FAB_T_Industry_Day_Brief_Jan_12.pdf

PDF 582 KB Posted

Attached to
Family of Advanced Beyond Line-of-Sight Terminals (FAB-T) Alternate Source
Solicitation number
FA8307-12-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

Briefing from 1/11/12 Industry Day Including Attendees List

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NOCA 04 Sept 12.pdf PDF
RFP Letter 4 v1.pdf PDF
Atch 13 - Cost Formats 20120602.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Letter 3 v2.pdf PDF
RFP Letter 2 v1.pdf PDF
GTRD 14 May Update Errata.docx DOCX document
1 RFP 20120424 Section J.pdf PDF
Atch 10 - Variable Quantity Pricing Table 20120424.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 13 - Cost Formats 20120416v35.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Letter v4.pdf PDF
1 RFP 20120424 No Attachments.pdf PDF
DRAFT RFP No Attachments.pdf PDF
DRAFT RFP Section J.pdf PDF
1 RFP No Attachments and Exhibits.pdf PDF
1 RFP Section J.pdf PDF
20120323_FABT_AltSource_Revised_and_New_Docs_Available_v2.pdf PDF
Revised_GTRD_20120224_FABT_AltSouce_Special_Handling.pdf PDF
Draft RFP 3_9_12 v30 Sections A-M.pdf PDF
Draft RFP 3_9_12 v30 Exhibits and Attachments.pdf PDF
FAB_T_Industry_Day_Brief_8MAR2012_FEDBizOpps.pdf PDF
NOTICE OF CONTRACT ACTION.pdf PDF
ESC_OCI_PolicyBrief_IDB2008.ppt PPT presentation
Atch 13 - Cost Formats 20120228 v23.pdf PDF
SECTION L 20120301 cdl.pdf PDF
FAB-T RFI for 8 March 2012 Industry Day Jan 2012 V1.pdf PDF
Atch 10 - Variable Quantity Pricing Table 20120216 v3.pdf PDF
Exhibit E - Data Requirements List for TM86-01 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - Instructions for Data Requirements List 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Atch 14 - Cost and Software Data Reporting Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibit C - Data Requirements List for LRIP 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Exhibit D - Data Requirements List for Production 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
CLIN structure V26 - 2.pdf PDF
Exhibit F - Data Requirements List for PDAL - full 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Exhibit B - Data Requirements List for EMD 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Atch 3 - Entrance and Exit Criteria for SRR PDR CDR 20120223.pdf PDF
Atch 1 - Statement of Work 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Exhibit G - Data Requirements List for PDAL - sust 20120223 v36.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - Preliminary WBS.pdf PDF
Atch 13 - Cost Formats 20120223 v23.pdf PDF
Atch 9 - Terminal Delivery Schedule 20120223 v4.pdf PDF
Gov_Proposed_WBS.pdf PDF
FAB_T_Corporate_NDA.pdf PDF
SECTION_M.pdf PDF
DD Form 254.pdf PDF
SECTION_L.pdf PDF
GTRD_and_Other_Documents_Requiring_Special_Handling.pdf PDF
FA8307_12_R_0003.pdf PDF
FAB_T_Individual_NDA.pdf PDF
FAB_T_RFI_for_Industry_Day.pdf PDF
Show all 49

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Family of Advanced

Beyond Line-of-Sight

Terminals (FAB-T)

Competitive Acquisition

Industry Day

11 JAN 2012

ESC/HNT

Electronic Systems Center

Industry Day Schedule

Day 1

1000 – 1015 Kickoff

1015 – 1030 Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)

1030 – 1045 Opening Remarks from Col DeLaPena

1045 – 1130 Industry Briefing

1130 – 1200 Question and Answer Session

1200 – 1300 Lunch

1300 – 1730 One-on-one sessions

Day 2

0800 – 1230 One-on-one sessions

Administrative Information

• Shut off all electronic devices

• Restrooms are located outside of the auditorium to the left – no escorts required

• Escorts are required for any other movement outside of this room

• Emergency exit is located in the M Lobby

• Forms are available to submit questions for the Q&A session

Companies Represented at Industry Day

Raytheon

Xicom

Boeing

ViaSat

DRS ICAS, LLC

Harris Corp.

MITEQ

Rockwell Collins

General Dynamics C4S

L-3 Communications

Sechan Electronics

Cubic Defense Applications

Millitech, Inc

Cobham Electronic Systems

Lockheed Martin

Northrop Grumman

Disclaimer

• All acquisition strategy information is draft and subject to change pending receipt of the required approvals, including approval on the method of acquisition (full and open, small business set-aside, 8(a) program, etc)

• This briefing does not constitute an invitation for bid or request for proposal and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government

Special Presentation

ESC/JA Presentation on Organizational Conflict of Interest

Acquisition Objective

• Restructures the program to deliver Warfighters’ highest priority terminals: E-4, E-6, and Ground

Command Post Terminals with Presidential &

National Voice Conferencing (PNVC)

• Defers the force element requirements for the B-2, B-52, and RC-135 airborne and ground terminals

– Force element requirements to be addressed in a future acquisition

• Initial terminal deliveries no later than the end of

FY15 to meet Warfighter needs

Presidential & National Voice Conferencing (PNVC) Overview

• Description

– PNVC is the AEHF (XDR) worldwide, secure, survivable voice conferencing capability for the President and national senior leaders

– Capability is achieved through the development and integration of PNVC Baseband equipment with the Digital

Red Switch Network (DRSN) and AEHF systems

– DISA’s role is to acquire the baseband equipment and facilitate

• Warfighter Benefits

– Provides worldwide survivable voice conferencing

– Reduces conferencing time delays

– Improves voice quality

– Adds conference management

Business Opportunity

• Competitive award of up two (2) fixed price contracts for development/production in FY12 based on

Offerors’ proposals and demonstrations of existing

HW/SW

• Contract values will be capped at $80M for a Firm

Fixed Price (FFP) initial ten month development period

• A down-select decision will occur at month ten to a single contractor for the remainder of development effort and production

RFP Key Features (1 of 2)

• Technical requirement document splits requirements into two blocks

− Block 1 design focused on high priority (PNVC) mission

− Block 2 remainder of CPT capabilities

• An extended source selection will be conducted in two phases and will include demonstrations for risk assessment at both the initial award and down-select

• Proposals will describe a detailed schedule (e.g., SRR, PDR, CDR, TRR) and event information for the entire CPT development and production

• Proposal will include a contractor defined development event from their Integrated Master Plan (IMP) nine months after award

RFP Key Features (2 of 2)

• Contractor(s) will be provided an opportunity to update their proposals and prices for the remainder of development effort and production for the down-select

• Special Clauses will be used to define down-select, downward adjustment and contract incentives

(positive and negative)

• Full Data rights will be sought to enable the

Government to sustain FAB-T system and reuse to support the future force element portion of the program

Contract Structure

• Development Period of Performance 39 months (FY12-14)

– FFP CLIN initial development of CPT w/PNVC (10 months to down-select)

– FPIF Option CLIN for completion of CPT w/PNVC (14 months)

– FPIF Option CLIN for full capability CPT to completion (15 months)

• Production six (6) annual buys

– FPIF Option CLIN LRIP FY14

– FPIF Option CLIN LRIP FY15

– FFP Option CLINs FRP FY16-19

Production Quantities

• Command Post Terminals

– Airborne Terminals

• E-4

• E-6

– Ground Terminals

• Fixed

• Transportable

Note: Force element terminal requirements (Qty 132) to be addressed in a future acquisition

Terminals Quantity

E-4 4

E-6 17

Ground Fixed 41

Ground

Transportable

Total: 84

Source Selection

• Draft Evaluation Factors for Initial Contract Award(s)

– Evaluation Factors

– Demonstration

– Past Performance Relevancy

• Draft Evaluation Factors for Down-select

– Down-select Decision

Draft Evaluation Factors for

Contract Award(s)

• Section M: Initial Contract Award

• Evaluation Factors and Subfactors:

− Factor 1: Technical Capability

− Sub-factor 1: Architecture, System Design and Performance

− Sub-factor 2: Integrated Processes

− Sub-factor 3: Small Business (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

− Factor 2: Past Performance

− Factor 3: Cost/Price

• Relative Importance of Factors − Technical Capability is approximately equal to Cost/Price. All evaluation factors, when combined are significantly more important than Cost/Price, however Cost/Price will substantially contribute to the selection decision

Draft Demonstration (Initial Award)

• A one day demonstration to be conducted at the

Offeror’s facility with the Offeror’s equipment

• The demonstration will address the maturity and the performance of the Offeror’s proposed technical solution as well as the Offeror’s overall ability to deliver a sufficiently mature and integrated solution within the proposed contract schedule

• The demonstration will be used as a means to assess the risk associated with the contents of the written proposal

• No GFE is planned to be used for the demonstration

Draft Past Performance Relevancy Criteria (1 of 2)

• Developing communication systems with layered communication architectures

• Developing EHF satellite communications systems or segments

• Developing, producing, and sustaining multi-band satellite terminals where the degree of complexity is similar to that of the FAB-T

• Development and platform integration of terrestrial and/or airborne satellite terminals

• Developing airborne terminals operating with narrow beam-width satellite tracking antennas

Draft Past Performance Relevancy Criteria (2 of 2)

• Demonstrating understanding of strategic Nuclear

Command and Control Extremely Sensitive

Information, formally known as Single Integrated

Operations Plan (SIOP), radio communications requirements

• Demonstrating an understanding of security certification of satellite communication systems including cryptographic devices

• Large scale military software development

• Development and production of HEMP and nuclear hardened components

Draft Evaluation Factors for Single Award

• Section H Clause: Down-select

• Evaluation Factors and Subfactors:

− Factor 1: Technical Capability

− Sub-factor 1: Architecture, System Design and Performance

− Sub-factor 2: Integrated Processes

− Factor 2: Cost/Price

• Relative Importance of Factors − Technical Capability and Cost/Price will be evaluated and they are approximately equal.

Down-select Decision

• Down-select criteria will consist of an assessment of the contractors’ revised cost and price for the remainder of the development and production and technical performance from the nine (9) month IMP event and demonstration

FAB-T Schedule

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

Competitive

Development &

Production

Proposal Receipt

MDA Decision & Competitive RFP release

Source Selection

Requirements defined, Acq Strategy & SSP signed

FAB-T w/PNVC

MS-C

First delivery CV/SV

Flight test IOT&E

Production

FCA/PCA

Delivery of Command

Post with PNVC in FY15

RFP Release to Meet FY12

Contract Award

Dual Award

TT&C Option

Development to a

9 month IMP event

Exercise Option to Complete

Notional start of AWT

Development

FAB-T w/PNVC

Down-Select Award based on IMP event results, Demo

& Cost/Price update

Development to a

9 month IMP event

Contract Award Schedule

Industry Day #2 Jan 12

Final RFP release Feb 12

Proposal Receipt / Demonstration Mar 12

Source Selection Mar-Aug 12

Award(s) Aug 12

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .