AMENDMENT 0012.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION NO. N40085-20-R-0021, DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB), P-381, MULTI MISSION DRY DOCK #1, PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD, KITTERY, ME

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to PPI's and updates to draw ings and specifications.

The Step 2 proposal due date of 26 February 2021 NTL 2:00 P.M. EST remains unchanged.

See Continuation Page(s).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 76

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jan-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008520R0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-Aug-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jan-2021

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008520R0021

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0012

CONTINUATION SHEET

SECTION 01 50 00.00 22 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS (PWD ME)

Paragraph 2.3.1, Temporary Dewatering Pumping Systems

Emergency Dewatering Pumps, delete the first two paragraphs in their entirety and replace with the following:

“Provide emergency dewatering pumps located in the drydock as indicated on the phasing drawings once the existing dewatering pumps are taken offline by the P-381 construction. Once installed, the emergency Drydock 1 dewatering system must remain on site and operational until the permanent dewatering pumps have been field tested and certified as specified in Section 35 45 01. These pumps shall be in place at all times during construction and may discharge into the existing basin. The emergency dewatering pump system shall be designed to deliver 24,000 gpm. The system shall have a minimum of three equally sized pumps and shall meet the required pumping rate with one pump unit out of service. The emergency dewatering pumps shall be sized to fit within the existing drainage sump on the North side of Dry Dock 1 and shall be capable of maintaining the water surface at least two feet below the dry dock floor (at least elevation -23.50).

The Contractor shall design and provide a system that ensures that all of the requirements of this specification are met. They system designed shall physically fit within the spaces designated. The basis of the P381 conceptual design is based on the following:

1. Number of pumps = 3 (2 primary, 1 standby)

2. Pump design point = 12,000 gpm at 36.6 feet

3. Flygt model number = CP 3531/806 3 1240”

Primary Temporary Dewatering Pumps, Last paragraph, delete “1. Number of pumps = 3 primary” and replace with “1. Number of pumps = 4 (3 primary, 1 standby)”

SECTION 01 57 19.00 22 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS - PORTSMOUTH NAVAL

SHIPYARD (PWD ME)

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

Add:

“Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) Waste Discharge License (WDL)/Maine Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MEPDES) Permit; G”

Paragraph 3.19 CONCRETE WASH WATER

Delete existing paragraphs “3.19.2 On-Shipyard Disposal” and “3.19.3 Off -Shipyard Disposal” in their entirety.

Add the below paragraphs:

“3.19.2 Concrete Wash Water Disposal

The contractor will be responsible for the proper disposal of concrete wash water. Off-shipyard disposal includes direct conveyance of rinsate to sealed tanks and hauled to a licensed receiving facility. On-site disposal options include discharges to the Piscataqua River (3.19.3). On site disposal must be approved prior to execution; and discharge to the Piscataqua River by ME DEP. It is the Contractor's responsibility to manage concrete wash water in compliance with federal and state water quality regulations. Contractor shall provide careful oversight to prevent improper dumping of concrete wash water. Contractor shall ensure companies use proper disposal facilities designated for concrete wash water disposal. The Contractor shall be responsible for any clean up resulting from improper control of concrete wash water.

3.19.3 On-Shipyard Disposal to Piscataqua River

For the floating concrete batch plant, Contractor will have an option of obtaining a Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) Waste Discharge License (WDL)/Maine Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MEPDES) Permit that allows for the discharging of treated concrete wash water into the Piscataqua River.

Contractor shall be responsible for preparation and submittal of the General Application for the WDL, including the design, installation, and monitoring of required treatment system to ensure concrete wash water meets the WDL conditions and water quality standards for discharge. The Shipyard will require review of the Contractor's General Application prior to MEDEP submittal. Review time for the WDL license is up to 120 days once MEDEP receives a complete application. In the absence of an approved WDL, Contractor will remain responsible for proper handling and on or off-Shipyard disposal of concrete wash water through adherence to Project specifications or any relevant permit conditions.”

SECTION 40 95 00 PROCESS CONTROL

APPENDIX B - IO List

Replace list in its’ entirety with updated list provided.

SECTION 01 44 01.22 CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION (PWD ME)

Paragraph 3.2.1 Requirements, item b.

At the end of the first sentence add: “Only traditional fiber base prints made using a wet chemical process to HABS/HAER/HALS standards are acceptable.”

Add the below section to the specification:

“3.5 PREPARE AN INTERPRETIVE PANEL & ARTICLE

This proposed project involves the development of an interpretive panel and article detailing the history of the Shipyard Crane and Railroad Track System.

3.5.1 OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this scope of work is to prepare an interpretive panel to be mounted in Building 238 and provide an article with images for future publication in order to satisfy a stipulation in the Programmatic Agreement between the Navy and the Maine State Historic Preservation Office for the Dry Dock 1 Modification and Expansion project, P-381, Multi-Mission Dry Dock.

3.5.2 GENERAL TECHNIAL APPROACH

1. The contractor conducting the research, developing the narrative, and selecting the images in support of this task must meet The Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (62 FR 33707) for history and/or architectural history.

2. It is assumed that much of the research needed to prepare this material will be provided by the Government. If additional research is required to complete the task, it shall be conducted at relevant repositories including: Public Works Department, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine; Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Museum in Kittery, Maine; Portsmouth Athenaeum in Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Rice Public Library in Kittery, Maine; University of New Hampshire Special Collections in Durham, New Hampshire; National Archives offices in Washington D.C.

and College Park; and National Archives Northeast Regional Office in Waltham, Massachusetts.

3.5.3 TASK ONE: INTERPRETIVE PANEL

1. Prepare an interpretive panel to be displayed inside Building 238. The interpretive panel shall outline the history and development of the crane and railroad track system, discuss changes in technology, and how cranes, trains, and track have supported the evolving Shipyard mission. A combination of historic photographs, maps, documents, and drawings shall be used to illustrate the full color panel. All files shall be provided in their Native format and in PDF to enable future Navy editing and publication on a website. All graphics shall be of sufficient quality to support printing and web publication.

2. The panel shall measure no less than two feet tall by three feet wide and be made of a durable material, able to withstand frequent handling. Provide the wall-mounted sign support stand-offs with security locking screw caps, and instructions, necessary to install the panel in the future.

3. Assume three rounds of proofs will be required; a draft, final draft, and final. The proofs shall be provided electronically to the COR. The first proof will be provided for Navy comment. After Navy comments have been incorporated into the design, submit a final draft for Navy and SHPO review. Once the Navy and SHPO comments have been received and incorporated, produce a final electronic proof for approval. Once the final proof has been approved by the COR, the panel may be produced.

3.5.4 TASK TWO: PREPARE ARTICLE

1. Utilizing the research undertaken to prepare the interpretive panel under Task One, prepare a brief (approximately 500 word) article for publication in the Shipyard magazine, The Periscope. Select images from the panel to illustrate the article. Provide captions for each image. Assume two drafts will be required. All drafts, and the final submission, shall be provided electronically to the COR. The first draft will be provided for Navy comment. Once Navy comments are incorporated, a final draft will be produced for Navy and SHPO comment.

The final submittal shall incorporate all comments. All images shall be provided as .jpg or .tif and shall be at a high enough resolution to support publication in a magazine. Text files shall be provided in Microsoft Word or Publisher to enable future Navy editing.

3.5.5 SUBMITTALS

a. Draft Proof - Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

b. Final Draft Proof- Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

c. Final Proof - Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

d. Panel, hardware, and mounting Instructions - Hard copy and electronic on CD or DVD.

e. Draft Article - Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

f. Final Draft Article - Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

g. Final Article - Electronic (DoD SAFE or e-mail)

3.5.6 SCHEDULE

DRAFT PROOF 90 DAYS FROM CONTRACT AWARD

FINAL DRAFT PROOF 30 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NAVY COMMENTS

FINAL PROOF & DRAFT ARTICLE 15 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NAVY COMMENTS

FINAL DRAFT ARTICLE 10 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NAVY COMMENTS

INTERPRETIVE PANEL 60 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NAVY APPROVAL

FINAL ARTICLE 15 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NAVY APPROVAL”

SECTION 05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

Add Paragraph 2.1.6 Stainless Steel as follows: “Stainless steel shall be Grade 304L per Specification 05 12 00, Paragraph 2.7.”

Add Paragraph 2.11 DEWATERING PUMP EMBEDDED STEEL LINER as follows: “Dewatering pump embedded steel liner shall be stainless steel, Type 316L.”

SECTION 23 22 26.00 20 HIGH PRESSURE STEAM SYSTEM

Paragraph 3.2.1 Pipe Flushing, 1st paragraph – Delete “Fill piping system with solution of clean water and 12-percent hypochlorite bleach, Nalco 2567 cleaner, or equivalent. The use of trisodium phosphate cleaner is prohibited. Circulate solution for at least 24 hours and then drain system to sanitary sewer.”

SECTION 33 20 00 PURE WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Add new paragraph 2.3.1.2 Actuators for Actuated Ball Valves 2 Inch and Smaller in Size – Pneumatically controlled on/off actuator, with torque coordinated with selected ball valve. Direct mount, rack, and pinion type quarter turn, with spring return and visual position indication.

Original Paragraph 2.3.1.2 Swing Check Valves 2 Inches and Smaller in Size becomes Paragraph 2.3.1.3.

Original Paragraph 2.3.1.3 Pressure Relief Valves becomes Paragraph 2.3.1.4.

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

The following drawings are revised as of 08 January 2021:

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823008

CHANGE G-132 HISTORIC QUAY WALLS & ABANDONED FOUNDATION PLAN BERTH 11 as follows:

Area of Archaeological Sensitivity hatch was added to the existing quay walls in the crane rail turnout area north of DD1 and east of Building 175.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823432

CHANGE PA-201 PUMP STATION – BUILDING ELEVATIONS as follows:

In “South Elevation - C2” louver removed from elevation.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823629

CHANGE UM601 UTILITY ENCLOSURE SCHEDULES 1 OF 5 as follows:

In schedule “Centrifugal Side Stream Filter Schedule” change note 1 model number from PF-64-012 to PF-64-015.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823796

CHANGE MS702 ASW SCHEMATIC – DD1N as follows:

FT-01 and FT-02 tags have been updated for clarity in correlation with schedule.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823797

CHANGE MS703 ASW SCHEMATIC – DD1W as follows:

FT-01 and FT-02 tags have been updated for clarity in correlation with schedule.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823659

CHANGE UP105 UTILITY ENCLOSURE – MEZZ AND LOWER ROOF PLUMBING

as follows:

Add tags UE-FT-02N and UE-FT-02W for clarity and coordination with schedules sheet UM605.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823615

CHANGE UM204 UTILITY ENCLOSURE – THIRD FLOOR PIPING PLAN

Add tags UE-FT-01N and UE-FT-01W for clarity and coordination with schedules sheet UM605.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823457

CHANGE PM601 PUMP STATION - SCHEDULES - SHEET 1 OF 2

as follows:

Dimensions on the Louver Schedule have been updated to match the louvers that were modeled and intended.

Additionally, louver PS-L-6 was added to the schedule as it was previously missing.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823952

CHANGE ES405 UTILITY TUNNEL-WEST

Change junction box designation to TJB-10.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823962

CHANGE ES502 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS

Modifications to detail C2 to clarify receptacle types.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823989

CHANGE ES609 COMMUNCIATIONS SYSTEMS SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

Change junction box designation to TJB-10.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823486

CHANGE PE102 PUMP STATION - MAIN LEVEL POWER AND TELCOM PLAN

Modified keynotes 8,9 &10 to require cast iron boxes for receptacles/devices.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823487

CHANGE PE103 PUMP STATION - MEZZANINE LEVEL POWER AND TELCOM PLAN

Modified electrical equipment layout. Corrected switchboard labelling.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823493

CHANGE PE109 PUMP STATION – CONDUIT PLAN

Modified conduits based on caisson outlet changes. Added conduit/feeder 190.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823494

CHANGE PE110 PUMP STATION – CONDUIT PLAN

as follows:

Modified conduits based on caisson outlet changes.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823498

CHANGE PE204 PUMP STATION – ELEVATIONS

Modified equipment labels based on caisson outlet changes and conduit routing for same.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823506

CHANGE PE501 PUMP STATION – LOAD CENTER 20 NORTH DETAILS

Modified breaker layout based on caisson outlet changes. MDP-2 has been moved to LC20-South

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823507

CHANGE PE502 PUMP STATION – LOAD CENTER 20 SOUTH DETAILS

Modified breaker layout based on caisson outlet changes. MDP-2 has been added to LC20-South.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823508

CHANGE PE601 PUMP STATION – SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

as follows:

Modified breaker layout based on caisson outlet changes. Breaker/feeder to PS-SWBD1-S has been changed from 1200A to 2000A. MDP-2 has been moved to PS-LC20-South.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823509

CHANGE PE602 PUMP STATION – SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

as follows:

Changed PS-HV1-S to PS-SWBD1-S (1200A panel to 2000A switchboard). Moved Caisson outlets from PS- SWBD-1 & 2 to PS-SWBD1-S. Modified PS-HV2 depiction. Moved feeder to PS-HV1 from PS-LC20-South to PS-

SWBD1.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823510

CHANGE PE603 PUMP STATION – CONDUIT AND WIRE SCHEDULE

Changed feeder designations 53,54,55,190. Added note to clarify 100KAIC minimum rating for feeder 48.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823512

CHANGE PE605 PUMP STATION – PANELBOARD SCHEDULES

Deleted schedule for Panelboard PS-HV1-S. Changed schedule info on PS-HV1 and PS-HV2

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823516

CHANGE PE609 PUMP STATION – PROCESS CONTROL

Deleted E-stop for ASW pump in detail A3.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823518

CHANGE PE611 PUMP STATION – SCHEDULES

Updated schedule to show PS MDP-2 fed from LC20-South.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. TBD

ADD UE609 UTILITY ENCLOSURE – SCHEDULES

New drawing adds requirements VFDs for PWP-1 and PWP-2.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823194

CHANGE YS102 – GENERAL PLAN as follows:

Added dimensions showing the distance between the bottom of the stairs.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823216

CHANGE YS124 – NORTH DOCKWALL – CONCRETE – PLANS – SHEET 2 OF 4 as follows:

Added dimensions showing the size and location of the stair and floor access door at approximately STA 1+70.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823219

CHANGE YS127 – SOUTH DOCKWALL – CONCRETE – PLANS – SHEET 1 OF 2 as follows:

Added dimension showing the location of the floor access door and revised the size of the floor access door at approximately STA 5+00.

Added dimensions showing the size and location of the stair and floor access door at approximately STA 3+75.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823309

CHANGE YS502 –STRUCTURAL STANDARD DETAILS – SHEET 2 OF 2 as follows:

In the Grating and Embedded Frame Detail, revised the support angle bolted to the face of concrete and the threaded stud used for fastening grating from stainless steel to galvanized steel; and added “GALVANIZED STEEL” to the callout for the steel plate welded between the steel grating bearing bars.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823328

CHANGE YS521 – PUMPWELL – METAL GRATINGS FOR PIPE VALVE ACTUATORS as follows:

In Sections A2, A4, B2 and B4, revise the detail reference callouts for the vertical fixed ladders and guardrail and post from C5 to A5.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823329

CHANGE YS522 – PUMPWELL – METAL GRATING DETAILS AT VALVE CHAMBERS as follows:

In Sections A4 and A5, revise the detail reference callouts for the vertical fixed ladders from C5 to A5.

In Section A2, add the following callout to the embedded angle grating support: “L3x3x1/2”.

In Section B4, revise the embedded angle grating supports from L4x4x3/4 to L3x3x1/2.

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823525

CHANGE PI101 – DRY DOCKS INSTRUMENTATION PLAN as follows:

Change Title of drawing from “Dry Docks Instrumentation Site Plan” to “Utility Enclosure RIO Location Plan”

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823526

CHANGE PI102 – PUMPING STATION INSTRUMENTATION SITE PLAN as follows:

Changed scales on details from “3/8” = 1’-0” to “1/4” = 1’-0”

On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12823008

CHANGE G132 – HISTORIC QUAY WALLS AND ABANDONED FOUINDATION PLAN – BERTH 11

Drawing changed to add additional historic elements.

Contractor

PPI#

Section of RFP or Page Number

Paragraph Reference

Drawing Number

Question RESPONSE

148 NA NA ES211, ES401

Please provide specifications for the voltage Regulator Enclosures shown on ES211 and ES401.

Updated information has been provided as part of amendment 10

149 NA NA

YS529, YS530,

YS531

In Section A3, is all of the reinforcing in the riser wall and utility tunnel epoxy coated?

See Note 3 on the subject drawings and Section 03 45 33.01, Paragraph 2.2.3, last sentence. This requirement pertains to the reinforcing bars projecting from the tops of the precast starter walls, from the vertical face of precast concrete into the openings for the drilled shaft connections, and any other bars that would be located under water per Paragraph 2.2.3 based on the Contractor's means and methods. Only the length of the bar that is exposed plus 12" inside of the precast concrete under these conditions is to be epoxy-coated. The remaining length of the bar shall be un-coated. It is envisioned that the reinforcing bars at the utility tunnel would be installed in-the-dry and therefore do not need to be epoxy-coated per the above requirements.

150 NA NA YS528 - YS605

Please identify any epoxy coated reinforcing steel that is required.

See Note 3 on the subject drawings and Section 03 45 33.01, Paragraph 2.2.3, last sentence.

151 33 20 00 2.1.1 NA

Pure Water; spec section 2.1.1 requires a vendor supplied pretreatment system to treat a fresh water supply for use in the pure water system.

What are the deionized quality requirements for the output of this system?

PENDING RESPONSE

152 33 20 00 2.1.1 NA

Pure Water; Attachment A; section 5.2.6 states that PNSY will be providing a pure water source for hydrostatic testing. Since PNSY will be providing a source of pure water, what is the need for a pretreatment system required in spec section 2.1.1?

PENDING RESPONSE

153 33 20 00 3.3.1 NA

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 3.3.1 regarding hydrostatic testing of pure water tanks using deionized water.

Reference Spec 01 50

00.00 22 - 3.2.2 which states that NAVFAC is to make available to the Contractor at no cost various utilities that do not include deionized water. Please confirm that Contractor is to provide deionized water required for the project.

Please confirm that the hydrostatic testing of pure water tanks with deionized water cited in Spec. 33 20 00 - 3.3.1 is to be performed after the tanks have been set in place and is not to be performed in the factory prior to shipment.

PENDING RESPONSE

154 23 65 00 2.9.3.2 UM601

Reference Spec. 23 65 00 - 2.9.3.2 and Sheet No. UM601 "Centrifugal Side Stream Filter Schedule" regarding side stream filter. Cited spec and schedule both state to provide 80 gpm flow and 3 hp motors.

Schedule states basis of design for side stream filters is Puroflux model No. PF-64-012. Our Puroflux representative has been advised by Puroflux factory engineers that the cited model no. PF-64-012 features a 50 gpm flow and 2 hp motor. Please confirm that we are to provide model no. PF- 64-012 with 50 gpm flow and 2 hp motor. If we are to provide an 80 gpm flow and 3 hp motor, please advise as to model no. to be provided.

Side stream filter shall be Puroflux PF-64-015, 80 GPM, 3 HP. Schedule capacity data is correct but model number was incorrect and will be updated in a future amendment

155 22 15 26.00 20 2.1 MC401

Reference Spec. 22 15

26.00 20 - 2.1 and sheet

no. MC401 regarding the MP Compressed air system. This system is to be installed inside the existing power plant.

This system is to be disassembled to allow for handling through a small aisle. The drawings do not show the existing power plant in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand the existing access available for handling the MP compressed air system components into the building and then through the building to final install location.

Please provide existing drawings of the power plant enough for this need.

There is an existing overhead door shown on the left wall in plan. Contractor is responsible for all rigging means and methods.

156 NA NA BE501

Reference sheet no.

BE501 which calls out an existing ASW intake at DD1. This existing ASW intake conflicts with the proposed new center wall construction. Please confirm that NAVFAC is to remove this existing ASW intake.

Should this not be the case and Contractor is to remove, please provide details of the existing ASW intake.

ASW intake is on the suction side of the dewatering pumps which is shown as being demolished on MD401. The contractor is responsible for all demolition

157 NA NA ES519

Drawing shows the duct bank from manhole AC-502 to existing manhole AC-321 with different circuit numbers from one end to the other. Please clarify which circuits #'s are correct.

The circuit #'s at AC-321 are correct. The information on AC 502 will updated by amendment

158 NA NA

UE

Power/Telcom Drawings

There are multiple areas with equipment labels "UE-BAS"-with an equipment tag designation. Drawings and panel schedules indicate a 120-volt circuit to each BAS.

Spec section 23 65 00 gives information about the VFD's being compatible with the BAS. Please provide information for these multiple BAS's, any interconnection conduit/wire requirements, who to supply etc.

General contractor is responsible for the delegation of scope to the subcontractors. Refer to 25 00 00 ASW Control Specifications for conduit and wiring.

159 NA NA UM712, UM606

Both Drawings reference the Pure Water Pumps to be VFD controlled. The electrical one-line drawing UE602 doesn't show these circuits, nor are the VFD's referenced in the specifications. Please clarify if the PWP's are to be VFD controlled and who is responsible to furnish them.

VFD supplied by electrical contractor. Drawings will be updated to reflect this by amendment

160 NA NA PE102, PI102

The scale provided does not appear to be correct based on comparison with the structural drawing PS101 that gives the dimensions of the Pump Station.

Please advise.

The scale on PE102 is correct, the scale at PI102 is wrong and will be corrected by amendment

161 35 20 23 1.16 NA

Are all dredge spoils required to be offloaded on the shipyard and processed through building 357?

Alternative disposal means have been utilized in the past. These require the approval of the shipyard on a case by case basis.

162 35 20 23 1.16 NA

Will the contractor be allowed to offload dredge spoils at a facility off shipyard property? If so, what are the requirements for tracking spoils for disposal?

Approval from the shipyard to offload offsite or through Berth 7 and directly off base can be discussed with the shipyard post award.

163 31 23 00.00 3.3.4 NA

Per Specification 31 23

00.00 part 3.3.4 Excavated Materials Unsuitable for Backfill, need to be disposed of at a licensed facility.

Does this apply to the stone fill to be removed from inside of the West Closure Wall Cells?

PENDING RESPONSE

164 31 23 00.00 3.3.4 NA

Will the Stone fill from the West Closure Wall Cells need to be offloaded inside the shipyard and brought through building 357 regardless of if it to be disposed of at a licensed facility or other approved location?

PENDING RESPONSE

165 NA NA BE102

Note 2 says see demolition dwgs for west closure wall demolition sequence.

The west closure wall demo does not appear in the CD drawings. Could you please provide the Sheet numbers for this demolition sequence?

Removal of the West Closure Wall is shown on

YD101.

166 NA NA Y-002

Additional Notes for tremie concrete, note 5.

"If multiple tremie pipes are used, concrete shall be fed into each pipe at the same rate so that the concrete rises uniformly across the placement" Also, with regards to note 6, it would not be feasible to assume placing in multiple tremie pipes simultaneously due to physical constraints of site access as well as resources with placing equipment and material supply. Please consider removing these two requirements.

Contractor shall plan the size of the tremie concrete placements accordingly.

The requirements are intended to minimize the amount of latent concrete within the concrete placement. Note 5 is being revised as follows: “IF

MULTIPLE TREMIE

PIPES ARE USED,

CONCRETE SHALL BE

FED ALTERNATELY

INTO ADJACENT

TREMIE PIPES SUCH

THAT A 2-FOOT

MAXIMUM

DIFFERENTIAL IS

MAINTAINED ACROSS

THE ENTIRE CONCRETE

PLACEMENT AND THAT

ALL OF THE TREMIE

PIPES REMAIN ALWAYS

IMMERSED AT THE

SAME DEPTH BELOW

AT LEAST 5-FEET OF

FRESH CONCRETE.”

Note 6 is being clarified to allow up to a 2-foot maximum differential across the entire concrete placement.

167 NA NA YS540

YS540 section B4 details 6'6" type 2 wall drilled shaft rebar. The rebar has 6" of cover making the cage diameter 5'6". The precast monoliths that this rebar needs to pass through has a 6' bondout. The cage centralizers to be installed to pass through the precast will be undersize by several inches for the drilled socket below. Please advise the greater variability on rebar location in the socket will be acceptable.

Dwgs. YS539, YS540, YS574 and YS575 will be revised to call out a 9" cover for the 6'-6" dia. drilled shafts below the precast floor slab and a 6" cover within the precast floor slab.

168 31 41 16 3.4.1 NA

The contractor requests to pull sheet piles in pairs when possible opposed to singles a prescribed.

Specification will be amended to allow pulling in pairs.

169 31 41 16 3.2.2.1.b NA

"Use two templates at least, when placing each piling at third points."

31 41 16 1.5 "Contractor to design multi-level pile templates or other temporary supports of sufficient length and rigidity to assure sheets are placed to indicated tolerances." Please consider removing this requirement for multi-level templates should contractor be able to meet instillation tolerances with other means.

The requirement in the specification will not be relaxed. Contractor may submit "other temporary supports of sufficient length and rigidity". Such alternates will be accepted if contractor can demonstrate that they will be able to meet tolerances.

170 31 41 16 2.1.1.b NA

Please consider removing specific material requirement noted for temporary installations.

The specified requirement will not be relaxed.

171 NA NA YS506, YS507

Detail B5 on YS506 details the PTFE assembly. This consists of 2 1/2" SS plates.

Detail A5 on YS507 calls for a 1" SS plate flush with the bottom of precast as well as the two 1/2" SS plates that have anchors into the precast. Is the top plate under the center wall to be upsized or is the intent to have 3 plates here?

Section A2 on YS507 is being revised to remove the callout for the 1" thick plates.

172 21 30 00 2.7.1 NA

Reference Spec. 21 30 00 - 2.7.1 regarding fire pump controller. Spec.

21 30 00 - 2.2 states that the fire pump is to be rated for 500 gpm with a rated net pressure of 71 psi which would require a 40 hp motor.

Spec. 21 30 00 - 2.7.1 states the controller is to be designed for a 125 hp motor which greatly exceeds the 115% short circuit rating of full load current for a 40 hp motor. Please confirm that the fire pump controller is to be designed for a 125 hp motor.

Fire pump controller is to be designed for the selected fire pump horsepower rating. The fire pump controller shall be a full-service controller.

173 21 30 00 2.4.4.6 NA

Reference Spec. 21 30 00 - 2.4.4.6 regarding the suction pressure regulating valve. Please advise if each fire pump is to be provided with a dedicated suction pressure regulating valve or if one suction pressure regulating valve is to be provided for one suction pipe header that is common to both fire pumps.

Suction pressure regulating valves are not required and do not need to be part of the system. The requirement was deleted from the spec in amendment 10

174 21 30 00 2.6 NA

Reference Spec. 21 30 00 - 2.6 regarding the fire pump motor enclosure rating. Spec is silent as to the pump motor enclosure rating.

Please advise as to the pump motor enclosure rating.

The fire pump motor enclosures shall have a NEMA 4 rating. The information was added to the spec. in amendment 10

175 06 60 45 1 NA

Spec section 08 60 45 Skylights item 1.1 Summary references UFC 4-010-01, with item 1.2 References noting that it is the 2012 version, with Change 1 included. UFC 4-010-01, version 2012 with Change 1 included, notes that its #10 Standard (which pertains to Window (Exterior) and Skylights) is to refer to Table B-1 for Stand-off Distances for New and Existing Buildings and Table B-2 for Conventional Construction Standoff Distances, with assist from review of Figure B-1 Stand-off Distances – With Controlled Perimeter and Figure B-2 Stand-off Distances – No Controlled Perimeter.

Footnotes from the noted Tables state that the applicable Explosive Weight is to be provided from the UFC 4-010-02 Plan Manual.

It appears to be implicit from UFC 4-010-01 that the host installment site is to provide the Stand-off Distance, from a Controlled Perimeter, along with the Explosive Weight to be used in the design of the new construction.

No information has been found within the project documents for a Perimeter for the project.

Please confirm the following:

• Is there a Controlled Perimeter for either the Pump Station or the Utility Enclosure structure?

• If so, what is the Stand-off Distance for each of the structures?

• Also, what is the Explosive Weight for each of the structures?

Assume question is for Section 08 60 45 vs. 06 60

45. The referenced UFC is not applicable and has been removed by amendment 10

176 NA NA CS103

Keynote 11 says “Provide reinforced structural slab, refer to C2/C3/C5 on drawing CS507". C2 depicts and electrical equipment pad, C3 is not provided and C5 is the PIDC retaining wall. Please clarify what detail should be used for keynote 11 slabs.

Keynote will be revised to reference the correct detail and drawings numbers.

177 NA NA CD106

General Note 2 directs the removal of the existing sheet pile wall at the Berth 11 head end. Please clarify the required elevation to which the sheets must be removed and extents of demolition along the Berth 11 head end.

The elevation for removal of the sheets will need to be coordinated with the structural drawings for the pumpwell and utility enclosure. Generally, the sheet piles will need to be cut down to El. -43 at the pumpwell connection (see YS338) and as low as El. +5 for the utility enclosure.

Local penetrations will also be required for utilities.

178 33 20 00 NA UM712, UM605

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 and sheet nos.

UM605 and UM712 regarding pure water control valves. Sheet

no. UM712 shows a quantity of 9 each control valves (XV 01 thru XV 09) to be installed in the pure water piping system.

Control valve schedule on sheet no. UM605 and Spec. 33 20 00 are silent as to these control valves. Please advise as to specification for said valves. Please advise as to controller for said valves. Please confirm that said valves are not monitored by the "Pure Water Local Control Panel".

Valve actuator requirements to be added. Valves themselves covered by

2.3.1.1 - these are on-off actuated valves.

179 33 20 00 NA

UM712,

UM204, UE103,

UE606

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 and sheet nos.

UM712 and UM204 regarding pure water local control panel.

Spec. 33 20 00 is silent as to pure water local control panel. Please advise as to who NAVFAC intends to furnish said control panel (i.e. pump supplier; systems integrator). Please advise as to the location of said control panel.

Please confirm that said control panel is serviced

Location called out on on column line C between columns 4 and 5.

Confirmed Circuit UE LV1- 4 is intended for this panel.

General contractor is responsible for the delegation of scope to the subcontractors. PLC required to control all points as outlined on UM712.

Refer to division 26 for wiring and conduit.

by circuit no. UE LV1- 4 on sheet nos. UE103 and UE606.

180 33 20 00 2.1 UM207, UM712

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.1 and sheet nos.

UM207 and UM712 regarding pure water System. Sheet no.

UM207, General Note No. 3 states that pure water pretreatment components to be furnished and maintained by third party vendor. Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.1.1 states that vendor is to replace deionization media as needed to maintain water quality. Please advise as to the length of time said replacement of deionization media is required. Please confirm that other than media replacement NAVFAC is to perform all other pure water system component maintenance.

181 33 20 00 2.2.1.2 UM601

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 and sheet

no. UM601 regarding pure water system insulation. Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 states that pure water piping is to receive 1-inch thick cellular glass insulation.

Sheet no. UM601 Mechanical Piping Schedule indicates that the pure water system receives no insulation.

Please reconcile this conflict.

PENDING RESPONSE

182 33 20 00 2.2.1.2 UM207, UM712

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 and sheet nos. UM207 and UM712 regarding pure water system insulation.

Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 states that pure water piping is to receive 1-inch thick cellular glass insulation. Sheet nos.

UM712 and UM207 are silent as to pure water demineralization tanks and pure water storage tanks receiving insulation. Please confirm that the pure water demineralization tanks and pure water storage tanks do not receive insulation.

PENDING RESPONSE

183 NA NA PI101

Reference Sheet no.

PI101. Sheet no. PI101 is titled "Dry Docks Instrumentation Plan" however the information provided on said sheet is "Utility Enclosure - Second Floor Plan". The step 1 issued sheet no. PI101 pertained to bubbler level tube information for DD1E, DD1W and DD1N. Please provide drawing for the bubbler level tube information aforestated.

Drawing title will be changed amendment to match said floor plan.

DD1E, DD1W and DD1N bubblers do not exist.

184 NA NA PE601, PE 102

Drawings appear to refer to the Main Dewatering Pumps as SMDP's, however on Drawings PI102 and PI401 they are referred to as MDP's. Please clarify which is preferred.

The designations in the PE drawings will be change to MDP for clarity by amendment.

185 NA NA PE609

Drawing indicates E-stops for ASW pump motors, however Drawing MS701 does not show these E-stops.

Please clarify

E-stops are not required.

Dwg PE609 will corrected by amendment

186 NA NA PI401

Please confirm if the ASW control panels, Soft Starts, and Estops are by others, or if the Electrical Contractor is to provide.

The General contractor to determine delegation of the scope among his subcontractors. No Estops required.

187 NA NA PI603

Drawing indicates high level alarm LSH101 but is not listed on PLC I/O list? Please clarify.

IO List has been amended to add LSH101

188 NA NA PI604

In the Specifications on the I/O list [section 40- 95-00 Appendix B, page 3] it lists a GV-8;

however this cannot be found on the referenced drawing PI604. Where is GV-8 located?

IO List will be corrected by amendment to correct valve numbering.

189 NA NA CS503

Please provide wiring requirements for the temporary CIA Turnstiles, including source location.

All enclave requirements will be updated in a future amendment

190 NA NA PI602, PI603

Drawings show E-stops for MPD1,2 and 3 going to DCP/SCADA but not shown on PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B)? Please advise

E-stops are not required.

191 NA NA MS702

Sump tanks UE-ST-1 and UE-ST- 2 LSL’s and LSH's are not on the PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B)?

Please advise

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

192 NA NA MS702

Referencing Cooling Towers UE-CT-1A,1B and 2, is “MN” the run signal back to PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B)?

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

193 NA NA MS703

Are cooling towers UE- CT-3A and 4 the same as towers 1 and 2 on PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B sheet 5)?

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

194 NA NA MS703

Sump tanks UE-ST-3 and 4 LSL's and LSH's not on PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B). Please advise

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

195 NA NA MS703

Referencing Cooling Towers UE-CT-3A, 3B and 4, is “MN” the run signal back PLC I/O list (section 40 95 00 appendix B)?

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

196 NA NA MS702

Referencing pumps UE- P-1 and 2, is “MN” the run signal back to PLC I/O list for ASW System Pump1 and 2 (section 40 95 00 appendix B)?

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

197 NA NA MS703

Referencing pumps UE- P-3 and 4, is “MN” the run signal back to PLC I/O list for ASW System Pump1 and 2 (section 40 95 00 appendix B)?

Signal is listed in IO list.

The list will be amended to add additional clarification from the terminology used on MS drawings and the IO list

198 NA NA MS703

Within the 3" Fresh Water Line, should FT01 PLC signal read FT01 not FT02?

FT01 is for the ASW water flow. The FT02 is for fresh water flow. This will be updated on drawing MS703 by amendment for Clarity.

199 NA NA NA

Please provide a conduit/wire schedule for the process control equipment within the Utility Enclosure.

Refer to spec section

25.00.00 for information on control cabeling and conduit.

200 01 14 00.00 22 1.17 NA

This Section states that Contractor employees can park privately owned vehicles in the JI Parking Lot. Please provide capacity and expected usage by non- P-381 employees for Contractor to determine the amount of off-site parking is required.

The number of parking spaces made available to the contractor will not be provided. Parking is on a first come first serve basis.

201 NA NA NA

Please provide additional information regarding the temporary CIA Turnstiles. Will the temporary concrete bases be installed on grade?

Requirements fo the enclave will be updated by future amendment

202 NA NA CS503

Please confirm the required height of the temporary CIA fence as shown on sheet CS503.

The turnstile height shows 7 feet of chain link with barbed wire.

Requirements fo the enclave will be updated by future amendment

203 NA NA CS503

Will the temporary swing gates also be 12 feet tall to match the barrier mounted fence detail on sheet CS503?

Requirements fo the enclave will be updated by future amendment

204 NA NA NA

Please confirm the method of anchor bolt installation for the Crane Rail Base Plates.

Will post installed anchors be permitted?

Post installed anchors are permitted. Prior to fabrication of rail base plates and drilling of rail anchor bolts, contractor shall locate reinforcing steel with pachymeter to avoid interference. Post installed anchors shall be installed with appropriate adhesive that assures a minimum pullout capacity greater than the yield strength of the 1” diameter ASTM F1554, Grade 55 rail anchor bolt. Anchors shall be tested and shall be completed by an independent testing agency. Tension testing shall be required on the first 5 anchors installed and a minimum of 5% of all anchors shall be tested as chosen by the contracting officer. Anchors shall be tested to 90% yield strength and the load shall be maintained for 10 minutes. Any displacement greater than the elastic stretch of the materials will be considered failing. Anchors that fail testing shall be replaced at no cost to the government.

205 NA NA NA

Various drawings detail construction joints in the walls and topping slab based on the locations of the precast monoliths below. Will wall and slab construction joints be per contractor placement plan or do they have to follow as shown? The contractor believes the as shown construction joints will cause additional paths for water integration.

Wall and slab construction joints shall be per the contractor's placement plan as proposed by the contractor on the contractor's concrete neat line shop drawings and approved by the Government. Construction joints should be minimized and coordinated with subsequent placements.

Construction joints in topping slabs should be located in-line with the precast monolith-closure placement CJ's below.

206 33 20 00 NA UM712, UM605

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 and sheet nos.

UM605 and UM712 regarding pure water control valves. Sheet

no. UM712 shows a quantity of 9 each control valves (XV 01 thru XV 09) to be installed in the pure water piping system.

Control valve schedule on sheet no. UM605 and Spec. 33 20 00 are silent as to these control valves. Please advise as to specification for said valves. Please advise as to controller for said valves. Please confirm that said valves are not monitored by the "Pure

Duplicate Comment - See #178

Water Local Control Panel".

207 33 20 00 NA

UM712,

UM204, UE103,

UE606

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 and sheet nos.

UM712 and UM204 regarding pure water local control panel.

Spec. 33 20 00 is silent as to pure water local control panel. Please advise as to who NAVFAC intends to furnish said control panel (i.e. pump supplier; systems integrator). Please advise as to the location of said control panel.

Please confirm that said control panel is serviced by circuit no. UE LV1- 4 on sheet nos. UE103 and UE606.

Duplicate Comment See #179

208 33 20 00 2.1 UM207, UM712

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.1 and sheet nos.

UM207 and UM712 regarding pure water System. Sheet no.

UM207, General Note No. 3 states that pure water pretreatment components to be furnished and maintained by third party vendor. Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.1.1 states that

Duplicate Comment See #180 vendor is to replace deionization media as needed to maintain water quality. Please advise as to the length of time said replacement of deionization media is required. Please confirm that other than media replacement NAVFAC is to perform all other pure water system component maintenance.

209 33 20 00 2.2.1.2 UM601

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 and sheet

no. UM601 regarding pure water system insulation. Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 states that pure water piping is receive 1-inch thick cellular glass insulation.

Sheet no. UM601 Mechanical Piping Schedule indicates that the pure water system receives no insulation.

Please reconcile this conflict.

Duplicate Comment See #181

210 33 20 00 2.2.1.2 UM207, UM712

Reference Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 and sheet nos. UM207 and UM712 regarding pure water system insulation.

Spec. 33 20 00 - 2.2.1.2 states that pure water piping is receive 1-inch thick cellular glass insulation. Sheet nos.

UM712 and UM207 are silent as to pure water demineralization tanks and pure water storage tanks receiving insulation. Please confirm that the pure water demineralization tanks and pure water storage tanks do not receive insulation.

Duplicate Comment See #182

211 NA NA PI101

Reference Sheet no.

PI101. Sheet no. PI101 is titled "Dry Docks Instrumentation Plan" however the information provided on said sheet is "Utility Enclosure - Second Floor Plan". The step 1 issued sheet no. PI101 pertained to bubbler level tube information for DD1E, DD1W and DD1N. Please provide drawing for the bubbler level tube information aforestated.

Drawing title will be amended to match said floor plan. DD1E, DD1W and DD1N bubblers do not exist.

212 NA NA

YS558, YS559,

YS560

The sections show details for the reinforcing in the closure pours between the monolith base slabs.

There is no reinforcing shown in the closure pour between the monolith side walls above the base slab.

We cannot find a section in the drawings detailing the reinforcing in the closure pours between the center wall B monoliths. Is the side wall reinforcing in the B precast monoliths to have couplers so that the side wall reinforcing continues through the closure pour? Or is the side wall closure pour un-reinforced?

See YS512, Section A4 for the reinforcing details in the closure pours between all of the precast monoliths. The callout on YS558, YS559 and YS560 for the reinforcement details in the closure placements in the base of the center wall also includes the side walls - this callout is being clarified as such. Per YS512, the side wall closure pours are reinforced and the reinforcement needs to be tied into the precast monoliths.

Specification Section 316613

N/A N/A

Will the jet grout Contractor be responsible for providing a final stamp design stamped by a professional engineer?

A stamped design is not needed if the jet grout is installed as shown in contract documents.

Specification Section 316613

Part 3.3.E N/A

If additional test programs are required due to a non-conforming initial test program how will the additional work be compensated?

The test program should account for multiple mixes/methods such that the design requirements (diameter and strength) can be achieved and a method can be proven out without additional test programs.

215 BP-302, BP-304

The referenced project drawings call for jet grout columns to be embedded 2ft into bedrock for their full design diameter. This requirement is not feasible. The jet grout boreholes can be advanced two into rock and jetting can be performed consistent with the final design but actual diameters within the bedrock formation are likely to be much smaller than the diameters specified in soil. Is this acceptable?

The minimum diameter will not be required for the portion in rock. Drawings will be updated to clarify via amendment.

216 BK-103

Anchors A19 and A17 appear to be in conflict with existing piles. Will these anchors be relocated?

While it appears to be a conflict in plan view, the micropiles that appear to intersect in…