26R1300_Note5.pdf

RFP N62742-26-R-1300

Notice No. 5

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC

258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100

PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134

9 April 2026

PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

WON 1665555, FY24 AJJY183012 (P-012), PDI: NORTH AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP,

ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM

NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The

RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.

DEFERRED RESPONSE FOR NOTICE NO. 4 DATED 18 MARCH 2026:

16. 1. Zone 1 (Impermeable Fill) - Due to the many variables at bid time (i.e. undefined quantities of shafts, holes, throat sizes, depths of holes, etc.), please give us a uniform basis for the bid quantity of 9,000 CY. For example, for pipe shaft grout infill (quantity, depth, hole size) and for durable stone with concrete capping (quantity, depth of holes, hole sizes).

2. Likewise, for Zone 2 (Permeable Fill) – pls provide uniform assumptions on number of holes, hole depths, hole sizes.

For bid uniformity purposes, the above information is requested due to differing sizes of durable stones and thicknesses of concrete capping based on varying throat widths.

ANSWER: As per RFP, 18,000 CY is the total estimated volume of repair, with 9,000 CY of the total being for impermeable fill (Zone 1), and 9,000 CY of the total being for permeable fill (Zone 2).

19. 1. Keynote # 236 on drawing CS103 indicates Personnel Gate, RE: C4/CS507. However, this detail is missing. Please provide.

2. Site Details (drawing A1/CS506) shows 6’-0” long of concrete barrier supporting the temporary CL fencing. Please confirm if 12’-0” long is acceptable in lieu of 6’-0” long concrete barrier.

ANSWER:

1. There should be no Personnel Gate shown on the temporary fencing on CS103. This will be removed in a forthcoming amendment.

2. 12'-0" long concrete barriers are acceptable. Sheet CS506 will be revised in a forthcoming amendment.

22. Tables 2 and 3 on Plan Page CS502 do not indicate WWF or saw cut depth for the designed

14” airfield pavement. Can you please clarify?

ANSWER: Utilize welded wire fabric (WWF) to control cracking with 0.05 percent steel in two directions. A 6X6-W4xW4 would satisfy this calculation. The required reinforcement for the panels will be included in a forthcoming amendment. Saw cut depth provided in answer to

Question 23.

RESPONSES FOR NOTICE NO. 5:

25. Under Technical Evaluation Factor 1 - Experience, the RFP instructions state the following

(emphasis added):

• The Offeror shall complete the attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet

(Attachment A) for each project submitted and complete all individual blocks.

• Attachment A and all information therein is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to evaluate experience.

• The Government will evaluate only the information provided in Attachment A and all other information provided on other than Attachment A will not be considered.

• The Offeror may expand individual blocks on the Attachment A; however, Attachment A for each project submitted shall not exceed a total of four (4) single-sided pages [or, two (2) double-sided pages], 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger.

Upon review of the RFP-provided Attachment A template, the left and right margins appear to be approximately 0.5”, which is less than the stated 1” margin requirement. Given the strict page limitations and formatting requirements, please confirm that Offerors may utilize

Attachment A exactly as provided in the RFP, including the existing margin dimensions, without being blocked from consideration.

ANSWER: Confirmed. Document 00 22 00, Factor 1 – Experience, 2.3(a) Solicitation Submittal

Requirements, 1st paragraph will be revised to the 0.5” margin for Attachment A in a forthcoming amendment.

26. Specification requires asphalt binder that conforms to ASTM D6373 for Performance Grade

(PG) 76-22. This type of asphalt binder is not available in Guam. We propose using

Viscosity-Graded Asphalt Binder AR8000 that conforms to ASTM D3381. Please advise if this is acceptable.

ANSWER: No. RFP remains unchanged.

27. Table 8 - Marshall Design Criteria requires 50 blows. We propose to use 75 blows Marshall test which will provide a stronger mix of asphalt. Please advise if this is acceptable.

28. Specification requires asphalt cement binder that conforms to ASTM D6373 Performance

Grade (PG) 70-10. This type of asphalt binder is not available in Guam. We propose using

Viscosity-Graded Asphalt Binder AR8000 that conforms to ASTM D3381. Please advise if this is acceptable.

29. Table 5. Table 3. Mix Design Criteria requires 50 blows. We propose to use 75 blows

Marshall test which will provide a stronger mix of asphalt. Please advise if this is acceptable.

ANSWER: It is acceptable to utilize 75 blow Marshall Mix Design Criteria. The option to utilize either 50 or 75 blow mix will be made in the specification in a forthcoming amendment.

30. “Unless otherwise specified, provide cement that conforms to ASTM C150/C150M Type

II/V where in contact with earth and Type I/II elsewhere.” Please advise if it is acceptable to use cement that conforms to ASTM C150/C150M Type I/II for concrete where in contact with earth since ASTM C150/C150M Type II/V is not available on this island.

ANSWER: It is acceptable to use cement that conforms to ASTM C150/C150M Type I/II for concrete where in contact with earth. This will be revised in the specification in a

31. Drawing CD107 called out for demolition of Building 2550, 2551 & 2552. The bid documents do not provide sufficient details of the existing buildings. This information is needed to accurately quantify demolition work to provide a competitive pricing to

Government.

Please provide available information for existing buildings Bldg. No. 2550, 2551 & 2552, including:

1. As-built drawings

2. Known utility connections and service lines

3. Any hazardous materials reports (if available)

ANSWER: Refer to response for Question #7.

32. Drawing CD101 to 127 called out for demolition of existing asphalt pavement. But do not provide the thickness of the existing pavement section. This information is necessary to accurately estimate quantities, removal methods, and associated costs in order to provide a competitive price proposal to Government.

Please provide any available documentation—such as as-built drawings, pavement core results, or other records—that indicate the actual thickness of the existing asphalt pavement in the areas included in this.

ANSWER: Refer to response for Question #8.

33. Drawing CG203 indicates a detail reference to Drawing CG508. However, CG508 is not included in the RFP drawing package provided to bidders. The absence of this sheet prevents a complete understanding of the referenced detail and may affect quantity take-off and bid accuracy.

Please provide Drawing CG508 to ensure accurate interpretation of the scope of work and proper preparation of the bid.

ANSWER: Refer to response for Question #9.

34. Can the Government confirm whether proposal submissions may be accepted electronically

(e.g., via DoD SAFE, PIEE Solicitation Module, or other Government-approved secure file transfer platform) in lieu of physical hard-copy delivery?

Given standard federal procurement practices promoting efficiency, cost control, security, and audit traceability—particularly for large, multi-volume submissions—electronic transmission would:

• Eliminate risk of delivery delays, courier disruptions, or handling errors;

• Enhance document security through controlled access and encrypted transfer;

• Support version control and time/date-stamped receipt verification;

• Reduce administrative burden and unnecessary reproduction costs; and

• Align with prevailing DoD digital acquisition initiatives.

If electronic submissions are acceptable, please confirm:

1. Whether DoDSAFE or PIEE will be used to submit proposals (If DoDSAFE will be used, provide timeline for receiving these links).

2. Whether any limited hard copies (e.g., signed SF1442, bonds) remain required.

ANSWER: RFP remains unchanged.

35. Demolition drawing CD101 to CD127 called out for HAZMAT disposal per notes below.

Note 108: REMOVE EXISTING WATERLINE (ASSUME ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPES)

Note 120: REMOVE EXISTING 6" ABESTOS CEMENT STORM PIPE

Note 126: REMOVE EXISTING LEACH FIELD AND ASSOCIATED PIPING. ASSUME

ENCOUNTERING RESIDUAL SOIL CONTAMINATION, INCLUDING FUEL

CONTAMINATION FROM THE EXISTING LEACHING FIELD AND FORMER

DEMOLISHED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. ASSUME THE LEVEL OF

CONTAMINATION IS BELOW THE SOIL SCREENING LEVELS. REFER TO

SECTION 02 61 13 FOR THE DETAILS.

Note 142: REMOVE STOCKPILE (STOCKPILE MUST BE REMOVED OFF-SITE

UNLESS MATERIAL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING).

Note 145: EXCAVATE PFAS-IMPACTED SOIL FOR RELOCATION. DEPTH OF

EXCAVATION: 3 FT FROM SURFACE. REFER TOSECTION 02 61 13 FOR THE

DETAILS.

Note 146: EXCAVATE LEAD IMPACTED SOIL ALONG BUILDING PERIMETERS

FOR DISPOSAL.

LATERAL DISTANCE: 2 FT FROM THE EDGE OF PERIMETER DEPTH: 1FT BELOW

PAVEMENT. REFER TO SECTION 02 61 13 FOR THE DETAILS.

Note 147: EXCAVATE ARSENIC IMPACTED SOIL FOR DISPOSAL EXCAVATION

DEPTH: 1FT FROM SURFACE. REFER TO SECTION 02 61 13 FOR THE DETAILS.

Note 148: RELOCATE PFAS-IMPACTED SOIL. PROVIDE GEOMEMBRANE

BARRIER TO WRAP RELOCATED IMPACTED SOIL. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 1-

FOOT LAYER OF VEGETATED CLEAN SOIL CAP. REFER TO SECTION 02 61 13

FOR THE DETAILS.

Confirm above listed works are include in CLINs 001AI to 001AM.

ANSWER: The listed notes in this RFI are the 0001AA Base Item except for Note 142. Note

142, REMOVE STOCKPILE, can be executed under CLINs 0001AI Abandoned Concrete

Debris/Stockpile; 0001AJ Abandoned Waste Debris Stockpile Excluding Concrete Debris;

0001AK Abandoned Hazardous Waste; 0001AL Abandoned Hazardous Liquid Waste; or

0001AM Abandoned Asbestos Containing Waste Not Listed in Section 02 82 00, depending on findings.

36. Specification Section 26 56 20, Paragraph 2.2.1 identifies the required taxiway edge light fixture as L 852E(L). However, the project drawings—specifically E 001, EA101, and

EA102—call out L 852T(L) fixtures for the taxiway edge lighting. These two fixture types differ in application and installation requirements, creating a conflict between the written specification and the design drawings.

Please confirm which fixture type should be provided and installed for the taxiway edge lights:

• L 852E(L) as indicated in the specification, or

• L 852T(L) as indicated on the drawings.

ANSWER: The contractor will provide L-852T(L) per the drawings. Section 26 56 20, paragraph 2.2.1, will be revised in a forthcoming amendment.

37. Specification Section 02 61 13 called out for following submittal:

G-RAM/LLRW PWS Submittal List

a. Qualification of Radiation Safety Officer (RSO)

b. Radiation Work Plan

c. Qualification of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensed service provider

d. Key Personnel Qualification for G-RAM/LLRW

e. Report for G-RAM Site Screening Level

f. Weekly G-RAM/LLRW Inventory Report

g. Final G-RAM/LLRW Status Survey Report

h. G-RAM/LLRW Closure Report

Question 1: Confirm whether radioactive materials are present in the project site or not.

Question 2: If radioactive materials are not present then can these submittals be removed from the specification?

ANSWER:

1. Refer to Section 02 61 13 Attachment B, G-RAM/LLRW Performance Work Statement, Para 1.1.2.1 and 1.1.2.2. There are no documented radiological disposal activities at Site

78A; however, due to the timeframe of firefighting activities, radioluminescent components or other G-RAM-containing materials may be present.

2. No. The submittals are still required to document monitoring/screening activities and negative findings. Submission of weekly reports can be stopped when monitoring/screening activities are no longer required.

38. Please provide location of existing ISOLATIN VALVE located up stream and down stream of connection point located at station 35+00 including amount of fuel volume to be handled by the contractor.

ANSWER: The location of existing isolation valves is shown on as-builts for Pump Houses 3 and 4, which will be issued in a forthcoming amendment. See specification section 33 08 53 for flushing procedures. Contractor must submit a detailed system start-up plan in accordance with specification section 33 08 53, Para 1.2.1.

39. 1. CLIN 0001AD states that “The basis for SLIN 0001AD is for One-Day Cultural Resources

Feature Investigations for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications”.

Question: Please clarify in detail what is included in the CLIN 0001AD like how many

Archaeologist?

2. CLIN 0001AE states that “Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery (Small Sites)The basis for SLIN 0001AE are Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery for small sites (equal to or less than 0.5 hectares) for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications”.

Question: Please clarify in detail what is included in the CLIN 0001AE like how many features, what is the size of the features, etc.?

Question: What is the definition and detail of “Small Sites”?

3. CLIN 0001AF states that “Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery (Large Sites) The basis for SLIN 0001AF is a Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery for a large site

(greater than 0.5 hectares) for project P-012in accordance with drawings and specifications”.

Question: Please clarify in detail what is included in the CLIN 0001AF like how many features, what is the size of the features, etc.?

Question: What is the definition and detail of “Large Sites”?

4. CLIN 0001AG states that “Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery of Human Skeletal

Remains) The basis for SLIN 0001AG are Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery of

Human Skeletal Remains for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications”.

Question: Please clarify in detail what is included in the CLIN 0001AG like how many humans remains, what is the size of the area with human remain, how many locations, etc.?

ANSWER: The following requirements/bid assumptions will be included in the forthcoming amendment in Section 01 57 19 Temporary Environmental Controls, Part 1.5.5, SLIN

Assumptions for Cultural Resources.

1.5.5, SLIN Assumptions for Cultural Resources

The part includes bid assumptions for SLIN 0001 AD through SLIN 0001AG.

1.5.5.1 SLIN 0001 AD, One-Day Cultural Resources Feature Investigations

The basis for SLIN 0001AD is for One-Day Cultural Resources Feature Investigations for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications, but not including work specified in any other SLINs/CLINs. Assume as follows for bidding purposes:

a. The One-Day Cultural Resources Feature Investigation will be conducted if previously unidentified or unanticipated historical, archaeological, and cultural resources are discovered.

b. Preparation of work plan is not required.

c. Each investigation will have one day’s work. A qualified archaeologist must locate, record, and evaluate the significance of cultural resources in accordance with National Register of

Historic Places (NRHP) criteria.

d. Prepare a One-Day Cultural Resources Feature Investigation Report including findings, photographs, and recommendations.

1.5.5.2 SLIN 0001AE, Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery (Small Sites)

The basis for SLIN 0001AE is Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery for small sites (equal to or less than 0.5 hectares) for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications, but not including work specified in any other SLINs/CLINs. Assume as follows for bidding purposes:

a. Use and implement the Data Recovery Plan provided in Section 01 57 19, Attachment B.

b. Each site will have 2 days to conduct data recovery.

c. Staff

i. One archaeologist

ii. Two field technicians

iii. One excavator operator including using an excavator.

d. Submit the following documents:

i. End‐of Fieldwork Letter

ii. Draft and Final GIS Data

iii. Daft and Final Archaeological Data Recovery Reports

1.5.5.3 SLIN 0001A,F Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery (Large Sites)

The basis for SLIN 0001AF is a Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery for a large site

(greater than 0.5 hectares) for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications, but not including work specified in any other SLINs/CLINs. Assume as follows for bidding purposes:

a. Use and implement the Data Recovery Plan provided in Section 01 57 19, Attachment B.

b. Each site will have 5 days to conduct data recovery.

c. Staff

i. One archaeologist

ii. Four field technicians

iii. One excavator operator including using an excavator.

d. Submit the following documents:

i. End‐of Fieldwork Letter

ii. Draft and Final GIS Data

iii. Daft and Final Archaeological Data Recovery Reports

1.5.5.4 SLIN 0001AG, Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery of Human Skeletal Remains

The basis for SLIN 0001AG is Cultural Resources Post Review Discovery of Human Skeletal

Remains for project P-012 in accordance with drawings and specifications, but not including work specified in any other SLINs/CLINs. Assume as follows for bidding purposes:

Assume recovery of one burial. Prior to full excavation and retrieval, the archaeological team shall expose and document the full extent of the burial feature. This shall include drawing a plan view, photo-documenting the features and recording the in situ osteological inventory.

Excavation will proceed in arbitrary levels within natural soil strata using non-metal tools (e.g., wood, bamboo) while carefully inspecting for a possible burial pit outline. The burial matrix shall be recorded separately from the surrounding strata, and samples of burial fill will be collected for further analysis. If encountered, carbonized remains from secure contexts shall be collected and submitted for radiocarbon dating. All excavated sediment shall be sieved using

1/8-inch mesh and all artifacts and ecofactual materials will be collected for laboratory analysis.

A stratigraphic profile shall be recorded for the burial feature. Soil and sediment descriptions shall be prepared using the Munsell color notation reference system and standard soil composition descriptions per the USDA Soil Survey Manual.

Digital photographs (with 12 megapixels or higher) shall be taken to correspond to all profiles and base of excavation and/or burial plan views. All photos shall include a photo board, north arrow, and scale.

Retrieval of skeletal remains shall be conducted under the supervision of a qualified osteologist or forensic anthropologist. Elements shall be collected and catalogued by element and placed in paper bags for careful handling to the AAFB Cultural Resources Manager or laboratory determined by the Government.

40. 3.0 P-012 PROJECT SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN (SMP)

3.1 PFAS-Impacted Soil

The PFAS-Impacted Area and depth have not been fully delineated. The Navy ERP is currently conducting a remedial investigation (RI) to determine the nature and extent of

PFAS and will provide additional sampling data to the P-012 project as it becomes available.

3.1.1 Assumed P-012 PFAS-Impacted Soil Areas

States “…The depth of PFAS-impacted soil has not been vertically delineated at the site. ..”

The maximum excavation depth in the assumed PFAS-Impacted Soil Areas is 3 ft bgs based on the project grading plan. The P-012 project will assume the soil from the existing surface level to 3 ft bgs is PFAS-impacted exceeding the PSL. The Contractor will be required to conduct additional sampling if the maximum excavation construction depth is extended deeper than 3 ft bgs. All additional PFAS testing results with detailed sampling procedures shall be provided to the contracting officer.

Section 3.1.2.1 Geomembrane states “…A chemically resistant geomembrane liner free of holes and…”

Q: please provide specifications for the geomembrane liner

ANSWER: Section 02 61 13, Part 2.1.3 Geomembrane, will be revised in a forthcoming amendment to provide the minimum properties of the Geomembrane as follows:

41. SECTION 33 08 53 AVIATION FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM START-UP PART 1

GENERAL para c (4) states “Flushing and cleaning of the combined new and existing hydrant loop after tie-in performed by Contractor.”

Please provide all drawings for the existing hydrant loop system contractor is required to flush / clean / pig. Without any information regarding size of existing hydrant loop and equipment available to flush contractor cannot price this scope and will be unable to bid.

ANSWER: As-builts of Pumphouse 3 & 4 will be provided in a forthcoming amendment.

42. DRAWING ES 505

Drawing called out for “AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER WILL HAVE WIRELESS

CONTROL TO TURN APRON LIGHTS ON AND OFF FOR BASE

OPERATIONAVIATION”. New wireless control shall be compatible with existing system.

Please provide information regarding existing wireless control system.

ANSWER: The high mast lights will be controlled by the existing Airfield Lighting Control

System. The existing control system is manufactured by Crouse-Hinds. The controls for the high mast lights must be compatible with the existing system.

43. DRAWING CG144

GENERAL NOTES “C” & “D” on drawing CG144 called out for “FOR AREAS

RECEIVING GROUT AS SHOWN ON CG146, STOP GROUTING AT 10CY PER

HOLE/PIPE SHAFT/SOLUTION TUBE AND CONTACT THE CONTRACTING

OFFICER IF 10CY DID NOT RESULT IN VISIBLE FILLING OF VOID”.

It is impossible for contractor to estimate quantities of grout without knowing the number

“HOLE/PIPE SHAFT/SOLUTION TUBE”.

Question: Provide either number of holes or grout quantities for bid purposes.

ANSWER: Contractor to determine number of sinkhole and pipe shaft tubes during site prep, clearing, and conducting ERT.

44. CLIN ITEM NO. 0001AB called out to provide pricing for “mitigation of Karst Features using permeable infill complete in accordance with drawings and specifications”

But it doesn’t refer to any specific drawing or details.

Drawing CG146 shows a detail of “SINKHOLE REPAIR REQUIREMENTS” which consist of “CONCRETE”, “DURABLE CRUSHED STONE”, “SAND FILTER”, GEOTEXTILE”, “END DUMPED DURABLE STONE”

Question: Confirm/identify which items mentioned above are included in CLIN ITEM NO.

0001AB.

ANSWER: Contractor to determine number of sinkholes and pipe shaft tubes to fill during site prep, clearing, and conducting ERT. Sheet CG146 is the approved sinkhole mitigation plan and protocols.

45. CLIN ITEM NO. 0001AC called out to provide pricing for “mitigation of Karst Features using impermeable infill complete in accordance with drawings and specifications.

But it doesn’t refer to any specific drawing or details.

Drawing CG146 shows a detail of “SINKHOLE REPAIR REQUIREMENTS” which consist of “CONCRETE”, “DURABLE CRUSHED STONE”, “SAND FILTER”, GEOTEXTILE”, “END DUMPED DURABLE STONE”

Question: Confirm/identify which items mentioned above are included in CLIN ITEM NO.

0001AC.

ANSWER: Contractor to determine number of sinkholes and pipe shaft tubes to fill during site prep, clearing, and conducting ERT. Sheet CG146 is the approved sinkhole mitigation plan and protocols.

46. CLIN ITEM NO. 0001AH called out “to conduct ERT testing in areas approved by the contracting officer, in accordance with drawings and specifications” of 37,000LF.

While, drawing CG144 shows total of 42,000FT (5,000+37,000).

Question: Is it Government intention to include 5,000LF ERT testing in CLIN ITEM NO.

0001AA?

ANSWER: Contractor to price 42,000 LF of ERT. The SLIN will be updated in forthcoming amendment.

47. Drawing CG146 called out drawing CG145 for Sinkhole repair methodology. Refer to the excerpt note shown below

“……..THE METHODOLOGY MUST BE BASED ON AND INDICATE THE REPAIR

TYPE ZONE SHOWN ON CG144 AND CG145 THAT IS REQUIRED TO GUARANTEE

THE PROJECT'S DESIGN”.

Drawing CG145 is missing in the drawing package and SHEET INDEX listed CG145 as

“NOT USED”.

Question: Provide a copy of CG145 drawing?

ANSWER: There is no Sheet CG145. The note on Sheet CG146 will be corrected in a

48. Section 01 57 19, Attachment F, Para 2.0 Item 5 & Para 4.0 Item B - Green Waste

Management

Specifications require a Qualified Biologist(s) to implement green waste management, supervise biological monitors, and inspect the work sites to confirm that vegetation debris is properly managed in accordance with green waste protocols.

Kindly confirm if an Environmental Engineer or Manager is an acceptable alternate in lieu of the required Biologist to execute the above-mentioned work.

ANSWER: Refer to Section 01 57 19, Attachment F, Natural Resources (NR) Performance

Work Statements, Para 2.0 Qualified Biologist. The Contractor must retain a Qualified

Biologist(s). The Contractor's Environmental Engineer or Manager may implement green waste management, inspect the work sites, or other NR work under the supervision/direction of the Qualified Biologist. The Environmental Engineer or Manager must complete the necessary NR training.

49. The Electrical Site Plan ES103, Keyed Note 0004, indicates to provide 1-2” conduit with 3-

#2 AWG from existing SW-16-11 to 75KVA transformer. However, the Existing Distribution

One Line Diagram – New Work EP601, Keyed Note 0004, indicates to provide 1-5” conduit with 3-#4/0 AWG Cu, 15KV cable from existing switch to 75KV transformer, 1-5” spare conduit. Kindly confirm which requirement applies.

ANSWER: On Drawing ES103 Keyed Note 0004 will be revised in forthcoming amendment to read: “PROVIDE 1-5” CONDUIT WITH 3-#4/0 AWG CU, 15KV CABLE AND 1-#4/0

GROUND FROM EXISTING SWITCH TO 75KVA TRANSFORMER. 1-5” SPARE

CONDUIT”

50. The Airfield Lighting Plan 1 and 2 (EA101 and EA102), indicates that the crossing at

Taxilane L2 contains 1-#8 L-824C Circuit “T3”. However, the same location references Duct

Detail B4 EA503, which shows 2-2” Sch 40 PVC.

Kindly confirm if this requirement is correct, or clarify the intended duct configuration for these crossings.

ANSWER: The Contractor shall provide the 2 conduits across the taxiways as shown on

Drawing EA504, Detail B4. One conduit will have the 1-#8 L-824C cable as indicated on

Drawings EA101 and EA102, with the second conduit being a spare.