffing, and other data of the affected unit sufficient to permit the PCO to evaluate the necessity for the overtime;
(2) Demonstrate the effect that denial of the request will have on the contract delivery or performance schedule;
(3) Identify the extent to which approval of overtime would affect the performance or payments in connection with other Government contracts, together with identification of each affected contract; and
(4) Provide reasons why the required work cannot be performed by using multishift operations or by employing additional personnel.
* Insert either "zero" or the dollar amount agreed to during negotiations. The inserted figure does not apply to the exceptions in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(4) of the clause.
52.232-19 AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR (APR 1984)
Funds are not presently available for performance under this contract beyond [see individual task orders]. The
Government's obligation for performance of this contract beyond that date is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the
Government for any payment may arise for performance under this contract beyond [see individual task orders], until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for performance and until the Contractor receives notice of availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.
252.216-7006 ORDERING (SEP 2019)
(a) Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the contract schedule. Such orders may be issued from date of IDIQ award through five years (Amend 0002).
(b) All delivery orders or task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a delivery order or task order and this contract, the contract shall control.
(c)(1) If issued electronically, the order is considered ``issued'' when a copy has been posted to the Electronic Data
Access system, and notice has been sent to the Contractor.
(2) If mailed or transmitted by facsimile, a delivery order or task order is considered “issued'' when the Government deposits the order in the mail or transmits by facsimile. Mailing includes transmittal by U.S. mail or private delivery services.
(3) Orders may be issued orally only if authorized in the schedule.
(End of Clause)
The following have been deleted:
52.230-3 (Dev) Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices
(DEVIATION 2018-O0015)
JUL 2018
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
**Note: The Base IDIQ; Task Order 0001, and Task Order 0002 PWSs have been rewritten and therefore do not contain track changes or amendment references
Section J - List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments
Item Description
Attachment 1 Basic IDIQ Performance Work Statement (PWS) (Amend 0002)
Attachment 1(a) Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) (Amend 0002)
Attachment 1(b) Contract Data Requirement List (CDRL) (Amend 0002)
Attachment 1(c) Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
Attachment 1(d) Deleted/Reserved (Amend 0002)
Attachment 2 Security Reference Workbook (Amend 0002)
Attachment 3 Technical Experience Reference Workbook (Amend 0002)
Attachment 4 DD 254 (DRAFT with solicitation, FINAL at award)
Attachment 5 RFP Cross Reference Matrix (Amend 0002)
Attachment 6 STAF Cost Price Workbook (Amend 0002)
Attachment 7 Questions_Comments_Form
Attachment 8 Task Order 0001_ PWS (Amend 0002)
Attachment 8(a) Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) (Amend 0002)
Attachment 9 Task Order 0002_ PWS (Amend 0002)
Attachment 9(a) Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) (Amend 0002)
Attachment 9(b) Technical Exhibit DDIST Desk Reference
Attachment 9(c) Technical Exhibit DDIST Line by Line
Attachment 9(d) Technical Exhibit DDIST Travel Cost Estimate
Attachment 9(e) Technical Exhibit DDIST Logistics Cost Estimate
Attachment 9(f) Technical Exhibit DDIST Funding
Attachment 9(g) Technical Exhibit DDIST CME Funds
Attachment 9(h) Technical Exhibit DDIST Contractor Roster
Attachment 9(i) Technical Exhibit DOT USAICOE Handbook First Edition
Attachment 9(j) Technical Exhibit DOT USAICOE Writing Standards-Analytic Rubric 011
Attachment 9(k) Technical Exhibit DOT USAICOE Writing Standards-Score Instructions
Attachment 9(l) Technical Exhibit DOT USAICOE Writing Standards- Score Sheet
Attachment 10 SF 1408 Checklist
Attachment 11 Wage Determination (Amend 0002)
Attachment 12 Historical Level of Effort (Amend 0002)
Attachment 13 Past Performance Questionnaire (Amend 0002)
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
*******NOTE: Insourcing for some of the support services stated in this requirement will occur after award.
The Government does not have specific data at this time to incorporate into this solicitation. Negotiations will be conducted with the awardee of this effort, after contract award, when the specifics have been defined.
******** (Amend 0002).
L.1.0. Proposal Submission
L.1.1 Introduction. The Staff Technical Assistance and Functional (STAF) effort is being competed as Small
Business set-aside 8(a) Competition under NAICS code 541611, Administrative and General Management
Consulting, with a size standard of $15M in average annual receipts. The STAF effort will be a Single Award (SA)
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to provide administrative, project management, and technical staff support services consisting of a 1-month phase-in period, 11-month base period of performance, and four 12-month option periods for a total of 60 months.
Volume I – Factor 1 proposals are due no later than the date and time annotated on the SF 33 coversheet. Early delivery is authorized.
The required method of STAF proposal delivery is via the DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) located at https://safe.apps.mil/. Offerors shall ensure the recipients receiving the proposal submitted via DoD SAFE are the
STAF Primary Point of Contact (POC), Alternate POC, and the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), identified in
Section L.2.8.
Offerors are encouraged to test the DoD SAFE proposal exchange methodology by sending a copy of the STAF
PWS to the aforementioned POCs at least 72 hours prior to the proposal due date/time. The Government will confirm receipt, via email, within one business day. If confirmation email is not received, please coordinate directly with the PCO to resolve issue.
If there are any technical difficulties with DoD SAFE, the Offeror shall coordinate an alternate method of STAF proposal submittal with the Primary POC, no less than 24 hours prior to the due date and time. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the entire proposal is received by the Government prior to the proposal due date and time. All proposals submitted must be in compliance with the full solicitation.
L.1.2 Phased Acquisition Approach
The Government will evaluate Offerors’ proposals in a two phased approach to progressively reduce the number being considered for contract award. The purpose of this procedure is to reduce the time and cost of source selection, both for the Government and for the competing Offerors.
Phase I: Offerors shall prepare and submit ONLY Volume I – Factor 1 – Security Reference (Amend 0002) and
Volume II – Factor 2 – Technical Experience (Amend 0002) proposal in accordance with the instructions provided below. The Government will evaluate each volume in accordance with the acceptability criteria in Section M of this solicitation. The Government will eliminate from further consideration any Offerors proposals evaluated and assigned an unacceptable rating.
The decision to eliminate any Offeror through this procedure will not constitute the establishment of a competitive range, as described in FAR 15.306(c), and it will not obligate the Government to conduct discussions or to solicit or entertain proposal revisions. FAR 15.202(b) the last sentence states, “The agency shall inform all respondents that, notwithstanding the advice provided by the Government in response to their submissions, they may participate in the resultant acquisition.” This sentence does not apply to those offeror eliminated from Phase I. However, the
Government reserves the right to establish a competitive range and conduct discussions if the PCO decides that it is in the best interest of the Government to do so.
Phase II: Offerors with an Acceptable Phase I proposal will be notified by the PCO and requested to submit , Volume III – Factor 3 – Program Management, Volume IV – Factor 4 – Past Performance, and Volume V – Factor
5 –Cost/Price, and Volume VI – Administrative/General (Amend 0002) Information of the proposal in accordance with the instructions established below and within the notification.
L.1.3 Proposal Validity: The Government requires that the proposal, in its entirety, be valid for at least two hundred and seventy (270) calendar days from the final, phase II proposal due date which will be annotated in the
PCO notification referenced in the above paragraph. Offerors are cautioned that for their proposal to be eligible for award, the proposal shall be in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the solicitation. The Offeror shall insert the validity date in Block 12 of the SF 33.
L.1.4 The Offeror’s proposal shall consist of five (5) volumes:
PHASE I
Volume I – Factor 1 – Security Reference (Amend 0002);
Volume II – Factor 2 – Technical Experience (Amend 0002)
PHASE II
Volume III – Factor 3 – Program Management:
Subfactor 3.1 Program Management Plan
Subfactor 3.2 Phase-in/Phase-out Approach
Volume V – Factor 4 Past Performance (Amend 0002)
Volume V – Factor 5 Cost / Price
Volume VI – Administrative/General Information. (Amend 0002)
L.1.5 All proposals must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the entire requirement and associated risks; is able, willing, and competent to devote resources necessary to meet the requirement; articulates a specific detailed approach with sufficient information, details, procedures and techniques to support the determination that the Offeror has a valid and practical solution for the requirement. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can, or will comply with the requirements, and statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information/narrative are considered inadequate and unsatisfactory.
Mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material is discouraged and is considered inadequate and unsatisfactory. The Offeror must include any data necessary to illustrate the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. In presenting material in the proposal, Offerors are advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Offerors are encouraged to use quantitative terms wherever possible and avoid the use of qualitative and subjective terms to the maximum extent practicable.
L.1.6 Offerors are cautioned that while the Government will not evaluate every PWS requirement for the purposes of the source selection evaluation, the awardee/Contractor will be required to comply with all PWS requirements during performance of the contract. The Offeror’s proposal shall describe its approach to implementing PWS requirements that are being evaluated.
L.1.6.1 The proposal shall reference the related paragraphs of the PWS (e.g. 3.1.2) and Section L, and provide the detail necessary to substantiate the proposed approach and methodology for performance. The proposal should identify any unique or innovative approaches which ensure successful performance.
L.1.7 The Government will determine that an Offeror's proposal is non-compliant, and therefore ineligible for award, if the proposal indicates that: it cannot or will not meet all the requirements; takes unreasonable or unjustifiable exception to any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation; provides an approach that clearly does not meet any of the requirements; or, includes data which prompts the Government to question the Offeror's compliance with any of the requirements. The Source Selection Authority may reject all proposals received in response to a solicitation, if doing so is in the best interest of the Government. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.
L.1.8. If an Offeror believes that the solicitation contains an error, omission, or is otherwise unsound; the
Offeror shall immediately notify the Contract Specialist and PCO stated in L.2.8 in writing with supporting rationale prior to the solicitation closing date and time.
L.2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
L.2.1 Failure to submit documents in the correct format is grounds for non-compliance determination, at the sole discretion of the PCO.
L.2.2 It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the electronic files submitted are virus free and can be opened and read by the Government. Proposal submissions shall not be locked, encrypted, or otherwise contain barriers to opening. All files shall be clearly identified with a filename appropriate to the content (e.g., Volume-
I_Security Reference__Attachment_1). Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions of the proposal, including exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. Compressed files are not allowed. When submitting proposals, Offerors shall follow these instructions.
L.2.3 File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be separate documents in their native format; i.e. xls, doc, ppt,.
In addition, an Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) version of all electronic documents, other than the Volume
IV – Factor 4 –STAF Price Workbook, shall also be included as separate volumes (Amend 0002) as a control copy.
Control Copy shall be in the title of the files after the name of the volume as stated below (Amend 0002). All price breakdown information to aid in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format, showing all formulas and calculations with no hidden/locked cells (Amend 0002) and viewable in Microsoft
Excel 2013. Please note – Self extracting .exe files are not acceptable. PDF documents shall use Adobe Acrobat 9.0 or later. Do NOT submit main documents in the PDF “image.” Teaming Agreements, Letters of Intent (Amend
0002) or Letters of Commitment may be in the image format and must be readable (Amend 0002)
L.2.4 All proposal files shall be verified to be free of any virus or malware.
L.2.5 All submitted files (MS Office and PDF) shall be created with textual search and copy functions enabled.
Non-searchable signature pages are acceptable, but other submitted materials that are not searchable may not be evaluated, and the Offeror may be determined non-compliant, at the sole discretion of the PCO.
L.2.6 The following volumes of material shall be submitted:
VOLUME TITLE
PAGE LIMIT
I – Factor 1 - Security Reference Complete Security Reference Workbook, Solicitation Attachment 2. Amend 0002 deleted language)
II – Factor 2 – Technical Experience Technical Experience Workbook, Solicitation Attachment 3. All information/narrative shall be documented in the space provided in the workbook space provided.
Technical Experience Evidence – No page limit
III – Factor 3 –Program Management
Subfactor 3.1 – Program Management Plan
Subfactor 3.2 – Phase-in / Phase-out Approach
40 Pages
IV – Factor 4 – Past Performance Unlimited (Amend 0002)
V – Factor 5 – Cost/Price Unlimited
VI – Administrative/General Information Unlimited
NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. Documents submitted in their native format will be the official version and take precedence over PDF control copy (e.g. difference in page count and/or content)
L.2.7 Acronym lists, cover pages, title pages, table of contents, cross reference matrices, dividers, index tabs, and lists of tables or figures will not be counted as part of the page count, so long as they are inserted solely for the purpose of reading ease and locating sections of the proposal. Pages marked: "This page is intentionally left blank" will not be counted nor evaluated. Additionally, teaming agreements, letters of commitment, letters of Intent
(Amend 0002) and the Contractor work breakdown structure, attached to their respective volume, will not be counted as part of the page count.
L.2.8 STAF solicitation Points of Contact:
Primary:
Isabel Rodriguez
Contract Specialist
U.S. Contracting Command – Orlando
12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826-3224
Ofc: (407) 384-3709 isabel.m.rodriguez12.civ@mail.mil
Alternate:
Jey Jeyasingam
Contract Specialist/Procuring Contracting Officer
U.S. Contracting Command – Orlando
12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826-3224
Ofc: (407) 384-5113 jeyanthan.jeyasingam.civ@mail.mil
Procuring Contracting Officer
Gloria E. Bailey
Branch Chief/Contracting Officer
U.S. ARMY Contracting Command - Orlando
12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826-3224 gloria.e.bailey2.civ@mail.mil
L.2.9 Beneficial features offered beyond the requirements of this solicitation will be incorporated into the awardee’s contract and subsequent Task Order. The Offeror will be expected to perform based on the entire proposed approach, including any over-and-above features and/or merits contained within its proposal.
L.2.10 If there are any questions resulting from this solicitation, each respective Offeror shall coordinate its questions through one company representative. The Government will provide responses to these questions via the
Government Point of Entry in which the solicitation was posted or email to all Offerors. All questions regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in writing, via email, to the STAF solicitation Primary and Alternate POCs identified within Section L, NLT 1400 hours EDT 7 calendar days after the solicitation Amendment 0002
(Amend 0002) issue date annotated on the SF 33 coversheet. The Government will respond to questions/comments specific to Phase I prior to the proposal due date for Phase I. Responses specific to questions/comments regarding
Phase II of the solicitation may be provided by the Government after the Phase I due date and prior to the Phase II due date. Offerors with an acceptable Phase I proposal will be afforded an additional opportunity to submit questions/comments regarding Phase II; specific instructions will be within the PCO notification referenced in L.1.2
Phased Acquisition Approach (Amend 0002). The subject line of the email for Offeror’s questions/comments shall include the Solicitation number, W900KK-20-R-0004. Questions/comments shall be submitted using the RFP attachment 7 entitled, “Question/Comment Form.”
L.2.11 Information previously submitted to the Government should be assumed unavailable during this proposal evaluation and source selection process. Proposals submitted will not be returned. Alternate proposals will not be evaluated or accepted.
L.2.12 In accordance with FAR Subpart 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition, the
Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the PCO later determines them to be in the best interest of the Government. The PCO will schedule the discussion sessions, and each Offeror within the competitive range will be notified of the time and place. The
PCO will provide additional instructions with the notification.
L.2.13 If the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the PCO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Clarifications are not discussions. Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of the proposal or resolve minor or clerical errors (see FAR 15.306(a)(1) and (2)). (Deleted language Amend 0002)
L.2.14 Any proprietary information submitted separately for major Subcontractors shall be furnished in the same format, level of detail, and submission due date as prescribed for the prime Offeror. A Subcontractor is considered a
Subcontractor executing at least 10% of the total proposed value. Subcontractor proposals submitted separately are considered part of the Offeror’s proposal, including the page count. All Subcontractor proposals submitted separately must identify the prime Contractor and be clearly marked in accordance with (IAW) L.2 and L.3. If mailto:jeyanthan.jeyasingam.civ@mail.mil
Subcontractor proposals are late or not in accordance with the other submission requirements, the entire proposal may be considered non-compliant.
L.2.15 A Major Subcontractor is considered a Subcontractor, Joint Venture, parent company and/or affiliate company executing at least 10% of the total proposed SA IDIQ contract value (Amend 0002).
L.3 PROPOSAL FILES
L.3.1 Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled, including the completed solicitation attachment 5, Cross-Reference Matrix within Volume III – Factor 3 – Program Management proposal.
A Table of Contents should be created to delineate the paragraphs and subparagraphs within that volume. As annotated above, the Cross-Reference Matrix and Table of Contents does not count against that volume’s respective page limitations. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Standard proposal text format shall be 12 point
Arial or Times New Roman font.
All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered (X of Y) and shall contain the company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. Pages shall be numbered sequentially within each volume. All pages shall be marked: “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104” in the footer.
Additional data use restrictions shall be located in the header/footer area of each page where applicable. The signed
Standard Form (SF) 33, each SF30 – as applicable – and Section K – Certifications and Representations may be submitted in Adobe.pdf file format. Microsoft Word and PDF files shall use the following page setup parameters:
Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1”
Gutter – 0”
From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5”
Page Size, Width – 8.5”
Page Size, Height – 11”
Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and can utilize an alternate paper size of 11x17, if necessary. For page-count purposes, each side of an 11x17 page with content will count as two pages.
Format requirements provided in this section do not apply to Government provided documents, such as: SF forms, Section K clauses (Amend 0002), DD254, Pricing, Technical Experience References, Security References (Amend
0002), Deleted language Amend 0002, etc. Additionally, attachments to the proposal, such as: Teaming agreements, verification documents for Vol VI, etc., are not required to be compliant with the format requirements.
L.3.2 Cross-Reference Matrix –The intent of the attached Cross-Reference Matrix is to ensure that all requirements for Volume III - Factor 3 - Program Management are addressed and easily accessible to evaluators.
The Cross-Reference Matrix must provide a single integrated index for the corresponding proposal Volume/Factor.
The Cross-Reference Matrix is to assist evaluators during the evaluation; however, the Cross-Reference Matrix will not be evaluated.
L.3.3 Compliancy Screening. The proposal volumes will be reviewed for compliance in accordance with the
Instruction to Offerors provided in Section L (Amend 0002 Deleted language).Failure of an Offeror to provide all requested proposal information may render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant, and as such, the Offeror's proposal will not be evaluated, at the sole discretion of the PCO. If determined to be non- compliant, the PCO will notify the
Offeror as soon as practicable.
L.3.4 The Offerors shall ensure that each proposal volume submitted contains only the information relevant to that specific volume. The Offerors are cautioned that each volume of the proposal is evaluated standalone against the criteria set forth in Section M and the evaluators for one volume may be different than the evaluators of another volume. It is incumbent upon the Offerors to ensure they properly submit their proposals. If the data is not contained in the appropriate volume of the proposal, it will not be evaluated. The Government will consider information it requires for proposal evaluation not found in its designated volume as the Offeror having omitted it from the proposal. No cost information shall be included in the Program Management volume of the Offerors proposal. No
Program Management information shall be included in the Cost volume of the Offerors proposal. Files shall not contain classified information.
L.4.0. Volume I – Factor 1 – Security Reference
L.4.0.1 The Offeror shall provide Security Reference information within attachment 2 (Amend 0002) which demonstrates current possession of an Active Facility Security Clearance (FCL) for the Prime as stated and required by the contract DD254 at the time of the proposal. Submission. Reference: TO 0001 & 0002 PWS Section 1.8, Security (Amend 0002).
Note: At the time of proposal submission both companies and/or entities forming the Joint Venture must have a Top Secret Facility Security Clearance.
Additionally, if the CAGE Code provided for the Prime does not correlate to current valid required FCLs, no further review or evaluation will be completed (to include Factor 2, Technical Experience) and the proposal will be deemed unacceptable and unawardable and will not receive (Amend 0002) continued evaluation.
(Amend 0002 deleted language).
L.4.1. Volume II -- Factor 2 – Technical Experience
L.4.1.1 This volume shall contains technical experience information. The Offeror's shall provide no more than four projects/ (Amend 0002 deleted language) contracts on which the Offeror served as either the prime, subcontractor or as a Major Subcontractor, during the past three years of this solicitation issuance date, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Each submitted reference shall defined whether the work was done as a prime, subcontractor or Major Subcontractor. No more than four technical experience references will be considered and evaluated. If more than four technical experience references are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first four consecutive submissions; any additional references will not count towards meeting the requirement and will not be evaluated (Amend 0002).
(Deleted Language Amend 0002)
Technical Experience shall be submitted using Solicitation Attachment 3 entitled, “Technical Experience Reference
Workbook.” Each reference submitted shall clearly delineate how the referenced project is relevant experience performing (Amend 0002) the following STAF Core Experience areas:
a) Experience executing a service contract with services managing a workforce in excess of 40 Full-Time
Equivalent Contractor personnel required to have and maintain a security clearance (ranging from a Secret to Top Secret and Specialized Compartmentalized Information). Reference: TO 0001 and 0002 PWS
Section 1.8.2; TO 0002 PWS section 5 (Amend 0002)
b) Experience executing a service contract with administrative, Program Management, and Technical services in support of DoD training centers of excellence (or comparable, to include non-DoD) and/or Combat
Training Centers (CTCs). Government agencies or organizations considered “comparable” to DoD COEs and CTCs will be any organization and/or agency aligned within a formal federal chain of command and tasked with a national security mission requiring Contractor support in a classified environment. This may include organizations and agencies such as the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), National Geospatial
Agency (NGA), etc. as described in STAF PWS paragraph. Reference: TO 0001 and 0002 PWS Section
1.8.2; TO 0002 PWS section 5 (Amend 0002).
c) Each Technical Experience reference submitted in support of any of the above letters (a) through (b) shall have been gained during a period of at three years of the solicitation release date and has at least 12 months of performance completed (Amend 0002).
L.4.1.2 Offerors shall submit Technical Experience References using the attached Technical Experience Reference
Workbook. At least one of the up to four Technical Experience references shall provide verifiable experience for
Section L.4.1.1 paragraphs (a) thorough (c) to be rated as Acceptable. If the Offeror’s referenced projects submitted fail to provide evidence of technical experience in the STAF Core Experience areas defined in both a) and b) above or does not meet the criteria stated in paragraph (c), no further review or evaluation will be completed and the proposal will be deemed unacceptable and unawardable and will not receive continued evaluation. These requirements may be met separately or in the up to four Technical Experience References submitted. (Deleted language Amend 0002)
L.4.1.3 An overarching Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) base contract, Blanket Purchase Agreement
(BPA), or Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) shall not be submitted as an individual Technical Experience
References reference. Offerors may submit an order issued from a single ID/IQ contract, BPA, or BOA as one
Technical Experience Reference to show experience in each relevant area. Each Technical Experience Reference shall comply with the criteria established within this solicitation.
L.4.1.4 Technical Experience References may include references of the Offeror’s proposed Major Subcontractors for this effort. Joint Ventures may include references executed by individual member(s) of the Joint Venture.
(Amend 0002 deleted language)
(Amendment 0002 Deleted Language)
L.4.1.5 (Deleted language Amend 0002) The Offeror shall include applicable verification documents, which unambiguously and sufficiently validate the individual Technical Experience References submitted. Examples (not an inclusive list) of such documents would be: a copy of the contract with this requirement (with POC information), a copy of the Subcontractor proposal/contract with the prime that has the requirement (with POC information), signed contract surveillance reports, other documents that can show the link between the requirements of this solicitation and performance on that effort (Amend 0002). When a Technical Experience Reference submitted was executed in the capacity of a Subcontractor, the Offeror shall ensure the applicable verification documents patently differentiate the Subcontractor’s Technical Experience from the prime Contractor’s Technical Experience. Failure to provide verifiable documents, which unambiguously and sufficiently validate the individual Technical Experience, will result in the Government not considering the individual submittal for evaluation.
L.4.1.6 If the Technical Experience Reference was accomplished through a Teaming agreement(s) and/or Joint
Venture, the agreement documentation shall be submitted with this Volume. Agreements shall be submitted and bilaterally signed, by authorized representatives from each organization, for all major Subcontractors or individual members of the team or of the JV citing their Technical Experience in this Volume. The Technical Experience shall reference the appropriate agreement that is submitted in this volume. (Amend 0002)
L.4.2 Volume III -- Factor 3 – Program Management
The Offeror shall prepare and submit a standalone Program Management Volume organized IAW the factor description below. All general assumptions concerning the proposal shall be stated in this volume as well as the
Cost/Price volume. No cost/price data shall be included in this volume.
This volume provides Offerors with an opportunity to demonstrate their approach in meeting the solicitation requirements. While Offerors will not be evaluated on all requirements of the STAF PWSs, they must comply with and be able to accomplish all PWS requirements throughout the life of the contract.
** NO COST/PRICE INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED WITHIN THIS VOLUME. **
L.4.2.1 Subfactor 3.1 Program Management Plan
The Program Management Plan shall contain all of the elements outlined below.
L.4.2.1.1 Management Structure. Offeror must provide a realistic approach to creating and depicting its management structure for the geographically separated sites in the required area of operation, from general staff oversight by first line supervisors, through its local organizational structure to the company headquarters management. Key Personnel resumes ONLY with names redacted, shall be submitted with this volume. They shall not contain any salary information or other information as specified in L.4.3.5. Reference TO 0001 PWS 1.6-1.6.2, 1.7, 2.2 and 5.1.11, and TO 0002 PWS 1.6-1.6.2, 1.7(Amend 0002).
L.4.2.1.2 Recruitment and Retention Plan:
The Offeror shall describe the methodology to be employed by the Offeror to recruit, retain, and develop personnel with the requisite knowledge, skills, education, experience and clearances to ensure successful accomplishment of
STAF PWSs. At a minimum, the plan shall address, for the STAF contract: how lessons learned will be incorporated to improve recruitment and retention practices; describe recruitment and hiring practices that will be used for this contract; process and procedures for addressing performance issues; process for ensuring individuals are trained properly to perform PWS requirements; process for ensuring continuity and quality services during personnel absences due to leave, terminations, and resignations to ensure the impact to the Government mission is minimal or non-existent; and any other processes, business practices, personnel management resources and/or methodologies to maintain a qualified pool of candidates to ensure a stable workforce over the life of the contract. IDIQ PWS
Reference: 5.3.1 and TO 0001 PWS Reference: 5.1.11
L.4.2.1.3 Contractor Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS). Within Microsoft Project, the Offeror shall provide, as an attachment to this volume, a CWBS with all proposed labor categories executing performance-based requirements within the Task Order PWSs. Each CWBS shall identify, for the proposed labor categories, clearly defined lines of responsibility, clearly defined levels of decision authority, reporting structures, location of personnel, and the communications/interfaces (e.g., Contractor/Subcontractor to Government, Prime to
Subcontractor, Prime to Site/Site Manager, and Subcontractor to Site/Site Manager).
CWBS shall clearly articulate the Contractor’s approach to satisfy all Task Order requirements and must identify the following:
a) Labor categories, broken out by PWS section
b) Number of personnel for each labor category, broken out by PWS section
c) Number of hours proposed for each category, broken out by PWS section
d) Provide a copy of worksheet 1b from cost/price workbook with this volume with columns J, K, L, M and N deleted. (no cost/price data shall be submitted in this volume (Amend 0002)
e) Provide a copy of worksheets 2b and 2c with labor categories and labor hours – NOT COST data shall be included in these worksheets (Amend 0002)
CWBS rationale and assumptions: Within this the Volume, the Offeror must provide its overarching methodology for determining its proposed Qualifications by Labor Category and assumptions supporting staffing decisions or explanations needed to clarify staffing decisions made in order to ensure proper execution of the effort. The numbers of hours, personnel and labor categories must match the number of hours, personnel and labor categories in the
Offeror’s Cost/Price Workbook. The Offeror shall provide rationale and calculations that clearly identify the methodology used to arrive at the labor categories, number of personnel, and/or proposed hours for each labor categories proposed to meet the requirements in the TO PWSs.(Amend 0002) Task Order 0001 and 0002 PWSs in totality. (Amend 0002) *******No cost/price data shall be included in this volume. *******
No cost/price data shall be included in this volume.
L.4.2.1.4 Management Methodology. As part of its Program Management Plan, the Offeror shall:
a) Describe their methodology and approach to managing multiple Subcontractors, joint venture, and/ or teaming partners in order to execute multiple requirements;
b) Describe their methodology and approach to managing its workforce alongside the workforces of other
Contractors in shared spaces;
c) Describe their methodology and approach to providing on-site management with authority, flexibility and the efficiency to quickly and effectively resolve all performance-related issues; and
d) Identify risks and corresponding risk-mitigation strategies that will be employed during execution.
Task Order 0001 PWS Reference 1.6.2 – 1.6.5.3, 1.7, 2.2, 2.3 - 2.3.2.1, and Section 5 – with special focus on 5.1.11;
TO 0002 PWS Reference: 1.6.2 – 1.6.5.3, 1.7, 2.2, 2.3 - 2.3.2.1, and Section 5, (Amend 0002)
L.4.2.1.5 Quality Control Plan. Each Offeror shall provide a STAF Quality Control Plan (i.e., onsite quality control procedures) capable of providing continuous improvement and problem resolution in coordination with local management and supported Government unit and/or higher headquarters.
Task Order 0001 PWS Reference: 2.3.3, 5.1.7, and 5.1.11; Task Order 0002 PWS 2.3.3 (Amend 0002)
L.4.2.1.6 Joint Venture/Teaming or Major Subcontracting Arrangements. Each Offeror shall provide, if applicable, a summary describing the joint venture or subcontracting arrangement established for this solicitation as well as a bilaterally signed document (format as established by Offeror) specifying an agreement (e.g., Teaming
Agreements) among the parties. Offeror shall identify for each proposed team member/Subcontractor: a) what PWS section each joint venture team member/Subcontractor will support; b) the team member/Subcontractor’s name; c) the actual services to be provided; d) the percentage of work it will perform. The Teaming Agreements shall be attached to this volume and are not included in the page count.
Task Order 0001 and TO 0002 PWSs 2.2 - 2.3.2.1; TO 0001 PWS 5.1.11 (Amend 0002)
L.4.2.2 Subfactor 3.2: Phase-in / Phase-out Approach:
L.4.2.2.1 Phase-in. The Offeror shall provide a 30-day Phase-in approach that provides for continuity of STAF operations with no loss of service and minimal loss of operational knowledge. The plan shall address the following elements:
a) Detailed 30-day Milestone Chart
b) Identification of any risks and describe how those risks will be mitigated
c) Approach to ensure open communication with incumbent Contractor and the Government to include periodic meetings documenting progress
d) Personnel plan describing how the Contractor will provide personnel in order to assume Full
Performance after the Phase-in period, as required by this PWS
e) Approach to ensure…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .