H-53E_Att_13_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(2020-01-09).docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- H-53E Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services
- Solicitation number
- N6264920R0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for H-53E aircraft maintenance and repair services. The Navy is seeking proposals from contractors with experience maintaining CH/MH-53E helicopters deployed in the Western Pacific region. Under the terms of the contract, awardees will provide depot-level maintenance, repair, and overhaul services to support the Marine Corps and Navy's H-53E aircraft. Services will include planned maintenance interval depot events conducted under Naval Air Systems Command's integrated maintenance program, as well as in-service repair requirements. Proposals are due by response dates specified in solicitation N6264920R0003. The contract will be awarded by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command to maintain H-53E aircraft operating from bases in the Western Pacific area.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 56 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6264920R0003 Attachment 13 – Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire
Offeror:
Point of Contact
Your Company/Organization Name:
Your Name:
Position Title:
Telephone:
E-mail:
General Contract Information
a. Contract Number:
Type of contact:
☐ Firm-Fixed-Price
☐ Cost-Reimbursement
b. Brief Description of Work:
c. Location of Work:
e. Contract Performance:
From: Click here to enter a date.
To: Click here to enter a date.
f. Total Contract Value (USD):
Quality
How do you assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, statements of work, and standards of good workmanship (i.e. commonly accepted technical, professional, and quality standards)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
(Please provide a detailed, elaborative response. Recommend a minimum of one full paragraph.)
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve contract performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Schedule
How do you assess the contractor’s timeliness in meeting contract delivery schedules?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve schedule performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Safety
How do you assess the contractor’s adherence to safety requirement (including safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
| How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve issues and deficiencies involving safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations? |
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Additional Comments
Please select your overall level of customer satisfaction, considering contract work performed, promptness, completeness, follow up to correct errors, and documentation and history of reasonable and cooperative behavior.
☐ Exceptional
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Wrap-up Question
All things considered, would you recommend this Contractor for performance on another contract?
| ☐ Yes |
| ☐ No |
We greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .