EXHIBIT C_P1241.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247325R3443
About this file
Exhibit C is a Design Firm Design Experience Project Data Sheet for solicitation N62473-25-R-3443, which serves as a template for design firms to document their project experience when responding to the Low Altitude Radio Communication System (LARCS) Communication Towers contract. The form allows firms to submit up to 5 relevant projects, with each project limited to two pages, and requires detailed documentation including project specifics, client information, work type, and a narrative describing the firm's performed work and project relevance.
The form is designed to help evaluators assess a design firm's qualifications and past performance, with specific emphasis on demonstrating meaningful involvement in similar projects. Key requirements include identifying the firm that performed the work, its relationship to the primary design firm, contract details, project type (new construction or renovation), and a comprehensive description of the project's alignment with the current solicitation's requirements. The template aims to standardize how design firms present their experience for evaluation under Factor 2: Experience.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT C
DESIGN FIRM DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
N62473-25-R-3443 This form is to be completed by the Design Firm. Submit (one per project) in order to provide supporting project information for Factor 2, Experience. Only projects that are within the project description parameters of the solicitation will be considered relevant. Submit up to 5 projects. All other projects will not be considered. Do not exceed two (2) pages per project.
Project No. (check one): - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 Design Firm:
1. Design Firm Name:
Design Firm Address:
Firm who performed the work:
Performed this work as: Lead Design Firm Consultant
Other (explain):
If Consultant, name of Lead Design Firm:
Phone #:
If the firm who performed the work differs from Joint Venture Member Affiliate the Design Firm named above, identify the firm’s Partner Predecessor Company relationship to the named Design Firm: Subsidiary Satellite Office
Parent Company Other:
Explain the relationship and how this firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract:
Note: The firm who performed the work of this project must be named on Exhibit “A” and fully described as a team member who will have meaningful involvement in performance of the relevant work of this contract. If the Offeror fails to demonstrate the firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.
Design Contract:
2. Contract/Project No.:
Delivery/Task Order Number:
Title:
Location:
3.
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Design Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
(excluding any construction phase support services such as PCAS)
Final Actual/Estimated Construction Cost:
4. Type of Contract: (check one)
Design-Build (DB). If DB, Construction Contractor was:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Other (explain):
Client/Owner Information:
5. Client/Owner:
Point of Contact Name/Title:
POC Phone Number:
POC Email Address:
Project Description:
6. Type of Work (check all that apply): New Construction Renovation/Repair
7. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.
8. Provide a detailed description of the work your design firm performed on this project.
| RATING DEFINITION NOTE |
| Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. |
| Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .