EXHIBIT B_P1241.pdf
PDF 193 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247325R3443
About this file
This document is an Exhibit B Offeror Construction Experience Project Data Sheet for Solicitation N62473-25-R-3443, designed to capture detailed project experience information for an evaluation factor. The form requires offerors to submit up to 5 past projects that demonstrate relevant construction experience, with strict guidelines on project documentation and firm involvement. Key requirements include providing comprehensive details about each construction project, such as contract type, award dates, completion dates, contract value, client information, and a detailed description of the firm's specific construction efforts.
The associated federal contract opportunity is for a Design-Build (DB) project to construct and modernize Low Altitude Radio Communication System (LARCS) Communication Towers at the Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command in Twentynine Palms, California. The unrestricted, full and open Firm-Fixed-Price contract involves building new communication towers and restoring existing ones in remote, helicopter-accessible locations without utilities. The project requires coordination across multiple Department of Defense commands, with Naval Sea Systems Command providing communication infrastructure support and Government Furnished Equipment for installation by the contractor.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT B
OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
N62473-25-R-3443 This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Submit (one per project) in order to provide supporting project information for Factor 2, Experience. Only projects that are within the project description parameters of the solicitation will be considered relevant. Submit up to 5 projects. All other projects will not be considered. Do not exceed two (2) pages per project.
Project No. (check one): - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 Contractor:
1. Offeror Name:
Firm who performed the work:
Performed this work as: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture
Other (explain):
If subcontractor, name of prime:
Phone #:
If the firm who performed this project differs from the Offeror proposing on this contract, identify the firm’s relationship to the Offeror:
Joint Venture Member Affiliate Partner Predecessor Company
Subsidiary First-tier SB Subcontractor
Parent Company
Other: Explain how this firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract:
Note: The firm who performed the work of this project must be named on Exhibit A and fully described as a team member who will have meaningful involvement in performance of the relevant work of this contract. If the Offeror fails to demonstrate the firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.
Construction Contract:
2. Contract/Project No.:
Delivery/Task Order Number:
Title:
Location:
3. Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Award Amount:
Final Price:
This is the: total project subcontract price
Note: If firm is indicated as a subcontractor in Block 1, provide the price of the subcontract.
4. Type of Contract: (check one)
Design-Build (DB). If DB, design firm was:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
Other (explain):
Client/Owner Information:
5. Client/Owner:
Point of Contact:
Name/Title:
POC Phone Number:
POC Email Address:
Project Description:
6. Type of Work (check all that apply): New Construction Renovation/Repair
7. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP:
8. If project is design-build, provide a description of the design effort.
9. Describe your firm’s construction efforts on this project Provide a detailed description of the relevant construction work your firm performed on this project. Note: do not include project administration or management functions (such as quality control or safety program) or miscellaneous work (such as housekeeping or cleanup).
| RATING DEFINITION NOTE |
| Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. |
| Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .