Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 106 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24921R0010
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal construction contract opportunity. The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 9 is soliciting proposals for Project 621-18-102 to renovate Building 34 at the James H. Quillen VA Medical Center in Mountain Home, Tennessee to correct deficiencies. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by both the offeror and assessors knowledgeable about the offeror's previous work. It requests ratings and explanations for quality of service, ability to meet schedules, and business relations on a prior contract. Assessors are to provide their role and period of involvement. Proposals are due by January 5, 2020. The questionnaire aims to collect performance history to evaluate offerors for this renovation project to improve facilities.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 58 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 621-18-102, Renovate Bldg. 34 to Correct FCA
Deficiencies at James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mt. Home, TN 37684
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Project 621-18-102, Renovate Bldg. 34 to Correct FCA Deficiencies.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the
Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network
Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist – Dewayne L. Knowles by way of email at
Dewayne.Knowles@va.gov or Contracting Officer - Diana K. Grube by way of email at Diana.Grube@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than
January 5, 2020 at 12:00pm CT. Assessor is requested to send electronically to Dewayne.Knowles@va.gov and Diana.Grube@va.gov.
Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
mailto:Dewayne.Knowles@va.gov mailto:Dewayne.Knowles@va.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24921R0010
Project/Requirement Project 621-18-102, Renovate Bldg. 34 to Correct FCA Deficiencies
Customer/Agency Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, Murfreesboro, TN 37129
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s
Name and Address:
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award number:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9
Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
Rating Description
ACCEPTABLE Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the
Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining
A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively
Resolution of any problems, etc.)
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.
Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
Would not award another contract to this contractor.
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
✓ Role Period of Involvement
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .