N32205-18-R-4256_Amend_0001.docx
DOCX document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USNS ARCTIC Mid-Term Availability Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N32205-18-R-4256
About this file
N32205-18-R-4256 Amendment 0001
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
USNS ARCTIC Mid-Term Availability has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N3220518R4256
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES
The following have been modified:
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Category "A" Work Items (WIs)
FFP
Prepare for and accomplish the MTA of the USNS ARCTIC (T-AOE 8) Total Category "A" WIs $_____________
Proposed unit price per KWh $_____ in accordance with (IAW) WI 011, 7.1.1.4
Proposed unit price per gallon of potable water $______ IAW WI 011, 7.1.3.2
Proposed unit price per gallon of distilled water $______ IAW WI 011, 7.1.4.2
Proposed unit price per gallon of bilge water removal $______ IAW WI 011, 7.1.19.3
Proposed unit price per crane usage $______ IAW WI 11, 7.9.1
Proposed Hazardous Waste handling fee rate IAW WI 023, 7.4.1 ______%
FOB: Destination
NET AMT
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
AGR and ODC
AGR
(4400) man-hours @ $________ per man-hour = $_____________
ODC
Base $502,000.00
Proposed G&A Rate _______________% Subtotal: $_____________
Proposed Profit Rate _______________% Subtotal: $_____________
NET AMT
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Category "B" WI 0025
WI 0025 - Physical Security at Private Contractor's Facility in FPCON Bravo - Delta
Category B WIs are optional WIs and not required to be accomplished as part of this contract as awarded. The KO may require the contractor to perform the requirements of the optional Category B WIs by exercising the option via written notice to the contractor.
NET AMT
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Category "B" WI 0030
WI 0030 - Continuation of Services
Category B WIs are optional WIs and not required to be accomplished as part of this contract as awarded. The KO may require the contractor to perform the requirements of the optional Category B WIs by exercising the option via written notice to the contractor.
NET AMT
TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE
TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE FOR CLINS 0001 THROUGH 0004 $______________
The contractor shall enter the total proposed price of all CLINs.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
PART I - THE SCHEDULE
Section B, Price Schedule, detailed information
CLIN 0001 –Attachment J-2 – Category “A” WIs provides a WI breakdown of CLIN 0001 pricing.
CLIN 0002: This CLIN contains the FBLR (e.g., G&A, overhead, profit, supervision, consumables, and/or support functions, etc.) and the ODC profit and G&A rate. These rates are used for pricing changes negotiated under the H-3 Clause - AGR and H-4 Clause ODC, for the duration of the contract. Changes are inherent to vessel repair contracts and should be expected by the Contractors. Additionally, this CLIN includes G&A and profit rates for ODC to be used for negotiating changes. These rates shall prevail even when the contract is extended/modified. The number of AGR man-hours and the ODC base amount are estimates that were generated for evaluation purposes. The actual amounts of man-hours and ODC may be used interchangeably under the contract which could result in a distribution and amount of man-hours and ODC that is either higher or lower than that stated in CLIN 0002. Any additional AGR or ODC required beyond the CLIN 0002 estimated amount shall be added through contract modification using the same AGR and ODC rates agreed upon at contract award. Any unused AGR or ODC will be de-obligated from the contract at the same AGR and ODC rates agreed upon at contract award. The contractor agrees that the number of man-hours included in its proposed price for such AGR shall include only direct production man-hours. For these purposes, direct production man-hours are for skilled labor at the Journeyman level expended in direct production as exemplified by the following functions:
| Abrasive cleaning/blasting | Tank cleaning | ||
| Welding | Machinists (inside and outside) | ||
| Burning | Brazing | ||
| Carpentry | Electrical work | ||
| Electronic work | Shipfitting | ||
| Lagging | Painting | ||
| Boilermaking | Pipefitting | ||
| Sheetmetal work | Engineering | ||
| Rigging | Staging/scaffolding | ||
| General labor | Fire Watch |
Direct production man-hours will not include those functions (whether charged directly or indirectly by the contractor’s accounting system) which are defined herein as support for production functions. Necessary support functions shall be considered to be included in the offeror's FBLR for direct production man-hours. Examples of support functions include:
| Testing | Quality Assurance | ||
| Planning | Cleaning (except tank cleaning) | ||
| Material handling & warehousing | Security | ||
| Surveying | Administration | ||
| Transportation | Purchasing staff | ||
| Lofting | Other indirect support | ||
| Supervision |
Consumable materials are goods used in the ordinary course of work performance such as office supplies, paper, rags, vehicle or equipment fuel costs, cleaning chemicals, disposable tools, welding rods, paint buckets, paint brushes, protective clothing, etc. that do not become an integral part of the repaired vessel. Consumable material shall be included in the contractor's fully loaded manhour rate and not separately priced.
The rates for profit and G&A on CLIN 0002 above shall be the same rates used by the contractor in its responses to the Request for CCO Proposals issued under this contract. The KO will apply these rates to the ODCs for each CCO when it is negotiated and settled.
The base cost, stated in this CLIN does not include the profit or G&A rates.
NOTE: This does not include any material cost for Category “A” WIs. The material cost for Category “A” WIs has been included under CLIN 0001.
CLINs 0003 through 0004 –Attachment J-3 – Category “B” WIs provides a WI breakdown of CLIN 0003 through 0004 pricing.
SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been added by reference:
| 52.209-9 |
| Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters |
| JUL 2013 |
| 52.209-10 |
| Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations |
| NOV 2015 |
| 52.219-6 |
| Notice Of Total Small Business Set-Aside |
| NOV 2011 |
The following have been deleted:
| 52.209-9 |
| Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters |
| JUL 2013 |
| 52.209-10 |
| Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations |
| NOV 2015 |
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The following have been added by full text:
M-4 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
1. Evaluation criteria consist of factors and subfactors. The proposals will be evaluated under the following factors: technical, past performance, and price. The technical factors and subfactors and past performance factors will each receive one of the adjectival ratings defined in section M-3. Ratings of subfactors are used to derive an overall rating for the related factor.
2. Technical Factors include:
Factor 1 – Understanding the WI Package
| Subfactor 1.1 – Time Phased Sequencing Network |
| Subfactor 1.2 – Problem Areas |
| Subfactor 1.3 – Engineering |
| Subfactor 1.4 – Material Availability |
| Subfactor 1.5 – Material Control and Storage |
| Subfactor 1.6 – Heavy Weather Plans |
| Subfactor 1.7 – Cold Weather Plans |
Factor 2 – Ability To Perform the WI Package
| Subfactor 2.1 – Man-hour Chart |
| Subfactor 2.2 – Growth Absorption |
| Subfactor 2.3 – Facilities |
Factor 3 – Management Control and Quality Assurance
| Subfactor 3.1 – Organization and Key Personnel |
| Subfactor 3.2 – Subcontractor Participation |
| Subfactor 3.3 – Quality Control Plan |
| Subfactor 3.4 – Hazardous Waste Management Plan |
| 3. | Past Performance Factor Includes: | |
| Element 1 – Quality of product or service | ||
| Element 2 – Timeliness or scheduling of service/deliveries |
Element 3 – Business relations/customer satisfaction Element 4 – Key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors) Element 5 – Cost Controls (Cost Contracts Only)
4. Price
Technical Factor 1 – Understanding the WI Package
Subfactor 1.1 TPSN
Demonstrate in detail, an understanding of the overall scope of work and the plan to accomplish that work by providing a TPSN, including milestones for each WI including Category B items. In addition, develop a Critical Path Analysis by WI. The analysis shall clearly identify the primary Critical Path at each point of the availability. In addition, a secondary Critical Path may be presented.
Milestones shall include:
a. MSC Overhaul Management Board office start and end dates.
b. Start of contract/ship arrival date.
c. Crew move-off date (if applicable).
d. Dry-dock date (if applicable)
e. Completion of tanks gas-freeing date.
f. Turnover of the Engine Room date.
g. Undock date from Dry-dock (if applicable)
h. Light-off start date.
i. Crew move aboard date (if applicable).
j. Pre start-up meeting.
k. Bridge turn-over.
l. Dock trial date.
m. Sea trial date.
n. Ship redelivery date.
Subfactor 1.2 Problem Areas
Identify any foreseen potential problem areas in accomplishing the work requirements, e.g., LLTM, open and inspect items, potential labor disputes, etc. within the allotted contract period and propose solutions to those problems. If no problems are foreseen, state “No problems are foreseen.”
Subfactor 1.3 Engineering
The Offeror shall demonstrate his understanding of the engineering support requirements (e.g., working drawings, tech/system manuals, selected record plans, inclining requirements, Trim and Stability booklet, and docking and undocking calculation if required) of the work package.
Identify completely the extent of engineering services that you plan to provide for this Work Package.
Describe the methodology to be used for resolving technical engineering problems, including engineering/production interfaces.
Describe the liaison between production and any engineering or design subcontractors (e.g. whether or not specifically dedicated in-house individuals will be assigned liaison).
Describe how regulatory approvals will be obtained for applicable engineering drawings (i.e. use of Professional Engineer review, use of ABS review for ABS approval).
Submit brief but concise resumes of engineering personnel (in-house and subcontractor) assigned to this project.
Subfactor 1.4 Material Availability
Identify materials/sources of materials for any item whose material cost exceeds 25% of the total estimated work item cost.
Identify materials and sources for material costs that exceed $10,000.00 for any single item. Do not list normal stock materials such as fasteners, gaskets, weld rod, etc.
Provide a separate listing of all brand name or equal items pursuant to the Brand Name or Equal provision of this solicitation (FAR 52.211-6). List should identify the product or material by work item number.
Subfactor 1.5 Material Control and Storage
Provide information on the location and size of all storage areas including those available for the receipt and inspection of material. Provide supporting data to demonstrate capability for compliance with the storage requirements identified in the statement of work.
Describe the system to be used for Material Control, providing data for the following areas:
1. Advanced CFM material ordering.
2. Receipt, inspection, and identification of GFM and CFM, including rotatable pool items.
| 3. Control of pilferable and sensitive material. |
| 4. Control of damage and reporting system. |
| 5. Turn-in material, including equipment shipped to subcontractors for work. |
| 6. Scrap material and relative accounting system. |
| 7. Ripout material which is to be reinstalled |
| 8. Procedure for critical material decisions such as substitution. |
| 9. Temporary issue of storeroom repair parts to support overhaul/availability. |
Show how the proposed system satisfies Production and QA Material Control requirements. Describe how material is distributed to the crafts.
Subfactor 1.6 Heavy Weather Plans
A Heavy Weather Plan shall be submitted in accordance with the specification item on heavy weather. The heavy weather plan shall include a description of the protection arrangements available and the preventive measures that will be taken to ensure the safety of the ship from potential heavy weather conditions.
Subfactor 1.7 Cold Weather Plan
A Cold Weather Plan shall be submitted in accordance with the specification item on Cold Weather. The Cold Weather Plan shall include a description of the protection arrangements available and the preventive measures that will be taken to ensure the safety of the ship from potential cold weather conditions.
Technical Factor 2 - Ability To Perform the WI Package
Subfactor 2.1 Man-hour Chart
Provide the supervisor/worker ratio for each specification item. Submit man-hour estimates by Hull, Machinery, and Electrical departments, with totals for each specification item and grand totals for all specification items in the format outlined below. The man-hour estimates provided shall reflect the actual man-hours planned to accomplish the work in the specification items.
MAN-HOUR ESTIMATES
| ITEM NO. |
| HULL/ |
STRUCTURAL
PRIME/SUB
MACHINERY
PRIME/SUB
ELECTRICAL
PRIME/SUB
ELECTRONIC
PRIME/SUB
OTHER
PRIME/SUB
TOTAL
PRIME/SUB
GRAND TOTAL
Provide one graphic presentation indicating each of the following items (only one graph to be provided) Note: Left side of graph to indicate “man-days”; bottom of graph to indicate time from award date to redelivery of vessel in daily intervals.
| (a) Total number of personnel required to accomplish all work projected during the period of performance required by the solicitation. |
| (b) Total number of personnel required to accomplish all shipyard work, all other work |
currently scheduled, and all other work projected during the period of performance required by this solicitation.
| (c) Total number of subcontractor personnel used to accomplish work projected during the period of performance required by this solicitation. |
| (d) Projected number of contractor and subcontractor personnel required to accomplish the additional man-hours of growth work as outlined in the Clause “Additional Requirements.” |
For all other work projected to be performed during this availability, list the name of the ship/barge/vessel, the period of performance. Explain if it will impact this availability and, if so, how.
Subfactor 2.2 Growth Absorption
Provide an estimate of the amount of additional work that can be absorbed without impact on the overhaul completion. Assume that most of the additional work is identified during the first 50% of the overhaul, that the work per trade (Hull, Machinery, and Electrical) is proportional to the work in the basic specifications, and that all material for such additional work is available within a reasonable time.
Justify the estimate of the amount of additional work that can be absorbed beyond AGR and Category B-items.
Subfactor 2.3 Facilities
1. Complete the enclosed MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey Form (MSC Form 4330/26). Forms must be signed and dated. (See section J for the form). Note the following special instructions when completing the form.
| a. | On sheet 2 of 5, the “Services Available” block should include only those services which are permanently installed. Temporary service capability should be listed on sheet 5 of 5. |
| b. | Photocopies of crane certification data shall be supplied. |
| c. | The following instructions apply to the required submittals list located on sheet 5 of 5. |
(a) Submittal number 1: submit as instructed.
(b) Submittal number 2: submit as instructed.
(c) Submittal number 3: submit as instructed; list only capital equipment. Do not list portable hand-held tools.
(d) Submittal number 4: do not submit, covered elsewhere in RFP.
(e) Submittal number 5: do not submit, covered elsewhere in RFP.
(f) Submittal number 6: submit as instructed, do not list subcontractor locations.
(g) Submittal number 7: do not submit.
Use additional sheets as necessary to give a complete description of your facilities.
Submit the following:
A Berth Chart that complies with the requirements set forth in Specification Item entitled “Berthing and Mooring Requirements.”
An Approach Chart that complies with the requirements set forth in Specification Item entitled “Berthing and Mooring Requirements.” A Mooring Chart that complies with the requirements set forth in Specification Item entitled “Berthing and Mooring Requirements.”
Technical Factor 3 – Management Control and Quality Assurance
Subfactor 3.1 Organization and Key Personnel
Provide an organization chart of the key personnel who will be assigned for this availability. Include upper management, program managers, negotiators, estimators, scheduling personnel, engineering personnel, key production personnel by trade, the shipyard safety program organization, testing organization, the quality assurance organization, and contractor personnel responsible for each subcontractor being used. Identify the 2nd and/or swing shift yard managers/supervisors.
Include the name, title, percentage of time to be devoted to this availability, and years experience in the ship repair industry for each key person.
Subfactor 3.2 Subcontractor Participation
Identify all proposed major (over $25,000.00 aggregate) subcontractors and suppliers by work item. If none, state so. For all major subcontractors identified, advise whether the use of a second-tier subcontractor is proposed. If so, identify the proposed second-tier subcontractor and the specific work that it will be tasked to perform.
If the planned subcontractor work exceeds 50% of the total base contract cost, present a detailed subcontractor management plan that demonstrates established management procedures exist to control multiple subcontractors and to prevent interference and delays that might result. Do not submit cost/ price data with this factor. (Disregard if Small Business Set-Aside).
Contractor shall identify all work items where work required is planned to be accomplished outside of the contractor's primary repair facility. Identify the facility/subcontractor planned to accomplish this work, the location where work will be performed, and contractor intentions for accomplishing regulatory body and MSCREP inspections at the off-site location.
Where a Technical Representative is required, identify each Technical Representative by source and by WI number. If none, state so.
Subfactor 3.3 Quality Control Plan
Describe in detail the Quality Control Plan to be used for this availability. The description should address the method in which you will comply with the provisions of the Testing and Quality Control Clause and specification item entitled "Testing and Quality Assurance."
Submit a Preliminary "Schedule for key Inspection Events" within the contactor's proposal for review; to show the contractor's full understanding of all inspections criteria, call outs, and checkpoints specified within the WI package.
Identify the individuals who will perform the QC function. Discuss other duties, if any, to be performed by QC personnel and the percentage of time that they are to perform other duties. Discuss the documentation of QC activity (e.g., logs, notebooks, records, etc.). Present the test failure recovery plan.
Subfactor 3.4 Hazardous Waste Management Plan
Identify key shipyard personnel associated with hazardous waste management including, but not limited to, personnel associated with employee training, hazardous waste identification, and manifest documentation.
Identify any subcontractors associated with removal, handling and disposal of hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, subcontractors responsible for removing, storing, transporting, recycling, reclaiming or otherwise disposing of hazardous waste. All permits or other applicable credentials associated with safe and proper disposal of hazardous waste should be included. If a hazardous waste subcontractor is changed for any reason, the Hazardous Waste Management Plan shall be amended prior to the new subcontractor beginning work on the vessel.
Identify all local, state and federal agencies associated with the disposal of hazardous waste.
Outline procedures used by the facility to accomplish removal, handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements.
Describe all steps to be taken to reduce the volume and toxicity of hazardous waste generated during the performance of the contract. This is to include, but not be limited to a description of management of hazardous waste generation, process controls utilized to ensure that effective minimization techniques are maintained, and any technological resources available to reduce either the toxicity or the volume of hazardous waste.
Provide a copy of the facility’s Hazardous Waste Spill Response Plan.
4. Past Performance
The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, PPIRS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews.
(1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk.
(a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
(b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
(2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors); and (e) cost controls (COST CONTRACTS ONLY).
(3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.
(4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, DOD Requirements).
The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror.
In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
5. Price Proposal
Price proposals will not be assigned an adjectival rating, but shall be evaluated for completeness and price reasonableness utilizing one or more of the process analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b). The total evaluated proposal price will consist of Category “A” Items (CLIN 0001), Additional Government Requirements (CLIN 0002), Other Direct Costs (CLIN 0002), Category “B” Items (CLIN 0003 through 00XX), and the Interport Differential, if applicable.
| a. | Completeness: All information / data required by the solicitation have been submitted. The price volume will also be evaluated to ensure the completion of the representations and certifications in Section K and the inclusion and submission of other information required by the clause requirements. |
| b. | Price Reasonableness: Prices are considered fair under current market conditions, reasonable to the offeror and reasonable to the Government. Reasonableness may also be determined by comparison to the Government estimate and / or other offers received. |
6. CONTRACTOR INDUSTRY CERTIFICATIONS
1. Eligible contractors must be capable of performing the full scope of the solicitation within their own facilities, utilizing their own shops and work force or be capable of subcontracting for these elements beyond their managerial, technical, or physical capability or capacity. Contractors must assume full responsibility for the integrated scheduling, cost, and quality of subcontractor performance.
2. Eligible contractors must be a company recognized as engaged in ship repair work and possess an organization capable of the full scope of planning, engineering, quality control, shipboard/off ship production and component/system testing and trials. The contractor shall provide industry certifications such as, MSRA, ABR, or ISO Certifications that would further emphasize the contractor's ability to perform the work. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must submit acceptable evidence to demonstrate its ability to accomplish the work. This will include a conclusive demonstration of having the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors) at the time of award. The contractor’s proposal shall provide a documented and positive demonstration of established organizational elements as set forth below. These characteristics will be evaluated to determine a firm's eligibility for contract award:
1. Administration/Management Control. Established organization geared toward ship repair at all levels of size, value and complexity, and toward technology innovation and process improvement. Clear lines of authority. Delegation of responsibility. Mid-level managerial positions in place. Competent and experienced employees with ship repair experience. Capability to develop and integrate planning, estimating and scheduling functions. Defined managerial responsibilities for production, quality assurance, material procurement/control and subcontractor control.
1. Financial Control. Segregation of accounting costs. Adequate accounting system. Favorable cash flow-ratios. Availability of a line of credit or other source of financial income to support the work effort. Prompt payment of subcontractors and suppliers.
1. Production Control. A production organization. On board (or ability to obtain) trade mix/skills to perform ship repair work. Control of production efforts. Integration of other key functions with production. Use of scheduling techniques. Methods of progressing. Training available to trades employees.
1. Production Technical Support. Engineering and design support capabilities (in-house or subcontracted) with sufficient capability to diagnose and evaluate technical problems and issues and to make competent technical recommendations to MSC when necessary and appropriate. They shall be fully cognizant of ABS rules and USCG regulations and how they apply and impact this specification package
1. Material/Procurement Control. A material purchasing department with staff. Procedures for control of material (purchasing, monitoring, receipt, inspection, segregation, issuance, nonconformance and disposal). An inventory system – ordering, tagging warehousing. CFM/GFM storage, control and protection. Existing environmentally-controlled warehouse space. Material handling equipment. Familiarity with the Navy logistics support system.
1. Subcontractor Control. Procedures for selecting, scheduling, managing, monitoring, and controlling subcontractors.
1. Quality Control/Test and Trials. A quality control organization/department/staff. Quality assurance procedures/manual. Calibration and metrology system availability. Test memo writing capability. Nondestructive Testing capabilities. Welding procedures and welders’ qualifications. Ability to perform trend analysis. Quality control system shall be certified or equivalent to ISO 9001:2001 standards
1. Safety/Security. Safety Organization/Manager or Engineer. Safety manual/procedures. Safety training. First-aid capabilities or medical services. Fire protection/procedures. Physical yard security/security procedures.
1. Hazardous Material/Waste Control. Proper procedures and facilities to meet the legal requirements for removal, storage and disposal of hazardous waste. Segregated storage. Documentation of licensed subcontractors responsible for control of hazardous waste removal, storage and disposal. Appropriate state/Federal agency issued hazardous waste generator number. Disposal records which indicate type of material, date and place of disposal.
1. Facilities. Although facility requirements may vary with the work authorized for a specific ship, the contractor must be a ship repair company that possesses or has available the following facilities:
0. Pier, with services in place, accessible to the CLASS size ship for berthing
0. Structural Shop
0. Machine Shop
0. Pipe Shop
0. Electrical/Electronic Shop
0. Carpentry Shop
0. Rigging Equipment
0. Dry-dock – when required for docking of vessel in performance of the specification
1. Agreements. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA, ABR or submit acceptable evidence in lieu of the aforementioned to effectively communicate and demonstrate its ability to obtain required resources.
3. The Government reserves the right to perform a site survey(s) for verification of policies, procedures, capabilities, and facilities prior to award.
The following have been deleted:
| M-4 |
| M-4 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD |
| NOV 2017 |
(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it.