52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Nov 2021.pdf
FAR Clause Nov 2021 PDF 194 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 97 IS NIPR Expansion Project (Offutt AFB, NE)
- Solicitation number
- FA4600_NIPRExpansion
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document (FAR 52.212-2) that outlines how the government will evaluate offers for a NIPR expansion project at Offutt AFB. The evaluation will be based on three factors: price, technical capability, and past performance.
The government will evaluate offers by ranking total evaluated prices (TEP) based on contract line item pricing for all CLINs. Technical capability will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, requiring vendors to submit a plan demonstrating how they will meet Statement of Work requirements for wiring, cabling, and network switch installation. Past performance will only be evaluated for the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offer on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. If that offeror receives an "unacceptable" past performance rating, the next lowest-priced offer will be evaluated until an acceptable rating is found or all offers are evaluated. The government intends to award without discussions, though clarifications for minor errors may be conducted. Any option pricing will be evaluated as part of the total price, though the government is not obligated to exercise options.
View the file
Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-2
Show all 20
Who attaches FAR 52.212-2
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Nov 2021
Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
(1) Price: The quotations will be ranked according to their total evaluated price (TEP) as identified by contract line-item total pricing. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINs for the required period of performance.
The offeror's price quotation will be evaluated using one or more of the procedures and techniques defined in FAR 13.106-2 and FAR 13.106-3 in order to determine price reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through competitive quotations as described in FAR 13.106-3.
(2) Technical Capability: The Vendor shall submit a plan describing how they will meet the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). The Vendor shall demonstrate that they can provide all content within the SOW.
Quotes will be evaluated to be technically acceptable or not technically acceptable based on the evaluation factors listed above.
(3) Past Performance: The lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror’s past performance will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In order for the Government to have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, the offeror must demonstrate that they have performed wiring, cabling, and network switch installation, either with the Government or other entities.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(d) Basis for Award. If the lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror receives an “Acceptable” past performance rating, evaluation of that quote is complete, award will be made to that offeror, and the evaluation process will stop. If the lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror receives an “Unacceptable” past performance rating, evaluation of that quote will stop. In that instance, the next lowest total evaluated priced offeror will be evaluated using the methodology above and the process will continue (in order by price) until a technically acceptable offeror is evaluated to have an acceptable past performance rating, or until all offerors are evaluated.
Clarifications conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for a quote revision. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions (while keeping with FAR Part 12 and 13).
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .