W9128A-19-R-0014_Am-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PN94631 Repair Building 131 and Construction Central Utility Plant, Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Haw aii and PN95082/95265 Repair Buildings 130 and 132, Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Haw aii

See Continuation Page

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9128A19R0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Jul-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

Am-0003

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Aug-2019

CODE

CECT - CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, HONOLULU DISTRICT

BLDG 252 (CECT-POH)

FT. SHAFTER HI 96858-5440

W9128A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9128A19R0014 Am-0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS. Attached hereto are revised pages/paragraphs to the specifications. The revision mark “(Am-0003)” is shown on each revised page.

a. REVISED SECTIONS. The following are revised pages to the solicitation. Changes are marked in “*” asterisks.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 9

b. NEW SECTIONS. The following are new pages to the solicitation.

Section 00 60 00, Attachment B – Requests for Information (#1 through 3)

2. The proposal due date and time remain unchanged.

W9128A-19-R-0014

Section 00 22 16 – Page 9 (Am-0003)

d. Joint Ventures

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and the JV does not have experience working as a JV, the members of the JV may submit experience on behalf of the Offeror. All references herein to “the Offeror” include all proposed joint venture members. Submitted contracts by members of a joint-venture or from the joint-venture itself will be considered and evaluated as long as the member or joint-venture itself was the prime contractor. Information provided from potential sub-contractors (not members of the joint venture) will not be considered or evaluated.

The JV shall submit a minimum of one (1) and no more than five (5) contracts, but each respective JV member must submit at least one (1) contract under this Factor.

Contracts in which an Offeror or a JV member performed the work as a subcontractor will not count as construction experience as a prime contractor.

5.1.2 Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the extent of relevant experience of the prime contractor. If an Offeror submits a proposal as a joint venture, the Government will evaluate the experience of its proposed JV team and the roles each member of the JV team will have in performing this contract.

The extent of relevant experience will be determined based on the similarity of the submitted contracts to the size, scope, and complexity of the construction required by the solicitation. For the purposes of this solicitation, a recent contract is defined as at least 80% complete or turned over within the last five (5) years of the issuance of this solicitation.

Only relevant construction contracts will be considered for evaluation. In order to be considered relevant, a contract must possess the following:

a. The contract was a Design-Bid-Build construction project.

b. It was substantially complete or at least 80% complete within five (5) years before the date the solicitation was issued. Substantially complete means a contract administrator or equivalent determined that the terms of the contract were fulfilled to the extent that the constructed product can be occupied or used for its intended purposes. Evidence provided by the owner / contracting agency or CPARS documentation must be included in the proposal to demonstrate the date the contract was substantially complete or at least 80% complete. Documentation in regard to substantially complete does not count against the page limitations in Paragraph 3.4.4.

c. New and/or repair/renovation construction contracts with an award amount between of $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 or more.

d. The work was self-performed by the contractor Offeror, and not as a subcontractor on the contract.

If an Offeror presents a contract that is less than 80% complete, the proposal must include an explanation why that contract should be considered substantially complete. The Government will determine whether the explanation is sufficient to consider the contract substantially complete.

When assessing an Offeror’s relevant experience, the Government intends to give greater weight to each of the following:

a. Construction contracts for renovation of existing facilities.

b. New / renovation construction contracts with an award amount of $50,000,000 or more.

c. Construction contracts adjacent to an occupied building.

d. Construction contracts at a confined site.

e. Construction contracts demonstrating work performed in the State of Hawaii.

PN94631 Repair Building 131 and Central Utility Plant, Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii PN95082/95265 Repair Buildings 130 and 132, Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii

RFI # References Question Government Response 1 Amendment 0001 deleted multiple spec sections for Buildings 130 and 132.

However, work covered under these spec sections were not deleted from the drawings. Please advise if revised Spec Sections will be provided for Buildings 130 and 132.

See Note on Submittal Register, Page 1 of 5, for both Packages 1 and 2, per Am- 0002.

2 RFP Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 5.1.2 indicates that relevant projects must possess the following:.

Subsequent paragraph 5.1.2.c indicates the award amount must be between $50,000,000 to $100,000,000. Can the relevant project be over $100M?

See Revised Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 5.1.2.c, per Am-0003.

3 RFP Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 5.1.2.d indicates that the relevant project (over $50,000,000 in paragraph c.) "was self-performed by the contractor Offeror and not a subcontractor". Does this require all divisions of the work to have been self-performed by the Offeror? Please claify intent of this requirement.

See Revised Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 5.1.2.d, per Am-0003.

Section 00 60 00, Attachment B (Am‐0003)