9._Vance_FOS__Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(18_Dec_2013).docx
DOCX document 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vance Flight Operations Support (FOS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-13-R-0008_Vance_FOS
About this file
FA3002-13-R-0008 Attachment 9. Vance FOS Past Performance Questionnaire.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA3002-13-R-0008
Attachment 9. Vance FOS Past Performance Questionnaire
FA3002-13-R-0008
Attachment 9. Vance FOS Past Performance Questionnaire
VANCE FOS
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
PLEASE DO NOT SEND THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTOR.
1. The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the 338 Specialized Contracting Squadron, JBSA Randolph, TX. You have received this questionnaire because you have been identified as a source of Past Performance Information for that offeror.
2. Please complete the attached questionnaire for the contractor and program described in Section 1. Send the completed questionnaire via email to the following addresses:
(Simply copy and paste the addresses below in to the “To…” box)
Email Addresses: samuel.hutchins@us.af.mil and nellie.martin@us.af.mil
3. Indicate a rating, based on the description below, for the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Circle the selected rating. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
Performance Ratings
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Satisfactory (S)
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Unsatisfactory (U)
During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
| Not Applicable (N/A) (N) |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know. |
4. Please provide narrative explanations to support your ratings particularly for high or low ratings. Space for your remarks is provided after each area.
5. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, please provide comments on any other programs for which your activity has contracts with this contractor. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization.
6. Please fill in all sections. Indicate “Not Applicable - N/A” if a question does not apply. Your prompt response will be key to the successful and timely completion of this source selection and ensuring the Government receives the best value.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Program Title: _____________________________________________________________________
1. Contractor (Company/Division): _______________________________________________________
1. Contractor Cage Code: ______________________________________________________________
1. Contract number: __________________________________________________________________
1. Contract type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPFF): _________________________________________________
1. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes __________ No _________
1. Was this contract set aside for small business? Yes __________ No _________ If Yes, how was it set aside? _______________________________________________
1. Period of performance: _____________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: ________________________________________________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: ___________________________________________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
L. Brief Description of Effort as ________Prime or ________Subcontractor:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, national, worldwide, other Commands: ___________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's Name: _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Position or Title ( e.g., Program Manager, QAE, PCO/ACO): _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Phone/Fax number: _________________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Email Address:
| E. | Number of years Evaluator worked on subject contract: _________________________________________________________________________________ |
| F. | Other suggested points of contact: |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
A. QUALITY SYSTEM
A.1. How did the contractor do with providing quality of services, products, and workmanship?
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.2. How did the contractor implement processes for identifying and preventing deficiencies to include root cause analysis procedures in the quality of service, including workmanship, products, and customer support? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.3. How did the contractor apply and monitor corrective actions and ensure successful and timely problem resolution? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.4. How did the contractor’s system(s) for recording, computing, and accessing performance measure data? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.5. How did the contractor link the quality control process to their training program? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.6. How did the contractor do with workforce staffing of their quality system? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.7. How did the contractor’s corporate management approach do with identifying negative trends and implementing corrective actions? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| A.8. Overall how would you rate the contractor’s quality system? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
B. STAFFING PLAN
| B.1. How did the contractor do with workforce staffing to support all Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.2. How did the contractor’s organizational structure support the Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.3. How did the contractor’s staffing skill mix support PWS requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.4. How did the Contractor cross-utilize their workforce. Consider whether a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) was in place and cross-utilization was permitted under the CBA? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.5. How did the Contractor backup “one deep” personnel with properly trained/certified personnel to ensure continuous contract performance? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.6. How did the Contractor maintain adequate staffing to meet changing, unscheduled, urgent, and surge requirements while meeting PWS requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.7. How did the Contractor do with providing adequate staffing to support aging aircraft maintenance requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| B.8. How did the Contractor resolve/avoid labor disputes and/or strikes or execute their Strike Plan to ensure no interruption of services? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
| B.9. Overall, how would you rate the Contractor’s staffing plan? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
C. Management Approach and Understanding the Requirements
| C.1. How did the Contractor do with providing adequate aircraft availability to meet the flying mission? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.2. How did the Contractor do with performing daily workload, to include meeting time change requirements, TCTOs, unscheduled maintenance, pre-flights, basic post flights, special inspections, launch and recovery of aircraft, troubleshooting, on and off equipment repairs to meet PWS requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.3. How did the Contractor do in effectively managing a Foreign Object Damage (FOD) program, and damage to government property? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.4. How did the Contractor do with providing qualified instructor(s) to train Government personnel as part of the services? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.5. How did the Contractor do with managing aircraft phase inspections? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.6. How did the Contractor do with managing aircraft engine maintenance? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
C. Management Approach and Understanding the Requirements
| C.7. How did the Contractor do with ensuring airfield inspections were accomplished at home station and auxiliary airfield(s) managed by the base or station? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.8. How did the Contractor do with providing a comprehensive training plan to ensure that only properly trained employees were performing the PWS required services? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| C.9. Overall, how would you rate the Contractor’s Management Approach and Understanding the Requirements? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
D. CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
| D.1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance? |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.3. Rate the Contractor’s responsiveness to modification requests or adjustments in delivery requirements. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.4. Rate the effectiveness of the Contractor’s ability to manage their subcontractors’ quality of work. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
D. CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
| D.5. If the Contractor was issued a cure notice or show cause notice, rate the contractor’s performance pertaining to rectifying the situation. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.6. Rate the Contractor’s effectiveness with showing initiative to identify and solve issues and offer alternative approaches. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.7. Rate the Contractor’s ability in paying their subcontractors/suppliers and personnel in a timely manner. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.8. Rate the quality and accuracy of documentation the Contractor provided in support of Requests for Equitable Adjustment and/or other contract changes. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.9. Rate the Contractor’s ability to maintain a cooperative business relationships with the Government personnel, e.g. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), contracting personnel, customers, etc. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.10. Rate the contractor’s ability to delegate authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
| D.12. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| SAT |
| UNS |
| NA |
Comments:
E. Please discuss each response for which you indicated EX (Exceptional), MAR (Marginal) or UNS (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
F. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? Or indicate if there is a pending termination?
No ____ Yes ____ For Default ____ For Convenience ____ Pending Terminations ____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc). _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
G. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this contract by circling your rating:
| UNS |
| SAT |
| NA |
H. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I, (mark your response below) , award to him today given that I had a choice.
Definitely would _____________ Probably would ______________ Might or might not ____________ Probably would not ___________ Definitely would not ___________
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
| ______________________________________ | _____________________________ | |
| EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE | DATE |
PLEASE DO NOT SEND this completed questionnaire to the Contractor.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .