Attach 24 - Solicitation Questions and Answers-Round 1 thru 3_21 Mar 22.pdf

Type PWS Paragraph

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

1 C

Amendment 3 Respectfully will the Government please extend the due date from 4/1 to 4/15 at minimum? With 685 questions and 33 newly revised attachments, this is in essence a new BOS solicitation. Factoring that in alone, to complete and produce/deliver a BOS contract in 15 working days is aggressive. For reference Round 2 Q&A's listed that the Gov would extend the due date 4 weeks from Amendment 3.

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

2 C n/a Solicitation+Amendment+FA300221R0012 0003+SF+30+Signed_11+Mar+2022

Q&A response #352 stated that "The Govt is going to extend proposal due date to 4 weeks after Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and Round 2 Q&A is posted." However, the extended timeline from Amd 3 (issued on Mar 11) to the new date of April 1 does not add up to 4 weeks.

Due to the amount of revised/new information issued with Amendment 3 ‐ in addition to responses to additional questions being submitted following the Q&As released in Amendment 3 ‐ significant effort is required to incorporate corresponding changes into the proposals. Therefore, 14 business days provided by the extension is not sufficient, particularly because submittal of a printed copy is still required.

Question: Will the Government extend the due date by 4‐6 weeks (until at least April 15th) to allow bidders develop complete and competitive proposals, and giving a full week after electronic copies are submitted for production/delivery of hard copies?

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

3 T n/a Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

Appendix 10A.1 and Appendix 11A.1 Publications: CE Playbooks

Q&A Response #501 referenced updated links to CE Playbooks, also stating that "No CAC required but an account will have to be created". However, when requested access, we were denied an account without a CAC.

Question: Will the Government add the referenced CE Playbooks to the Technical Library for bidders access?

The link provided will allow access without a CAC from a non‐government network device.

4 T/C n/a Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Works heet+Section+B_28+Feb+22

Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0072 through

Each Period of Performance starting in OY1 totals $6,075,000.00 for CLINS 0072 through 0077.

Question: Should bidders assume this number is all inclusive for Section 11 Operations Management materials in its entirety? Or is this number specific to each PWS number called out in the CLIN description?

The CLIN descriptions in Attachment 19 reference the applicable PWS Section and paragraph(s) that apply to that CLIN. Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been corrected. Not to Exceed plug numbers have been added to Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0072 thru 0077. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

5 T/C n/a Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Works heet+Section+B_28+Feb+22

Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0072 through

Each Period of Performance starting in OY1 totals $6,075,000.00 for CLINS 0072 through 0077. There is not any Cost Reimbursable Plug Numbers for the Base Year.

Question: Should bidders assume a materials build up and cost will be required for the Base Year Only?

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been corrected. Not to Exceed plug numbers have been added to Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0072 thru 0077. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

6 T

Section 32‐3 Attach+1j+‐‐+PWS+Section+32+‐ +Weather+Services_28+Feb+22

Paragraph 32.3.1 states "The weather station is closed on weekends with the exception of UTA weekends: 1000‐1700L on UTA Saturdays and after 0700L on UTA Sundays."

Question: Can the Government clarify how many UTAs are there a month?

There is normally 1 UTA weekend per month.

Solicitation FA300221R0012 ‐ Keesler BOS Questions & Answers Round 3 ‐ 21 Mar 22

Provided with Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

7 T

11.1.1.2.2 Attach+1b+‐‐+PWS+Section+11+‐

+Operations+Management_28+Feb+22

Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

Para 11.1.1.2.2 states "11.1.1.2.2. Collect Builder Data. Collect missing BUILDER data and ensure data for the critical systems (such as B20, B30, C10, D20, D30, D40 and D50) is current (within the last five (5) years) and complete. Gather information and data to support BUILDER asset management tools, assessments, techniques, and strategies such as, Facility Condition Assessments (FCA), Asset Visibility Teams (AVT), Energy Audits, Linear Segmentation Infrastructure Assessments, Preventive Maintenance, and RPIE Inventories."

Several of QA responses (199, 534) stated that "Builder SMS is current as defined by USAFE guidelines which requires data to be validated every 5 years".

Question: Can the Government provide a copy of the current QA 13B report from

BUILDER?

A portion of the information provided in the workload data is from the requested report. The complete report is not available at this time.

8 T

PWS 2.1.20 and Section L.2.4.b Attach+1+‐‐+PWS+Section+2+‐ +All+Services_28+Feb+22

Attach+13+‐+Section+L+‐ +Instructions+Conditions+and+Notices+to +Offerors_28+Feb+22

Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

Q&A responses #502 and #533 in Attachment 24 issued in Amendment 3 reference that CE legacy systems will not work as of January 2022 and then NexGen/TRIRIGA will be used.

However, the Government has not updated para 2.1.20 in Amd 3, which still states states:

"Legacy Data Systems. The SP shall populate, maintain, update, generate, and manage data and reports from Government Management Information Systems (MIS) and Government designated replacement database system, and other data collection systems as required. Systems must be kept up to‐date and accurate. When database content errors are found, regardless of who caused the error, corrections shall be made within 60 calendar days of notification."

Also, section L.2.4.b was not revised in Amd 3 and states "A comprehensive plan to manage, update, and configure legacy systems and/or replacement systems."

Question 1: Are there additional legacy systems that the SP will be required to populate, maintain? If so, please provide the list, timeline of change, and new systems planned to be introduced.

Question 2: Will the Government be updating paragraph 2.1.20?

Question 3: Does section L.2.4.b now only need to address managing/updating/configuring NexGen/TRIRIGA? If not, what other systems should be discussed?

PWS Section 2 is for All Services and paragraph 2.1.20 is referencing legacy systems across all areas of the contract (not just CE); several areas of the PWS outside of CE also have legacy systems that the contractor will be required to maintain and use.

9 T

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21, Appendix 13B, Irrigation Workload Data

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21, Appendix 13B, Irrigation Workload Data

The irrigation systems workload data for the growing season is 8‐16 acres and the nongrowing season is 0‐25.

Will the USG please clarify the acreage requirements for the growing and non‐growing seasons?

Workload data numbers referenced in this question are for events, not acres.

10 T

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21

Question ‐ is the Contractor responsible for performing winterization irrigation system tasks?

Attachment 1d ‐ PWS Section 13, para 13.1.2.6, has been reivised to remove reference to "during the growing season". Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLIN 0037 was revised. See Attachments 1d and Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA3000221R0012‐0004.

11 T

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21, Appendix 13B, Irrigation Workload Data and Section 13B.1.2 Irrigation Systems Locations

Attach+1d+‐+PWS+Section+13+‐ +Grounds_17+NOV+21, Appendix 13B, Irrigation Workload Data and Section 13B.1.2 Irrigation Systems Locations

Question ‐ Will the USG please provide the number of irrigation system operational locations for the growing and nongrowing seasons in addition to the acreage information?

This information is already provided in the workload data.

12 C

Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Workshe et+Section+B_8 DEC+21, CLIN 0037

Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Works heet+Section+B_8 DEC+21, CLIN 0037

CLIN 0037 is for Reimbursement for Irrigation Repairs (COST NOT TO EXCEED $5,000).

"The contractor shall maintain, adjust, and repair identified lawn irrigation systems during the growing season IAW..."

Question ‐ is reimbursement for irrigation systems repairs only limited to the growing season?

No. Irrigation systems are typically winterized during the non‐growing season, but if a repair is needed, it would be allowable under this CLIN.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

13 C

Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Workshe et+Section+B_8 DEC+21, CLIN 0037

Attach+19+‐ +CLIN+Structure+Pricing+Proposal+Works heet+Section+B_8 DEC+21, CLIN 0037

CLIN 0037 is for Reimbursement for Irrigation Repairs (COST NOT TO EXCEED $5,000).

Question ‐ Is the Cost Not To Exceed $5,000 per repair event?

No, the $5,000 NTE amount is for the contract year.

14 C n/a Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

Some of the answers in file “Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22” have been cut off (e.g., Question 338). Could you re‐send a version that includes all of the information?

Attachment 24‐Solicitation Questions and Answers (Round 1 & 2) dated 28 Feb 22 has been replaced with Attachment 24‐Solicitation Questions and Answers (Round 1 thru 3) dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐ 0004 and cells have been corrected to show missing information.

15 C n/a Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22 As per the response to Question 352, could you confirm “The Govt is going to extend proposal due date to 4 weeks after Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and Round 2 Q&A is posted.”

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

16 C Q&A 352 provided with Amendment 0003 on 3‐11‐22

Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22

Q&A # 352 provided with Amendment 0003 on 3/11/22 stated "The Govt is going to extend proposal due date to 4 weeks after Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and Round 2 Q&A is posted." However, Am 0003 offered only a 3‐week extension. With the number of Q&A and changes resulting from the amendment, respectfully request the Government fulfill their commitment in Q&A # 352 by offering a 4‐week extension to 4/08/22.

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

17 C

We respectfully request a two (2) week extension to the current deadline of April 1st due to the extensive Q&A released, the numerous changes to the solicitation, and significant changes to Sections L&M in the most recent amendment. The hard copy production, and the two (2) delivery locations further complicate the tight schedule. Please consider extending the deadline.

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

18 C L.1.2 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits & L.2.3 Volume Organization

Amendment 3 requires additional information to be included in Volume I Technical, but additional page count was not provided. Will the Government please consider increasing page count for Volume I Technical to 150 pages to accomodate the additional requirements?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Vol I Technical to 150 pages. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

19 C

Attach 19 CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B 28 Feb 22 & Conformed Copy thru Amendment 0003 Signed 11 Mar 2022

Attach 19 ‐ CLINs 0043 and 0044, have the number of months as 5 and 6, which equal 11 months instead of 10 months.

Conformed Copy ‐ CLINx 0043 and 0044 have the number of months as 6 and 4, which equal 10 months.

Please confirm that the months in the Conformed Copy is correct and that Offerors should revise the Attach 19 or provide a revised document.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

20 C

Attach 19 CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B 28 Feb 22 & Conformed Copy thru Amendment 0003 Signed 11 Mar 2022

Attach 19 ‐ CLINs 0045 and 0046, have the number of months as 4 and 6.

Conformed Copy ‐ CLINx 0045 and 0046 have the number of months as 6 and 4.

Please confirm that the months in the Conformed Copy is correct and that Offerors should revise the Attach 19 or provide a revised document.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

21 C

Attach 19 CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B 28 Feb 22 & Conformed Copy thru Amendment 0003 Signed 11 Mar 2022

Attach 19 ‐ CLIN 0047 has the number of months as 4.

Conformed Copy ‐ CLIN 0047 has the number of months as 10.

Please confirm that the months in the Conformed Copy is correct and that Offerors should revise the Attach 19 or provide a revised document.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

22 C

Attach 19 CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B 28 Feb 22

CLIN 6037, the amount for IO2 is $50,000 vs the $5,000 for all other years. Please confirm this is correct or please provide a revised Attach 19.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

23 C

Attach 13 Section L Instructions Conditions and Notices to Offerors dated 28 Feb 22

L.2.5.1 c.i. A completed Manpower Matrix (Section J, Attachment 17)

Will the government please specify if the completed Manpower Matrix (Section J, Attachment 17) is to be submitted as a separate attachment or contained within the technical volume?

If it's in the technical volume, does it count towards the 120 page limit?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Volume I Technical to 150 pages. Attachment 17 shall be submitted as separate attachment from Volume 1 and will not count towards the 150 page limit. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

24 C

Solicitation Section J ‐ List of Attachments Solicitation Section J ‐ List of Attachments lists Attachment 1d‐1 ‐ Section 13 ‐ Grounds Maps, dated 28 Feb 22. This attachment was not posted on sam.gov with Amendment 0003. Please provide ASAP.

Attachment 1d ‐1 ‐ Section 13 ‐ Grounds Maps dated 28 Feb 22 was accidentally omitted from Amendment 0003. It has been posted to SAM.gov with Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

25 C

Q&A 352 The Answer states that Offerors will have 4 weeks after the Q&A to submit proposals. 4 weeks from March 11 is April 8th. Would the Government adjust the Proposal Due Dates in Section L.1.4.2 of 1 April?

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 April 2022 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 22 Apr 2022. Hardcopies shall be delivered by 3:00 PM (Central Time) on 25 Apr 2022. See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

26 C

L.1.3.3 Offerors shall upload electronic submission of offers to DoD SAFE. When will Offerors receive instructions to access the DoD SAFE link?

See revised Attachment 13 Section L dated 21 Mar 22, paragraph L.1.4.2.1, in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004 for instructions on how to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

27 T

Q&A 461 Construction value is the primary driver of estimating design costs in Statute, policy, and procedure. Please provide either a maximum value for an individual project, or a maximum cumulative value for the 19 projects in this range.

Attachment 1c ‐ PWS Section 12, has been revised. See Attachment 1c dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. See table 12B.1.5. for the requested information.

28 C

Attach 19 ‐ CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B_28 Feb 22; and Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22 (Question #355)

The Base Period totals for Cost Reimbursable CLINs in Column G are blank and the total in cell G83 is "N/A". Should these values be the same as the other contract periods?

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

29 C

Attach 19 ‐ CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B_28 Feb 22; and Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22 (Question #355)

The total amount for CLIN 6037 is $50,000. Please confirm that this amount should be the NTE amount of $5,000?

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

30 C

Attach 19 ‐ CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B_28 Feb 22; and Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22 (Question #355)

The Total formula in cell G86 includes only the value for Mobilization CLIN 0079. Should this be modified to include FFP and CR CLIN totals?

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

31 C

L.3.2.5 and L.3.2.5.1 Attach+13+‐+Section+L+‐ +Instructions+Conditions+and+Notices+to +Offerors_28+Feb+22

Amendment 3 allows for the inclusion of CPARs in lieu of PPQs.

Question: Where within the PP Volume should the CPARs be included?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised. CPARS can be submitted as a separate attachment to Volume II ‐ Past Performance and will not count towards the 40 page limit. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

32 C

L.3.2.5 and L.3.2.5.1 Attach+13+‐+Section+L+‐ +Instructions+Conditions+and+Notices+to +Offerors_28+Feb+22

Amendment 3 allows for the inclusion of CPARs in lieu of PPQs.

Question: Does the Government require submitting all CPARs or only the most recent

CPAR?

See Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Offerors shall submit all CPARs that meet the recency definitions outlined in Section L.

33 C

L.3.2.5 and L.3.2.5.1 Attach+13+‐+Section+L+‐ +Instructions+Conditions+and+Notices+to +Offerors_28+Feb+22

Amendment 3 allows for the inclusion of CPARs in lieu of PPQs. Some CPARS may add up to dozens of pages.

Question: Please confirm CPARS are not included in the 40 page limit.

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised. CPARS can be submitted as a separate attachment to Volume II ‐ Past Performance and will not count towards the 40 page limit. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

34 C

N/A Attach+6+‐ +Past+Performance+Information+Worksh eet_28+Feb+22

There are 8 items listed under requirement 'B' of the PPI. However, the last two items are both numbered as item #7.

Question: Can offerors correct the numbering or will the Government provide an updated PPI Worksheet?

The numbering in Attachment 6‐Past Performance Information Worksheet has been corrected. See Attachment 6 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

Ref. Q&A # 346. The Government's response to the following question did not provide the answer necessary for supplying meaningful prices on CLINs which are differentiated only by funding source (APF/NAF). Request that the Government consider the fololowing more detailed explanation of the issue (shown below), and provide an updated response.

Original question:

Request the government provide workload data at a level of detail that supports creation of prices at the funding level (APF/NAF), as required by CLINs 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0032, 0033, 0034, 0035, 0059, 0060, 0061, and 0062. The requirements described in the relevant PWS documents do not break out workload data into APF and NAF; however, this level of workload detail is necessary for completion of the pricing workbook and determination of Schedule B values. Without more differentiated workload information, bidders will be unable to supply meaningful prices for CLINs that are differentiated by funding source.

Initial Government Response:

For CLINS 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0032, 0033, 0034, & 0035 ‐ See Attachment 1b ‐ PWS Section 11 Appendix/paragraph 11B.1.2.19. For CLINS 0025, 0026, and 0027 ‐ See Attachment 1a ‐ PWS Section 10 paragraph 10.3.2.2. For CLINS 0059, 0060, 0061, and 0062 ‐ See Attachment 1g ‐ PWS Section 23 Appendix/paragraph 23B.1. See Attachments 1b, 1a, and 1g dated 28 Feb 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003.

In Table 23B.1.1, Linen Exchange and Dry Cleaning Workload references to Lodging are NAF facilities (Line 12/16), Dormitories are APF Facilities (line 13), Other Organizations are APF (line 15).

35 T

Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐

Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

Attach_19_‐ _CLIN_Structure_Pricing_Proposal_Works heet_Section_B_8_Dec_21.xlsx; Attach+1+‐

+PWS+Section+2+‐ +All+Services_13+Dec+21; All PWS

Sections relevant to CLINs 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0032, 0033, 0034, 0035, 0059, 0060, 0061, 0062

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

Clarification/more detailed question: The references provided in the Government's response do contain workload data for the CLINs in question; however, they do NOT contain workload data differentiated by funding source. For example, CLIN 0061 Linen Exchange (APF) and CLIN 0062 Linen Exchange (NAF) BOTH relate to workload data found in Attachment 1g Section 23 Appendix para 23B.1, table items number 12, 13, and 15.

There is no information within the workload data table for those items to identify which items are APF (CLIN 0061) and which items are NAF (CLIN 0062). Are bidders simply to price items 12, 13, and 15 and assume that the price should be divided evenly between CLINs 0061 and 0062? Request that the government provide identification within the workload data tables that identifies APF and NAF for all workload data relating to CLINs CLINs 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0032, 0033, 0034, 0035, 0059, 0060, 0061, and 0062. Without this data, bidders cannot prepare accurate prices for these CLINs.

The references provided in the Government's response do contain workload data for the CLINs in question; however, they do NOT contain workload data differentiated by funding source. For example, CLIN 0061 Linen Exchange (APF) and CLIN 0062 Linen Exchange (NAF) BOTH relate to workload data found in Attachment 1g Section 23 Appendix para 23B.1, table items number 12, 13, and 15. There is no information within the workload data table for those items to identify which items are APF (CLIN 0061) and which items are NAF (CLIN 0062). Are bidders simply to price items 12, 13, and 15 and assume that the price should be divided evenly between CLINs 0061 and 0062? Request that the government provide identification within the workload data tables that identifies APF and NAF for all workload data relating to CLINs CLINs 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0032, 0033, 0034, 0035, 0059, 0060, 0061, and 0062. Without this data, bidders cannot prepare accurate prices for these CLINs.

36 T

28G Government Furnished Training Attach+1h+‐‐+PWS+Section+28+‐ +Community+Services_28+Feb+22

The references provided in the Government's response do contain workload data for the CLINs in question; however, they do NOT contain workload data differentiated by funding source. For example, CLIN 0061 Linen Exchange (APF) and CLIN 0062 Linen Exchange (NAF) BOTH relate to workload data found in Attachment 1g Section 23 Appendix para 23B.1, table items number 12, 13, and 15. There is no information within the workload data table for those items to identify which items are APF (CLIN 0061) and which items are NAF (CLIN 0062). Are bidders simply to price items 12, 13, and 15 and assume that the price should be divided evenly between CLINs 0061 and 0062? Request that the government provide identification within the workload data tables that identifies APF and NAF for all workload data relating to CLINs CLINs 0008, 0009, 0019, 0020, 0023, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0032, 0033, 0034, 0035, 0059, 0060, 0061, and 0062. Without this data, bidders cannot prepare accurate prices for these CLINs.

NTE cost is for whole contract, not divided by section; the Government does not have a historical cost for the training, as it varies based on several factors including turnover and qualifications of personnel

37 T

Paragraph 23B.1.1.1 and Question 307 Attach+1h+‐‐+PWS+Section+23+‐+Supply + Logistics_28+Feb+22 and Attach+24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+and+2_28+Feb+22

The Amendment 3 Section 23B.1.1.1 SRAN (024) 3010 Keesler AFB WRM Fill Rates and response to question 307 provides the authorized, on hand, and deployed quantity.

Question: Will the Government please provide the annual historical number of transactions (i.e. from storage to deployed, from deployed to storage, and annual or forecasted SRAN WRM equipment shortages to be filled)?

This information is not being provided since it has no bearing on how Offerors were asked to propose.

38 T

PWS 2.1.2.6. Attachment 1: PWS Section 2: All Services (8 Dec 21)

CDRL 0203 Quality Control Plan is referenced in PWS 2.1.2.6., but that PWS section is not listed in the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document. Should 2.1.2.6. be referenced in this CDRL table at CDRL 0203?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

39 T

PWS 2.1.2.2.11. Attachment 1: PWS Section 2: All Services (8 Dec 21)

CDRL 0209 Report of Requesting Substance Abuse Testing is referenced in PWS 2.1.2.2.11., but that PWS section is not listed in the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document. Should 2.1.2.2.11. be referenced in this CDRL table at CDRL 0209?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

40 T

CDRL 1103 Attachment 1b: PWS Section 11:

Operations Management (8 Dec 21)

In the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document, CDRL 1103 Industrial Control System (ICS) Report lists PWS 11.1.1.10. as a section where that CDRL is referenced.

However, it is not referenced in this section. Should CDRL 1103 be referenced in section 11.1.1.10?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

41 T

PWS 11.1.1.1.1. Attachment 1b: PWS Section 11:

Operations Management (8 Dec 21)

CDRL 1104 Electrical System Vulnerability is referenced in PWS 11.1.1.1.1., but that PWS section is not listed in the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document. Should

11.1.1.1.1. be referenced in this CDRL table at CDRL 1104?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

42 T

PWS 12.1.2.1.2.1.1. Attachment 1c: PWS Section 12:

Installation Engineering (8 Dec 21)

CDRL 1204 Non‐Appropriated Funds (NAF) Projects Call for Air Force Base Capital Improvement Fund (AFBCIF) Projects is referenced in PWS 12.1.2.1.2.1.1., but that PWS section is not listed in the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document. Should

12.1.2.1.2.1.1. be referenced in this CDRL table at CDRL 1204?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

43 T

CDRL 1405 Attachment 1e: PWS Section 14:

Emergency Management (17 Nov 21)

In the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document, CDRL 1405 After Actions Report (Input information into the report) lists PWSs 14.1.4.2.1.5., 14.1.4.2.1.9., and 14.1.4.2.2.6.

as sections where that CDRL is referenced. However, it is not referenced in these sections.

Should CDRL 1405 be referenced in section(s) 14.1.4.2.1.5., 14.1.4.2.1.9., and/or 14.1.4.2.2.6.?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

44 T

PWS 28.1.2.2. Attachment 1h: PWS Section 28:

Community Services (8 Dec 21)

CDRL 2804 After Action Reports appears in PWS section 28.1.2.2. but that section is not listed in the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document in association with CDRL 2804. Should 28.1.2.2. be referenced in this CDRL table at CDRL 2804?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

45 T

CDRL 2804 Attachment 1h: PWS Section 28:

Community Services (8 Dec 21)

In the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document, CDRL 2804 After Action Reports lists PWS 28.1.2.3. as a section where that CDRL is referenced. However, it is not referenced in this section. Should CDRL 2804 be referenced in section 28.1.2.3.?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

46 T

CDRL 3005 Attachment 1i: PWS Section 30: Human Resources (8 Dec 21)

In the CDRL Table at the end of the Reference Document, CDRL 3005 Annual Installation Training Plan (AITP) lists PWS 30.1.2.4.6.3. as a section where that CDRL is referenced.

However, it is not referenced in this section. Should CDRL 3005 be referenced in section 30.1.2.4.6.3.?

All PWS Sections dated 8 Dec 21 were revised and replaced in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003 and/or FA300221R0012‐0004. Any missing information in the Appendix CDRL tables in the PWS Sections will be completed at time of award.

47 T

Solicitation Section B ‐ CLIN 0029 CLIN 0029 references PWS paragraphs 12.1.2.1 through 12.1.2.1.2.2.4. Should CLIN 0029 reference PWS paragraphs 12.1.2.1. through 12.1.2.1.2.2.2.4.?

The correct reference is 12.1.2.1. thru 12.1.2.1.2.3.4. The CLIN description for CLIN 0029 has been corrected in in the Solicitation Section B and Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

48 C

Attachment 19, Price Summary Tab and Price Per PoP Tab.

The periods of performance dates on these two Excel worksheets do not match (the are different). We request the Government update/correct the periods of performance between these two worksheets and reissue Attachment 19.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

49 C

Conformed copy thru Amendment 0003 PDF file.

The Section B CLIN worksheet quantities do not match the quantities shown in Attachment 19 on the Price per Period of performance Tab. We request the Government correct these errors and reissue the conformed copy through Amendment 0003 with the corrected Section B CLIN worksheets and correct and reissue the Attachment 19 price per period of performance Tab (worksheet) with the quantities corrected.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 and Conformed copy thru Amendment 0004 provided in Amendment

FA300221R0012‐0004.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

50 C Section L, L.4.3.3, L.4.4, L.5.2.1

Will the Government please define what percentage of work constitutes a "major subcontractor" as referenced in L.4.3.3, L.4.4., and L.5.2.1. If a definition is not provided, Offerors will likely interpret this differently and result in inconsistent responses among the Offerors for these requirements.

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised. The term "major" has been removed from paragraphs L.4.3.3, L.4.4, and L.5.2.1.

See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

51 C Section L.2.5.1.i, L.2.4.1.g, Section J, Attachment 22 & Section J, Attachment 17

Will the Government please confirm that Section J, Attachment 22, and Section J, Attachment 17 (Manpower Matrix and Vehicle Matrix) are excluded from page limits for Volume I – Factor 1: Technical.

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Volume I Technical to 150 pages. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. Attachment 12 ‐ Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Attachment 22 ‐ Vehicle Matrix template shall be submitted with Volume I ‐ Technical as separate attachments and will not count against the 150 page limit.

52 C Section L: L.5.6 Section H – Special Contract Requirements AND all of Attach 20, Special Contract Requirements

Solicitation+‐+FA300221R0012; AND…;

+ReleasedAttach+20+‐+Section+H+‐ +Special+Contract+Requirements_17+Nov +21

Please confirm Government is only requesting contractors insert the solicitation file entitled: "+ReleasedAttach+20+‐+Section+H+‐ +Special+Contract+Requirements_17+Nov+21 file" as part of contractual documentation volume, Section H‐Special Contract Requirements?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, paragraph L.5.6.1 has been revised to remove statement "The Offeror shall provide required information to complete special clauses if required.".

53 C/T Section L Clauses, 252.237‐7024 Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Sercies. Oct 2010

Solicitation+‐+FA300221R0012+Released,

pg. 210

On Pg. 205/206 of file entitled: "Solicitation+‐+FA300221R0012+Released file" clause 252.237‐7024 Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services states,paragraph b) states Offeror is to submit a MECS plan and also refers to an attachment entititled: "1‐ PWS, Mission Essential Contractor Services, dated _,…”. 1) Was it the Government's intent to provide this attachment with the solicitation and 2) are we required to provide a MECS plan with the proposal? If so, provide the attachment referred to and update sections L&M in the proposal with the instructions/evaluation criteria for the plan.

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Volume I Technical to 150 pages. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

The Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan shall be provided with Volume 1 ‐ Technical under Subfactor 2: Program Management and Staffing Approach.

54 C/T Section L Clauses, 252.237‐7024 Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services. Oct 2010

P.g 220 to 222, Conformed+Copy+thru+Amendment+000 3_Signed Mar 2022.pdf

It appears based on the cited clause from Amendment 0003 that the Government desires a mission essential contractor personnel plan. However, not the conformed copy of the RFP, nor Q&A, nor any past amendments, or the original solicitation provide instruction for incorporating the plan into our proposal (i.e., which factor, section, etc.), nor did the Government provide any additional page count to accommodate this requirement. If it is the Government's desire to receive this plan with proposals, please provide specific instructions so that each offeror may respond in a compliant manner; making it much easier for the Government to evaluate the required section? If this section is not required with the proposal, will the Government please so state and change the verbiage to "due date XX days following contract award."?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Volume I Technical to 150 pages. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

The Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan shall be provided with Volume 1 ‐ Technical under Subfactor 2: Program Management and Staffing Approach.

55 T 23.1.2.12 and 23B.1.1.12‐15 Attach 1g PWS Section 23

It is not clear if the service provider is responsible for the cleaning of linens outside of the dry cleaning with washing machines/dryers. Please confirm whether or not the service provider is responsible for washing linens/laundry outside of the dry cleaning requirement.

Attachment 1g ‐ PWS Section 23, paragraphs 23.1.2.12.1 thru 23.1.2.12.5 have been revised. See Attachment 1g dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment

FA300221R0012‐0004.

56 T 23B.1.1.19 Attach 1g PWS Section 23

The workload data shows workload for alterations and references PWS Para 23.1.2.12.

There is no mention of alteration services within the PWS paragraphs.

1. Is alterations a requirement of Section 23?

2.If so please provide PWS paragraphs with performance requirements associated with alterations.

Attachment 1g ‐ PWS Section 23, paragraphs 23.1.2.12.1 thru 23.1.2.12.5 have been revised. See Attachment 1g dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment

FA300221R0012‐0004.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

57 T Attachment 1g ‐ PWS Section 23 ‐ Supply/Logistics

Att. 1g, Sec. 23.1.2.12 ‐ 23.1.2.12.5

The contractor is required to "perform both NAF and APF laundry and dry‐cleaning services. Shall the offerors assume that there is a contract in place with an on‐ or off‐site laundy and dry cleaning service, and the offeror's role is only to collect, sort, deliver, and account for all items received from both users and laundry services contractor(s)? Or, is the contractor required to wash, dry, fold, and dry clean the items as well? Please clarify.

Attachment 1g ‐ PWS Section 23, paragraphs 23.1.2.12.1 thru 23.1.2.12.5 have been revised. See Attachment 1g dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment

FA300221R0012‐0004.

58 T 10.1. Installation Management Attachment 1a, PWS Section 10 – Installation Management

What role does the 81st Civil Engineering Squadron (CES) play in the overall Installation Management requirements and specifically with regard to the environmental permit requirements?

The requested information is not being provided as it has no bearing on how the Government has asked Offerors to Bid.

59 T 10.1. Installation Management Attachment 1a, PWS Section 10 – Installation Management

The PWS references the Base Civil Engineer (BCE). What role does the BCE fill in the daily operations of the civil engineering requirements?

The requested information is not being provided as it has no bearing on how the Government has asked Offerors to propose.

60 T 10.1. Installation Management Attachment 1a, PWS Section 10 – Installation Management

What base civil engineering positions are filled by 81st CES Government personnel?

Is there a Government base environmental management position included in the 81st CES staffing? If so, is that position in charge of the permits and subsequent submittal for permit renewals?

The requested information is not being provided as it has no bearing on how the Government has asked Offerors to propose.

61 T Q&A 352 provided with Amendment 0003 on 3‐11‐22

Attach 24 ‐ Solicitation Questions and Answers‐Round 1 and 2_28 Feb 22

In the response to question 461 the government indicates that the estimate cost of construction “has no bearing on how the government has requested Offerors to propose”. The PWS asks the SP to provide full design services, which would seem to include both direct and indirect design costs as shown in DFARS 236.606‐70. Since existing statues, policies, and procedures tie design costs to estimated construction costs, the estimated construction value of projects being designed would have a direct bearing on the design budget for those projects. Please provide an upper limit for this range or a maximum cumulative value for the 19 projects listed as >$500k.

Attachment 1c ‐ PWS Section 12, has been revised. See Attachment 1c dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004. See table 12B.1.5. for the requested information.

62 T

Would the Government reconsider the requirement for AFIT classes to be completed within 2 months of hire date? It generally takes 4‐6 weeks to get a CAC, and these classes require that you have the CAC prior to registering. As the government has stated, if the total time is added for each AFIT course, it exceeds 2 months.

No, a CAC is not required to access AFIT classes.

63 T

Would the Government consider allowing 1 year for the completion of the AFIT classes?

Some of the classes are not all available on demand; some are only available at certain times during the year. Additionally, a registered person has to be working for the DoD in order to take these classes.

No

64 T

Would the Government reconsider the requirements for the Director of Civil Engineering and Chief similar to the note added for the Program Manager? ‐ Individuals that are highly qualified, but do not meet the exact requirements of the position may be allowed to serve in this position if approved in advance by the 81st CONS Contracting Officer.

No

65 T

At what point does the government consider a position is filled and not subject to penalties as described in the Performance Incentive Reduction Plan? If a key position is filled that requires AFIT classes and those classes take 8 months to complete, will the contractor be penalized monthly until completed?

Position is filled when qualified candidate is actively working in the position. If the position requires Government Furnished Training, the contractor will not be penalized prior to training as long as the training is promptly applied for/scheduled upon hiring.

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

66 C

FA300221R0012 Attachment 19 ‐ 28 Feb

Did the Government intend for CR CLIN 6037 to be funded at $50,000? All other CR CLIN's for all years are identical in funding except for this CLIN. Please confirm $50,000 is the correct funding amount.

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

67 T Attach‐24+‐ +Solicitation+Questions+and+Answers‐ Round+1+ and+2_28+Feb+22

Reference Q&A #418. The question submitted concerned the breakout of grounds workload for pricing NAF CLINs X033, and X035. The Governments response to question #418 states "This information is already in PWS Section 13 ‐ Gounds. Section 13 doesn't contain the acronym "NAF" let alone provide NAF workload, please address the original question so offerors can determine staffing requirements and associated costs for the NAF CLINs in Section 13.

Attachment 1d ‐ PWS Section 13, Appendix 13B.1.1 was been revised to state that NAF grounds account for 1% of the total improved grounds. See Attachement 1d dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐ 0004.

68 C

Attachment 22 – Vehicle Matrix Template_28 Feb 22 and L.2.4.1 g) i.

Question 1: Can the government please specify if offerors are supposed to provide a completed Vehicle Matrix as a separate attachment or include it in their technical volume as an appendix?

Question 2:Is the Vehicle Matrix out of page count for the technical volume?

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L, Instructions to Offerors, has been revised to increase the page limit for Volume I Technical to 150 pages. Attachment 22 shall be submitted as separate attachment from Volume 1 and will not count towards the 150 page limit. See Attachment 13 dated 21 Mar 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

69 C

Attach 19 ‐ CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section B_28 Feb 22.xlsx

In Attachment 19 on tab “KAFB BOS Pricing per PoP,” cells G73‐82 appear to be missing the NTE value for the Cost Reimbursable CLIN for the Base Period. Will the Government please provide an updated Attachment 19 with values populated or instruct offerors how to proceed with those cells (ie, take 10 months value from OP 1).

Attachment 19‐CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet Section has been revised and CLINs corrected. See Attachment 19 dated 21 Mar 22 provided in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0004.

70 C

DCMA now marks their Approved Accounting Systems letters as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Therefore, our latest approval letter cannot be included in our hardcopy response to the above referenced solicitation. Is it agreeable to the Government that we submit an encrypted transmission of this letter via DoD SAFE and add an explanation of this submission within our hardcopy Volume IV – Contract Documentation?

Yes, that is acceptable.

1 C

Solicitation Section B Please clarify the following:

1. CLIN 0079: Quantity shows 12 months for the Mobilization CLIN. Should this be 2 months?

2. CLIN 4096: The description appears identical to CLIN 4069. Should this CLIN be removed?

3. CLN 6052: The Unit for this CLIN is "Lot". Should it be changed to "Months" for consistency with other periods?

The CLIN descriptions in the Solicitation document and Attachment 19 ‐ CLIN Structure Pricing Proposal Worksheet/Section B have been corrected. See Conformed copy of Solicitation thru Amendment 0003 and Attachment 19 dated 28 Feb 22 in Amendment FA300212R0021‐0003.

2 C

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L L.1.2.3 says "Narrative documentation shall be submitted in Microsoft Word", but L.1.3.1 says "Word documents may be converted to PDF. " Please confirm that it is acceptable for the offeror to submit either Word or PDF submissions for all Volumes, excluding documents required to be submitted in Excel.

Attachment ‐ 13 Section L ‐ Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, Para L.1.2.3 and L.1.3.1 have been revised. See Attachment 13 dated 28 Feb 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003.

3 C

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L Per L.4.5.3, offerors must submit a statement that includes "The Offeror developed their prices with the demographic data of the current workforce as specified in paragraph 2.5.1 above." Paragraph L.2.5.1 does not include demographic data. Will the government provide this data?

Attachment ‐ 13 Section L ‐ Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, Para L.4.5.3 has been deleted. See Attachment 13 dated 28 Feb 22 in Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003.

Solicitation FA300221R0012 ‐ Keesler BOS Questions & Answers Round 2 ‐ 28 Feb 22

Provided with Amendment FA300221R0012‐0003

Reference (If Applicable) Reference Document (If Applicable) QUESTION GOVT RESPONSE

4 C

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L What is the definition of "Critical", "Major" and "Key" subcontractors for the purposes of Sections L.4.3.3(f), L.4.4, and L.5.2.1?

Attachment ‐ 13 Section L ‐ Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors has been revised, Paragraphs have been revised to only include "major subcontractors". See Attachment 13 dated 28 Feb 22 in Amendment

FA300221R0012‐0003.

5 C

Attachment 13 ‐ Section L Per Section L.5.1, ""The Offeror's proposal shall include a signed/dated copy of the Solicitation.