STAF_RFP_Attachment_9k_Technical Exhibit USAICoE Writing Standards - Scoring Instruction.pdf
PDF 368 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-20-R-0004
About this file
This document provides instructions for scoring technical writing submissions for an Army contract opportunity. It outlines a rubric for assessing submissions based on categories such as mechanics, organization, and content. Assessors are instructed to first read submissions in full without editing, then conduct a second read while providing targeted feedback. Patterns of errors should be identified rather than individual instances. A scoring scale of 1-6 is divided into "Go" and "No Go" sections, with the dividing line adjusted based on criticality. Assessors are to consider the behavioral descriptions and determine if submissions are higher, lower, or equal to the scale's middle before selecting a score. Any grammar or formatting errors found should be underlined on a reference sheet. Scores are then recorded in the appropriate columns and totals calculated.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Proposal for Staff Technical Assistance and Functional Support services under solicitation number W900KK-20-R-0004. Questions are due by March 5, 2020 at 2:00pm EST and Phase I proposals are due by March 12, 2020 at 12:00pm EDT. The Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions for Using the USAICoE Assessment Materials
Pre-Assessment
1. Read and Study:
The USAICoE Writing Standards – Analytic Rubric o Learn the categories and descriptions o And use the USAICoE Resource Guide for help defining key terms and concepts
2. Attend and Participate in:
A norming session with your course manager and peer instructors o Norming sessions “normalize” assessments through group practice o Keep several sample essays from the norming session on hand for comparison
3. Review:
The assignment sheet or assignment description for the specific requirements and expectations
Assessment and Feedback
1. Read the student’s work product in its entirety. Resist the urge to make editing marks.
2. When complete, briefly consider the student’s point of view and your own style preferences. Before continuing, remember to separate personal style preferences or pet peeves (“better/worse” features) from actual errors from breaking rules for spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, or citation
(“right/wrong” features).
3. Read the paper a second time, this time adding targeted marks and comments.
As appropriate, indicate 2-3 areas of positive feedback in the margin (reader response).
As appropriate, indicate 2-3 areas of constructive criticism in the margin (instructor feedback).
4. For papers with frequent errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, or citation, identify patterns rather than individual instances. For these problems, a single error (e.g. not using commas properly) may repeat in multiple instances throughout the paper. See also: Step 4 under Scoring.
Scoring
1. Divide the scoring scale into two sections, Go and No Go, as appropriate for your course’s criticality assessment.
For example, most BOLC assignments split the scale between levels 3 and 4. Levels 4-6 are Go, while levels 1-3 are No Go.
Based on the course criticality assessment, this dividing line may be higher or lower to adjust the difficulty of the standard.
2. Once you’ve got the general impression (Go or No Go), read the behavioral anchors in the mid-range
(usually 5 and 2).
3. Use the other behavioral anchors to determine if the paper is higher, lower, or equal to the middle of the range.
For example, is the paper higher or lower than a 5 on this feature?
4. Turn the scoring sheet over and underline any grammatical, mechanical, or punctuation mistakes that you found on the Grammar Reference and CMS Formatting Sheet on the back.
5. For each criteria, check the appropriate box (column) on the scoring sheet.
6. Add the total for each column in the “Total” row, then add all columns for a row total.
7. If required, calculate the average by dividing the total points by the number of row entries.
Some courses may use this option if the assignment has many requirements to use in the optional rows.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .