SF1442 - N4008021R3502.pdf

P-5001, DESIGN-BID-BUILD, JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER, PHASE II, JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, WASHINGTON, DC

CORNELIA RUFFIN 202-685-3282

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

06-Jan-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________440 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See __________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________08 Feb 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (202) 685-3192 TEL: FAX:

N4008021R3502 63

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008021R3502

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Each

BASE BID

FFP

Price for CLIN 0001 shall be the entire work for Complete the Joint Air Defense Operations Center permanent facility, the second phase of Construction in accordance with the specifications and drawings of the project but not including the work specified on CLIN 0002-CLIN 0005.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Each OPTION CLIN 0002 - Option 1: Electronic Securit

FFP

Bid Option for CLIN 0002 shall be the entire work for Electronic Security Systems Equipment in accordance with the specifications and drawings of the project

0003 1 Cubic

Yard

OPTION CLIN 0003- Option 2: Excess or Unsuitab

FFP

Bid Option for CLIN 0003 shall be the entire work for Excess or Unsuitable Material in accordance with the specifications and drawings of the project.

0004 1 Cubic

Yard

OPTION CLIN 0004 - Option 3: Additional

FFP

Bid Option for CLIN 0004 shall be the entire work for Additional off Base Fill Material in accordance with the specifications and drawings of the project.

0005 1 Each OPTION CLIN 0005 - Option 4 FF&E

FFP

(1)Basis of the Bid for CLIN 0005 shall be establishment of a HAR for any possible future work associated with FF&E / Collateral Equipment. BUDGET Amount: $585,055.83

HANDLING & ADMINISTRATIVE RATE (HAR): _____%

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0005 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. TITLE: P-5001 JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS PHASE II JOINT BASE

ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, WASHINGTON, DC

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This acquisition will result in the completion of the Joint Air Defense Operations Center permanent facility by providing the second phase of the Military Construction: Construct a two-story Joint Air Defense Operations Center. Construction includes concrete slab-on-grade foundation with Concrete spread footings under steel columns, structural steel frame, concrete masonry unit shear walls, and roofing system with sloping roof deck.

Includes pavements, all utilities, site improvements, passive force protection measures, security fencing, and diverse communication routing to eliminate single points of failure and ensure constant connectivity. Special Construction Requirements include Controlled Space in accordance with Intelligence Community Directive/Intelligence Community Standard 705 and use of special exterior finishes to meet Joint Base Anacostia Bollings architectural design requirements. The facility shall be compatible with applicable Department of Defense, Air Force, and Joint Base design standards. In addition, local materials and construction techniques shall be used where cost effective. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria 1-200-01. This project will comply with Department of Defense antiterrorism/force protection requirements per Unified Facility Criteria 4-010-01.

3. POINT OF CONTACT: The primary point of contact for this procurement is Cornelia Ruffin at Cornelia.Ruffin@navy.mil The secondary point of contact is Cynthia Crowder at Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil

4. DISCLOSURE OF MAGNITUDE: In accordance with DFAR 236.204(ii), the construction magnitude of this project is estimated between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

5. TYPE OF CONTRACT: Firm-Fixed Price.

6. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: This procurement is Unrestricted, Full and Open

7. NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE: 236220

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction with the annual size standard of $ 36.5M.

8. SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS: Best Value Trade Off

9. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Work under this contract shall commence 15 days after award and shall be completed within 440 calendar days after contract award (this includes time for bond approval).

10. PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE PERIOD: The Offeror’s price is valid for 90 days from the receipt of proposals.

11. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT

There will be only one government sponsored site visit Date: Thursday 20 January 2022 Time: 9:00 Location: Bldg 370 Room 109

Base Access Info

All personnel attending the site visit must complete and submit the attached “Site Visit Excel file for information.xlsx” via email to Cornelia Ruffin Cornelia.Ruffin@navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder Cyndi.Crowder@navy.mil NLT 12:00 PM EST on January 13, 2022. On the “Excel file for information” the Base Sponse is LT Scott Hattok (scott.hattok@us.af.mil; 202-284- 4650). Please do not remove his contact information. Those who submit this form late may not be guaranteed access to the site.

Fill out and bring a hard copy of the attached "Site Visit New Pass Registration.xlsx" with you in person to the Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling (JBAB) Visitor Center on Thursday, January 20, 2022. Note that there may be a wait time at the visitor's center. Arrive to the JBAB Visitor Center early to allow time for the form to be processed in time for the start of the pre-proposal conference / site visit. Below is the address of the JBAB Visitor Center:

JBAB Visitor Center 256 McGuire Ave Washington, DC 20032

Site Access (JADOC Access - BLDG 7400) Info

All personnel attending the site visit must complete and submit the attached “JADOC Visitor Request Form_Nov.2021.pdf” via email to Cornelia Ruffin Cornelia.Ruffin@navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder Cyndi.Crowder@navy.mil NLT 12:00 PM EST on January 13, 2022. Use Major Claude Hibbert (claude.hibbert@us.af.mil; (202) 404-7442, (203) 376-1902) as the JADOC Sponsor on the form. Please note that submitting the form does not guarantee site access. Base access does not guarantee site access.

Electronics cannot be taken into facility. Leave any backpacks / purses, computers, etc., in your car. Phones, smartwatches, fitbits, cameras, and any bluetooth devices, etc. can be kept either in your car or locked in small lockers provided in the building vestibule. Note that there are limited lockers available.

There is limited parking on the site. Overflow parking is available across the street in a gravel area

Current policy is that fully vaccinated persons can visit. Non-vaccinated persons need to have a negative test 24 hours prior to the visit.

12. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI): Offerors are required to review the entire solicitation package before submitting questions. All inquiries must be submitted January 31, 2022 by 2:00 PM EST. All inquiries must be submitted in writing and emailed utilzing the Attachment G – RFI Form to Cornelia Ruffin Cornelia.Ruffin@navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder Cyndi.Crowder@navy.mil. No tables please.

13. DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL: Proposals shall be received electronically no later than 2:00 PM EST on Tuesday 8 February 2022. Proposals shall be submitted utilizing the Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). Department of Defense (DoD) training for industry partners is available at https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module. Additional Web Based Training is available at https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml.

Please allow SUFFICIENT TIME for your proposal to be received within the Government’s electronic system prior to the proposed cutoff date/time. All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be documented with the date and hour of receipt and may be held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Facsimile copies and hard copies will NOT be accepted. NO HAND DELIVERY IS

ALLOWED.

14. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT: The proposal submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clear, concise, and shall contain sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposals should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather should demonstrate convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the RFP. Nonconformance with the solicitation requirements, specified organization and content may result in elimination or misevaluation of the proposal. All claimed technical capabilities to meet the requirements shall be realistic and are subject to verification by the Government. Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s business and that the Government will base its evaluation on the information contained in the offeror’s proposals.

Cross-Referencing: To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.

Volume I: Technical Proposal: Volume I shall contain the Offerors entire technical proposal in a single pdf., sectioned appropriately by major evaluation factor with the following characteristics: (1) Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font. (2) Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address. (3) Technical Factors 1-4

Volume II: Price Proposal: Volume II shall contain the Offerors price proposal in a single pdf.

With the following information in the pricing volume, the Offeror shall provide the following information:

1. Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

2. Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

3. Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged.

4. Completed Price Schedule.

5. Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM)

6. Confirmation of filing of VETS-4212 and/or VETS report for the cycle.

7. Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee.

8. Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

9. Small Business Subcontracting Plan. (see below).

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Schedule that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00010 – Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal.

Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the Solicitation is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.

FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity

Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters. VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report.

Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL

PACKAGE: RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. The offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN INFORMATION:

In accordance with FAR 19.7, all other than small businesses shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) utilizing the attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment F). Acceptability of the SBSP will be considered a responsibility matter. The SBSP will not be evaluated or rated by the SSEB, but reviewed by a Small Business Professional/Authorized Representative and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. The SBSP shall be negotiated and/or accepted within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to negotiate an acceptable subcontracting plan within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer will render the offeror ineligible for award of the contract. The SBSP will be incorporated into the resulting contract.

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging, small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition consistent with efficient and effective performance of the contract. These targets are based on a percentage of total planned subcontract dollars.

Small Business: 37.44% HUBZone: 8.75%

SDVOSB: 4.22%

SDB: 23.57%

WOSB: 6%

The SBSP shall be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Utilization and Participation Factor. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c)(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, those small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in the SBSP.

Please note that SBSP goals and the participation rates provided in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) WILL NOT be the same. The participation rates within the SBPCD are provided as percentages of the total contract value; subcontract plan goals are provided as a percentage of planned subcontracting dollars. While the percentages will differ, the types of products/services identified in the SBSP, should be the same as those products/services identified in the SBPCD. Likewise, the planned small business subcontract dollars in the SBSP will be equal to (or in some cases greater than) the extent of small business participation identified in the SBPCD.

15. BASIS FOR AWARD:

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract negotiate with offerors in the competitive range;

and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

16. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD:

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1– Experience Factor 2– Small Business Utilization Factor 3– Safety Factor 4– Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors 1, 2, and 3 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Factor 4. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

• SF 1442, signed and all amendments acknowledged.

• Completed Price Schedule (Attachment H)

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the base requirements and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Non-cost/price Factors:

FAR Part 9.6 defines Contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangement, as used in this subpart, means an arrangement in which -- (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime Contractor; or (2) A potential prime Contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered.

The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, management, equipment that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies shall commit to the performance of this contract). In particular, the proposal shall clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team (e.g., partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) whose projects are submitted to demonstrate Construction Experience. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment. See specific restrictions on the use of subcontractor experience under Factor 1.

Factor 1 Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates experience on relevant projects that are similar in Size, Scope, and

Complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as meeting one of each of the following Size, Scope, and Complexity Characteristics:

Size:

• New construction of a building or an addition 18,000 SF or greater and/or new construction of building or addition with a final contract price of $16,000,000 or greater.

Scope:

• A defense operations center (i.e. facilities with complex user spaces and equipment that require high level of coordination for installation).

• Or comparable facility administrative space, that must include one of the following:

o New construction of storage areas / shipping & receiving spaces or comparable facilities including multiple categories such as warehouses, high security equipment storage, climate-controlled storage, shipping and receiving rooms, etc.

o New construction of armories, arms vaults, and/or arms maintenance areas or comparable facilities.

o New construction of workshop spaces or comparable facilities including multiple categories such as laboratories for electronics (i.e., cameras/lasers), field engineering operations/planning spaces, etc.

Complexity: New construction of facilities indicated in the Scope above, inclusive of one or more of the following:

• New construction of ICD 705 compliant spaces.

• Construction requiring installation of 20 or more helical piles.

• New construction requiring scheduling utility outages and performance of timely connections to existing facilities.

• Construction of a new facility attached or adjacent to a facility conducting 24/7 operations while maintaining 24/7 operations during construction.

• Experience with the relocation of above ground diesel fuel tanks 2000 gallons or greater in support of backup generators or comparable systems.

• Experience with new construction projects where the Contractor was required to comply with security procedures and all construction personnel were required to be US persons (individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence as defined in 8 U.S.C.

1101(a)(20) or protected individuals as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3)).

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

Self-performing prime contractors may be considered a strength. However, experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s experience will be used as a means of evaluation the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Individual projects that include all relevancy characteristics may be considered more favorably.

Proposals may be strengthened if submitted construction projects possess:

1. Demonstrate experience with new constructions on military installations.

2. Demonstrate experience with one project that contains multiple scope and complexity characteristics as indicated in this factor.

3. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with defense operations centers may be considered more favorably than those that do not.

4. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience connecting electrical power to an existing building switchboard within 2 hours or less without negatively impacting facility operations may be considered more favorably than those that do not.

Factor 2 Small Business Utilization

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.

Achievements: All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance. In support of narrative submissions:

All offerors shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Experience Factor in the format provided in Attachment D, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.

Notes:

The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.

Offerors utilizing achievements information of team members or key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

Small Business Participation and Commitment: All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment E, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

b. Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

c. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment E consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals and other performance information available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals. Offerors will also be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The anticipated benefits of proposed initiatives and tools to enhance small business participation and capabilities will be considered. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

Factor 3 Safety

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

The attached Safety Data Sheet (Attachment C) SHALL be used to submit the Offeror’s safety information below.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

(1) DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2020, CY2019, CY2018, CY2017, and CY2016] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate or a Zero (0.00) rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required, that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Dart cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Total Number of Enployee Labor Hours Worked

(2) TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate or a Zero (0.00) rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required, that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Total Number of Enployee Labor Hours Worked

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout the performance of the contract (to include their own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

(4) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(a) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(1) DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low

Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to

High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

(2) TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to

Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

(3) The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the

Offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

Factor 4, Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1, Experience. If a completed CPARS evaluation is not available for a project that was submitted under Factor 1, Experience, the offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for that project. The Offeror shall provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the

Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s points of contact, Contract Specialist Cornelia Ruffin at cornelia.f.ruffin.civ@us.navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder at Cynthia.y.crowder.civ@us.navy.mil

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided 8 1/2” x 11” pages (or four (4) 8 1/2” x 11” single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Recency and relevancy is defined as:

Recency is projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years prior to the date of issuance of this RFP.

Relevancy is defined as follows:

• Size: Approximately 18,000 SF or greater and a final construction cost of $16,000,000

• Scope: New Construction of a defense operation center or comparable facility…