Attachment (c) 52.212-2 Evaluation.docx
FAR Clause DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6824624Q0039
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for a liquefied petroleum gas supply and delivery contract opportunity for the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside for NAICS code 424720 with a small business size standard of 200 employees. It seeks a single-award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract to provide liquefied petroleum gas to various facilities on Department of Defense installations in Guam. The base ordering period is from April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025 with four optional one-year ordering periods. Quotes are due by the response date listed in Contract Opportunities and will be evaluated based on price, technical capability, and past performance. The award will have a minimum $1 guarantee and establish a not-to-exceed amount for the indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract.
View the file
Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-2
Show all 20
Who attaches FAR 52.212-2
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment (2)_Q and A.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation N6824624Q0039_final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment (a) Quotation Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment (b) Addendum to 52.212-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment (1) PWS.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination_26DEC23.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (c) 52.212-2
RFQ: N6824624Q0039
Title: Liquefied Petroleum Gas Supply and Delivery in Guam
52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) Quotations will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 Evaluation of quotations or offers; the tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1 will be utilized.
The Government intends to award a single Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quoter whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:
Factor 1 – Price Factor 2 – Technical Capability Factor 3 – Past Performance
All evaluation factors other than price are approximately equal. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
Technical Capability adjectival rating will be provided using the following table:
| Adjectival Rating |
| Description |
| Outstanding |
| Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Good |
| Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Marginal |
| Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is un-awardable. |
Past Performance adjectival rating will be provided using the following table:
| Adjectival Rating |
| Description |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a high expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
| Neutral Confidence |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has a low expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
| No Confidence |
| Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the |
Government has no expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
In the case of a quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .