Attch. 26 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 191BWC26R0009
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), United States Section, for solicitation number 191BWC26R0009. The form is designed to collect feedback from federal agencies, firms, or other entities that have previously contracted with or worked alongside bidders responding to the solicitation.
The questionnaire requests information identifying the firm or agency providing feedback, the project name, period of performance, contract type, award date, completion date, awarded value, and current contract dollar value. Respondents must provide the assessing official's name, email, phone number, and their association with the firm being rated, along with any applicable contract or order number. The assessment section requires ratings across eight core performance categories—quality of product or service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, reliability, customer support, and overall performance—using a six-point scale: Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, Exceptional, and N/A. Two additional assessment areas can be rated at the respondent's discretion. The form concludes with a section for supplementary comments to provide context or detail regarding the ratings assigned.
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
International Boundary and Water Commission United States and Mexico
United States Section
Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation No. 191BWC26R0009
1. NAME OF FIRM/AGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
PROJECT NAME:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT TYPE (if applicable):
CONTRACT AWARD DATE: CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
AWARDED VALUE: CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):
CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):
3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)
4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A
a. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
b. SCHEDULE
c. COST CONTROL
d. BUSINESS RELATIONS
e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
f. RELIABILITY
g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT
h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE
i. OTHER AREAS:
(1)
(2)
Emily Allen Cross-Out
| 1 NAME OF FIRMAGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK: |
| PROJECT NAME: |
| PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: |
| CONTRACT TYPE if applicable: |
| CONTRACT AWARD DATE: |
| CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: |
| AWARDED VALUE: |
| CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE: |
| 2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL: |
| EMAIL: |
| PHONE NUMBER: |
| ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role: |
| CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER if applicable: |
| Assessment Categories: |
| Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Marginalb SCHEDULE: |
| Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Very Goodb SCHEDULE: |
| Exceptionalb SCHEDULE: |
| NAb SCHEDULE: |
| Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Marginalc COST CONTROL: |
| Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Very Goodc COST CONTROL: |
| Exceptionalc COST CONTROL: |
| NAc COST CONTROL: |
| Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Marginalf RELIABILITY: |
| Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Very Goodf RELIABILITY: |
| Exceptionalf RELIABILITY: |
| NAf RELIABILITY: |
| Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Marginali OTHER AREAS: |
| Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Very Goodi OTHER AREAS: |
| Exceptionali OTHER AREAS: |
| NAi OTHER AREAS: |
| 1: |
| Unsatisfactory1: |
| Marginal1: |
| Satisfactory1: |
| Very Good1: |
| Exceptional1: |
| NA1: |
| 2: |
| Unsatisfactory2: |
| Marginal2: |
| Satisfactory2: |
| Very Good2: |
| Exceptional2: |
| NA2: |
| 4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .