STAF_RFP_Attachment_9k_Technical Exhibit USAICoE Writing Standards - Scoring Instruction.pdf

PDF 368 KB Posted

Attached to
Staff Technical Assistance and Functional(STAF) Support Amendment 0003
Solicitation number
W900KK-20-R-0004
Issued by

About this file

This document provides instructions for scoring technical writing submissions for an Army contract opportunity. It outlines a rubric for assessing submissions based on categories such as mechanics, organization, and content. Assessors are instructed to first read submissions in full without editing, then conduct a second read while providing targeted feedback. Patterns of errors should be identified rather than individual instances. A scoring scale of 1-6 is divided into "Go" and "No Go" sections, with the dividing line adjusted based on criticality. Assessors are to consider the behavioral descriptions and determine if submissions are higher, lower, or equal to the scale's middle before selecting a score. Any grammar or formatting errors found should be underlined on a reference sheet. Scores are then recorded in the appropriate columns and totals calculated.

The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Proposal for Staff Technical Assistance and Functional Support services under solicitation number W900KK-20-R-0004. Questions are due by March 5, 2020 at 2:00pm EST and Phase I proposals are due by March 12, 2020 at 12:00pm EDT. The Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center is the issuing agency.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W900KK20R0004_Amend 0003_Mod_06232020.pdf PDF
W900KK20R0004_Amend 0003_Conformed_06232020.pdf PDF
STAF_Amendment 0002_QandA_23JUN2020.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_6_Cost_Price_Workbook_Amend0002.xls XLS spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_12_Historical_LOE Annex_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_2_Security__Reference__Workbook_Amend0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Questions_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9_Task_Order_0002_PWS_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1a_PRS_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_8_Task_Order_0001_PWS_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_8a_PRS_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_5_Cross_Reference_Matrix_Amend_0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_11_WD_2015-5720_Rv10_23DEC19.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1b_CDRL_Amend0002.pdf PDF
W900KK20R0004_Amend 0002_PD2_conformed_06122020.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_3_Technical Experience__Reference__Workbook_Amend0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W900KK20R0004_Amend 0002_PD2_Mod_06122020.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1_PWS_IDIQ__Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_13_Past Perfromance Questionnaire_Amend0002.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_3_Past Performance__Reference__Workbook_Amend_0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W900KK20R0004_STAF_Amed_0001_Conformed.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1_PWS_IDIQ__Amend_0001.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_5_CROSS_REFERENCE_MATRIX_Amend_0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W900KK20R0004_STAF_Amed_0001.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1b_CDRL.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9l_Technical Exhibit USAICoE Writing Standards - Scoring Sheet.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9g_Technical Exhibit DDIST CME funds Status.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9jTechnical Exhibit USAICoE Writing Standards - Analytic Rubric 011.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9_Task Order 0002_PWS.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_6_STAF_Cost_Price Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9c_Technical Exhibit DDIST Line by Line.ppt PPT presentation
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9i_Technical Exhibit USAICoE Handbook_First Edition_012815.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_8a_PRS.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9h_Technical Exhibit DDIST Contractor Roster.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_3_Past Performance__Reference__Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9dTechnical Exhibit DDIST Travel Cost Estimate.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1c_Classified Information_NDA.pdf PDF
W900KK20R0004_STAF_Final.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9b_Technical Exhibit DDIST Desk Reference.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_2_Technical_Experience__Reference__Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_10_SF 1408 Checklist.doc.docx DOCX document
STAF_RFP_Attachment_4_DD254.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_8_Task Order 0001_PWS.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_7_Question-Comment_Form.doc DOC document
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1d_Personnel Qualififcation_Matrix.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1a_PRS.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_1_PWS_IDIQ__20200131.pdf PDF
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9e_Technical Exhibit DDIST Logistics Cost Estimate.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_9f_Technical Exhibit DDIST Funding.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STAF_RFP_Attachment_5_CROSS_REFERENCE_MATRIX.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Instructions for Using the USAICoE Assessment Materials

Pre-Assessment

1. Read and Study:

The USAICoE Writing Standards – Analytic Rubric o Learn the categories and descriptions o And use the USAICoE Resource Guide for help defining key terms and concepts

2. Attend and Participate in:

A norming session with your course manager and peer instructors o Norming sessions “normalize” assessments through group practice o Keep several sample essays from the norming session on hand for comparison

3. Review:

The assignment sheet or assignment description for the specific requirements and expectations

Assessment and Feedback

1. Read the student’s work product in its entirety. Resist the urge to make editing marks.

2. When complete, briefly consider the student’s point of view and your own style preferences. Before continuing, remember to separate personal style preferences or pet peeves (“better/worse” features) from actual errors from breaking rules for spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, or citation

(“right/wrong” features).

3. Read the paper a second time, this time adding targeted marks and comments.

As appropriate, indicate 2-3 areas of positive feedback in the margin (reader response).

As appropriate, indicate 2-3 areas of constructive criticism in the margin (instructor feedback).

4. For papers with frequent errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, or citation, identify patterns rather than individual instances. For these problems, a single error (e.g. not using commas properly) may repeat in multiple instances throughout the paper. See also: Step 4 under Scoring.

Scoring

1. Divide the scoring scale into two sections, Go and No Go, as appropriate for your course’s criticality assessment.

For example, most BOLC assignments split the scale between levels 3 and 4. Levels 4-6 are Go, while levels 1-3 are No Go.

Based on the course criticality assessment, this dividing line may be higher or lower to adjust the difficulty of the standard.

2. Once you’ve got the general impression (Go or No Go), read the behavioral anchors in the mid-range

(usually 5 and 2).

3. Use the other behavioral anchors to determine if the paper is higher, lower, or equal to the middle of the range.

For example, is the paper higher or lower than a 5 on this feature?

4. Turn the scoring sheet over and underline any grammatical, mechanical, or punctuation mistakes that you found on the Grammar Reference and CMS Formatting Sheet on the back.

5. For each criteria, check the appropriate box (column) on the scoring sheet.

6. Add the total for each column in the “Total” row, then add all columns for a row total.

7. If required, calculate the average by dividing the total points by the number of row entries.

Some courses may use this option if the assignment has many requirements to use in the optional rows.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .