Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

Items 8 and 15, and returning is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 1

0002 04/14/2026

AAQ-730 FAC. & AVIATION SAFETY ACQ

PO BOX 25082

BLDG 014-AHQ, ROOM 233A

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

AAQ730-AFN

x

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By ___________ 1 x x

6973GH-26-R-00082

1 copies to the issuing office.

04/14/2026

(x)

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate Provision M.3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AND PAST

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (REVISED MAY 15, 2026).

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Cynthia L. Cooper

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

M.3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (REVISED

MAY 15, 2026)

a. Relevant Experience and Past Performance will assess the degree of confidence the Government has in an offeror's ability to supply products and services that meet users' needs, while controlling cost and schedule, based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Government will review each Offeror’s submission for Factor 1 – Relevant Experience and assign a Relevancy Rating for the Offeror (General Contractor) as follows:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Aspects of relevance include similarity of service/support provided, complexity of effort, dollar value, contract type, and, where applicable, the degree of subcontracting/teaming. To be relevant performance data needs to be recent as described in Section L of the RFP.

Very Relevant Present/past performance involved multi-discipline building renovations at or over $8 million.

Relevant Present/past performance involved multi-discipline building renovations at or over $6 million.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance involved multi-discipline building renovations at or over $4 million.

Not Relevant Present/past performance involved multi-discipline building renovations below $4 million.

The Government will review each Offeror’s submission for Factor 1 – Relevant Experience and assign a Relevancy Rating for the Offeror’s proposed Mechanical Subcontractor as follows:

value, contract type, and, where applicable, the degree of subcontracting/teaming. To be relevant performance data needs to be recent as described in Section L of the RFP.

Very Relevant Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-discipline building renovations at or over $4 million

Relevant Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-disciplined building renovations at or over $3 million

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-disciplined building renovations at or over $2 million

Not Relevant Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-discipline building renovations below $2 million

The Government will review each Offeror’s submission for Factor 1 – Relevant Experience and assign a Relevancy Rating for the Offeror’s proposed Electrical Subcontractor as follows:

value, contract type, and, where applicable, the degree of subcontracting/teaming. To be relevant performance data needs to be recent as described in Section L of the RFP.

Very Relevant Present/past performance involved Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $4 million

Relevant Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-disciplined building renovations at or over $3 million

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance involved HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-disciplined building renovations at or over $2 million

Not Relevant Present/past performance involved multi-discipline building renovations below $2 million.

b. The Government will review each Offeror’s submission for Factor 1, Past Performance by reviewing completed PPS’s as well as assessments from CPARS or similar reporting systems, and other sources of past performance are complete, the Government will assign a confidence rating of “High Confidence”, "Moderate Confidence", “Satisfactory Confidence”, “Unknown Confidence”, “Little Confidence”, or “No Confidence” as follows: The Offeror (General Contractor) will be evaluated as follows:

High Confidence

Multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $8 million, with most ratings being Exceptional for Quality, Schedule, Cost Control on Project Modifications, and Subcontract Management and no ratings below Very Good. Past performances must have no show cause notices, no deficiency notices, and/or no cure notices. Both the Mechanical and Electrical Subcontractors must have High Confidence ratings.

Moderate Confidence

Multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $6 million, with most ratings being Very Good or above for Quality, Schedule, Cost Control on Project Modifications, and Subcontract Management and no ratings below Satisfactory. Past performances must have no show cause notices but may have had deficiency notices or cure notices that were successfully resolved with a workable solution, and the contract was successfully completed.

Both the Mechanical and Electrical Subcontractors must have at least Moderate Confidence ratings

Satisfactory Confidence

Multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $4 million, with most ratings being Satisfactory or above for Quality, Schedule, Cost Control on Project Modifications, and Subcontract Management and no ratings below Satisfactory. Past performances must have no show cause notices but may have had deficiency notices or cure notices that were successfully resolved with a workable solution, and the contract was successfully completed.

Both the Mechanical and Electrical Subcontractors must have at least S ti f t C fid ti

Little Confidence

Multi-Discipline building renovations below $4 million, with most ratings being Marginal or above for Quality, Schedule, Cost Control on Project Modifications, or Subcontract Management, and no ratings below Marginal.

Past performances have a record of show cause notices, deficiency notices, and/or cure notices that were eventually resolved. Both the Mechanical and Electrical Subcontractors must have at least Little Confidence ratings.

Unknown Confidence

Offeror has no relevant past performance experience. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an Unknown

Confidence rating for the Past Performance Factor; however, a Satisfactory Confidence is considered to be a higher confidence rating than Unknown Confidence.

No Confidence

Multi-Discipline building renovations with any rating of Unsatisfactory for Quality, Schedule, Cost Control on Project Modifications, or Subcontract Management. Past performances have a record of show cause notices, deficiency notices, or cure notices that were not successfully resolved.

Mechanical Subcontractors will be evaluated as follows:

HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-discipline building renovations at or over $4 million, with most ratings being Exceptional for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Very Good.

Moderate Confidence HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $3 million, with most ratings being Very Good or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Satisfactory.

Satisfactory Confidence HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $2 million, with most ratings being Satisfactory or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings are below Satisfactory.

Little Confidence

HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-Discipline building renovations below $2 million, with most ratings being Marginal or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Marginal. There is evidence the past performance of the Mechanical Subcontractor has had adverse impact to the Government/Owner.

Unknown Confidence

Offeror has no relevant past performance experience. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an Unknown Confidence rating for the Past Performance Factor; however, a Satisfactory Confidence is considered to be a higher confidence rating than Unknown Confidence.

No Confidence HVAC, Plumbing and Fire Suppression systems in multi-Discipline building renovations with any rating of Unsatisfactory for Quality or Schedule. There is evidence the past performance of the Mechanical Subcontractor has had adverse impact to the Government/Owner.

Electrical Subcontractors will be evaluated as follows:

Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $4 million, with most ratings being Exceptional for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Very Good.

Moderate Confidence Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in multi-Discipline building renovations at or over $3 million, with most ratings being Very Good or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Satisfactory.

Satisfactory Confidence Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in Multi-purpose Office renovations at or over $2 million, with most ratings being Satisfactory or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings are below Satisfactory.

Little Confidence

Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in multi-Discipline building renovations below $2 million, with most ratings being Marginal or above for Quality and Schedule and no ratings below Marginal. There is evidence the past performance of the Electrical Subcontractor has had adverse impact to the Government/Owner

Unknown Confidence

Offeror has no relevant past performance experience. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an Unknown Confidence rating for the Past Performance Factor; however, a Satisfactory Confidence is considered to be a higher confidence rating than Unknown Confidence.

No Confidence Electrical, Telecommunications and Security systems in multi-Discipline building renovations with any rating of Unsatisfactory for Quality or Schedule. There is evidence the past performance of the Electrical Subcontractor has had adverse impact to the Government/Owner.

c. The Contracting Officer will include Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports and findings from the FAA AAQ-700/800 Vendor Performance Database, as available, for evaluation of past performance. Discrepancies between PPQ responses and CPARS/AAQ Vendor Database must be addressed in the Final Technical Evaluation Report.

d. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. The final assessment will describe the degree of confidence in the offerors’ likelihood of successful contract performance based on that Offerors’ demonstrated record of performance under similar contracts.

e. Offerors are cautioned that the FAA will use the data provided by any and all available sources associated to determine offeror responsibility. While the FAA may consider data from other sources, the burden of providing thorough and complete performance data rests with the offeror. Offerors will be given an opportunity to rebut information considered negative and relevant to the evaluation.

f. To be eligible for contract award, an Offeror (General Contractor) and proposed Mechanical and Electrical Subcontractors must have an overall confidence rating for past performance of High, Moderate and Satisfactory Confidence. A past performance rating of Little Confidence or No Confidence will eliminate the offeror from consideration for contract award.

g. General Contractors and Subcontractors will be rated with NO CONFIDENCE if ANY of the items contained in the PPS, CPARS or other sources are rated with Unsatisfactory.